On 21 Nov 2008, at 00:56, Scott Anguish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
please file a bug on the doc.. it should tell you this.
bugreporter.apple.com
Well, why don't you do it yourself?
No, this is not an attack on you, Mr. Anguish.
But almost daily I see some Apple engineer advising people to
On 21 Nov 2008, at 04:55, Adam Leonard wrote:
See the Cocoa Fundamentals Guide:
"Class factory methods are implemented by a class as a convenience
for clients. They combine allocation and initialization in one step
and return the created object autoreleased. These methods are of
the form
They are.
On 21 Nov 2008, at 02:54, Klaus Backert wrote:
Am 20.11.2008 um 22:04 schrieb Adam Leonard:
Just to clarify:
They probably are identical, but not in the way everyone seems to
be assuming.
To make sure I don't misrepresent anything, I'll just quote the rule:
"You take ownership
On Nov 20, 2008, at 8:02 AM, Kiran Kumar S wrote:
I have two popups which I want to bind together; the first popup
contains a list of Categories, which has an array of reports. The
reports array is a content array of the second popup.
I want to select a Category in the first popup and get a lis
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Ken Tozier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, why do you need to send such common math
> operations to a soap request? Wouldn't it be easier to do simple stuff
> like calculations in your Soap class and only make requests for the
> unique services t
On 21/11/2008, at 3:45 PM, Jim Correia wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 11:36 PM, Kiel Gillard wrote:
While your discovery is interesting, maybe we're not supposed to
know how NSString is implemented. Even if on your computer you do
not get double free messages in your run log, a crash or whate
My application started in 10.2.8 and has progressed to the current
state of affairs with 10.5.5 and XCode 3.1.1. I am now experiencing
two problems with the current stuff.
First, when I send setEnabled:No to a new popup that I just added,
the popup does not dim. All of the old stuff doe
So thinking gets in the way of understanding and not thinking is the
path to enlightenment?
Sent from my iPhone.
On Nov 20, 2008, at 8:45 PM, Jim Correia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 11:36 PM, Kiel Gillard wrote:
On 21/11/2008, at 2:55 PM, Adam Leonard wrote:
I think
On Nov 20, 2008, at 11:36 PM, Kiel Gillard wrote:
On 21/11/2008, at 2:55 PM, Adam Leonard wrote:
I think this is a bug in the documentation. I am curious to know
what others think.
While your discovery is interesting, maybe we're not supposed to
know how NSString is implemented. Even i
On 21/11/2008, at 2:55 PM, Adam Leonard wrote:
I think this is a bug in the documentation. I am curious to know
what others think.
While your discovery is interesting, maybe we're not supposed to know
how NSString is implemented. Even if on your computer you do not get
double free messa
See the Cocoa Fundamentals Guide:
"Class factory methods are implemented by a class as a convenience
for clients. They combine allocation and initialization in one step
and return the created object autoreleased. These methods are of the
form + (type)className... (where className excludes a
I'm away till 24th November and may not be near the internet.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
He
I use CocoaCryptoHashing - which you can find at: http://github.com/ddfreyne
Works like a charm.
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Andrew Farmer wrote:
On 20 Nov 08, at 14:12, Sebastian Pape wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a MD5 Checksum of a file. This is my code:
[...]
CC_MD5(cStr, strlen(cStr
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:53 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Jonathon Kuo wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Jonathon Kuo wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Jo
Speaking of which -- What does it take to print a view with layers? (GC
also.)
On 11/20/08 5:17 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a GC-only document-based application and I'm trying to add
> basic print operations to my documents. I've reduced this down to what
> I t
Hi Jim,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Jim Correia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The header documentation for NSPointerArray says:
>
>> Fast enumeration, copying, and archiving protocols are applicable only
>> when NSPointerArray is configured for Object uses. Since the array may
>> contain NULLs
On 11/15/08 12:40 AM, Michael Ash said:
>>>+ (BOOL)MacOSTigerOrLower
>>>{
>>> UInt32 version;
>>> return (Gestalt(gestaltSystemVersion,(SInt32 *) &version) ==
>>>noErr) && (version < 0x01050 );
>>>}
>>
>> Gestalt() is a good approach, but never use gestaltSystemVersion. See
>> Gestalt.h f
If you think about it, it becomes clear why convenience methods return
autoreleased objects. As a heuristic, whoever retains an object should
release it. Since you're having the class method perform an implicit
retain (by calling alloc) then it needs to do a release. It obviously
cannot rel
On 21/11/2008, at 12:08 PM, Jean-Nicolas Jolivet wrote:
thanks you for all the information! I'm still reading
However, this makes me think: Even though the "Executable" (in XCode
that is) has the old name, if I look in my project directory under /
Build/Debug or /Build/Release , my resu
On 20 Nov, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Klaus Backert wrote:
"Class factory methods are implemented by a class as a convenience
for clients. They combine allocation and initialization in one step
and return the created object autoreleased. These methods are of the
form + (type)className... (where cl
Am 20.11.2008 um 22:04 schrieb Adam Leonard:
Just to clarify:
They probably are identical, but not in the way everyone seems to
be assuming.
To make sure I don't misrepresent anything, I'll just quote the rule:
"You take ownership of an object if you create it using a method
whose name b
On Nov 20, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Jonathon Kuo wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Jonathon Kuo wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Jonathon Kuo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just my 2 cents
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Jonathon Kuo wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Jonathon Kuo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just my 2 cents, but it seems an abuse to turn functions into
ob
I think this is an "old feature" request. I have a large existing PDF help file
--- many hundreds of pages. Fact: it's not getting re-authored in Apple Help.
Even Apple does not use Apple Help for products such as Motion --- very few pro
apps do. So we work with what we've got.
I do have a la
thanks you for all the information! I'm still reading
However, this makes me think: Even though the "Executable" (in XCode
that is) has the old name, if I look in my project directory under /
Build/Debug or /Build/Release , my resulting app is there with the new
name...
So does the "E
I'm away till 24th November and may not be near the internet.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
He
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Jonathon Kuo wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Jonathon Kuo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just my 2 cents, but it seems an abuse to turn functions into
objects.
Functions don't retain state; objects do. Objec
Exectuables specify settings that the running executable should honour
(for example, run-time arguments).
Targets describe how the source should be compiled, linked, packaged,
etc. Therefore, the name of your (compiled, linked, packaged etc)
product will be defined in the active target.
O
On Thursday, November 20, 2008, at 04:32PM, "Jean-Nicolas Jolivet" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just renamed my project (according to the instructions here:
>http://aplus.rs/cocoa/how-to-rename-project-in-xcode-3x/
> )
>
>However, I noticed that the "Executable" in my project still has the
Le Nov 20, 2008 à 7:32 PM, Jean-Nicolas Jolivet a écrit :
I just renamed my project (according to the instructions here: http://aplus.rs/cocoa/how-to-rename-project-in-xcode-3x/
)
However, I noticed that the "Executable" in my project still has the
old name... should I (and how do I) renam
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Jean-Nicolas Jolivet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I noticed that the "Executable" in my project still has the old
> name... should I (and how do I) rename it to the new name?
Get Info on the Target and change the Product Name setting.
> Also, what exactly
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Jean-Nicolas Jolivet wrote:
Also, what exactly is the difference between "Targets" and
"executables" ??
Targets set up a product to be built; executables tell Xcode to launch
an executable when running or debugging or launching Instruments or
something simil
On Nov 19, 2008, at 11:40 PM, Jerry Krinock wrote:
Build and run the above project. No warnings, no errors, no
exceptions, but the output logs:
JunkProps[7449:10b] foo.bar = 0
Remove the old getter declaration under // Whoops, and it's fixed:
JunkProps[7462:10b] foo.bar = 600
If I cha
I just renamed my project (according to the instructions here: http://aplus.rs/cocoa/how-to-rename-project-in-xcode-3x/
)
However, I noticed that the "Executable" in my project still has the
old name... should I (and how do I) rename it to the new name?
Also, what exactly is the difference
i process the color from a colorPanel further around in my app and don't
know the appropriate place where to handle some conversion.it seems
neccessary since i wan't to get the components.
don't know what kind of NSColor is the color, NSColorPanels "color" method
delivers.
thanks for your help
__
The header documentation for NSPointerArray says:
Fast enumeration, copying, and archiving protocols are applicable
only when NSPointerArray is configured for Object uses. Since the
array may contain NULLs, fast enumeration (for..in) will yield
NULLs. As a convenience, fast enumeration wil
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Jonathon Kuo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just my 2 cents, but it seems an abuse to turn functions into
objects.
Functions don't retain state; objects do. Objective C very
gracefully allows
objects to call C
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Richard S. French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The table does not show any scroll bars until I resize the window and the
> items above and below sometimes get overlaid.
I'm assuming this isn't what you want. In that case, make sure you've
set up your UI so that th
If you do decide to go to ref counting, you should check out the llvm
static analyzer. It can help keep easy common cases from falling
through the cracks.
http://clang.llvm.org/StaticAnalysis.html
-Ken
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Gordon Apple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Last year when
Filed: rdar://6390443
I was kind of hoping it was something I was doing though. Any ideas
for a workaround?
Ashley
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
Please file a bug. It may also be that something is CFRetaining the
document that shouldn't be.
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:1
In Interface builder I have a TableView that I want to stay fixed in
relation to items above and below.
The table does not show any scroll bars until I resize the window and the
items above and below sometimes get overlaid.
How do I fix this in IB? I¹ve tried changing the size on NSScrollView in th
I've tried searching and didn't see anything relevant.
I'm placing custom views in a menu. These views respond to mouse
events, and -acceptsFirstResponder returns YES. When I click on one of
the views, however, -mouseDown: is not sent to the view. When I double-
click on one of the views, -m
Please file a bug. It may also be that something is CFRetaining the
document that shouldn't be.
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:13 PM, Ashley Clark wrote:
I've got a GC-only document-based application and I'm trying to add
basic print operations to my documents. I've reduced this down to
what I thi
I'm away till 24th November and may not be near the internet.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
He
Once I fixed the color of my checkboxes and radio buttons to match the overall
light on dark UI scheme (user-configurable), my NSBox text stuck out as a sore
thumb. NSBox does not support setAttributedTitle, but fortunately there is an
incredibly simple way to set the color of NSBox text:
I've got a GC-only document-based application and I'm trying to add
basic print operations to my documents. I've reduced this down to what
I think is the absolute minimum required here and I'm still seeing
this bug.
With a completely new Document-based application I'm adding these 3
metho
Just out of curiosity, why do you need to send such common math
operations to a soap request? Wouldn't it be easier to do simple stuff
like calculations in your Soap class and only make requests for the
unique services the endpoint provides?
On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Austin Ziegler wro
Le Nov 20, 2008 à 1:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
given the following sequence of events:
1) load a window (NSWindow subclass) from a nib using an
NSWindowController subclass
2) the window contains an NSOutlineView, and the delegate of the
outline view is the window
3) in the window'
It turned out that the problem was really occurring in the setAttributedTitle
--- a bad control value was getting passed in. Pretty sure I single-stepped
through it a dozen different time, but whatever.
- Original Message
From: Shawn Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Russ <[EMAIL PRO
On 20 Nov 08, at 14:12, Sebastian Pape wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a MD5 Checksum of a file. This is my code:
[...]
CC_MD5(cStr, strlen(cStr), result);
Does your file contain any null bytes? If so, strlen() will return the
wrong length. (It'll just return the length of everything up to th
Hi,
I'm trying to get a MD5 Checksum of a file. This is my code:
__
#import
- (NSString*)getMD5ChecksumOfFile:(NSString*)pathOfFile {
const char *cStr = [[NSData dataWithContentsOfFile:pathOfFile] bytes];
unsigned char result[CC_MD5_DIGEST_LENGTH];
Great, thank you. I've changed the validation code as per your suggestion and
everything seems to be working fine now; I had been under the mistaken
impression that these methods were always the right ones to call when checking
the text that *could* be changed, so I had changed many references t
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Jonathon Kuo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just my 2 cents, but it seems an abuse to turn functions into objects.
> Functions don't retain state; objects do. Objective C very gracefully allows
> objects to call C functions. If you're doing something like [calc
> add
On Nov 20, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Richard S. French wrote:
My program compiled and ran once. Appeared that possible run away
where
table view was just being populated over and over again. I did a
force quit.
Now I am getting a debug error of ³BAD_EXC_ACCESS². All that¹s
displayed on
the debug sc
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Adam Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I think it *would* be a bad idea to call [[[NSWorkspace
> sharedWorkspace]retain]autorelease]
> A good singleton will override -retain, -release, and -autorelease to do
> nothing and return an appropriate value. Bu
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Jean-Nicolas Jolivet wrote:
From what I can see... it seems like OS X (or BSD or whatever
manages that) will use a lot of memory if it has a lot of memory
available (I have 4gb)... and use less if it has less... I might be
wrong about that but it seems to be wo
I'm away till 24th November and may not be near the internet.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
He
Well, I posted my other msg before I saw your reply... but I guess
you're right, it would explain the unreliable results I am getting...
I'll trust Instrument on that one! :)
From what I can see... it seems like OS X (or BSD or whatever manages
that) will use a lot of memory if it has a lot
given the following sequence of events:
1) load a window (NSWindow subclass) from a nib using an
NSWindowController subclass
2) the window contains an NSOutlineView, and the delegate of the
outline view is the window
3) in the window's awakeFromNib call:
[[NSNotificationCenter defaultC
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:28 PM, Richard S. French wrote:
My program compiled and ran once. Appeared that possible run away
where
table view was just being populated over and over again. I did a
force quit.
Now I am getting a debug error of “BAD_EXC_ACCESS”. All that’s
displayed on
the debug s
Maybe the problem is that your last name is French; try launching it in
English rather than in Greek. ;-p
Okay, seriously, maybe you should start by looking at the code in your
NSTableDataSource protocol methods for an infinite loop.
On 11/20/2008 2:28 PM, "Richard S. French" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just a quick update...
I ran Leaks (From the Instruments utility)... apparently the only
"leaks" I have are not related to images (some NSPathStore and strings
that I am not responsible for...those appear to be the only leaks)
So basically should I assume I am not doing anything wrong?
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:10 PM, Jean-Nicolas Jolivet wrote:
However it seems like something is not getting released properly...
I'm looking at Activity Monitor and the memory usage is climbing
fast each time I click the preview button... (like 2-3mb each time)...
Is there a better way to do i
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Keith Blount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I did consider that but from what I had read I only
> thought that was a fix for the retain cycles created when file's own is an
> NSWindowController. I already manuallet setContent: and setContent:ni
On Nov 20, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Adam Leonard wrote:
Now, I agree that it is mostly paranoia, but it is simply incorrect
to say that any object you send autorelease to, or get through a
method "whose name [DOES NOT] begins with "alloc" or "new" or
contains "copy"" will be sent release in the ne
I feel compelled to wade in here, to clarify a point. I'll pick on
Luke's comment but there were some other similar ones ...
On Nov 19, 2008, at 15:44, Luke the Hiesterman wrote:
It's simply not true that you have "no idea" when an object will be
autoreleased. If you're on the main thread,
My program compiled and ran once. Appeared that possible run away where
table view was just being populated over and over again. I did a force quit.
Now I am getting a debug error of ³BAD_EXC_ACCESS². All that¹s displayed on
the debug screen is greek to me. How do I determine the error and correct?
On Nov 19, 2008, at 9:27 PM, Austin Ziegler wrote:
For a project that I'm working on, I have a need to write a code
generator that will wrap certain kinds of C functions as Objective C
messages on an Objective C proxy. Because I don't ultimately control
the input, the parameters on the C functio
I'm using an NSImageView to preview an image result (i.e. you adjust
brightness etc.. then click preview and the image is displayed in the
NSImaveView)...
Basically everytime the image is previewed, a new NSImage object is
created... right now I'm using:
NSImage *displayPreviewImage = [[[
Thanks for the reply. I did consider that but from what I had read I only
thought that was a fix for the retain cycles created when file's own is an
NSWindowController. I already manuallet setContent: and setContent:nil on my
NSArrayController, does that not have the same effect? I'll certainly
On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Keith Blount wrote:
I've had some bug reports from users saying that accented characters
don't always work correctly in my software, but I've never been able
to reproduce it - until now. It seems that calling NSTextView's -
rangeOfUserTextChange: and -rangeOfUs
Just to clarify:
They probably are identical, but not in the way everyone seems to be
assuming.
To make sure I don't misrepresent anything, I'll just quote the rule:
"You take ownership of an object if you create it using a method whose
name begins with "alloc" or "new" or contains "copy" (
Hi,
I've had some bug reports from users saying that accented characters don't
always work correctly in my software, but I've never been able to reproduce it
- until now. It seems that calling NSTextView's -rangeOfUserTextChange: and
-rangeOfUserCharacterAttributeChange: wipes out marked text i
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Keith Blount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, Ken. I did search the archives (and other places to)
> but didn't see the recent discussion you mentioned, so I must have missed it.
> The window controller method isn't a great solution for me, unf
Thanks for your reply, Ken. I did search the archives (and other places to) but
didn't see the recent discussion you mentioned, so I must have missed it. The
window controller method isn't a great solution for me, unfortunately - I tried
it but it causes all sorts of responder issues given how d
On Nov 20, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Påhl Melin wrote:
But if I create a universal project with both x86-64 and i386 code and
run the application on a 32-bit system, is it possible to detect in
the code that I'm running the 32-bit ABI?
Use the __LP64__ preprocessor definition to differentiate between
I'm away till 24th November and may not be near the internet.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
He
2008/11/20 Nick Zitzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Påhl Melin wrote:
>
>> I'm very tempted to use the new 64-bit Objective-C ABI in my next
>> project. Primarily because of the improved interoperability with C++
>> destructors, that are now called when unwinding Objectiv
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Arnab Ganguly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am going to develop audio codec.Want to support AACplus file streaming.The
> player I have developed using QT SDK.So can you tell me what would be best
> approach to develop the codec.
For this type of question you shoul
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Shawn Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Påhl Melin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Shawn Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The decision between 64b and 32b is made at compile time for your
>>>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Shawn Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The decision between 64b and 32b is made at compile time for your
> compiled code. As a result your 64b executable wont run under the 32b
> runtime not matter what you do.
>
> ...however you can of course (normally you wou
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm trying to change the color of a button's text by setting it's title using
> an attributed string; there are code snippets on the web, but I'm seeing a
> crash
Make sure to file bug reports (if you haven't already)...
ht
Thank you, that's good to know! :)
I was more worried about the fact that there might be a "better" way
to do it (i.e. in the same way that you don't call
"becomeFirstResponder" on an NSResponder, you call the
makeFirstResponder method of NSWindow... but then again, NSResponder
doc insist
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Michael Ash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please excuse a foolish question, but Why wrap this in Objective-C
> at all? Looks like the resulting ObjC code is essentially the same,
> except uglier, slower, and harder to use. Why not just keep the C and
> use it di
I'm trying to change the color of a button's text by setting it's title using
an attributed string; there are code snippets on the web, but I'm seeing a crash
NSAttributedString *attrTitle;
NSDictionary *dict;
dict = [NSDictionary dictionaryWithObjectsAndKeys:
colr, NSForegroundColorA
Thank you, guys, for all your replies!
Donnie.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/U
On Nov 20, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Jean-Nicolas Jolivet wrote:
I have to disable all toolbar items during a long process... I did
it basically by overriding
- (BOOL)validateToolbarItem:(NSToolbarItem *)toolbarItem
{
return !longProcessIsRunning;
}
So that everything is disabled when my pr
On Nov 20, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Gordon Apple wrote:
Has anyone else had to go through this reverse transition?
I've usually done both at once, just in case.
Is GC really
that problematic?
It's not problematic per se, although it has some bugs here and there.
It's just different, and work
I'm away till 24th November and may not be near the internet.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
He
On Nov 20, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Jean-Nicolas Jolivet wrote:
I have to disable all toolbar items during a long process... I did
it basically by overriding
- (BOOL)validateToolbarItem:(NSToolbarItem *)toolbarItem
{
return !longProcessIsRunning;
}
So that everything is disabled when my pro
Last year when I moved to 10.5 and Objective C 2.0, I made the decision
to move to garbage collection (GC). After seemingly working ok, I deleted
most of my pre-GC code, e.g., retain, release, dealloc. I am now regretting
that decision. I am running into major problems in working with images
It didn't actually
The problem was that, with certain images (only a small percentage) I
would get a size that is *totally* off...
keep in mind I have to draw them anyway because I'm also drawing a
border around the image (basically just resizing the image down a bit
and filling the b
I have to disable all toolbar items during a long process... I did it
basically by overriding
- (BOOL)validateToolbarItem:(NSToolbarItem *)toolbarItem
{
return !longProcessIsRunning;
}
So that everything is disabled when my process is running, however,
once the process is done, the t
On Nov 19, 2008, at 11:51 PM, Ken Ferry wrote:
however I found out that just using the setSize: method of NSImage
was unreliable
-[NSImage setSize:] doesn't change the pixels of an image, it changes
the natural size that the image is drawn at. If you try to write the
NSImage back out as a TIF
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Austin Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For a project that I'm working on, I have a need to write a code
> generator that will wrap certain kinds of C functions as Objective C
> messages on an Objective C proxy. Because I don't ultimately control
> the input, t
On Nov 20, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
I’d go for #1.
If you have an error in status, throw an exception.
In this case, an exception might actually be OK, given that the
library is in isolation.
However, it goes against the design patterns of Cocoa and if the code
is ever re
On 20-Nov-08, at 11:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
Just a question about doc bug.
Ah! Thanks for asking!
We can submit them using bugreporter.apple.com
And we can submit them using the "Did this document help you? > It’s
good, but" link at bottom of all online doc page.
Is there a pr
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Kyle Sluder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Michael Ash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Seriously, this kind of hysteria does nobody any good. Nothing you do
>> besides explicitly releasing/draining an NSAutoreleasePool instance
>> that
On Nov 20, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Påhl Melin wrote:
I'm very tempted to use the new 64-bit Objective-C ABI in my next
project. Primarily because of the improved interoperability with C++
destructors, that are now called when unwinding Objective-C exceptions
and should make it possible to use RAII de
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:53 PM, mmalcolm crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2008, at 8:40 PM, Michael Ash wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:41 PM, mmalcolm crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 19, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Michael Ash wrote:
Because there's
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
