...but since most uses of documents
over time tend to be to view...
That really, really sticks out for 2 reasons: 1) for the person creating
the
documents, that's not so true and 2) it really hints at the MS/media
cartel
attitude that users are, or ideally should be, mere passive
On 04.04.2008, at 20:31, Scott Anguish wrote:
OK, time to shut this one down folks.
We've been down this road far too many times in the past.
Feel free to move this to the Mac-GUI-Dev group, where it's fine and
on topic:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mac-gui-dev/
Cheers,
-- Uli
When I save a JPEG file in an image editing app, and later open it, I
expect it to open in Preview (or whatever my default image viewer is),
not the image editing app. This is especially true if someone else
opens the image.
Of course the expected behavior may depend on whether I am
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, even if it was possible to attach an UTI to a file, you would be
force to continue to use (nasty old fashioned) extensions for compatibility
with other OS.
That's an argument for creating files with appropriate
When I save a JPEG file in an image editing app, and later open it, I
expect it to open in Preview (or whatever my default image viewer is),
not the image editing app.
When I *create* an image in an image editing app and later open it, I expect
it to open in the app with which I created it,
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:08:56 -0600, Scott Ribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
But having an app explicitly
and automatically mark documents it saves as opening in itself can get
frustrating for the user.
How so? It seems the most reasonable default. I really don't see end users
saving a file from one
But having an app explicitly
and automatically mark documents it saves as opening in itself can get
frustrating for the user.
How so? It seems the most reasonable default. I really don't see end users
saving a file from one app, and expecting it to automatically open with a
different app. In
Oh. Looks like I'm off the hook. The UTI, I expect, is the bundle
identifier, no?
I don't think anyone actually answered this question for you.
Basically no, your bundle identifier is a URI.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Le 2 avr. 08 à 12:52, Keith Duncan a écrit :
Oh. Looks like I'm off the hook. The UTI, I expect, is the bundle
identifier, no?
I don't think anyone actually answered this question for you.
Basically no, your bundle identifier is a URI.
And to complete the answer, UTI are here to
On 01.04.2008, at 21:59, Marc Respass wrote:
I haven't registered for a creator code since System 7.5. Apple has
information and registration page (http://developer.apple.com/datatype/index.html
) about it but no indication if it's actually still required. Can
anyone tell me if it is still
Totally agreed that seeing extensions on file names is unfortunate.
But as long as applications are properly setting/using the hidden
extension bit (and many do), most of the time users should not see
extensions on any of their files, except the ones where they want to
(for instance,
On Apr 2, 2008, at 6:46 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
Le 2 avr. 08 à 12:52, Keith Duncan a écrit :
Oh. Looks like I'm off the hook. The UTI, I expect, is the bundle
identifier, no?
I don't think anyone actually answered this question for you.
Basically no, your bundle identifier is a URI.
Le 2 avr. 08 à 20:56, Ken Thomases a écrit :
On Apr 2, 2008, at 6:46 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
Le 2 avr. 08 à 12:52, Keith Duncan a écrit :
Oh. Looks like I'm off the hook. The UTI, I expect, is the bundle
identifier, no?
I don't think anyone actually answered this question for you.
Hi All,
I haven't registered for a creator code since System 7.5. Apple has
information and registration page (http://developer.apple.com/datatype/index.html
) about it but no indication if it's actually still required. Can
anyone tell me if it is still required or maybe point me at the
On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Marc Respass wrote:
Hi All,
I haven't registered for a creator code since System 7.5. Apple has
information and registration page (http://developer.apple.com/datatype/index.html
) about it but no indication if it's actually still required. Can
anyone tell me
On 01 Apr 08, at 12:59, Marc Respass wrote:
I haven't registered for a creator code since System 7.5. Apple has
information and registration page (http://developer.apple.com/datatype/index.html
) about it but no indication if it's actually still required. Can
anyone tell me if it is still
At 15:21 -0700 01/04/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:26:58 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01 Apr 08, at 12:59, Marc Respass wrote:
I haven't registered for a creator
Ah, a subject near and dear to my heart.
I agree with Rainer, UTIs can be deduced from file types, extensions
and file creators, but I would sure like it if one could set a UTI for
a document and have this take care of things, not the other way around.
Also, it certainly seems that UTIs do
18 matches
Mail list logo
