Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-06 Thread Simeon Walker
advise me on getting this complicated setup right? We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some served by Apache. It is not easy to separate them out because we need to retain legacy URLs. Likewise, it is not possible to give Cocoon served material a URL prefix, prima

Re: [SUMMARY] Complicated setup

2002-12-06 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Thursday, Dec 5, 2002, at 23:01 Europe/London, Charles Yates wrote: # Problem: now EVERYTHING is served by cocoon. No way to serve static/legacy content by Apache! A small quibble, but this isn't true. You can set up an alias in httpd.conf, for example: Alias /images/ "/usr/java/tom

Re: [SUMMARY] Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread Charles Yates
> # Problem: now EVERYTHING is served by cocoon. No way to serve >static/legacy content by Apache! A small quibble, but this isn't true. You can set up an alias in httpd.conf, for example: Alias /images/ "/usr/java/tomcat/webapps/cocoon/resources/images/" Options Indexes Multiviews

Re: [SUMMARY] Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread Mark Eggers
Folks, I added the following information to the Wikki pages. There are some binaries available, as well as source packages for the various Tomcat connectors. The connectors are now in their own project, called jakarta-tomcat-connectors. Unfortunately there is no home page within jakarta.apache.org

Re: [SUMMARY] Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread Geoff Howard
I really got the impression that mod_webapp and warp are on the way out, which was an important factor for me even though I wasn't deploying on windows. You may consider mentioning at least the rumor? Geoff --- leo leonid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mod_webapp communicates via the new WARP pro

Re: [SUMMARY] Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread Jens Lorenz
Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi, Hi Leo That was an excellent summary! I can only agree and turned Leo's mail into a Wiki page by adding a small amount of Wiki markup. http://outerthought.net/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonAndApache Best regards, Jens -- Jens Lorenz interface:projects GmbH

Re: [SUMMARY] Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread leo leonid
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 04:34 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi Leo That was an excellent summary! thanks :) The only thing I would add was that if you try to use mod_jk like this: JkMount /* worker ok, and maybe the hint that every mount directive must start with a '/' it complet

Re: [SUMMARY] Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Leo That was an excellent summary! The only thing I would add was that if you try to use mod_jk like this: JkMount /* worker it completely blocks the use of Apache for _any_ static content, making it very difficult (or at least, verbose) to use in certain circumstances. Does mod_jk2 suffe

[SUMMARY] Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread leo leonid
If you want to connect Cocoon with Apache httpd in order to serve static/legacy content directly from Apache you have three possibilities ATM (apart from the obsolete Jserv): a) mod_webapp b) mod_jk c) mod_jk2 (A) mod_webapp__ __

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Thursday, Dec 5, 2002, at 12:05 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote: On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote: I mean something like: JkMount /!(images|movies|audio)* no, this doesn't work. seems to be psedocode, hard to implement :-/ with the limited jk mount directives Thanks for th

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread Andrew Savory
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote: > >>> I mean something like: > >>> > >>> JkMount /!(images|movies|audio)* > >> > >> > > > > no, this doesn't work. seems to be psedocode, hard to implement :-/ > > with the limited jk mount directives > > Thanks for the confirmation! Yup, sorry, pseudocode

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Thursday, Dec 5, 2002, at 11:15 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote: On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 11:24 AM, Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi Andrew, On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:43 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote: Effectively I guess you want rules that pass everything but images, movies,

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread leo leonid
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 11:24 AM, Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi Andrew, On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:43 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote: Effectively I guess you want rules that pass everything but images, movies, audio, x-spaceprojects, harlem etc to mod_jk. Anyone else know how to

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-05 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Andrew, On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:43 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote: Effectively I guess you want rules that pass everything but images, movies, audio, x-spaceprojects, harlem etc to mod_jk. Anyone else know how to do that? ;-) I mean something like: JkMount /!(images|movies|audi

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-04 Thread Geoff Howard
i'm currently in warp/jk/jk2 hades right now, so I can tell you that you are correct that jk2 uses a totally different syntax and mod_jk.so doesn't use it. Here's what I'm picking up from the last two days of not getting anything to connect: - warp is now essentially (but not officially) abandone

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-04 Thread Jeremy Quinn
This is a different configuration syntax to the one I am using I think, or are there two different syntaxes? I am using mod_jk.so version 1.2.0, compiled locally. I have an Apache .conf file, which loads the module, sets up JkWorkersFile, JkMount etc. And a workers.properties file which sets u

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Skip Carter
> Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right? > > We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some > served by Apache. > > It is not easy to separate them out because we need to retain legacy > URLs. Likewise, it is not possible

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread leo leonid
> >> > >>> > >>> On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi All > >>>> > >>>> Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right? > >> > >>

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:43 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote: On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote: Is 'JK2' the best one to be using now? I am a bit confused between mod_webapp (warp) and JK[n] TBH. I never got warp working, so I've always used Jk myself. Sure you'll run into t

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
me on getting this complicated setup right? Many thanks for any help I had a very similar situation, I solved it by regarding the suffix. In my Apache DocumentRoot are all directories with static content. I only mount the following JkMount / worker2 JkMount /*.html worker2 JkMount

RE: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Ryan Agler
. HTH +Ryan -Original Message- From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Complicated setup Hi All Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right? We have a website that will have some stuff served by

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread leo leonid
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 05:52 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote: On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 15:31 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote: On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi All Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right? Many thanks for any

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Andrew Savory
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote: > Is 'JK2' the best one to be using now? > I am a bit confused between mod_webapp (warp) and JK[n] TBH. I never got warp working, so I've always used Jk myself. > > Sure you'll run into troubles if there are html files in the static > > directories, or yo

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Alex McLintock
At 16:52 03/12/02, Jeremy Quinn wrote: Is 'JK2' the best one to be using now? I am a bit confused between mod_webapp (warp) and JK[n] TBH. If it is any consolation so am I. I am using mod_webapp happily which I believe is the supposedly correct thing to use, but since the JK one is older it

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 15:31 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote: On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi All Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right? Many thanks for any help I had a very similar situation, I solved it by regarding

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 15:03 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote: On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote: We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some served by Apache. Is the stuff served by Apache static content, ie html, mpeg, avi, etc? correct, but we cann

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread leo leonid
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi All Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right? We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some served by Apache. It is not easy to separate them out because we need to retain legacy

Re: Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Andrew Savory
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote: > We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some > served by Apache. Is the stuff served by Apache static content, ie html, mpeg, avi, etc? > It is not easy to separate them out because we need to retain legacy > URLs. Likewise, it

Complicated setup

2002-12-03 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi All Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right? We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some served by Apache. It is not easy to separate them out because we need to retain legacy URLs. Likewise, it is not possible to give Cocoon served material a