ED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 04 Jan 2003 5:23 am, Tom Scott wrote:
You're right, but they'll never be able to come on Undernet ever again!
You have no idea how GLINEs work, do you. They *expire*.
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
Sorry. I thought since we're on the topic..I might as well talk about
#S.A.L.T.
- Necro
Kev wrote:
CALLING ALL OPERS!!! CALLING ALL OPERS!!!
This is not appropriate to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email list. Any
more off-topic mailings will result in your immediate unsubscription
from this lis
still DoS the IP, so the g:line would
just be a tiny obstacle for them ...
- wensu
- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:57 PM
Subject: [Coder-Com] Support Channel announcement..opers p
CALLING ALL OPERS!!! CALLING ALL OPERS!!!
In light of the recent events (on more networks then Undernet), I have
personally set up a channel called #S.A.L.T. It is a help channel for
people who have gone through DoS attacks, have been Nuked, Trojaned, or
hacked in any other way. #S.A.L.T, named
Not a bad idea @ all.
- Necro
stoney` wrote:
Well technically since cservice issues usernames that allow users to
mode +x, they need to be notified when there's credible evidence of
abuse. Unfortunately, the only way to confirm abuse is by having an
IRCop check user@hosts of clones and then r
You mean like #support on GamesNET or #feds on QuakeNet? That kinda thing?
Py Fivestones wrote:
The question still remains: How can a user complain to a lamer's ISP?
I think there's a need to have something in place to allow users to
report abuse to ISPs. Currently the only thing a user can do
But a channel op could be an attacker too! Also...if we're gonna stop
multiregistering we could possibly just say only 3-5 names per IP address.
Also..Chanops could possibly talk to an IRCop and only the IRCop could
find out the real hostmask..Chanops would never know it. IRCops would go
into t
Oh yeah :D
Chris Crowther wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:51 am, Tom Scott wrote:
Yes! I have a follower ;-) Channel modes they are, but +o is a
usermode...Why can't it be a channelmode too? +i is both... (invite and
invisible)
to
possibly add that or something.
- Necro
Chris Crowther wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:48 am, Tom Scott wrote:
What if we let netopers make their own commands on the server? Like...
/x or /xchan? Would that work?
Why?
- --
Chris
Eck..I guess we're losing some users then :(
- Necromncr
Chris Crowther wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:47 am, you wrote:
Yeah but sometimes clients tend to lock up @ the sight of mIRC code
Screwy and badly written clients aren't our pro
l mode to ban swearing or funny
non-regular characters like some scripts love to use.
Ircu is only suppose to relay. What you do with that data is your concern.
/Gen
----- Original Message -
From: "Tom Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [
Subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get info on the latest patches or
download from the CVS thing
Luzmu wrote:
People keep replying that patches like this and that exist but what I would
like to know is where can one get hold of them? So if someone knows,
please...
For me personally, the oper-only
10 lines of text/minute. Ircu will use all the cpu cycles to
"scan & clean" the text. It is easier to add such feature in a client,
rather do it on the ircd.
andreas louca
(aka n\)
- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Undernet
omething I have missed from ircu so that would be great to
have!
=)
-Luzmu
- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Undernet Coder Committee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 10:25 AM
Subject: [Coder-Com] New Mode Ide
only opers will be allowed to join the chan but im not sure if it works with .03
NeoWatch @ undernet.
NeoWatch @ dalnet.
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Url : Http://www.NeoWatch.Org
--- Tom Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey! I have some ideas for modes...
What if we had a mode +c (this
-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 8:25 am, Tom Scott wrote:
What if we had a mode +c (this is an example btw), for no mIRC colors?
Before sending messages to the channel, it would check for mIRC
colors...and strip them if +c was enabled. This would prevent a lot of
bans from occurring...
Hey! I have some ideas for modes...
What if we had a mode +c (this is an example btw), for no mIRC colors?
Before sending messages to the channel, it would check for mIRC
colors...and strip them if +c was enabled. This would prevent a lot of
bans from occurring...
Another idea: A mode +o (yet
lol
Kev wrote:
one option is to use a * in the ip field so a server can link form anywhere
then set a very strong password
We may not be EfNet, but we *are* Eris-free.
X off the channel?'
- Original Message -
From: "Kev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tom Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Kev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 5:09 AM
Subje
That actually would be a good idea...along with something else I've seen
on other networks...
What if we created some in-channel op commands for "X" like...
!kb (Kickban)
!b (Ban)
!k (Kick)
!op (Set Op)
!dop (Unset Op)
!v (Voice)
!dv (De-Voice)
!ld (LockDown: Kicks everyone that has no access abov
You know...we should probably make it both.
Alocin wrote:
/msg x help set KEYWORDS
[00:38] -X- /msg X set <#channel>
should be
[00:38] -X- /msg X set <#channel> keywords
isn't? :o)
- Alocin
Maybe we could force them to identify themselves as bots or else we'll kick
them off the network.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kev
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 8:16 PM
To: Carlo Wood
Cc: Isomer; Dani?l Boeije; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Yes, but couldn't people just open a client and set +b for someone even
though they're not a bot?
We could do what we do with "X" maybe...you could sign up for it, then you'd
have a one-week waiting period while we check the stats of your username.
Finally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] would "Bot" you every
Well, on DALNet they have a S-OP, these are guys directly under the
Successor. They're ops, but they can also perform some stuff with ChanServ.
That would be cool to add to ircu.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesda
Hi. I'm kinda new on this commitee. How does one go about joining this
thing?
25 matches
Mail list logo
