Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Le 2 nov. 04, à 21:04, Brett Porter a écrit :
are you sure it isn't jellydoc?
Yes.
Ok, I'll try it and find out why.
this was corrected in maven by adding:
maven.jar.javadoc=${java.home}/lib/tools.jar
But this is not done in maven-1.0, is that correct ?
No. It existed in
Le 1 nov. 04, à 07:01, Dion Gillard a écrit :
i'm having some problems running site:generate (from the jelly build).
1. does anyone know if this is working at the moment?
2. some of these problems also seem to occur when running the
site:generate from within the tag libraries. is this a issue that
it was pulled from the repository for licensing reasons.
are you sure it isn't jellydoc?
this was corrected in maven by adding:
maven.jar.javadoc=${java.home}/lib/tools.jar
- Brett
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Le 1 nov. 04, à 07:01, Dion Gillard a écrit :
i'm having some problems running site:generate
Le 2 nov. 04, à 21:04, Brett Porter a écrit :
are you sure it isn't jellydoc?
Yes.
this was corrected in maven by adding:
maven.jar.javadoc=${java.home}/lib/tools.jar
But this is not done in maven-1.0, is that correct ?
Then it's a known bug and someone should succeed without this
javadoc-1.3.
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Jelly and a release
Le 2 nov. 04, à 21:04, Brett Porter a écrit :
are you sure it isn't jellydoc?
Yes.
this was corrected in maven by adding:
maven.jar.javadoc=${java.home}/lib/tools.jar
But this is not done in maven-1.0, is that correct ?
Then it's a known bug
On 29 Oct 2004, at 20:00, Dion Gillard wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:17:34 +0100, robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this isn't really a release stopper but it's been bothering me for a
while and so this seems like a good excuse to try to resolve it...
the sub-sites for the tag
'site' definitely works.
I don't usually just do site:generate.
I am currently off air and oversaes, and will definitely be able to
check in a couple of days...
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:38:55 +, robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 Oct 2004, at 20:00, Dion Gillard wrote:
Le 28 oct. 04, à 19:24, Dion Gillard a écrit :
[X] +1. Release 1.0-RC1.
[ ] +0. Sounds good but I can't help
[ ] -0. I don't agree, but don't want to hold the release.
[ ] -1. Please don't. Here's why:
-
To unsubscribe,
this isn't really a release stopper but it's been bothering me for a
while and so this seems like a good excuse to try to resolve it...
the sub-sites for the tag libraries don't seem to inherit any common
navigation elements from either the main commons site or from the jelly
site. i think
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:17:34 +0100, robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this isn't really a release stopper but it's been bothering me for a
while and so this seems like a good excuse to try to resolve it...
the sub-sites for the tag libraries don't seem to inherit any common
We've covered most of the issues in Jira for Jelly to make a 1.0 release.
I'd like to go ahead and make the current code a release candidate, 1.0-RC1.
If anyone has changes or bugs that need to be addressed in 1.0,
*please* raise them now, so that we can decide to either include them
or wait.
My little addition XMLOutput.objectData() has received little feedback
but I'd like it to get into 1.0. If no-one objects, I'd put it in...
just... I'd like enough feedback.
paul
Le 28 oct. 04, à 19:24, Dion Gillard a écrit :
We've covered most of the issues in Jira for Jelly to make a 1.0
Hi Paul,
I think we agreed it would be a good addition, and that the name
should be objectData.
Is that right? If so, go for it.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:38:52 +0200, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My little addition XMLOutput.objectData() has received little feedback
but I'd like it
Done that, thanks for the precision. I was unclear from the last mails.
I feared for a while at the amount of checkstyle complaints... did
anyone pay attention to them ? It seems quite of an annoying task!
Maybe it would be simper to relax the requirements ?
paul
Le 28 oct. 04, à 21:23, Dion
Hmmm...
I setup the checkstyle config in two sections: Errors are things we
really don't want, and warnings are less of an issue and things we
could discuss and change.
I haven't looked at the report for a while.
Hopefully it's not a barrier to release.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:13:25 +0200,
I thought we were going to make the default behaviour of that method
to write the object.toString() to the output?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:13:25 +0200, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done that, thanks for the precision. I was unclear from the last mails.
I feared for a while at the
I just ran the tests and it looks like you forgot to commit outputData.jelly.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:30:46 +0200, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As, in my head, this was mostly be overridden by receiving
subclasses, I didn't really care.
I have done as you suggest, though, and,
On Oct 28, 2004, at 1:24 PM, Dion Gillard wrote:
We've covered most of the issues in Jira for Jelly to make a 1.0
release.
I'd like to go ahead and make the current code a release candidate,
1.0-RC1.
If anyone has changes or bugs that need to be addressed in 1.0,
*please* raise them now, so
18 matches
Mail list logo
