Anyway, I have no need to defend myself, so I'm out.
Steve, do let us know how you ultimately solve the problem. It would be a
good thing to know.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
Huh? It's true Gmail calls it's filters 'labels' (not 'tags'), but how
does that mean *I'm* doing anything wrong? I was the one making the
point that this is where we commonly see tags today - on the web, not
in file systems like you brought up.
I won't argue that tags may be the future. My other
If not wanting to buy a new version of Word is all that's stopping
you, check out Open Office. It's free and will let you read Word and
save your creations in Word format.
MS sells an inexpensive (but complete) version of Office for home use
called Student and Teacher's Edition. It is widely
What respects are those? Are you saying, that given equal
lenses, a charge coupled detector of fixed bandwidth is an
equal recording instrument compared to film?
More pics at essentially zero cost.
A good digital camera will have better resolution than 35mm film.
Film has grain, digital
On May 26, 2008, at 7:03 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
Film has grain, digital doesn't.
Digital does have noise, which in many ways is the digital version
of grain.
Digital camera noise is highly consistent from pic to pic. Software
can
profile it and remove it. Not so for film grain.
On May 26, 2008, at 7:08 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
At any rate, the CD can be viewed on virtually any computer
without problems, and if a recipient has a DVD player that they want
to view the images on, I can only hope it works 100% for them.
You should include a ReadMe file about what you have
On May 25, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Steve Yaffe wrote:
He might be ready to switch to a Mac - my 82-year old mother is
happy with hers. I'm thinking of doing the same - except I need to
exchange Word Excel files with the Dell at work either thru e-
mails or flash drive.
If not wanting to
On May 25, 2008, at 11:08 PM, Tony B wrote:
Point taken. But really, when one has to prepare an answer based on
virtually NO information, it's tough to be real 'polite'. The
re-phrasing you wrote is only with benefit of the list having dragged
_some few_ details out of the OP.
Others here
On May 26, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
What respects are those? Are you saying, that given equal
lenses, a charge coupled detector of fixed bandwidth is an
equal recording instrument compared to film?
More pics at essentially zero cost.
I can agree with this for the most part.
Well taken, Betty, But I don't know if the Wii would help or frustrate. His
Parkinsons is starting to gallop along.
Dan
b_s-wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/26/08 12:44 PM
My dad is using a computer that over 10 years old for Internet, email,
WP, database. It's old, slow, so is he. He's retired,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Av6gCq_awQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKK9-HEDa8INR=1
Using the same lens will you be able to produce a recorded image of equal or
better quality using a digital camera instead of film? With equal a full
frame digital (36mm) and 35 mm film frame, I'd say
On May 26, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
Steve, do let us know how you ultimately solve the problem. It
would be a
good thing to know.
Apparently the only 'problem' I had was with one person who
replied to my initial query, and my DVD player. My DVD player seems
to only want
Tony, if you admittedly don't know anything about the subject, why
bother to reply, especially in a condescending and somewhat hostile
manner. You may have only 25 out of 375 photos that are worth looking
at, but others may have 400+ photos that are 80-100% of interest to
target viewers.
I
13 matches
Mail list logo
