, Karl Wright wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 to both.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jack Krupan
gt;>>>> On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to both.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jack Kru
...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to both - review of name and address the NTLM issue since ACF is
>>>> getting
>>>>>> closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
>>>>>>
>>>&
p 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jack Krupansky <
>>>> jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 to both - review of name and address the NTLM issue since ACF is
>>> getting
>>>>> closer to where an actual 0.1 relea
gt;
>>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
>>>> To:
>>>> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VO
>> --------------
> >> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
> >> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
> >> To:
> >> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your preferred name
> >>
> >>
> >> ACF pas
gt; closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> --
>> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re:
Also, do we need to get approval to get "resources" allocated to start a
nightly build?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Grant Ingersoll"
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 8:43 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your p
NTLM issue since ACF is getting
>> closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> --
>> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35
-- Jack Krupansky
>
> --
> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your preferred name
>
>
> ACF passed the Incubator vote.
>>
>> My question to the comm
ubject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your preferred name
ACF passed the Incubator vote.
My question to the community is do you want me to go to the Board and ask
for advice on this since the Board ultimately approves any podling
graduating? One Director weighed in on the vote saying the Board wouldn'
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
> ACF passed the Incubator vote.
>
> My question to the community is do you want me to go to the Board and ask for
> advice on this since the Board ultimately approves any podling graduating?
> One Director weighed in on the vote saying th
ACF passed the Incubator vote.
My question to the community is do you want me to go to the Board and ask for
advice on this since the Board ultimately approves any podling graduating? One
Director weighed in on the vote saying the Board wouldn't care, but in my view
it was not an official opin
OK, I'll follow up on gene...@incubator.a.o.
On Sep 7, 2010, at 4:54 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Voting is now closed.
>
> Final tally (which only counts Robert's first choice and not all three):
>
> Apache Connectors Framework 15
> Apache Manifold 11
> Apache Yukon 9
> Apache Macon 4
> Apache Man
Voting is now closed.
Final tally (which only counts Robert's first choice and not all three):
Apache Connectors Framework 15
Apache Manifold 11
Apache Yukon 9
Apache Macon 4
Apache ManifoldCF 3
Apache Omni 1
Apache Acromantula 1
Apache Lukon 1
Karl
15 matches
Mail list logo
