O Ouch
There is no need for it now since the LG released updates for their
firmware and procedure how to fix the dead drives.
It would be nice if Mandrake would release updated iso-s for
club members or a howto on how to do it ourselves.
btw does this mean that the updated kernel is not necessary
MP It's because the mandrake kernel uses patches from patch-o-matic. In 9.1 this
MP didn't give problems, but in 9.2 it apparently did (hum, it was even a
MP netfilter faq).
How about TTL target patch. There is support for ttl matches, and also
iptables libs in 9.2 support TTL target but there is
BH well i have finished my own set and have made my own iso's but I don't think
BH that is what you mean. They are not fancy and still say cooker 9.2 when you
BH install them but they still pull updates from the 9.2 tree. I would put up a
Would you be interested in writing a short howto for the
BH I dont use the conf files at all.
It looks like simplicity is the best way :
BH then I copy the i586 tree myself. I add whatever i want onto my cd's from
BH contribs, plf, the club, texstar, updates, misc, and my own custom made
BH rpm's. I then run makecd with just the path to my i586
BH if they are not then dont worry about it. In my case I run apache 2 so the
BH above errors would not bother me at all.
Is there a way to force certain packages to for example first cd ?
4 20:20 4-Cooker-download.iso drwxr-xr-x2 root root
Nov 4 20:18 Cooker-download/ [EMAIL
Luca Berra, care to look at this?
LB Feeling very masochistic i could try to extract this from debian patch,
LB or i could try to adapt the one trustix ppl kindly extracted from there :)
LB will let u know...
Could you CC that to me also, since i often miss things from changelog list?
btw if this
JA Since upgrading to 2.4.22-21mdk from stock 9.2 kernel I have had cyrus-imapd
JA stop multiple times, and require a database recovery before it would accept
JA new mail. This was working fine for months on end with 9.1, and the
JA 2.4.22.10mdk kernel with no problems.
Are there any errors in the
BH I'm not sure here. if you got everything it will include them as long as there
BH are no issues.
I will run it again and log the output to a file. Maybe some useful
clue will come up.
Btw I changed 9.2.conf in the misc/doc/ dir. I have a feeling that it
is being used by default ?
BH I think
LB if i manage to do something, i will post on cooker list,
LB and put rpm on http://www.comedia.it/cooker/mail/
Thanks.
dmo Does it still do that? I talked about this with Thierry a while ago and he
dmo promised me the journal is updated before the filesystem check (which is
dmo the best thing, journal update doesn't necessarily fix all errors).
dmo In 9.1 the journal was certainly not updated before fs check.
GM Yeah, but I am trying to figure it all out right now. I am having a terrible
GM time getting MakeCD to run in anything other than auto mode. If I use the
GM config file, it won't build the iso.
The biggest problem for me is how to replace properly vmlinuz from kernel-boot
and initrd for it
Old subject didn't get any attention, so I'm posting with this one
which will surely get some.
While I was trying to build updated isos i found in misc/doc/download
a line kernel-source exclude. What ? this can't be true. I search
trough rpms, rpms2 and rpms3 and it isn't there.
I check on
BM And it had nothing to do with the subject, but the fact that it was
BM still quite a conflict-generating post.
You replied within 30 minutes. A rest my case :)
BM Yes, misc/doc applies *only* to ISO images, not to the mirrors.
Well that is so obvious that there is no need to point that out.
It doesn't matter what has changed. What matters is that there is
a difference between my rpms (in rpms rpms2 rpms3 ) and mirrors.
A was under impression that RPMS dir on mirror holds everything that I
get on my 3 cds. I will check this with 9.1 since I have those cd on
me.
MDP Not always. I
GM I think all you should have to do is replace the packages and then run some
GM scripts that update the package lists in the Mandrake/base directory.
GM gendistrib should be one, but I don't know of the others.
Have you considered adding a few remarks to your twiki page
like the need to use the
BM contributors on this list, and the Mandrakesoft people on this list are
BM developers, not support staff. If you aren't prepared to file a bug for
BM cooker, your issue does not belong on this list.
Because this is a developers list I posted here to get to the ones
responsible and not go
AW edition. It's officially supported packages / non-officially supported
AW packages. Clear?
Yes now. I have been using mandrake since 7.1 or so and i didn't now
this. A couple of my friends who are using it for I while didn't know
it either. I'm not going even to mention different package
A strange thought came to me an hour ago.
While I was trying to build updated isos i found in misc/doc/download
a line kernel-source exclude. What ? this can't be true. I search
trough rpms, rpms2 and rpms3 and it isn't there.
I check on fr2.rpmfind.net and its there. Hm strange, lets see what
bccz Maybe next time you can give us information like this? You seemed to imply
bccz you were running urpmi.addmedia against an official updates mirror.
Well i use this kind of setup for a long time since 8.2 or something
so i didn't thought of that.
Anyway mandrakesecure.net imply that I need
bccz Maybe next time you can give us information like this? You seemed to imply
bccz you were running urpmi.addmedia against an official updates mirror.
BTW since we are at the subject of updates, what's happening with
apache updates it been 3 days since the advisory and i can't find them
BM I just find it a bit unfortunate that you criticise everything first,
BM complaining that things are broken, before checking your own setup.
Well I think that you are getting a wrong impression, since I was
bitching/complaining on different subjects in other posts.
In this post (by my opinion)
LB well, if you insist i'll just state it works correctly for me.
LB but if you try and give some more useful info (eg output of commands)
LB we could see if it is a bug or another problem.
Well this was with 9.1 haven't had the time to test it with 9.2.
Anyway the situation was something like
bccz Because it's the key for security updates, and it should be imported for
bccz you by urpmi.addmedia when you setup a security update source.
Didn't know that. I have a local rsync mirror of security updates
which are then available to the rest of the machines in my network.
No problem. I
LB the second is phrased in a way i cannot understand
Simple lvm is not functioning properly when setup on top of raid1.
LB libraries, and they won't run if mysql libraries are not installed.
didn't know that it worked that way. Thanks.
LB maybe if you tried the patch before, you could also
E Would it be possible to re-package the ISO with the updates included
E and/or point me towards instructions to tell me how to make the new ISO
Anybody considered adding this patch:
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/patches/9.2/pubkey/patch.pl
to fix this bug in installation :
JC rpm -qa gpg-pubkey*
JC gpg-pubkey-22458a98-3969e7de
JC gpg-pubkey-9b4a4024-3874ddfb
JC gpg-pubkey-70771ff3-3c8f768f
JC The first key is the one you are missing.
Beats me. I will try to delete all of the keys then add the one from
isos and the other from mandrakes site.
What I don't understand
bccz Development is totally open. If you want to help, you can. There is no
bccz need to ask for developers, because the policy is clear. Volunteers are
bccz welcome and always have been.
???
Don't have to ask developers ? If I want something to be changed in ML
i will post a message to cooker
When trying to install updates i get an error that i have a missing
key. I have tried different things but none seem to work.
The last thing I did is I deleted all of the keys and imported
RPM-GPG-KEYS from first cd of 9.2 and a key from :
https://www.mandrakesecure.net/RPM-GPG-KEYS
now rpm -qa
G it looks like that I need this key :gpg-pubkey-22458a98-3969e7de
G So where can i find it ?
Newer mind already found it on
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/cks/search.cgi?stype=keyid_4bkeyid_4b=22458A98
Why wasn't this key imported the first time ?
bccz Sometimes it is more effective to post a patch, and/or file a bug.
bccz Sometimes not.
Well i can't post a patch since I'm not really a coder. I can find my
way around C, perl, php but nothing special.
This sometimes bothers me greatly.
bccz But you seem to infer that only Mandrakesoft
All of the updates for 9.2 have an invalid gpg signature
For example :
rpm --checksig kernel-2.4.22.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
returns :
kernel-2.4.22.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm: sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS:
GPG#22458a98)
i even imported gpg key from https://www.mandrakesecure.net/RPM-GPG-KEYS
BH um they are. Maybe you didn't look right at the top of the page but listed
BH right there are drivers for ati, nvidia, winmodems and whatnot else.
Let see:
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/NVIDIA_kernel-2.4.22.10mdk-4496-2mdk.i586.html
kernel-2.4.22.10mdk
this is
VD How did you import the key? Did you do it using gpg?
rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEYS from : https://www.mandrakesecure.net/RPM-GPG-KEYS
VD If so, then you really need to learn how to use urpmi. urpmi will import
VD the key for you. You also need to use rpm to import the key since rpm
VD manages
bccz Maybe you have an old page cached, but at least all the NVidia kernel
bccz packages have been updated. I hope the ATI and winmodem drivers could also
I know how to check for a page in cache. It wasn't it.
bccz BTW, this is better than 9.1, where Mandrakesoft did not update any of the
bccz
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020
More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the hell did this
happen ?
It looks like x.2 doesn't mean a thing anymore. 7.2 and 8.2 were
perfect. Why isn't so
Hi all
Lilo + software raid 1 +xfs + lvm curent disfunction and next release sugesstion
First a suggestion for the next release (9.2):
When creating a software raid 1 with xfs file system lilo doesn't know
how to write a boot loader to /dev/md0 device. It says that it will
destroy the file
Hi all
First a suggestion for the next release (9.2):
When creating a software raid 1 with xfs file system lilo doesn't know
how to write a boot loader to /dev/md0 device. It saues that it will
destroy the file system if it does that which is true but instead it
should add raid-extra-boot=
8BITMIME
no mention of crammd5 or digestmd5
anybody have I clue ?
--
Best regards,
Galileo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
H I found at least 20 typos and style mistakes in your message. Hope you
H don't mind me thinking your rpms will be as sloppy ;) This is not
H personal critique. If you want to build rpms that's great but they
H should give other people less instead of more work. Try to make them
H perfect.
In the atachment you can find cpec file patches and stuff neded to build
cyrus-imapd-2.0.16
Onlu thing missing is source tarrbal which you can get here:
ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/cyrus-imapd-2.0.16.tar.gz
You will have to conwert it to bz2 but thatsnoproblem there is bzme
A couple of sugestions:
I'm using postfix with mysql suport an cyrus-imapd for my mail servers
and I would like to see Mandrake packages of these programs.
Is there any plan to include those in standard distribution.Maybe on conttrib
disk?
A lot of distributions (redhat, polished
A couple of sugestions:
I'm using postfix with mysql suport an cyrus-imapd for my mail servers
and I would like to see Mandrake packages of these programs.
Is there any plan to include those in standard distribution.Maybe on conttrib
disk?
A lot of distributions (redhat, polished
A couple of sugestions:
I'm using postfix with mysql suport an cyrus-imapd for my mail servers
and I would like to see Mandrake packages of these programs.
Is there any plan to include those in standard distribution.Maybe on conttrib
disk?
A lot of distributions (redhat, polished
43 matches
Mail list logo
