Re: Re[2]: [Cooker] 9.2 ISOs on the mirrors.

2003-11-16 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Galileo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: O Ouch There is no need for it now since the LG released updates for their firmware and procedure how to fix the dead drives. It would be nice if Mandrake would release updated iso-s for club members or a howto on how to do it ourselves. btw does this

Re: [Cooker] idea for MDK 10: rpm packages compatibility

2003-11-11 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
The LSB project www.linuxbase.org aims to do exactly that. This compatibility is what the LSB option during Mandrake install is for. However it has a very long way to go. In order to have these universal RPMs: - Linux needs to standardise on a certain set of libraries. LSB has mostly achieved

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-11-02 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- FACORAT Fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: put them at the end after dm start Wouldn't work, because dm service just calls prefdm with a fork, so it's effectively executing X and KDE and everything else in parallel. As I've said, this makes X start veeery slowly. When I remove the fork, the

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.stack.nl/~josh/Mandrake Hello Jos! I think you have an excellent page there. Here are some thinkings: - Harddrake should *not* be disabled by default. If one changes some piece of hardware (they'll probably do that while their system is off :)

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hello, I agree with most of your points. --- Jos Hulzink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Vedran Ljubovic wrote: - I don't think parallelizing helps on computers with a single CPU that doesn't support hyperthreading. Sure Not true I think... Think about initializing

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, just accept the username and password, and show some moving graphics until you have authenticated the user. Ever noticed how long it takes to tell you your password is wrong on first start? Couldn't we just hack the bootsplash so that it

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-29 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I was on dial up (DSL now), but I have a lan, and the server shares the inet connection, and I need NFS enabled by default. Perhaps the installer/control panel should ask whether you want NFS (server/client), or not at all. Yes, but you had

Re: [Cooker] Fwd: [plug] Mandrake Bug announce warning rant ahead

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: where Errata points to http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/lgerrata.php3 which has quite comprehensive coverage of the issue. That's a great page! Very informative. Somehow you missed my submission. I have a GCE-8400B CD-RW that works fine. Possibly it

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For Stephane : I disagree there are a lot of bugs in the distro. The fact that the updates are big in size does not mean there are a lot of bugs. You may correct one little bug in KDe and anyway have to release 100MB of updated rpm. There is

[Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hi, Recently there were some articles on Slashdot proposing alternative boot procedures. Most of them advocate parallelizing of SysV-init tasks. Motivated by these I've decided to make a detailed analysis of boot procedure and see how can I make it faster. I have an oldish PC that can run most

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6251] [Installation] New: Mdkkdm not installed at first 9.2 install.

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- [zeb] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First install of 9.2 DE final. mdkkdm is not installed and kdm is running instead. Hey! I though that was a feature!!! lol __ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Michael Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Do we need to run depmod if no new modules are installed (many ways to check)? i think it use -A switch and so is runned only if it should. Well if there are new modules it takes almost 30 seconds, without them it's 4 seconds consistently.

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: don't even own a network card. Therefore I probably don't need sshd at all. Isn't xinetd startup of ssh disabled by default, in favour of starting as a daemon? Hm you're right. It seems that xinetd is used for fam. - While I'm at it, I also don't need

Re: [Cooker] [IMPORTANT] 9.2 install potentially frying some LG cdrom drives

2003-10-25 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Élie Charest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le 24 Octobre 2003 11:04, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : Régis Wira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mine has a 1.01 firmware Very interesting then. Listing all firmware versions needed will be long though :/. Pardon my ignorance, but how does

Re: Re[2]: [Cooker] 9.2 Updates a total mess

2003-10-25 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well if you haven't seen it a loot of others have. But that doesn't help fix it. Mandrakesoft has problems reproducing it too (and 'just install a package' isn't a reproducible test case), so it's difficult for them to solve it. Hope this helps: steps to

Re: [Cooker] [IMPORTANT] 9.2 install potentially frying some LG cdrom drives

2003-10-24 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
I have here a HL-DT-ST GCE-8400B CD-RW. MB is a taiwanese (i think Chaintech) with VIA KT-266. RC2 installed fine, didn't have time to try 9.2 final though, I'll probably do it over the weekend and let you know. How do I find the firmware version? --- Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-09 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No offense, but there already is a distribution (several) like this, why do we want to create another one? They are not free (as in freedom) Ok, as I've said in the original mail, it's a community decision and if any of my ideas is accepted, I'll be

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-09 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
I just hope that others don't find this little discussion of ours boring. if you do, please yell :) --- illogic-al [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a typical windows user. mdklinux is not windows and users installing linux know that (at least most of them do). It's the argument of

[Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hello list, I wasn't much involved in Mandrake development until now (except translation), but I hope that that will change. First I must say that, as a long time Mandrake user, I very much appreciate the fine work done by Mandrake developers, especially from a technical point of view. However,

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hi, Thank you all for your responses! This thread is much more than I've expected. These are a few clarifications, cause I see that there are already some ideas better then what I originally had. --- Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vedran Ljubovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- illogic-al [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So you suggest sticking a screenshot in the rpm? Further down you say certain people have no business installing an OS. Well by extension of that logic they wouldn't have gotten to the installation point so this doesn't need to be worried about. I

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Pierre Jarillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes your idea is very good and ergonomic. As GC said, There would take very much diskspace, especially screenshots! To avoid this, it could be useful to create a database hosted by Mandrake: [...] That's an excellent idea! I'd like to