Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-11 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: what's different's ? OpenSource no ? -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-11 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Vadim Plessky am Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 05:11:03AM +0300: 1) Konqueror 2.1 Against. It takes ages to start it, and when you want another window, it again takes quite some time to start that window. I'm not using KDE btw. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-11 Thread Meir Faraj
1) Konqueror 2.1 and, may be, if there is so strong demand from -wide masses_, 2) - netscape-old (4.76) 3) - netscape (6.0) 4) - netscape-hack (Mozilla) I'm also think that is a good idea to put all of them Konqueror, as the fastest one at a moment. but it's buggy;-) I

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-11 Thread Meir Faraj
On Saturday 11 November 2000 01:07, you wrote: Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So sprach Chmouel Boudjnah am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 06:56:46AM -0800: do you thing that a distribution of 1,2Gb is not enough ? Well, if you include powertools, redhat is at almost 2 Gig. So why not?

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-11 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Isn't too much since you've install cd , ext cd contrib cd , source cd people that want could only download 1-2 or 3 cd ... so isn't too much chmouel;-) ever heard about mirror, production cd for boxes, etc.. ? you distrib is the greatest ;-)

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-11 Thread Meir Faraj
On Saturday 11 November 2000 20:25, you wrote: Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Isn't too much since you've install cd , ext cd contrib cd , source cd people that want could only download 1-2 or 3 cd ... so isn't too much chmouel;-) ever heard about mirror, production cd for

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-11 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh yep , sorry , sorry but in the next will be also the option of installing the 3.3.6 (3.3.7?) or only the 4.0.2(since the big drivers updates that have been done(or not yet :( )) depending if it support cards as 3.3.6 if some things will be

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-11 Thread Leon Brooks
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Secondly , could you put the 6 version of netscape on the cooker the final release is out r8 now . isn't that better to switch to mozilla instead ? fcrozat ? Yes. -- "My enthusiam for this meal can't even be described by a

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-11 Thread Anton Graham
Submitted 11-Nov-00 by Alexander Skwar: Against. It takes ages to start it, and when you want another window, it again takes quite some time to start that window. I'm not using KDE btw. I agree with Alexander here. Those of us that don't use KDE find it takes an inordinate amount of time to

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Doug Roberts
I've not been able to make java work with any of the daily mozilla builds for a couple of weeks now, neither with Mandrake 7.1 nore 7.2. Cliock on a java url, click on download the java plugin, wait a couple of forevers for jre.xpi to download from netscape.com, restart mozilla, click on a

[Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Meir Faraj
Hi all , First I wanna to tell you thanks for your greatincroyable works on the cooker devlopment Secondly , could you put the 6 version of netscape on the cooker the final release is out r8 now . thanks a lot ?))

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Secondly , could you put the 6 version of netscape on the cooker the final release is out r8 now . isn't that better to switch to mozilla instead ? fcrozat ? -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Sam
Question- 1. Where is NS8, it's not on the netscape website or any download centers. Original Message On 11/10/00, 6:37:32 AM, Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker: Hi all , First I wanna to tell you thanks for your

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Meir Faraj
On Friday 10 November 2000 15:42, you wrote: Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Secondly , could you put the 6 version of netscape on the cooker the final release is out r8 now . isn't that better to switch to mozilla instead ? fcrozat ? what's different's ? need a good browers , they

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Meir Faraj
[Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker: Hi all , First I wanna to tell you thanks for your greatincroyable works on the cooker devlopment Secondly , could you put the 6 version of netscape on the cooker the final release is out r8 now . thanks a lot ?))

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Sam
. Original Message On 11/10/00, 6:42:40 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker: Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Secondly , could you put the 6 version of netscape on the cooker the final release is out r8 now

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Matthew Brealey
You wrote: Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Secondly , could you put the 6 version of netscape on the cooker the final release is out r8 now . isn't that better to switch to mozilla instead ? fcrozat ? Much better. Netscape is Mozilla with more bugs (because they use a two-

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Matthew Brealey
I mean you have both - Netscape if you need it (and if you can take closed source software), but otherwise Moz and Konqueror. -- Random fortune Win98 is called Win98 because it is 98% slower than Linux.

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Sam am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 01:59:18PM +: You're in charge of marketing- which has more brand recognition as included package on the side of your box- Mozilla, Netscape or Konqueror. I think the answers obvious. Right, it's my favourite, w3m, isn't it? :] To get real, I'd

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Matthew Brealey am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 02:01:50PM -: Netscape does have things like Java, etc., so it would be nice to have You can include the Java implementation for NS6 in Mozilla. Works fine, but takes ages to start up - it's even worse than the start up time for Java in NS

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Sam am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 01:51:07PM +: 1. Where is NS8, it's not on the netscape website or any download centers. See /., it's on Netscape's ftp server - but, I don't seem to be able to get into the 6.0 dir, is someone here able to do so? Alexander Skwar -- How to quote:

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And all those three browsers should be in the main distribution. Netscape old should be included, because it's known to work (well, sort of anyway do you thing that a distribution of 1,2Gb is not enough ? -- MandrakeSoft Inc

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Sam
I do use Mozilla- it's fast, but is it bug free- no way. Wrong. The trunk cvs branch is frozen code with bug fixing only. Hmmm seems like a contradiction You say that statement is wrong yet you say it's frozen for bug fixing only :) The reason they freeze it is because they know that

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I do use Mozilla- it's fast, but is it bug free- no way. Wrong. The trunk cvs branch is frozen code with bug fixing only. Hmmm seems like a contradiction You say that statement is wrong yet you say it's frozen for bug fixing only :) The reason they

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The reason they freeze it is because they know that they have numerous bugs to squash and it's easier to squash them without adding new code. This is standard practice on what most companies call a final BETA release. The idea is to stomp out as many bugs

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Sam
(made by Dell) uses Linux and a browser based on gecko. Original Message On 11/10/00, 8:19:11 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker: Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The reason they freeze it is because they know

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread andre
So sprach Sam am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 01:59:18PM +: You're in charge of marketing- which has more brand recognition as included package on the side of your box- Mozilla, Netscape or Konqueror. I think the answers obvious. Right, it's my favourite, w3m, isn't it? :] To get

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Chmouel Boudjnah am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 06:56:46AM -0800: do you thing that a distribution of 1,2Gb is not enough ? Yeah, they're somewhat big, granted. But what do you want to leave out? The 4.x series of Netscape? Or Mozilla? IMHO none should be left out. Alexander Skwar --

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach andre am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 11:28:36PM +0100: Why is netscape up to 4.76. Security-problem ??? IIRC they did some updates to the included programs, don't know for sure though. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage:

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (andre) writes: Why is netscape up to 4.76. Security-problem ??? up but only FreeBSD has discover the problem. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Sam
So sprach Chmouel Boudjnah am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 06:56:46AM -0800: do you thing that a distribution of 1,2Gb is not enough ? Well, if you include powertools, redhat is at almost 2 Gig. So why not? Although slackware is only 1.5 CD's in size, they have a contributions iso image as the

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So sprach Chmouel Boudjnah am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 06:56:46AM -0800: do you thing that a distribution of 1,2Gb is not enough ? Well, if you include powertools, redhat is at almost 2 Gig. So why not? Although slackware is only 1.5 CD's in size, they have a

Re: [Cooker] About to include netscape6 in the cooker

2000-11-10 Thread Vadim Plessky
On Friday 10 November 2000 17:28, Alexander Skwar wrote: | So sprach Sam am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 01:59:18PM +: |You're in charge of marketing- which has more brand recognition as |included package on the side of your box- Mozilla, Netscape or |Konqueror. I think the answers