Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca done (austin)
qjackconnectdone ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
csound done (austin)
cecelia done, tweaking default settings (austin)
rtsynth I can't find the source
Csound is finished, but license is for non-commercial use only. Maybe a
candidate for PLF? Also, cecelia is a GUI for it, but doesn't require
csound to build against. Should it go in contribs or PLF as well?
Also, I can't find the latest source code for rtsynth. If anyone knows
where it is,
Austin Acton wrote:
Csound is finished, but license is for non-commercial use only. Maybe a
candidate for PLF? Also, cecelia is a GUI for it, but doesn't require
csound to build against. Should it go in contribs or PLF as well?
It should not go in contrib if you can not use it with only
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:20:05 +0200
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Austin Acton wrote:
Csound is finished, but license is for non-commercial use only. Maybe a
candidate for PLF? Also, cecelia is a GUI for it, but doesn't require
csound to build against. Should it go in contribs or
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 12:30, Spencer Anderson wrote:
Which leads to the question of jmax. The only place I can think of is club
commercial. Maybe the place for csound also.
Jmax will have to go in jpackage.
Csound will go in PLF, because although it's open sourced, it cannot go
on commercial
On 17 Feb 2003 14:14:10 -0500
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 12:30, Spencer Anderson wrote:
Which leads to the question of jmax. The only place I can think of is club
commercial. Maybe the place for csound also.
Jmax will have to go in jpackage.
Csound will go
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 14:36, Spencer Anderson wrote:
OK, I just have the menu entries to do in jmax and it will be ready. Do you want me
to send it to you?
Hmm, I'm not a member of jpackage.
Send it to Guillaume Rousse maybe?
Or join the jpackage project. :-)
Austin
--
On 17 Feb 2003 14:44:14 -0500
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 14:36, Spencer Anderson wrote:
OK, I just have the menu entries to do in jmax and it will be ready. Do you want
me to send it to you?
Hmm, I'm not a member of jpackage.
Send it to Guillaume Rousse
R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
On 2003-02-13(Thu) 00:39:55 -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
[]
lilypond [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1.7.12 has issues compiling)
Can I participate too? I have a
Sure you can participate!
Buchan's been working on lilypond for some time though.
vstserver, pd, ceres, mammut, pain, seq24, gdam, and athena all need to
be done though.
;-)
Austin
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 02:07, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
Can I participate too? I have a lilypond 1.6.7 almost ready
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca done (austin)
qjackconnectdone ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
csound done (austin)
cecelia done, tweaking default settings (austin)
rtsynth
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 13:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As i have said before i did rebuild my rpms for Mandrake9.1.
I even uploaded my Mandrake9.1 lilypond-1.7.12 srpm to cooker but
nothing happens so i stopped building
my rpms for Mandrake 9.1 i only build for 9.0 now.
Don't forget, we're
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As i have said before i did rebuild my rpms for Mandrake9.1.
Sure, but it takes me a while to rebuild stuff, I have a lot of things
on my todo list which are more important (atm) than lilypond. Mine
compiles fine, and passes all rpmlint tests,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca done (austin)
qjackconnectdone ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
csound done (austin)
cecelia done, tweaking default
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 23:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have nothing against that you fix my mistakes im quite new to this.
So am I.
Don't sweat it.
But i really think that you should split gtk-ardour from ksi-ardour its
2 different interfaces.
Yep. I agree.
If you have already done it, send
Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003, 17:59:52 Uhr MET, schrieb Austin Acton:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 15:44, Buchan Milne wrote:
Another one for the list?
http://hydrogen.sourceforge.net/
Yeah, I've been planning on doing that one for about a month now.
Thought I'd try to finish the list first.
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 09:01:08 Uhr MET, schrieb Götz Waschk:
I'll do this, seems to be an easy one as there are even MDK 9.0
packages on the home page.
Nevermind, I must have missed the announcement for the contrib package.
--
Götz Waschk master of computer science University of
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 03:01, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003, 17:59:52 Uhr MET, schrieb Austin Acton:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 15:44, Buchan Milne wrote:
Another one for the list?
http://hydrogen.sourceforge.net/
Yeah, I've been planning on doing that one for about a month
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 10:10:52 Uhr MET, schrieb Austin Acton:
Hehe, believe me, it wasn't simple. For some reason, software
developers and packagers have differing ideas of what makes a good
package. :-)
I have to agree here. The worst example that comes to my mind is cinelerra.
--
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca done (austin)
qjackconnectdone ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
csound done (austin)
cecelia done, tweaking default settings (austin)
rtsynth I can't find the source
On 2003-02-13(Thu) 00:39:55 -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
[]
lilypond [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1.7.12 has issues compiling)
Can I participate too? I have a lilypond 1.6.7 almost ready
Another one for the list?
http://hydrogen.sourceforge.net/
--
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 15:44, Buchan Milne wrote:
Another one for the list?
http://hydrogen.sourceforge.net/
Yeah, I've been planning on doing that one for about a month now.
Thought I'd try to finish the list first.
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 2:44 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Another one for the list?
http://hydrogen.sourceforge.net/
bomp bomp bomp.. another one for the list.. and another one for, and another
one for.. another one for the list, hey hey!
--
Chuck Burns
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca done (austin)
qjackconnectdone ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
csound in progress, hell (austin)
cecelia in progress, waiting for csound (austin)
rtsynth I can't
On 10 Feb 2003 17:02:54 -0500
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladccadone (austin)
qjackconnect done ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
csound in progress, hell (austin)
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:57, Spencer Anderson wrote:
On 10 Feb 2003 17:02:54 -0500
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ecamegapedal[EMAIL PROTECTED] (coming soon)
What's wrong with the rpm I proposed?
--
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On 10 Feb 2003 19:01:52 -0800
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:57, Spencer Anderson wrote:
On 10 Feb 2003 17:02:54 -0500
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ecamegapedal[EMAIL PROTECTED] (coming soon)
What's wrong with the rpm I proposed?
--
Quel Qun
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 22:01, Quel Qun wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:57, Spencer Anderson wrote:
On 10 Feb 2003 17:02:54 -0500
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ecamegapedal[EMAIL PROTECTED] (coming soon)
What's wrong with the rpm I proposed?
It doesn't build.
Did you try it?
On Monday 03 February 2003 06:23 pm, you wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:52 pm, you wrote:
On Saturday 01 February 2003 02:37 pm, you wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound9.1.html
/thac
I have finally solved some
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:52 pm, you wrote:
On Saturday 01 February 2003 02:37 pm, you wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound9.1.html
/thac
I have finally solved some problems.
I have rebuilt ardour for Mandrake 9.1 it is up
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:31 pm, you wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:52 pm, you wrote:
On Saturday 01 February 2003 02:37 pm, you wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound9.1.html
/thac
I have finally solved some
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 13:31, tobbe wrote:
Th kernel is dated jan 30 2003
gcc dated jan 3.21 30 2003
and libalsa jan 10 2003
I don't see why rebuilding alsa wouldn't solve the problem.
But I tried yesterday, and I got the same error.
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:31 pm, you wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:52 pm, you wrote:
On Saturday 01 February 2003 02:37 pm, you wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
The bug is called unresolved symbol, this bug exists in ALSA 0.9 since the
existing
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:58 pm, you wrote:
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:31 pm, you wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:52 pm, you wrote:
On Saturday 01 February 2003 02:37 pm, you wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
The bug is called unresolved
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 14:13, tobbe wrote:
Is the kernel really built with the latest gcc ?
obviously tha alsa libs aint.
Well, rc7 was just released.
Maybe this will solve some of our problems.
(if someone updates it)
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fernando has made a patched kernel at Planet CCRMA (for RedHat), which
solves this problem. I don't know how we could implement the same
solution without sacrificing security, but I'm sure it's possible.
Where there's a will, there's a way.
if you
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fernando has made a patched kernel at Planet CCRMA (for RedHat), which
solves this problem. I don't know how we could implement the same
solution without sacrificing security, but I'm sure it's possible.
Where there's a will,
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Links to patches (don't necessarily look valid) and SRPMs (probably the
best bet) for a 2.4.19 kernel on RH 7.x/8.0.
oh, they use the capabilities stuff, that's good for them don't
think/know if we can get it by default in mdk.
On Saturday 01 February 2003 02:37 pm, you wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound9.1.html
/thac
I have finally solved some problems.
I have rebuilt ardour for Mandrake 9.1 it is up now.
i have also fixed the lilypond-1.7.12 srpm so that it
tobbe wrote:
On Saturday 01 February 2003 02:37 pm, you wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound9.1.html
/thac
I have finally solved some problems.
I have rebuilt ardour for Mandrake 9.1 it is up now.
i have also fixed the
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 06:04, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fernando has made a patched kernel at Planet CCRMA (for RedHat), which
solves this problem. I don't know how we could implement the same
solution without sacrificing security, but I'm sure it's
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 06:48, Buchan Milne wrote:
I think it's this (if Austin isn't awake yet ...):
http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/system.html#SECTION00037100
Yeah, I'm up now. Sorry for the duplicate reply, Chmouel.
I start my work day at 10:00 EST. Ahhh,
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 08:30, Buchan Milne wrote:
I also think that i have solved the problems compiling muse-0.6.0pre5
with iiwusynth, jackit-0.44 and graphviz support.
I know graphwiz is plf but its needed.
So we need a muse-plf package?
I have muse for contrib ready. Should be up
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca done (austin)
qjackconnectdone ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
csound in progress (austin)
cecelia in progress (austin)
rtsynth
swami done (austin)
muse
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:52 pm, you wrote:
On Saturday 01 February 2003 02:37 pm, you wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound9.1.html
/thac
I have finally solved some problems.
I have rebuilt ardour for Mandrake 9.1 it is up
On Monday 03 February 2003 11:00, Austin Acton wrote:
spiralsynthmodular
freqtweak done (austin)
spiralloops
spiralsynth
snd done (austin)
(We may need a C++ hacker to get *spiral* apps to compile as they are
very non-ANSI code.)
Here are the diff needed to get
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 12:42, Narfi Stefansson wrote:
Here are the diff needed to get spiralsynthmodular to compile on 9.0. They
were trivial replacements of #include Fl/xx.h with #include FL/xx.h (Note
the uppercase L).
Thanks for that, Narfi. I hadn't got around to trying ssm yet, but I
Narfi Stefansson wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2003 11:00, Austin Acton wrote:
spiralsynthmodular
freqtweak done (austin)
spiralloops
spiralsynth
snd done (austin)
(We may need a C++ hacker to get *spiral* apps to compile as they are
very non-ANSI code.)
Here are the diff
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:09, Austin Acton wrote:
The error I was referring to though, is a gcc3.2 problem.
Maybe you (or someone else) can figure it out?
To clarify, the problem I quoted earlier is in SpiralLoops, not
spiralsynth or ssmodular.
Austin
--
Austin Acton
On Monday 03 February 2003 12:09, Austin Acton wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 12:42, Narfi Stefansson wrote:
Here are the diff needed to get spiralsynthmodular to compile on 9.0.
They were trivial replacements of #include Fl/xx.h with #include
FL/xx.h (Note the uppercase L).
Thanks for
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 12:23, tobbe wrote:
everything is ok on the page now except muse-0.6.0pre5
it fails with
/usr/bin/ld: iiwusynth.so: undefined versioned symbol name
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value
Oi, yeah. I thought it had built fine,
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:40, Narfi Stefansson wrote:
Yes, the statement:
using namespace std;
is missing there.
Yeah I tried that and it didn't help.
Maybe I put it in the wrong place?
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 12:23, tobbe wrote:
everything is ok on the page now except muse-0.6.0pre5
it fails with
/usr/bin/ld: iiwusynth.so: undefined versioned symbol name
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value
Yeah I think the problem is with alsa:
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca done (austin)
qjackconnectdone ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
csound in progress (austin)
cecelia in progress (austin)
rtsynth
swami done (austin)
muse
On Monday 03 February 2003 12:22, Austin Acton wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:09, Austin Acton wrote:
The error I was referring to though, is a gcc3.2 problem.
Maybe you (or someone else) can figure it out?
To clarify, the problem I quoted earlier is in SpiralLoops, not
spiralsynth or
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 14:44, Narfi Stefansson wrote:
Ok, I have attached a patch suggestion for SpiralLoops
Narfi, you're awesome.
Ranger, got time to try it? I'm up to my neck here with ardour, csound,
and muse (problems with all now!).
Austin
--
Austin Acton
On Monday 03 February 2003 13:51, Austin Acton wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 14:44, Narfi Stefansson wrote:
Ok, I have attached a patch suggestion for SpiralLoops
Narfi, you're awesome.
Ranger, got time to try it? I'm up to my neck here with ardour, csound,
and muse (problems with all
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 11:32, Buchan Milne wrote:
ecamegapedal[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have ecamegapedal-0.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm here if you want it. I can mail
it to one of you. It's 154KB.
I haven't figured out how to use that thing yet. but it starts and
connects to jack-alsa
--
Quel Qun [EMAIL
On 03 Feb 2003 19:08:41 -0800
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 11:32, Buchan Milne wrote:
ecamegapedal[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have ecamegapedal-0.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm here if you want it. I can mail
it to one of you. It's 154KB.
I haven't figured out how to use that
Hey, by the way...
Were you guys aware of this stuff ?
---
http://lulu.esm.rochester.edu/kevine/turnkey/home.html
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, allen wrote:
Hey, by the way...
Were you guys aware of this stuff ?
Yes, but there aren't RPMs or SRPMs, and I think many of the apps are
already on the list, and if not, once we finish the list we'll add the
remainging ones to it.
Buchan
--
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 12:52, allen wrote:
Hey, by the way...
Were you guys aware of this stuff ?
Yeah I've seen that before.
However I'm sure (semi)official rpms are preferable to obscure binary
tarballs. :-)
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound9.1.html
/thac
yOn Sat, 1 Feb 2003, tobbe wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound9.1.html
Thanks, I noticed that while I was putting some of them into contrib,
where I think they would be more widely appreciated. Austin and I will try
and get most of your
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 18:49, Buchan Milne a écrit :
yOn Sat, 1 Feb 2003, tobbe wrote:
I heve already rebuilt most of my rpms for MAndrake9.1.
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound9.1.html
Thanks, I noticed that while I was putting some of them into contrib,
where I think they would be more
Buchan Milne wrote:
Thanks, I noticed that while I was putting some of them into contrib,
where I think they would be more widely appreciated. Austin and I will try
and get most of your stuff into contrib. Please take a look at the specs
in Mandrake CVS, as there would probably be the odd
On 30 Jan 2003, Austin Acton wrote:
Okay, here's the todo list.
Personally, I suggest Danny work on the kernel.
Why do I always have to do the boring things ;-P
Merging preempt with current cooker is not really a problem. With the new
XFS it is likely that it will work fine. The
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Buchan Milne wrote:
Danny, have you got something to show yet, or is the kernel in club the
best place to start looking?
preempt goes in easily AFAIK tell. lockbreaking not.
wait untill tuesday, I was very busy with work, but monday I take a day
off.
d.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Jan 2003, Austin Acton wrote:
Okay, here's the todo list.
Personally, I suggest Danny work on the kernel.
Why do I always have to do the boring things ;-P
You can do the boring things, plus the rest if you want ... but I think
I would be wasting my time
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Merging preempt with current cooker is not really a problem. With the new
XFS it is likely that it will work fine. The lock-breaking is a different
issue (hasn't been updated since 2.4.18, and there are a few problems with
that patch), perhaps I take a look at the
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
I don't know if you are talking about the a.morton stuff but i have
made a patch *completly unsupported by me or by others mdksoft people*
for the latest cooker kernel, you can grab it from :
http://www.chmouel.com/misc/kernel/low_latency.patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.chmouel.com/misc/kernel/low_latency.patch
yes I was. Thanks!
I hate these unsupported disclaimers btw.
you don't know how hard is it to live when you have done a decision to
support something, it's forever and ever and you die in your stupidity
because you
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 03:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merging preempt with current cooker is not really a problem. With the new
XFS it is likely that it will work fine. The lock-breaking is a different
issue (hasn't been updated since 2.4.18, and there are a few problems with
that patch),
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 04:21, Buchan Milne wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do I always have to do the boring things ;-P
Because you got the skills brotha.
You can do the boring things, plus the rest if you want ... but I think
I would be wasting my time looking at the kernel, don't know
On 31 Jan 2003, Austin Acton wrote:
As Mark pointed out in a separate email, it is not possible.
I'd like to see that mail.
The capabilities patch is a 2 line kernel patch that starts init with
a full set of capabilities (including CAP_SETPCAP, the ability to set
capabilities on other
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 11:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Mark pointed out in a separate email, it is not possible.
I'd like to see that mail.
[SNIP]
It is not possible to run jackd as root and applications as a user, from
what I understand. All jack apps, including jackd, have to be run from
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 11:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, it seems that this is only possible by sacrificing security: do we
want that in the low_lat kernel or not?
Seems like Fernando (at CCRMA) has made a RedHat kernel where the
scheduling and low-latency patches can be applied at boot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Jan 2003, Austin Acton wrote:
What I think is the problem is that they want jackd to be able to
reschedule any program at some moment in time. For this, they would
continuously need the ability to mess with the scheduler.
I would consider this a very
Buchan Milne wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Jan 2003, Austin Acton wrote:
What I think is the problem is that they want jackd to be able to
reschedule any program at some moment in time. For this, they would
continuously need the ability to mess with the scheduler.
I would consider
J. Greenlees wrote:
Depends what your business is I guess ...
Buchan
also would depend on the design ( hardware wise ) of your network.
Which is what I implied ...
if you are running through a *nix router/gateway/firewall from the
server to the extranet, then the intranet ( local )
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 11:38, Buchan Milne wrote:
But does *everything*, or only jackd, need to run as root?
Again, the problem is that jack applications can only connect to jackd
running under the same uid. I tried it.
So if you want to run your application as user, you have to run jackd as
I have noteedit building on my cooker box, but it doesn't build on klama
for some reason, but I will go home now and try it later from home ...
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca
qjackconnectdone ([EMAIL
Okay, here's the todo list.
Personally, I suggest Danny work on the kernel. That's top priority in
my eyes. Gotz is a wizard and already maintains a lot of audio apps, so
maybe he can pick some of these to do. Buchan, you can take some if you
want to, and I'll do the rest.
Top priority, highly
Austin Acton wrote:
Okay, here's the todo list.
Personally, I suggest Danny work on the kernel. That's top priority in
my eyes. Gotz is a wizard and already maintains a lot of audio apps, so
maybe he can pick some of these to do. Buchan, you can take some if you
want to, and I'll do the
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, anyone else who wants to take these, please keep the list of RPMs
intact (ie don't let them be quoted by your mailer) so it stays orderly ...
no kernel stuff, good for me ;-)
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, anyone else who wants to take these, please keep the list of RPMs
intact (ie don't let them be quoted by your mailer) so it stays orderly ...
no kernel stuff, good for me ;-)
You're expected to help Danny get a preempt
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:02:56 +0200
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Austin Acton wrote:
Okay, here's the todo list.
Personally, I suggest Danny work on the kernel. That's top priority in
my eyes. Gotz is a wizard and already maintains a lot of audio apps, so
maybe he can pick some
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca
qjackconnect[EMAIL PROTECTED]
csound
cecelia
rtsynth
swami
muse0.6.0-pre3 (0.8a current) in contrib:
Austin Acton wrote:
I have kalsatools built, but I think it will be better to split it up
into 3 seperate packages (we have enough monolithic KDE packages ;-)).
noteedit requires lilypond 1.7 (I have 1.7.12 building now), so ...
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
On 30. jan 2003 15:03, Austin Acton wrote:
jmax[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jmax is great tool for visual sound editing, but it runs under java
(jre), then i think, that it is impossible to add into contrib/main.
maybe into club member rpms ?
msg88843/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
Top priority, highly requested and on Thac's site
=
ladcca
qjackconnect[EMAIL PROTECTED]
csound
cecelia
rtsynth
swami
muse0.6.0-pre3 (0.8a current) in contrib:
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 15:31, Tibor Pittich wrote:
jmax is great tool for visual sound editing, but it runs under java
(jre), then i think, that it is impossible to add into contrib/main.
maybe into club member rpms ?
Nay, it compiles with gcj by default actually.
Austin
--
93 matches
Mail list logo
