Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-08-23 Thread Brian Tyndall
Luca Berra ha scritto: On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: I agree, it is better to use a subdirectory, and IMHO uw should ship like that by default. Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. Would it be

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-08-23 Thread Brian Tyndall
Buchan Milne ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 magic wrote: Luca Berra wrote: Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. Seconded... Toss UW, and let the person installing mdk make the choice (cyrus or courier).

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-08-23 Thread Brian Tyndall
Luca Berra ha scritto: well, for the .subscription/mailboxlist issue, name can be trivially changed in src/lib-storage/subscription-file/subscription-file.c, and i believe it is based on the root of the mailbox. Yes, in dovecot .subscription is on the MAILSUBDIR directory, i.e. in the dir

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-31 Thread Luca Berra
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:47:13PM +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote: Buchan Milne ha scritto: UW can't be tossed without a migration path. But maybe if someone can test uw-dovecot migration now that it's in contrib. uw - dovecot migration is transparent (but only if users place their mailbox in mail or

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-31 Thread Giuseppe Ghibò
Luca Berra ha scritto: well, for the .subscription/mailboxlist issue, name can be trivially changed in src/lib-storage/subscription-file/subscription-file.c, and i believe it is based on the root of the mailbox. Yes, in dovecot .subscription is on the MAILSUBDIR directory, i.e. in the dir

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-31 Thread Luca Berra
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote: so if we want to be compatible we could change the name to .mailboxlist provide a default_mail_env like mbox:%h/:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u:INDEX=%h/.imapidx As I said for imap using mbox:%h/ as default is a bad, as it would have Yes, the problem is that at the moment it is

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-31 Thread Giuseppe Ghibò
Luca Berra ha scritto: As I said for imap using mbox:%h/ as default is a bad, as it would have Yes, the problem is that at the moment it is set-up this way, so changing it will break something. Current RPM is set to use mbox:%h/Mail/, and I wish to continue to see that setting. The migration

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-30 Thread Levi Ramsey
On Tue Jul 29 23:40 +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote: Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. What secret oaths did UW violate? ;o) -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Take due notice and govern

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-30 Thread Luca Berra
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:11:19AM -0400, Levi Ramsey wrote: On Tue Jul 29 23:40 +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote: Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. What secret oaths did UW violate? ;o) i.e. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 LOGIN-REFERRALS

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-30 Thread magic
Luca Berra wrote: Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. Seconded... Toss UW, and let the person installing mdk make the choice (cyrus or courier). Personally I my vote is for cyrus, but I know others prefer courier. (How about

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 magic wrote: Luca Berra wrote: Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. Seconded... Toss UW, and let the person installing mdk make the choice (cyrus or courier). UW can't be tossed

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-30 Thread Giuseppe Ghibò
Buchan Milne ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 magic wrote: Luca Berra wrote: Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. Seconded... Toss UW, and let the person installing mdk make the choice (cyrus or courier).

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Giuseppe Ghibò wrote: Buchan Milne ha scritto: Furthermore as I said the default (now again) mailsubdir path in uw-imapd which allows to get $HOME system files suggested as mail folders for subscribing looks very unprofessional and insecure...

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-30 Thread Giuseppe Ghibò
Buchan Milne ha scritto: And Outlook Express downloads them all to see if they are mailboxes ;-). That's because they are visible in IMAP and the first time one is connected they are visibile? Is there a rule that forbid folders to be called with names like .ssh or Desktop or .procmailrc? that

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-29 Thread Giuseppe Ghibò
Luca Berra ha scritto: On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: I agree, it is better to use a subdirectory, and IMHO uw should ship like that by default. Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. Would it be

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-27 Thread Luca Berra
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: I agree, it is better to use a subdirectory, and IMHO uw should ship like that by default. Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. Would it be possible to ship dovecot

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-27 Thread Giuseppe Ghibò
Buchan Milne ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stew Benedict wrote: --=-=-= Name: imap Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2002d Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 3mdk Build

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-27 Thread Luca Olivetti
Luca Berra wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: I agree, it is better to use a subdirectory, and IMHO uw should ship like that by default. Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest ocean and left there forever. Ditto. In fact, once in

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-25 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stew Benedict wrote: --=-=-= Name: imap Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2002d Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 3mdk Build Date: Fri Jul 25

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-25 Thread Stew Benedict
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stew Benedict wrote: - add patch17, mailsubdir in $HOME/Mail (Giuseppe Ghibò) Is this wise? I have patched our own imap package that we run on our mail server to put mail in $HOME/mail, but I

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imap-2002d-3mdk

2003-07-25 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stew Benedict wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: Possibly not. Guiseppe convinced me there was an issue with various clients creating a variety of mail folder arrangements under $HOME, so it seemed a good idea to at least centralize