Luca Berra ha scritto:
well, for the .subscription/mailboxlist issue, name can be trivially
changed in src/lib-storage/subscription-file/subscription-file.c, and i
believe it is based on the root of the mailbox.
Yes, in dovecot .subscription is on the MAILSUBDIR directory,
i.e. in the dir specifie
Buchan Milne ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
magic wrote:
Luca Berra wrote:
Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
ocean and left there forever.
Seconded... Toss UW, and let the person installing mdk make the choice
(cyrus or courier).
Luca Berra ha scritto:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
I agree, it is better to use a subdirectory, and IMHO uw should ship
like that by default.
Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
ocean and left there forever.
Would it be possib
Luca Berra ha scritto:
As I said for imap using mbox:%h/ as default is a bad, as it would have
Yes, the problem is that at the moment it is set-up this way, so
changing it will break something.
Current RPM is set to use mbox:%h/Mail/, and I wish to continue to
see that setting.
The migration too
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
so if we want to be compatible we could
change the name to .mailboxlist
provide a default_mail_env like
mbox:%h/:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u:INDEX=%h/.imapidx
As I said for imap using mbox:%h/ as default is a bad, as it would have
Yes, the problem is that at the moment it is set-
Luca Berra ha scritto:
well, for the .subscription/mailboxlist issue, name can be trivially
changed in src/lib-storage/subscription-file/subscription-file.c, and i
believe it is based on the root of the mailbox.
Yes, in dovecot .subscription is on the MAILSUBDIR directory,
i.e. in the dir specifie
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:47:13PM +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
Buchan Milne ha scritto:
UW can't be tossed without a migration path. But maybe if someone can
test uw->dovecot migration now that it's in contrib.
uw -> dovecot migration is transparent (but only if users
place their mailbox in "mail"
Buchan Milne ha scritto:
And Outlook Express downloads them all to see if they are mailboxes ;-).
That's because they are visible in IMAP and the first time one
is connected they are visibile? Is there a rule that forbid
folders to be called with names like .ssh or Desktop or .procmailrc?
that th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
> Buchan Milne ha scritto:
>
> Furthermore as I said the default (now "" again) mailsubdir path in
> uw-imapd which allows to get $HOME system files suggested as mail
> folders for
> subscribing looks very unprofessional and inse
Buchan Milne ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
magic wrote:
Luca Berra wrote:
Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
ocean and left there forever.
Seconded... Toss UW, and let the person installing mdk make the choice
(cyrus or courier).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
magic wrote:
> Luca Berra wrote:
>
>> Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
>> ocean and left there forever.
>
> Seconded... Toss UW, and let the person installing mdk make the choice
> (cyrus or courier).
>
UW can't
Luca Berra wrote:
Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
ocean and left there forever.
Seconded... Toss UW, and let the person installing mdk make the choice
(cyrus or courier).
Personally I my vote is for cyrus, but I know others prefer courier.
(How about m
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:11:19AM -0400, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Tue Jul 29 23:40 +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
>Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
>ocean and left there forever.
What secret oaths did UW violate? ;o)
i.e.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 LOGIN-REFERRAL
On Tue Jul 29 23:40 +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
> >Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
> >ocean and left there forever.
What secret oaths did UW violate? ;o)
--
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take due notice and gove
Luca Berra ha scritto:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
I agree, it is better to use a subdirectory, and IMHO uw should ship
like that by default.
Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
ocean and left there forever.
Would it be possib
Luca Berra wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
I agree, it is better to use a subdirectory, and IMHO uw should ship
like that by default.
Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
ocean and left there forever.
Ditto. In fact, once in
Buchan Milne ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stew Benedict wrote:
--=-=-=
Name: imap Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 2002d Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 3mdk Build Dat
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
I agree, it is better to use a subdirectory, and IMHO uw should ship
like that by default.
Imho uw should be ditched, shot in the head, casted in the the deepest
ocean and left there forever.
Would it be possible to ship dovecot (http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stew Benedict wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Possibly not. Guiseppe convinced me there was an issue with various
> clients creating a variety of mail folder arrangements under $HOME, so it
> seemed a good idea to at least central
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Buchan Milne wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stew Benedict wrote:
> >
> > - add patch17, mailsubdir in $HOME/Mail (Giuseppe Ghibò)
> >
>
> Is this wise? I have patched our own imap package that we run on our
> mail server to put mail in $HOME/ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stew Benedict wrote:
> --=-=-=
> Name: imap Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 2002d Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 3mdk Build Date: Fri Jul 25
01:0
21 matches
Mail list logo