see bottom
--- Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21 Sep 2002, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:41, Digital Wokan wrote:
> > > I just remembered after sending this that they
> don't officially support
> > > contribs anyway, so why be worried about what
> shows up t
On 21 Sep 2002, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:41, Digital Wokan wrote:
> > I just remembered after sending this that they don't officially support
> > contribs anyway, so why be worried about what shows up there, as long as it
> > isn't under an incompatible license.
>
> Becau
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:41, Digital Wokan wrote:
> I just remembered after sending this that they don't officially support
> contribs anyway, so why be worried about what shows up there, as long as it
> isn't under an incompatible license.
Because of appearances. It's in some sense linked to M
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:31, Digital Wokan wrote:
> Mandrake is right to move it to PLF from a business point of view (and let's
> face it, we all want to be paid for our work, no matter what that work is).
> Of course, adding PLF to the list of software install sites for URPMI during
> the us
I just remembered after sending this that they don't officially support
contribs anyway, so why be worried about what shows up there, as long as it
isn't under an incompatible license.
On Thursday 19 September 2002 20:31, Digital Wokan wrote:
> Mandrake is right to move it to PLF from a busines
Mandrake is right to move it to PLF from a business point of view (and let's
face it, we all want to be paid for our work, no matter what that work is).
Of course, adding PLF to the list of software install sites for URPMI during
the use of RPMDrake or whatever the GUI version of the software
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 09:46, Guy.Bormann wrote:
> Is it true after all what they say about British men? :-)))
> *jumping in my flamesuit*
Huh? What's that? That we enjoy marmite? That we discuss the weather a
lot? That we're not terribly good at cricket?
--
adamw
Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 20:00, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>
>
>>[Contrib-RPM]
>>
>>--=-=-=
>>Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable)
>>Version : 0.1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
>>Release : 1mdk
On 19 Sep 2002, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 20:00, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > [Contrib-RPM]
> > Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable)
[snip]
> > Description :
> > Hot-babe is a small graphical utility which display the system activity
> > i
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:20, Levi Ramsey wrote:
> This thread from one of the Debian ML's is the classic in this subject:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200203/msg00829.html
They seem to have been discussing a package which actually had some use,
though.
My argument
On Fri Sep 20 0:45 +0200, Philippe Coulonges wrote:
> I'm happy with that, your honor.
> Could you please also remove bugsquish which hurts my animist religious
> conceptions, bzflag as proning military violence is certainly more
> questionable than any drawn young female, defenguin and xbill t
Le Jeudi 19 Septembre 2002 23:02, Nelson Bartley a écrit :
> LOL! Well Said.
>
> Whoever said that package had to leave CONTRIBS shoulda have been shot
> (But grats to Guillaume for reacting so quickly). Contribs is there for
> a reason. It's not part of the "standard" distribution, and god forbid
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 06:44, Digital Wokan wrote:
> While this may not get my grandmother to use Linux, I'll bet it might
> convince my brother and a couple more friends at work. :)
No worries. Grab the RPMS from the main distro, add hot-babe and anything else
you like from PLF, and roll your own
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 05:23, rcc wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2002 17:03:18 -0400
> there's more (real) skin to be seen in advertising and newspaper
> booths around here.
I would have thought paper was a more appropriate medium _and_ far easier to
obtain. (-:
Cheers; Leon
LOL! Well Said.
Whoever said that package had to leave CONTRIBS shoulda have been shot
(But grats to Guillaume for reacting so quickly). Contribs is there for
a reason. It's not part of the "standard" distribution, and god forbid,
should you install all 4.7 GB of OS w/ ALL the contribs you might
Le Jeudi 19 Septembre 2002 23:27, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:44, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > I see absolutely *no* need to turn Mandrake into a porn distributor.
> >
> > It could eventually be qualified of bad taste, but not of porn. Have you
> > only had a look at home
Adam Williamson wrote, On 9/19/2002 5:27 PM:
>On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:44, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>
>
>
>>>I see absolutely *no* need to turn Mandrake into a porn distributor.
>>>
>>>
>>It could eventually be qualified of bad taste, but not of porn. Have you only
>>had a look at homepag
While this may not get my grandmother to use Linux, I'll bet it might
convince my brother and a couple more friends at work. :)
Guillaume Rousse wrote, On 9/19/2002 3:00 PM:
>[Contrib-RPM]
>
>--=-=-=
>Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable)
>Version : 0.1
Finally a utility that has some usefullnes and isn't a total waste of Hard
drive space like such utils as GCC, KDE, gkrellm, etc... :)
Thanks Guillaume - now I'm going to have to write a program that does a
while(1) for a few mins and put it in my crontab. hehe
On Thursday 19 September 2002 03
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:44, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > I see absolutely *no* need to turn Mandrake into a porn distributor.
> It could eventually be qualified of bad taste, but not of porn. Have you only
> had a look at homepage ?
>
> Anyway, it has already been wiped out from contribs, and t
On 19 Sep 2002 17:03:18 -0400
David Dreggors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I personally think the last remark about porn was WAY too harsh. This
> may not be what every person wants running on thier desktop but it is
> definitely NOT porn either. I downloaded it just for the comical
> effect and t
I personally think the last remark about porn was WAY too harsh. This
may not be what every person wants running on thier desktop but it is
definitely NOT porn either. I downloaded it just for the comical effect
and to have somethig else M$ doesn't have. I may only check it out once
or I may keep
Le Jeudi 19 Septembre 2002 21:31, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 20:00, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > [Contrib-RPM]
> >
> > --=-=-=
> > Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not
> > relocateable) Version : 0.1.0 Vendor:
> > Mandra
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 20:00, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> [Contrib-RPM]
>
> --=-=-=
> Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 0.1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk Build Date: Fri Sep 20
On Thu Sep 19 21:00 +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Hot-babe is a small graphical utility which display the system activity
> in a very special way. When the CPU is idle, it displays a dressed girl,
> and when the activity goes up, as the temperature increases, the girl
> begins to undress, to fi
25 matches
Mail list logo