Kirjoitit viestissäsi (lähetysaika Sunnuntai 05 Lokakuu 2003 17:28):
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 14:55, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> > Jos Hulzink kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Sunnuntai 05 Lokakuu 2003
> >
> > 15:30):
> > > This is not a matter of depending on gaim, this is a matter of willing
> > >
> Kirjoitit viestissäsi (lähetysaika Sunnuntai 05 Lokakuu 2003 17:28):
>> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 14:55, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>> > Jos Hulzink kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Sunnuntai 05 Lokakuu
>> 2003
>> > today gaim, tomorrow OpenOffice.org final..., and then ...
>> >
>> > and suddenly the
On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 17:05, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> > > People will start saying: "... but you updated that package ...",
> > > and "this package adds or modifies this or that feature that is
> > > needed... if we don't have it I consider it's broken... and we can't
> > > have a "broken" distrib.
Jos Hulzink kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Sunnuntai 05 Lokakuu 2003
19:04):
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 17:05, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> > > > People will start saying: "... but you updated that package ...",
> > > > and "this package adds or modifies this or that feature that is
> > > > needed...
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 17:05, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>> > > People will start saying: "... but you updated that package ...",
>> and "this package adds or modifies this or that feature that is
>> needed... if we don't have it I consider it's broken... and we
>> can't have a "broken" distrib..."
>>
On Sunday 05 October 2003 15:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > If software is buggy, you can do three things IMHO:
> Sorry, but where is the bug report for this buggy software?
> This is not a bug (to my understanding), but a feature
> enhancement (if we're talking about gaim).
If by "feature enhan
> On Sunday 05 October 2003 15:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > If software is buggy, you can do three things IMHO:
>> Sorry, but where is the bug report for this buggy software?
>> This is not a bug (to my understanding), but a feature
>> enhancement (if we're talking about gaim).
>
> If by "feat
On Sunday 05 October 2003 16:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, when we couldn't connect to a samba (2.0.6) server from a
> Windows 2000 machine, did we isssue an update to 2.0.7 for all
> the current releases?
Had connecting from win2k worked in previous Samba releases? I
don't think it had.
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > Ok, I must admit, I missed the first time wizzard on 9.2 (and was not a
> > clubmember yet when I installed 9.1), for X crashes badly with my dual
> > screen setup. (A known bug in the Matrox driver) After I finished
> > hacking, the first time wizzard has
