> "borsenkow" == Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
borsenkow> What was the actual reason for that?
borsenkow> - secure kernel is i586 no highmem no SMP now.
now back to i586/SMP.
Reason is that people use secure kernel in firewalls, and people have
firewalls that are Pentiums wit
> "franco" == Franco Silvestro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
franco> visible also in /boot/config-2.4.18-12mdksmp
franco> visible also in /boot/config-2.4.18-12mdksecure
franco> visible also in /boot/config-2.4.18-12mdkenterprise
franco> all have :
franco> [...]
franco> # CONFIG_SMP is not set
Ural Khassanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When called from root, pinfo tries to use nonexistent group nobody.
> To fix: s/SAFE-GROUP=nobody/SAFE-GROUP=nogroup/ in etc/pinforc
2mdk is on the way, just wait :-)
thanks for the bug report.
--
"il a ete brule au 28e degre" (the naheulbeuk witch)
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:17:43AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > "brian" == Brian J Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> brian> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:00:19PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> --=-=-=
> >> Name: kernel-2.4.18.10mdk Relocations: (not relocateable)
> >>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:52:40AM -0700, Todd Lyons wrote:
>
> All it's doing is dropping you into the kernel debugger. From the man
> page:
A! You see, I knew the 2 blinking LEDs was meaningful.
> So the command "go" should restart execution.
But what is interesting is that there is no
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>>falling back to bttv-0.7.9x ...
>>>
>>Was this a serious solution?
>>
>>It is unacceptable. If bttv-0.8.33 caused problems with prior
>>kernels then I could understand it but it hasn't -- I have been
>>using bttv-0.8.x f
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > falling back to bttv-0.7.9x ...
>
> Was this a serious solution?
>
> It is unacceptable. If bttv-0.8.33 caused problems with prior
> kernels then I could understand it but it hasn't -- I have been
> using bttv-0.8.x for my last half dozen MDK ke
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:36:09AM +0200, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
> falling back to bttv-0.7.9x ...
Was this a serious solution?
It is unacceptable. If bttv-0.8.33 caused problems with prior kernels
then I could understand it but it hasn't -- I have been using
bttv-0.8.x for my last half doze
"David D. Huff Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Was this kernel hidden away for some reason? Will there be a
> re-release of the 2.4.17-1 MOSIX kernel from Mandrake?
yes there'll
> Will Mandrake continue to release MOSIX kernels
yes. but for now, userland tools're broken due to missing files
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:42:53 +0100
"Oden Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frederic Crozat writes:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:26:37 +0100, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 02:27:44 +0100 (CET) Juan Quintela
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> --=-=-=
> >>>
Frederic Crozat writes:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:26:37 +0100, Charles A Edwards wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 02:27:44 +0100 (CET) Juan Quintela
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> --=-=-=
>>> Name: kernel-2.4.18.7mdk Relocations: (not
>>> relocateable) Version : 1
> "oden" == Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
oden> [root@oden RPMS]# rpm -Uvh kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
oden> kernel-smp-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
oden> Preparing...### [100%]
oden> 1:kernel-2.4.16.10mdk###
Hello,
Sorry, forgot to add:
I am using kernel-2.4.13-11mdk and apmd-3.0final-26mdk
Owen
Hmm.. I'm running 2.4.13-2mdksmp and still get freezes in the night :-(.
I'm always in X, and haven't been able to see if they are panics or not.. (I
started a thread a few days ago on it, discovered that my CPU might have been
overheating due to a dust-clogged air intake, cleaned it, and ha
Eugenio Diaz wrote:
> Have anyone else had any problems with 2.4.13-6mdk?
>
> I have had 3 kernel panics since I upgraded last night!
>
> one when killing X with CTRL-ALT-BS
> one when running a dump backup
> and one when simply login in gdm
>
> I was able to see the output of one of them, and it
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> > Ok, will update after -5mdk (being compiled).
>
> OK. No hurry. I have compiled 0.5.12 (ALSA is one of the really nice
> drivers that compile outside the kernel tree very neat
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Ok, will update after -5mdk (being compiled).
OK. No hurry. I have compiled 0.5.12 (ALSA is one of the really nice
drivers that compile outside the kernel tree very neatly) and it does
not fix my problem. ~sigh~
> because at
On Friday 21 September 2001 17:51, Claudio wrote:
> I'm trying to use it with today's cooker, but I got a stack error during
> boot, and system hangs just after "press I to enter interactive startup"...
> "mounting proc filesystem", both with devfs=[mount,nomount].
> It's a 2.4.7 kernel, but on ww
"pablito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> recently building a kernel (bzImage) crashes at the same place. the script
> reads libraries having to do with raid disks (about ten lines from the
> beginning of the script) and then crashes with an error message. This has
> happened on various versions
recently building a kernel (bzImage) crashes at the same place. the script
reads libraries having to do with raid disks (about ten lines from the
beginning of the script) and then crashes with an error message. This has
happened on various versions of the kernel and happens whether or not I have
Submitted 09-Jul-01 by Brian J. Murrell:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:14:44AM -0700, Randy Welch wrote:
>> Any plans for kernel updates for the 8.0 distribution considering all
>> the various issues (ThinkPad mouse and aic_7xxx) drivers?
> IPSEC in 2.4.3-20mdk not working. In fact it was not wor
On Tue Jul 24, 2001 at 11:19:58AM -0700, Harry wrote:
> > I had to put a cooker kernel on my production boxes to get a working
> > IPSEC.
>
> Which still doesn't answer the question - will there be kernel upgrades for
> Mandrake 8.0?
>
> I believe there should be.
This question has been answer
On 7/9/01 7:07 AM, "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had to put a cooker kernel on my production boxes to get a working
> IPSEC.
Which still doesn't answer the question - will there be kernel upgrades for
Mandrake 8.0?
I believe there should be.
Harry
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:14:44AM -0700, Randy Welch wrote:
> Any plans for kernel updates for the 8.0 distribution considering all
> the various issues (ThinkPad mouse and aic_7xxx) drivers?
IPSEC in 2.4.3-20mdk not working. In fact it was not working for many
(most? all?) releases between 2.4
On ÷ÏÓËÒÅÓÅÎØÅ 08 éÀÌØ 2001 00:33, Ural Khassanov wrote:
>Subject: kernel-2.4.9 rebuilding notes
oops, read kernel-2.4.5-9.
On Saturday 02 June 2001 18:02, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > "peter" == Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> peter> I'm using kernel-2.4.4-6mdk in cooker and don't have this problem -
> peter> but I couldn't use cooker's lilo - I chrooted /cooker from 8.0 and
> peter> ran lilo from
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> This is true and freeswan works in the 2.4.5-1mdk release (yay).
> iptables does not however, rendering 2.4.5-1mdk useless for a gateway
> or any insecure environment. See other thread on this list regarding
> this issue.
iptables 1.2.2 is needed fo
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:14:53PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> new one, the last one was reported to not work with current kernels.
This is true and freeswan works in the 2.4.5-1mdk release (yay).
iptables does not however, rendering 2.4.5-1mdk useless for a gateway
or any insecure environme
> "peter" == Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi
peter> I'm using kernel-2.4.4-6mdk in cooker and don't have this problem - but I
peter> couldn't use cooker's lilo - I chrooted /cooker from 8.0 and ran lilo from
peter> there.
peter> I have a Promise UDMA100 controller, and cooker'
> "eugenio" == Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
eugenio> --- Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Eugenio Diaz wrote:
>> >
>> > > After upgrading to kernel-2.4.4-6mdk, the boot process halts to single
>> > > user just after
Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > yep fixed in 2.4.5-ac2
>
> Is this already in cooker? I don't see it on the mirrors.
noip.. juan ?
--- Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Eugenio Diaz wrote:
> >
> > > After upgrading to kernel-2.4.4-6mdk, the boot process halts to single
> > > user just after the "Checking file systems" message. It complains about
> > > filesystem bei
On Monday 28 May 2001 16:27, Eugenio Diaz wrote:
> Eugenio Diaz wrote:
> > After upgrading to kernel-2.4.4-6mdk, the boot process halts to single
> > user just after the "Checking file systems" message. It complains about
> > filesystem being mounted; which I traced back to fsck ... Anyway, after
Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eugenio Diaz wrote:
>
> > After upgrading to kernel-2.4.4-6mdk, the boot process halts to single
> > user just after the "Checking file systems" message. It complains about
> > filesystem being mounted; which I traced back to fsck ... Anyway, after
> >
Eugenio Diaz wrote:
> After upgrading to kernel-2.4.4-6mdk, the boot process halts to single
> user just after the "Checking file systems" message. It complains about
> filesystem being mounted; which I traced back to fsck ... Anyway, after
> a few minutes of troubleshooting I determined that the
> "magallon" == J A Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
magallon> On 05.10 Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> BTW, ac6 has 6.1.12, not 6.1.13.
>>
magallon> Alan's announcement in lkml:
magallon> 2.4.4-ac6
magallon> o Revert dead swap patch pending fixes(Dave Miller)
magallon> o
On 05.10 Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> BTW, ac6 has 6.1.12, not 6.1.13.
>
Alan's announcement in lkml:
2.4.4-ac6
o Revert dead swap patch pending fixes(Dave Miller)
o Allow arch specific writeproc/DMA for IDE (Bjorn Wesen)
o Move to aic7xxx 6.1.13
On 05.09 Juan Quintela wrote:
> > "jürgen" == Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> jürgen> # rpm -i kernel-2.4.3-26mdk.i586.rpm
> jürgen> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
> jürgen> /lib/modules/2.4.3-26mdk/kernel/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx.o.gz
> jürgen> depmod: *** Unresolve
> "magallon" == J A Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
magallon> On 05.09 Juan Quintela wrote:
>> > "jürgen" == Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> jürgen> # rpm -i kernel-2.4.3-26mdk.i586.rpm
>> jürgen> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
>> jürgen> /lib/modules/2.4.3-26
> "jürgen" == Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jürgen> # rpm -i kernel-2.4.3-26mdk.i586.rpm
jürgen> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
jürgen> /lib/modules/2.4.3-26mdk/kernel/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx.o.gz
jürgen> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
jürgen> /lib/modules/2.4.3-26m
Hello Mark,
No it was working fine until I applied the ext2 and kernel 2.4.3-25
update today. I was running the 2.4.3-23 kernel.
During the boot it see the card and detects all the drives and cdroms
on it.
Thursday, May 03, 2001, 9:49:31 PM, you wrote:
MG>
MG> Note: Especially w/ the 2940UW
Note: Especially w/ the 2940UW make sure you have the correct
combination of firmware and aic7xxx(_old if needed). Have u had
trouble booting to root=/dev/sd(xn) b/c it doesn't recognize adapter?
On clean inst from cooker the kernel (243-[23-25]) does not recognize
my 2940uw on boot and i ha
Jürgen Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CONFIG_TMPFS
> Tmpfs is a file system which keeps all files in virtual memory.
> [...]
>
> CONFIG_RAMFS
> Ramfs is a file system which keeps all files in RAM. It allows
> read and write access.
>
> It is more of an programming example than
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Cmouel, how did you manage to compile those rpm's?
> It compiled after the following patch was applied:
i did it without any problems.
--
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
--Chmouel
"Geoffrey Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> looks like that AC broke the 2.2.16 kernel after some security fixes, can we
> apply the following fixs see:
for sure...
--
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San Diego, CA USA --Chmouel
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Chmouel finished his first 2.2.16 patching nightmare. Now he needs test,
well wait a new kernel soon with the pcmcia modules :p
--
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
Pasadena, CA USA
Ivan Kerekes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A couple of problem with kernel-2.2.15-0.9mdk:
> The modules goes into /lib/modules/0.5.3-0.9mdk (easy to fix with a rename);
yes fixed thanks, i upload a new kernel this night.
--
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
Pasadena,
Chomouel
A couple of problem with kernel-2.2.15-0.9mdk:
The modules goes into /lib/modules/0.5.3-0.9mdk (easy to fix with a rename);
[root@cs5884-a RPMS]# rpm -Uvh kernel-doc-2.2.15-0.9mdk.i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
netscape-common = 4.72-1mdk is needed by netscape-navigator-4.7
Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> have your guys implemented the patch for the ls120 diskette drive in this
> kernel? (using the ide-floppy module)
no.
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Chmouel
have your guys implemented the patch for the ls120 diskette drive in this
kernel? (using the ide-floppy module)
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > SOURCES himself, just so making it build is easier. Better than having
> > to patch the spec
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SOURCES himself, just so making it build is easier. Better than having
> to patch the spec file every time a new kernel comes out methinks.
ok, i currently try to find a solution.
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> You know the problems, freeswan is not exportable i can't do a kernel
> from here(US) and export to another countrib.
Actually I think technically, under the new US export regs, it is
exportable. I belive t
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> System.map
$ egrep best_mem System.map*
System.map-2.2.15-0.7mdkfb:c01dfd14 T best_memcpy
System.map-2.2.15-0.7mdkfb:c01dfda4 T best_memset
System.map-2.2.15-0.7mdkfb:c01e0030 t best_memcpy_final
System.map-
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> > > I also want to bring up again the problem with kernel-2.2.15-0.7mdk not
> > > properly exporting best_memset for some reason. I had to revert to the
> > > 2.2.14 kernel to get vmware working. One of it's kernel modules
> > >
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > lmkml?
>
> linux-kernel mailiing list :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That was what I thought you meant but could not get "linux-kernel" out
of lmk. Probably a type. No matter. Perhaps I will go bother them.
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> > I also want to bring up again the problem with kernel-2.2.15-0.7mdk not
> > properly exporting best_memset for some reason. I had to revert to the
> > 2.2.14 kernel to get vmware working. One of it's kernel modules
> > complains about best_memset not being available o
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did anything happen here? Was the kernel spec file updated to deal with
> versionized Provides: tags?
I did what axalon has told me to do :
Provides: kernel = %{version}, kernel-smp-fb
with the ,
> I also want to bring up again the problem wi
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Axalon Bloodstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Give me another two hours and i will have a full explination.
> > But it does accept 'Provides: kernel = %{version},' I'm checking
> > 'Provides: kernel,' now
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> from the quill of Pablo Saratxaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > The problem is that the versions don't work with provides given by
> > Provides: line (that is they only work for package names).
>
> H. That seems l
from the quill of Pablo Saratxaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The problem is that the versions don't work with provides given by
> Provides: line (that is they only work for package names).
H. That seems like a shortsight.
> You know however the it is a correct ve
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> > Ugh! Did my changes for freeswan and %pre/post scripts not make it
> in
> > time?
>
>
> i think i did this but forget to noticed in the changelog, you t
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > do problems with DrakX. Ask pixel :).
> Pixel? What was the problem with it? Just so I understand.
The DrakX code try to get the current kernel with /boot/vmlinuz, if
kernel-linus is installed after kernel-classic the guys will reboot
with the
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > writes:
> >
> > > Damn! I liked this! What is/was the problem with it? OK, how
> > about a
> > > compromise?
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> > Damn! I liked this! What is/was the problem with it? OK, how
> about a
> > compromise? How about having %post look for a script, maybe in
>
> do probl
101 - 164 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
