Hi!
This is on cooker as of yesterday.
Reiserfs partitions was not useable for hd install via
cooker of 2003-08-10 from both isolinux/alt0 and isolinux/alt1 .
ext3 partitions worked. The reiserfs error was something like "no useful
partition on drive"
best regards
Keld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
maxxik wrote:
> TP> there is location of patch:
> TP> ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/quota-2.4.20
> TP> which is officially recommended at oficially reiserfs faq. if i can,
> TP> i vote for including it into mandrake kernel after un
TP> there is location of patch:
TP> ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/quota-2.4.20
TP> which is officially recommended at oficially reiserfs faq. if i can,
TP> i vote for including it into mandrake kernel after unfreezing distro.
TP> of course, directory named as testing, but qa t
On 14. mar 2003, 18:03, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> Quota on reiserfs is possible with a patch on kernel, suse include it.
>
> But is it a good to provide this ? (it is not support by kernel team
> for 2.4).
yes, quota support under reiserfs isn't included into plain 2.4 kernel,
but supermount isn'
Le Vendredi 14 Mars 2003 18:51, Buchan Milne a écrit :
> and assumed that the current implementation did not allow quota to work
> as a normal user ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ quota
Disk quotas for user thauvin (uid 5574):
Filesystem blocks quota limit grace files quota limit
gr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> Le Vendredi 14 Mars 2003 17:52, Buchan Milne a écrit :
>
>>plus normal users can check their quota,
>>(apparently not possible on ext3, maybe also not on reiser).
>
>
> Sorry ??
> User can check quota over nfs on ext3. you only
Le Vendredi 14 Mars 2003 17:52, Buchan Milne a écrit :
> plus normal users can check their quota,
> (apparently not possible on ext3, maybe also not on reiser).
Sorry ??
User can check quota over nfs on ext3. you only need to nsflock services.
Quota on reiserfs is possible with a patch on kernel,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
maxxik wrote:
> Hi ppl !
>
> I wanna ask - there will be reiserfs quota support in new MDK 9.1
> release kernel ?
AFAIK, no (see man mount, no quota option listed for reiser). Use a real
FS, like XFS ;-).
IMHO, ReiserFS is usually useful for fi
Hi ppl !
I wanna ask - there will be reiserfs quota support in new MDK 9.1
release kernel ?
WBR, maxx
Nicolas gomez wrote:
>Hi! I want to delete this ext2 partition and replace it for a ReiserFs partition with
>a 2.4.8 kernel on linux-mandrake 8.1...
>
>The things I want to know is the compatibility among reiser and other partitions like
>Fat16, 32, ext2, NFS, etc, etc.
>Also I wanna know your
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Nicolas gomez wrote:
> Hi! I want to delete this ext2 partition and replace it for a ReiserFs partition
>with a 2.4.8 kernel on linux-mandrake 8.1...
>
> The things I want to know is the compatibility among reiser and other partitions
>like Fat16, 32, ext2, NFS, etc, etc.
>
Nicolas gomez wrote:
>Hi! I want to delete this ext2 partition and replace it for a ReiserFs partition with
>a 2.4.8 kernel on linux-mandrake 8.1...
>
1) THIS IS NOT COOKER! DONT POST TO COOKER LIST!
>
>The things I want to know is the compatibility among reiser and other partitions like
>Fat
Hi! I want to delete this ext2 partition and replace it for a ReiserFs partition with
a 2.4.8 kernel on linux-mandrake 8.1...
The things I want to know is the compatibility among reiser and other partitions like
Fat16, 32, ext2, NFS, etc, etc.
Also I wanna know your opinion or experiences of Re
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 13:11, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
>>> Reiserfs doesn't need to be checked
>> normally no, but if you put a /forcefsck is should check it
> [root@cooker root]# ll /sbin/fsck.reiserfs
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 Sep 17 10:49
> /sbin/fsck.reiserfs -> ../bin/
> >
> > Reiserfs doesn't need to be checked unless your computer locks up. I
ran
> it
> > when I was using 7.2.
> >
> > Matthew D. Pitts
> >
> >
>
> normally no, but if you put a /forcefsck is should check it
[root@cooker root]# ll /sbin/fsck.reiserfs
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11
Jorg,
Reiserfs doesn't need to be checked unless your computer locks up. I ran it
when I was using 7.2.
Matthew D. Pitts
- Original Message -
From: "Jorg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:47 PM
Subject: [Cooker]
when you do a
/ filesystem is reiserfs
touch /forcefsck
the reboot, it does a filesystem check on the other filesystems, but does
nothing on the rootfs. using -22mdk initscripts
never runs a check on / filesystem
Jorg
On Monday 24 September 2001 01:56, you, Borsenkow Andrej, wrote:
> o Clean up reiserfs flags usage (Nikita Danilov)
> o Fix reiserfs disk leak on crash case (Nikita Danilov)
> o Fix reiserfs mount option handling (Nikita Danilov)
> o Cosmetic reiserfs changes (Nikita Danilov)
Now if they'd just
Sounds sweet:
o Clean up reiserfs flags usage (Nikita Danilov)
o Fix reiserfs disk leak on crash case (Nikita Danilov)
o Fix reiserfs mount option handling (Nikita Danilov)
o Cosmetic reiserfs changes (Nikita Danilov)
Can anyone tell me what version of ReiserFS went into RC1 of 8.1?
Haven't pulled it and was wondering about file size limitations. Maybe
ext3 would be a better choice.
Greg
Ainsi parlait Tom Berger :
> On Aug 27 2001, 11:58 +, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Does anyone know of an undelete tool or mean for ReiserFS ? I just had a
> > stupid typo in a shell command :-(
> > --
> > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > GPG key http://bohm.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgke
On Aug 27 2001, 11:58 +, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Does anyone know of an undelete tool or mean for ReiserFS ? I just had a
> stupid typo in a shell command :-(
> --
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GPG key http://bohm.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
---end quoted text---
>From t
Does anyone know of an undelete tool or mean for ReiserFS ? I just had a
stupid typo in a shell command :-(
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://bohm.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
Grégoire Colbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>Should I disable writeback mode?
> >>
> > safer but slower on writes :-)
> > if you want, put a hdparm -W 0 /dev/hd[XYZ] in your /etc/rc.d/rc.local
>
> "man hdparm" says that write-caching is disabled by default.
well it should but there has bee
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Should I disable writeback mode?
>>
>
> safer but slower on writes :-)
> if you want, put a hdparm -W 0 /dev/hd[XYZ] in your /etc/rc.d/rc.local
"man hdparm" says that write-caching is disabled by default.
Grégoire
Fresh install of Beta 8.1scary
chose recommended and couldn't get past the partitioning on the install.
'an error occurred'
reiserfs formatting of hda7 failed.
I have installed and reinstalled many times, but never have seen this message.
?
-michael-
SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > about "reiserfs ate my /var partition", note that
> > ext3 writeback mode where
> > metadata only are journalized, you can still have
> > old date or mix of old and new
> > data in your files on remount after crash.
> > ext3 ordered mode should be safe
does the eide disk problem also affect reiserfs?
Should I disable writeback mode?
--- Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> about "reiserfs ate my /var partition", note that
> ext3 writeback mode where
> metadata only are journalized, you can still have
> old date or mix of old and new
>
as far as eide hard drives is there not a bios
setting to control that?
--- Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Nima S. Panahi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have had mixed results. I tried to keep my mouth
> shut during the whole
> > thread, but I can't any longer. I experim
I have had mixed results. I tried to keep my mouth shut during the whole
thread, but I can't any longer. I experimented with Reiser since 7.2. All
it did was each my paritions and I think the VIA bug has something to do
with it. But this was not a rare occation, it ate my /home and /var
multiple t
t: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:32 PM
> To: Mandrake
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS
>
> On 8/5/01 11:06 PM, "Borsenkow Andrej"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Eh? It is default file system suggested by 8.0 install. What else do
you
> > mean under
On 8/6/01 2:04 AM, "Stefan Siegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since then I don't trust ReiserFS => I wouldn't install it
> currently on a critical system, only on playgounds for data loosing ...
Depending on the nature of your electrical failure, no data is really safe
if it is preceded by a s
On 8/5/01 11:06 PM, "Borsenkow Andrej" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Eh? It is default file system suggested by 8.0 install. What else do you
> mean under "default filesystem"?
Hmmm... On my disk, ext2 is the default filesystems chosen by standard and
expert install. On Expert I need to manually
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
cooker-owner@linux-maSubject: Re: [Cooker] Re
Folks, you all miss the point. Nobody argues that ReiserFS has been used
with success by many people. The problem is that if something goes
wrong, Reiser gives very few chances to recover compared with other file
systems (*especially* non-journaling).
-andrej
On Monday 06 August 2001 10:09 am, you wrote:
> On Mon Aug 06, 2001 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:
>
> This is really odd... I've been using reiserfs almost exclusively
> since 7.2 on all my machines. The only partition that I don't use it
> for is /var because I run qmail on all my m
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 11:09:45 -0600
Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Aug 06, 2001 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:
>
>
> This is really odd... I'v
During the bombing raid on Mon, 6 Aug 2001 11:09:45 -0600, Vincent Danen was
heard mumbling in fear:
> On Mon Aug 06, 2001 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:
>
> > > > thesis on it ... Since then I don't trust ReiserFS => I wouldn't install it
> > > > currently on a critical system,
I have had the same good luck with ReiserFS myself
and I use it on all my systems and my clients systems
starting with mandrake 7.2
-John
- Original Message -
From: "Andre Anneck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:24 A
ay, August 06, 2001 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var
This is really odd... I've been using reiserfs almost exclusively
since 7.2 on all my machines. The only partition that I don't use it
for is /var because I run qmail on all my machines and there was an
issue wit
[Snip]
I am using reiserfs since 7.2, including /var. And I never had any
problems with it. And we had more than one powerfailure ;). I am so
confident with it that
I sometimes just click on reset if the system seems to be hanging
Everytime it came up perfectly clear. From my expirience I wo
On Mon Aug 06, 2001 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:
> > > thesis on it ... Since then I don't trust ReiserFS => I wouldn't install it
> > > currently on a critical system, only on playgounds for data loosing ...
> >
> > The question is whether it ameliorates mean crash recovery on cri
Am 2001-08-06, um 15:41:26 (+0200) schrieb Guillaume Cottenceau:
> Stefan Siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> > thesis on it ... Since then I don't trust ReiserFS => I wouldn't install it
> > currently on a critical system, only on playgounds for data loosing ...
>
> The questi
Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej:
> [...]
> > After that I was able to mount the partition again, but it was totally
> > empty !!! :-(
>
> There is an option "rebuild tree" (sorry, do not have access to Mandrake
> just now, cannot check exactly). I guess you have not tried it?
I did, as this was IIRC
> > What exactly do you mean?
> >
> > - it was not possible to mount /var?
>
> Yes, boot pricess gave ma an error message (don't remember any more)
and
> left me with a prompt.
>
...
> > Have you tried fsck it?
>
> After it was unwillint to mount it, yes.
>
> It repoted a lot of note cecking/fi
Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej:
>
> >
> > It killed my var partiton. When I did reboot my desktop machine after
> > an electricity failure, my "/var" was gone. So I am currently left alone
> > with a 8.0 WITHOUT any RPM support, as all relevant files reside there
> > :-\
> > (In fact the whole sys
>
> It killed my var partiton. When I did reboot my desktop machine after
an
> electricity failure, my "/var" was gone. So I am currently left alone
with
> a 8.0 WITHOUT any RPM support, as all relevant files reside there :-\
> (In fact the whole system is relatively unusable without an intact
"/
Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej:
>
> >
> > On 8/3/01 2:21 PM, "Grégoire Colbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > 1- Is ReiserFS good enough nowadays for a production machine?
> >
> > Yes, in fact I use it on production machines with great success.
>
> I use it as well, but my systems are not mi
>
> On 8/3/01 2:21 PM, "Grégoire Colbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1- Is ReiserFS good enough nowadays for a production machine?
>
> Yes, in fact I use it on production machines with great success.
I use it as well, but my systems are not mission critical :-)
>
> > 2- Will it ever b
On 8/3/01 2:21 PM, "Grégoire Colbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1- Is ReiserFS good enough nowadays for a production machine?
Yes, in fact I use it on production machines with great success.
> 2- Will it ever become the default filesystem for Mandrake?
One can hope. I'm sure it will be made
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Nima S. Panahi wrote:
> Ok ok.. So I appoligize. As I sent this, I started reading the thread that
> talks about VIA and reiserfs. I still need some explaining thought. I
> don't see why the older kernels work fine and only the newer kernels have
> problems?
You can find wha
Ok ok.. So I appoligize. As I sent this, I started reading the thread that
talks about VIA and reiserfs. I still need some explaining thought. I
don't see why the older kernels work fine and only the newer kernels have
problems?
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Nima S. Panahi wrote:
> This is a strange pro
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Nima S. Panahi wrote:
> This is a strange problem that I have explored ever since beta 3 came out.
> I am not sure if it exited before beta 3, since I did not test it as much
> as I have now, but it could have. Anyway.. on with the problem.
>
> Reiserfs brakes bad with the ke
This is a strange problem that I have explored ever since beta 3 came out.
I am not sure if it exited before beta 3, since I did not test it as much
as I have now, but it could have. Anyway.. on with the problem.
Reiserfs brakes bad with the kernel that came with beta 3 and even the
newer cooker
I had this problem a few weeks back and solved it by doing a mke2fs (sic) to
make the partition a ext2 partition first and then ran mkreiserfs and it
worked OK...
Ruairi
Bryan Opfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just got a new 75GB hard drive and poped it in my machine. I ran
fdisk to create th
I just got a new 75GB hard drive and poped it in my machine. I ran
fdisk to create the partition, then ran "mkreiserfs /dev/hdc1". It
formated ok. But, when I mount the drive, I get:
# mount -t reiserfs /dev/hdc1 /disk2
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1,
o
Claudio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all!
> I know that Mandrake 8.0 is in beta stage now, so many packages are fixed,
> but I think that the incoming kernel (2.4.3) will have some interesting
> improvements about two important things that I daily use, and not only me I
> suppose... I can
Hi all!
I know that Mandrake 8.0 is in beta stage now, so many packages are fixed,
but I think that the incoming kernel (2.4.3) will have some interesting
improvements about two important things that I daily use, and not only me I
suppose... I can read
The first pre-patch of the 2.4.3 linux ke
"Michael R. Batchelor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, how about samba, too. My ultimate goal would be to use a single
> server which is the NIS domain server and NFS server for the Unix
samba touch to the kernel ? noip.. see with
sylvestre([EMAIL PROTECTED]) maintainners of samba package.
--
>> OK, I haven't really been following the cooker/LM8.0 stuff too
well,
>> and I couldn't find any reference in the archives about whether
the
>> new release is expected to support ReiserFS and NFSv3 (or even v2
for
>> that matter) together out of the box or not.
>
>Yup, we have tested the patches
"Michael R. Batchelor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, I haven't really been following the cooker/LM8.0 stuff too well,
> and I couldn't find any reference in the archives about whether the
> new release is expected to support ReiserFS and NFSv3 (or even v2 for
> that matter) together out of th
OK, I haven't really been following the cooker/LM8.0 stuff too well,
and I couldn't find any reference in the archives about whether the
new release is expected to support ReiserFS and NFSv3 (or even v2 for
that matter) together out of the box or not.
Is this a planned/supported configuration? I
Ruairi Hickey wrote:
> Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
> reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the
> 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? (
>
> Ruairi
>
> _
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 20:26, Ruairi Hickey wrote:
> Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
> reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the
> 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? (
>
> Ruairi
I did another install today
When you install just choose reiserfs as the partition type instead
linux-native when partitioning with diskdrake.
On Thursday 22 February 2001 22:30, you wrote:
> is there any way to install mandrake (cooker) on reiserfs partitions?
> i know it is possible, what I am asking for is the steps
>
is there any way to install mandrake (cooker) on reiserfs partitions?
i know it is possible, what I am asking for is the steps
thanks,
chris campbell
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Ruairi Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
>> reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the
>> 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? (
>
>
> yes it d
James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -Either it was fixed over the weekend and the installer fix hadn't
> percolated out to us,
that should be the reason.
> -You didn't install the standard 2.4.x kernel, you installed the 2.2.x
> kernel or perhaps even the 2.4.1-linus version of the ker
I don't think so. Looks like the kernel module isn't loaded until a
filesystem in /etc/fstab is accessed. I also tried to make my root
partition with reiser and got the same results.
Ruairi Hickey wrote:
> Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
> reiserfs aft
Ruairi Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
> reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the
> 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? (
yes it does, i have just installed in cooker with
Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the
2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? (
Ruairi
Get free email and a
Prana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems that SuSE has a solution for nonworking NFS under ReiserFS:
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/pipermail/nfs/2000q3/002396.html
solution is not really the answer they use unfsd when we use knfs
which allow NFSV3, Jeff is working on the NFS problem.
--
M
is there anyway to get back off this mailing list?
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:40:51PM -0700, Prana wrote:
> It seems that SuSE has a solution for nonworking NFS under ReiserFS:
>
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/pipermail/nfs/2000q3/002396.html
Good luck!
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
Theres a problem with NFS and ReiserFS??
I've been running two Linux boxes with ReiserFS,
sharing /home between them with no problems for
some months now.
What sort of problem should I be expecting...?
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Prana
>
> It seems that SuSE has a solution for non
It seems that SuSE has a solution for nonworking NFS under ReiserFS:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/pipermail/nfs/2000q3/002396.html
--
Prana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cyest.org
My GnuPG Key ID: 0x33343FD3 (2000-07-21)
Key fingerprint = F1FB 1F76 8866 0F40 A801 D9DA 6BED 6641 3334 3FD3
http
Not for now, I had a glimpse of reiserfs devel list, and it is said that
fixing bugs is still the primary concern for the developers. They promised
they'll consider extended attributes later though...
Abel Cheung
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Prana wrote:
> So far, not yet. I don't know about XFS t
So far, not yet. I don't know about XFS though.. it seems to me that XFS
is much more advanced since it's been used in IRIX for 6 years, thus
it's mature and stable.
Xavier Bertou wrote:
>
> Hi,
> is there some kind of chattr for reiserfs ? I really need a journalized
> file system but with the
Hi,
is there some kind of chattr for reiserfs ? I really need a journalized
file system but with the possibility of doing chattr +i dans chattr +d.
Any way to have the same behaviour ?
--
Xavier
>Hrm
>I heard somewhere Kernel 2.4 doesn't support ReiserFS.
>Ravenhall
2.4 supports reiserfs just peachily. For some reason that I don't understand
you can't read a 2.4-created reiserfs partition with a 2.2 patched kernel,
but 2.4 can read 2.2-created partitions. 2.4.0 doesn't support reiser a
Le Samedi 20 Janvier 2001 20:57, vous avez écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I have just changed my root partition (which contains /boot) to ReiserFS,
> > on a Mandrake cooker 7.2 updated with cooker, and I have two problems.
> >
> > The first one concerns grub. I have the following message at b
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> I have just changed my root partition (which contains /boot) to ReiserFS, on
> a Mandrake cooker 7.2 updated with cooker, and I have two problems.
>
> The first one concerns grub. I have the following message at boot time:
>
> grub loading stage 2
> failed line 426
I have just changed my root partition (which contains /boot) to ReiserFS, on
a Mandrake cooker 7.2 updated with cooker, and I have two problems.
The first one concerns grub. I have the following message at boot time:
grub loading stage 2
failed line 426
Fortunately the boot works well wit
"Ian C. Sison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These patches are suppsed to be included in 2.2.18, which i doubt was
> included in Chmouel's 2.2.17-21mdk series, right?
yup[1]
Footnotes:
[1] not proud of it i would say, but it was too late to include it.
--
MandrakeSoft Inc
These patches are suppsed to be included in 2.2.18, which i doubt was
included in Chmouel's 2.2.17-21mdk series, right?
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
>
> As long as you have NFS patches installed on your kernel your OK. If not
> NFS will be a total dog / broken with reiserfs. go
> Exactly what is the "strange thing" ? ; could it be that its not entirely
> related to reiser but is really an NFS problem?
Well my "strange thing" invloved the client (the machine mounting NFS from
a NFS/Reiserfs) having 5min lockups... get the nfs patches and It goes
away (so i'm told).
>
>
As long as you have NFS patches installed on your kernel your OK. If not
NFS will be a total dog / broken with reiserfs. goto
http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ to get the nfs patches...
On 21 Oct 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> "Ian C. Sison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Anyone on the list
"Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
> Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs?
Yes, including on install (just set the partition type to ``Reiserfs'' and it
all works). I've not lost a partition yet and some of the machines I've
installed with it get very clumsily treated.
Two caveats, Reiser will not forma
"Ian C.Sison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Exactly what is the "strange thing" ? ; could it be that its not entirely
> related to reiser but is really an NFS problem?
no related to a big server with very high level acess
> > > What i know is that ext3 and NFS _are_ compatible. Can't Mandr
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> "Ian C. Sison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Anyone on the list using reiser with NFS? It's really sketchy from the
> > wreiser website if it's safe to use it with NFS or not.
>
> We have a 100GB server here via nfs and reiserfs which works almost
> fine
"Ian C. Sison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone on the list using reiser with NFS? It's really sketchy from the
> wreiser website if it's safe to use it with NFS or not.
We have a 100GB server here via nfs and reiserfs which works almost
fine (but some time it does strange thing).
> What
"Ian C. Sison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone on the list using reiser with NFS? It's really sketchy from the
> wreiser website if it's safe to use it with NFS or not. What i know is
> that ext3 and NFS _are_ compatible. Can't Mandrake include a kernel with
> ext3 also included?
Yes, ou
from the quill of Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Yes, no problems here with 2.2.17-21mdk. Am using it since ~1yr.
> Never had
> any troubles at all.
Lots of people seem to be using it no problem. Anyone on the
hackkernel?
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
Anyone on the list using reiser with NFS? It's really sketchy from the
wreiser website if it's safe to use it with NFS or not. What i know is
that ext3 and NFS _are_ compatible. Can't Mandrake include a kernel with
ext3 also included?
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach
Yes it works. I use it. I'd recomend against it though. It's not fast, is
still not production quality, and unless your system is crashing all the
time its unneeded
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs?
>
> b.
>
>
>
>
---
Bryan Whitehead
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Warren Doney wrote:
> "Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs?
>
> /me puts hand up.
>
> works fine
ReiserFS is fine for me. I just wish I could say the same for Mandrake
(release, not beta), which missed out the small detail of install
"Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
>
> Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs?
/me puts hand up.
works fine
-WBD
So sprach Brian J. Murrell am Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:45:46AM -0700:
> Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs?
Yes, no problems here with 2.2.17-21mdk. Am using it since ~1yr. Never had
any troubles at all.
Alexander Skwar
--
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.c
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs?
>
> b.
yep - and have been for some time.
Is anyone successfully using Reiserfs?
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
