On Thursday 29 March 2001 12:29, Eleknader wrote:
|
|And by the way, I use Mandrake because it is pentium optimized, not
|because of something you call a nice gui.
|
| It's great that Mandrake is pentium optimized. But, for a user point of
| wiev:
|
| I need just one window
Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Eleknader" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit :
I'd also like to set up a keyboard shortcut for launching an application
in KDE.
Mandrake should not try to use Menudrake, since it does not work OK.
Could you elaborate on that point ?
What is broken in menudrake ?
Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Eleknader" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit :
I'd also like to set up a keyboard shortcut for launching an application
in KDE.
Mandrake should not try to use Menudrake, since it does not work OK.
Could you elaborate on that point ?
What is broken in
Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Eleknader" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit :
To be more exact: Menudrake itself works OK. But, KDE menus in Mandrake
7.2 are not shown properly. K-menu items that have scandic characters
like a-umlaut
() etc are not shown correctly. Some of these characters are
forwarding to the list
I meant to send this to the list, but it doesn't have the Reply to
header set to the list. Most other messages (but not all) from the list
have the Reply to header set to the list, which made me think the list
software sets that header. Does it? Should it? (It seems
So sprach Eleknader am Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 03:29:54PM +0300:
We have a great environment (libralies, tools etc) that are free, and they
work
wery well. Those tools are KDE libraries and KDE Control Center.
Or GNOME and gnomecc...
Mandrake should not try to use Menudrake, since it does not
My two cents...
your GUIs till now) look really horrible. They are nowhere
compared to Qt/KDE
GUIs.. this could be because i work with them under KDE.. if
that is the case
then you guys shld make sure that gtk gets a theme which looks
good under
both KDE and GNOME.. right now they
On Thursday 29 March 2001 07:39, Sarang Lakare wrote:
- PLEASE IMPROVE GUI!! are the artists at LM listening?
rpmdrake looks yuck to say the least (sorry!).. Just compare
kpackage and rpmdrake.. they are MILES apart in looks.. And if u say
looks don't matter.. then go use
So sprach Sarang Lakare am Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:35:36PM -0500:
b4 and will again suggest it.. USE QT There is nothing like Qt out
Okay, you like the look of Qt - I don't. Now what? I can't stand how Qt
looks, and please don't tell me to piss off - I don't like this either! Gtk
is
On 29 Mar 2001 09:01:08 +0200, Klaas Barends wrote:
Look.. I am not being an extremist.. its a fact that the current (and all
your GUIs till now) look really horrible. They are nowhere compared to Qt/KDE
GUIs.. this could be because i work with them under KDE.. if that is the case
If most people were working for the same goal, maybe we could beat Win
Stop fighting, children. We do need to work together. On the other
hand, let us not all be sheep, that's for the dozer users. Comrades,
let us unite! And let us also think as individuals.
Just feeling philisophical.
Blue
Sarang Lakare [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Here are some more impressions/experiences with LM8.0 Beta2
[...]
SUGGESTIONS:
- PLEASE IMPROVE GUI!! are the artists at LM listening? rpmdrake
looks yuck to say the least (sorry!).. Just compare kpackage and rpmdrake..
they are
- PLEASE IMPROVE GUI!! are the artists at LM listening? rpmdrake
looks yuck to say the least (sorry!).. Just compare kpackage and
rpmdrake.. they are MILES apart in looks.. And if u say looks don't
matter.. then go use debian/slackware/redhat.. We expect cool GUIs from
LM.. I
Look.. I am not being an extremist.. its a fact that the current (and all
your GUIs till now) look really horrible. They are nowhere compared to Qt/KDE
GUIs.. this could be because i work with them under KDE.. if that is the case
then you guys shld make sure that gtk gets a theme which looks
Hi,
Here are some more impressions/experiences with LM8.0 Beta2
I installed it on SGI's Zx10 worstations (/proc/pci and /proc/scsi/scsi is
included at the end of this mail)
BUGS:
- I could only see first 2/3rd of the installation screen from the top left
corner. i.e. this 2/3rd filled up
15 matches
Mail list logo
