Hi all,
just an informal note to see if there's significance to nfs hanging my machine
when I'm pulling files from it (using urpmi to update another workstation).
Works for a while, then hangs, requiring a reboot. Just as an indicator of
severity, the hangs occur after only 20-40 files have bee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oden Eriksson wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was following this guide:
>
> http://www.lowth.com/LinWiz/nfs_help.html
>
> ...to set up more secure NFS at our small office, that worked real nice,
Hmmm, looks better than standard NFS setup and having to open up
fire
Hi.
I was following this guide:
http://www.lowth.com/LinWiz/nfs_help.html
...to set up more secure NFS at our small office, that worked real nice, but I
wonder what "STATD_HOSTNAME" is and where this is supposed to be set?
I call for better logic in the /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfslock file to enable
berazafi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> can anyone confirm the probs im having with the nfs install see 1784
> pls help im sick of buring iso or coping it all to my hd
answered at bugzilla.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
berazafi wrote:
can anyone confirm the probs im having with the nfs install see 1784
pls help im sick of buring iso or coping it all to my hd
did not look into your bug yet, but I can tell tou that ftp install
worked fine 3 times last week :-)
can anyone confirm the probs im having with the nfs install see 1784
pls help im sick of buring iso or coping it all to my hd
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 22:59, Ron Stodden wrote:
> I was please to see that the 9.0 installer provides on the left an
> option to install an nfs client.
>
> But it is of little use to do that without also installing nfs-utils,
> which it neglects to do. I first reported this in 8.2.
>
> nfs-u
I was please to see that the 9.0 installer provides on the left an
option to install an nfs client.
But it is of little use to do that without also installing nfs-utils,
which it neglects to do. I first reported this in 8.2.
nfs-utils provides exportfs, among other things. exportfs is requ
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> Pablo Pita Leira wrote:
> > I have installed 9 Beta 4 in a laptop. I did a NFS installation.
> > I found these problems :
> > 1.- I entered the hostname and domain name to use the network, but after doing
> > the installation, the hostname is setup as localhost. The d
Pablo Pita Leira wrote:
> I have installed 9 Beta 4 in a laptop. I did a NFS installation.
>
> I found these problems :
>
> 1.- I entered the hostname and domain name to use the network, but after doing
> the installation, the hostname is setup as localhost. The domain name was
> correct.
I
I have installed 9 Beta 4 in a laptop. I did a NFS installation.
I found these problems :
1.- I entered the hostname and domain name to use the network, but after doing
the installation, the hostname is setup as localhost. The domain name was
correct.
2.- I use a PCMCIA ethernet card based
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've not tried NFS, but i've had equally big problems with an FTP
> install recently, on two different platforms whose only common feature
> is the floppy drive (Sony USB floppy.) It just crashes out immediately
> after setting the network parameters
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried it and when it asked for the directory I tried
> a few things, which it
> said did not seem to contain the Mandrake Linux
> distribution, when I gave it
> the cooker/i586 directory it said (on console 3 that
> it found it) on console 1:
>
> er
I'm using a regular floppy.
--- Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 01:15, David Walser wrote:
> > Does *anybody* do NFS installs? Is it broken?
> What's
> > the deal?
>
> I've not tried NFS, but i've had equally big
> problems with an FTP
> install recently, on
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 01:15, David Walser wrote:
> Does *anybody* do NFS installs? Is it broken? What's
> the deal?
I've not tried NFS, but i've had equally big problems with an FTP
install recently, on two different platforms whose only common feature
is the floppy drive (Sony USB floppy.) It
NFS installs are the only way I install cooker (except for hd.img when
I'm really desperate and the server is buggered).
So long as you know the complete export path from the server in question
you should be able to install properly. I just finished an install on a
600Mhz Toshiba Laptop which ha
Does *anybody* do NFS installs? Is it broken? What's
the deal?
--- David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any documentation anywhere on this?
>
> I tried it and when it asked for the directory I
> tried
> a few things, which it
> said did not seem to contain the Mandrake Linux
> d
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> error in exec of stage 2 :-(
> FATAL ERROR IN STAGE 1: Permission denied
at this step, the stage1 tries to run /usr/bin/runinstall2
maybe your mirror is on a fat partition (which doesn't handle
symlinks)?
a simple test:
- in cooker/i586/Mandrake/mdki
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had lots of problems with nfs installs in 8.2, switched to ftp then.
> error in exec of stage 2 :-(
> FATAL ERROR IN STAGE 1: Permission denied
well, what do the logs of the server say about that? Should be somet
Is there any documentation anywhere on this?
I tried it and when it asked for the directory I tried
a few things, which it
said did not seem to contain the Mandrake Linux
distribution, when I gave it
the cooker/i586 directory it said (on console 3 that
it found it) on console 1:
error in exec
Hello,
I've been a little out of contact lately so excuse me if this problem was
solved ages ago.
It sounds like you need to use the "soft" option in fstab. By default NFS
mounts are "hard" which I believe means they will keep retrying for ever !
The "soft" option only retries a number of tim
Hi.
Has the syntax of the exports file changed recently?
This works:
[root@lnx root]# cat /etc/exports
/Cooker *(ro,insecure)
/contrib *(ro,insecure)
Where this don't:
[root@lnx root]# cat /etc/exports
/Cooker 192.168.0.*(ro,insecure)
/contrib 192.168.0.*(ro,insecure)
--
Regards // Oden Eri
Is anyone else seeing this? Using kernel 2.4.18.12, I get the following
message (might not be 100% accurate, since I had to write it down--it doesn't
get logged.)
---
Unmounting NFS filesystems: Cannot MOUNTPROG RPC: RPC: Program not registered
umount2: Device or resource busy
umount: /ne
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Dave Seff wrote:
> You don't happen to be mounting /home via nfs? If you do, I feel your pain
> and have reported this a few time on this list but got no response from the
> mdk people.
I've had this problem too. You cannot unmount /home if it was NFS.
Regards,
Matias
On Tuesday 19 March 2002 02:01 pm, you wrote:
> 8.2(rc1) is the first Mandrake release that consistently shuts down,
> unmounting my NFS home, but it could just have been a configuration
> error on my side with Mandrake 8.0 and 8.1.
>
Same for me too.
> Are you guys with these problems running:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
8.2(rc1) is the first Mandrake release that consistently shuts down,
unmounting my NFS home, but it could just have been a configuration
error on my side with Mandrake 8.0 and 8.1.
Are you guys with these problems running:
- -portmap
- -nfslock
on b
"Litwack, Paul" wrote:
>
> NFS was enabled in my 8.2 install, and it interferes with clean shutdown.
> The shutdown process hangs indefinitely with the error Unmounting NFS
> "failed". Fortunately I didn't need nfs so I disabled it. But , if it were
> needed this might be a problem , so I thought
You don't happen to be mounting /home via nfs? If you do, I feel your pain
and have reported this a few time on this list but got no response from the
mdk people.
On Tuesday 19 March 2002 10:15, you wrote:
> NFS was enabled in my 8.2 install, and it interferes with clean shutdown.
> The shutdo
NFS was enabled in my 8.2 install, and it interferes with clean shutdown.
The shutdown process hangs indefinitely with the error Unmounting NFS
"failed". Fortunately I didn't need nfs so I disabled it. But , if it were
needed this might be a problem , so I thought I'd let you know.
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> In mcc mount points tab, there is a way to mount external NFS and Samba
> shares and to export smb share.
>
> Wouldn't it be nice to also setup NFS exports here?
in kinqueror or in nautilus, right click , properties..
--
Yves Duret
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:44:07AM +0100, Warly wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am experiencing slow NFS startup during boot, something
> > like 4 minutes before it completes. All my NFS mounts are
> > rw,soft,bg,noauto but I don't think launching the NFS
> > daem
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am experiencing slow NFS startup during boot, something
> like 4 minutes before it completes. All my NFS mounts are
> rw,soft,bg,noauto but I don't think launching the NFS
> daemon should try to mount filesystems anyhow.
> Sounds like it wants t
Keld Jørn Simonsen([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 11:03:00PM +0100:
> I am experiencing slow NFS startup during boot, something
> like 4 minutes before it completes. All my NFS mounts are
> rw,soft,bg,noauto but I don't think launching the NFS
> daemon should try to mount filesystems any
I am experiencing slow NFS startup during boot, something
like 4 minutes before it completes. All my NFS mounts are
rw,soft,bg,noauto but I don't think launching the NFS
daemon should try to mount filesystems anyhow.
Sounds like it wants to search for something on the net
but I do not se what it
Hi,
In mcc mount points tab, there is a way to mount external NFS and Samba
shares and to export smb share.
Wouldn't it be nice to also setup NFS exports here?
=-=
kk1
Hey there I noticed that the NFS bug that exists when you mount a 64bit IRIX
mount on a linux mount point has returned to the kernel. I have the last
cooker 2.4.16 kernel and have patched it with the code from here
http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/2.4.17/ that fixes it. Unfortunetly i
cant seem
After a complete crash (user error :-), I reinstalled my box using
recent cooker CD's (more or less up to date). Doing so I discovered a
problem I had not seen before - newly created files (for example
compiled programs) in my NFS home directory were not executable. After
some debugging I figured
Wow!
Mounting my NFS resources is lightening fast now, is it the new nfs utils
and/or mount ?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current uptime with kernel
On 6 Dec 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> It should work but the problem is that there is a bug. Last time
> I checked Reiser web site, they said it was fixed (around 2.4.8
> or something) but still latest check gave the bug: we have a
I just got everything working. For some reason NFS daemon
This is using todays Sept 25 files
says it can't find fsck
ERROR: check_prog can't find the program fsck.ext2 and we're not using ramdisk
--
Ray
* lspci
*
Hi,
The printer problem is still present in this mornings cooker. The error
message
is:
warning: foomatic-configure failed at /usr/bin/perl-install/printer.pm line
966.
Using printer.pm v1.107, printerdrake.pm v1.136
See earlier post about symptoms and a simplistic workaround.
Regards
Dav
Hi,
The printer problem is still present in tonights cooker. The error message
is:
warning: foomatic-configure failed at /usr/bin/perl-install/printer.pm line
966.
However, I have tracked down the problem(s):
1. printerdrake.pm is issuing a printer::SIGHUP_daemon("devfs"); at line
1749 th
Hi,
Testing results from tonight:
1. after installation, the /etc/group file contains xgrp, nogroup, ntools
and ctools groups with GIDs immediately following any users added using
user[]. Could someone let me know if this going to be fixed? If not, then
I'll stop reporting it...
2. Print
Hi,
1. after installation, the /etc/group file contains xgrp, nogroup, ntools
and ctools groups with GIDs immediately following any users added using
user[]. Could someone let me know if this going to be fixed? If not, then
I'll stop reporting it...
2. Printer auto install is broken again
On 31 Jul 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > 1- isa-pnp in the krenel (but it give some problems when isa-pnp was
> >compiled in-kernel, jeff do you remind was what they?
> > 2- do a insmod isa-pnp before _anything_ in stage1.
> > 3- fix all the kernel isa drivers and remove their isa-pnp
Juan Quintela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> pixel> - fix the kernel :-(
>
> nope, if you ask the kernel to install isa-pnp, you initialize the
> isa-pnp space, you need to do that the first time that you need the
> thing. Ohh, wait, we need to fix the kernel, 3c509 _should_ not work
>
> "pixel" == Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pixel> Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pixel> [...]
>> - you load (during stage1) 3c509 isa netword card driver by hand
>> - there is no dependency 3c509 -> isa-pnp
>> - but when isa-pnp gets loaded by drakx (due to dep on seri
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> - you load (during stage1) 3c509 isa netword card driver by hand
> - there is no dependency 3c509 -> isa-pnp
> - but when isa-pnp gets loaded by drakx (due to dep on serial.o), it
> reclaims the netword card, and make the interface colla
"kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know if anything has been changed by anyone, but it still fails
> with the July 30 build.
No, it's not solved yet AFAIK.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't know if anything has been changed by anyone, but it still fails
> > with the July 30 build.
>
> No, it's not solved yet AFAIK.
The scenario seems to be (correct me if necessary):
- you load (dur
I don't know if anything has been changed by anyone, but it still fails
with the July 30 build.
=-=
kk1
_
Free email with personality! Over 200 domains!
http://www.MyOwnEmail.com
> "kk1" == kk1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
kk1> Here are the console dumps.
kk1> On F4
kk1> <4>eth0: setting Rx mode to 1 addresses. (sic)
kk1> <4>nfs warning: mount version older than kernel
kk1> <6>isapnp: scanning for PnP cards
kk1> <4>eth0: infinite loop in interrupt, status
kk1> <6
"kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --
> Original Message
> From: "Guillaume Cottenceau"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] NFS install fails
> Date: 25 Jul 2001 13:14:13 +0200
>
> >
--
Original Message
From: "Guillaume Cottenceau"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Cooker] NFS install fails
Date: 25 Jul 2001 13:14:13 +0200
>"kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Here are the console dum
"kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here are the console dumps.
>
> On F4
> <4>eth0: setting Rx mode to 1 addresses. (sic)
> <4>nfs warning: mount version older than kernel
> <6>isapnp: scanning for PnP cards
> <4>eth0: infinite loop in interrupt, status
> <6>isapnp: Card '3Com 3C509B Ether
Here are the console dumps.
On F4
<4>eth0: setting Rx mode to 1 addresses. (sic)
<4>nfs warning: mount version older than kernel
<6>isapnp: scanning for PnP cards
<4>eth0: infinite loop in interrupt, status
<6>isapnp: Card '3Com 3C509B Etherlink III'
<6>isapnp: 1 Plug & Play card detected to
"kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But the first thing that DrakX tries to do is to to insert the isapnp
> module and this deactivates the ethernet card and breaks the network
> connection.
this is strange, DrakX doesn't try to insmod' isa-pnp... any more precise
info?
Hi,
I tried to install Cooker through NFS since I don't have enough memory to
use FTP.
Well, the first stage didn't detect automatically my 3C905 card but let me
select it and found Cooker succesfully the remote NFS partition.
But the first thing that DrakX tries to do is to to insert the isapn
Yes. NFS and ReiserFS don't work together correctly. This is supposed to be
fixed in Kernel 2.4.6.
On Monday 02 July 2001 00:13, you wrote:
> On my server, i have those two partitions using reiserfs on a Mandrake 8.0:
> /dev/hda8 mounted as /var/ftp
> /dev/hdc1 mounted as /var/ftp/pub/linux/di
On my server, i have those two partitions using reiserfs on a Mandrake 8.0:
/dev/hda8 mounted as /var/ftp
/dev/hdc1 mounted as /var/ftp/pub/linux/distributions
On the server side, everything is OK.
I also export /var/ftp/pub by NFS, but on the client side,
durruti:/var/ftp/pub/linux/distributions
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse :
> Ainsi parlait Chmouel Boudjnah :
> > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Something seems to have broken in the nfs locking on kernel
> > > 2.4.4-6mdk. When I try to use something that needs locking I get the
> > > following symptoms:
> > >
> > >
Ainsi parlait Chmouel Boudjnah :
> "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Something seems to have broken in the nfs locking on kernel
> > 2.4.4-6mdk. When I try to use something that needs locking I get the
> > following symptoms:
> >
> > strace of process (testlk - tests locking) try
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Something seems to have broken in the nfs locking on kernel
> 2.4.4-6mdk. When I try to use something that needs locking I get the
> following symptoms:
>
> strace of process (testlk - tests locking) trying to lock a file (foo)
> on an nfs filesy
Something seems to have broken in the nfs locking on kernel
2.4.4-6mdk. When I try to use something that needs locking I get the
following symptoms:
strace of process (testlk - tests locking) trying to lock a file (foo)
on an nfs filesystem (current filesystem is nfs mounted):
...
getpid()
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:41:22 -0400
Pierre Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Re: [Cooker] NFS install troubles]
wrote :
> Eaon wrote:
> >
> >What a lazy bum I can be on
> > weekends. But something else jumped out at me this weeken
Eaon wrote:
>
>What a lazy bum I can be on
> weekends. But something else jumped out at me this weekend. I was reading
> the latest ReiserFS sucks/rocks flame war on linuxtoday.com and one person
> mentioned that there were problems with NFS working w
> Dunno. I'm too busy to really dig into the sources for various
> problems I've
> analyzed and reported; probably by the time 8.1 comes out, I'll
> be able to spend
> more time with the sources. So much for retirement... :^)
>
If there's something as cool as Linux to play with when I retire, I
Mandrake 7.2 server
On 21 Apr 2001 21:36:45 +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > "eaon" == Eaon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> eaon> When I supply the IP (all IPs are static) and path to where the files
> eaon> are located, then hit enter, I can see on the hub that the lights for
> eaon
> "eaon" == Eaon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi
eaon> When I supply the IP (all IPs are static) and path to where the files
eaon> are located, then hit enter, I can see on the hub that the lights for
eaon> the client and server machines are blinking together (and that's the
eaon> only netwo
Eaon wrote:
>
> > Could be a server problem... On the server, what do you get from:
> >
> >netstat -l | grep 2049
> >
> > If you see someting like this:
> >
> >udp16992 0 *:2049 *:*
> > ^ (anything but zero)
> > retry the command; if still the sam
> Could be a server problem... On the server, what do you get from:
>
>netstat -l | grep 2049
>
> If you see someting like this:
>
>udp16992 0 *:2049 *:*
> ^ (anything but zero)
> retry the command; if still the same, get the nfsd crash data from
>
> > and HTTP require 52 MB - who picked that number?? ;-) ), and a first
>
> We. Ramdisk takes RAM.
>
Cool. You got 4 meg of RAM, a soldering iron and a hammer? I think that
should do it to get this system up to spec. ;-)
> Are you sure you have nothing on log console?
>
Absolutely positive.
Eaon wrote:
>
> Trying to install via NFS and it just won't do it.
[...]
> When I supply the IP (all IPs are static) and path to where the files
> are located, then hit enter, I can see on the hub that the lights for
> the client and server machines are blinking together (and that's the
> only
Eaon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying to install via NFS and it just won't do it. IBM Aptiva C30 (if
> that means anything to anyone - a friend gave it to me for free because
> he got a job in the Caribbean and couldn't take it with him - I cried
> for him, really, but I promised to give the
Trying to install via NFS and it just won't do it. IBM Aptiva C30 (if
that means anything to anyone - a friend gave it to me for free because
he got a job in the Caribbean and couldn't take it with him - I cried
for him, really, but I promised to give the system a good home).
Pentium 233, 3c509 I
Hi,
This is not a "cooker" bug; but if NFS hasn't been fixed since LM7.2, then 8.0
may ship with a now-known bug...
I've been chasing a NFS bug in back-burner mode for some time. The first one I
noticed is on a LM6.1 system:
[pfortin@micron pfortin]$ uptime
12:19pm up 206 days, 1:20, 2 user
[resend -- are we still having mailer problems...? Sent this 5.5 hours ago but
it never appeared on the list...]
Hi,
This is not a "cooker" bug; but if NFS hasn't been fixed since LM7.2, then 8.0
may ship with a now-known bug...
I've been chasing a NFS bug in back-burner mode for some time. T
David Eastcott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /tmp/floppy.o: error reading ELF header /tmp/floppy.o: no space left on device
the new mkreiserfs was too verbose and was filling the /tmp, now fixed.
Hi,
I am having a failure performing a fresh install via NFS.
I can't create a boot disk when prompted by the install GUI,
also can not generate an AutoInstall floppy and,
finally when I re-boot, I get Kernel panic: VFS: unable to mount root fs on
03:06.
As I was re-installing, I monitored the
Le 2001.03.21 16:06:58 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> ok and what you /etc/exports contain ? (BTW: i use the last cooker
> here with extensive NFS without any problems).
Here's my /etc/exports
/var/ftp/pub*.univ.run(ro,all_squash) \
*.univ-reunion.fr(ro,all_squash)
/var/
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le 2001.03.21 15:24:36 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Le 2001.03.20 20:14:51 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> > > > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > My s
Le 2001.03.21 15:24:36 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Le 2001.03.20 20:14:51 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> > > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > My server can't accepts any NFS mount request since today. Ever
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le 2001.03.20 20:14:51 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > My server can't accepts any NFS mount request since today. Every
> > attempt
> > > fails with following mesage:
> > > rpc.mountd: aut
Le 2001.03.20 20:14:51 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > My server can't accepts any NFS mount request since today. Every
> attempt
> > fails with following mesage:
> > rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request...
> > rpc.mountd: getfh failed: o
f: Re: [Cooker] NFS problems
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My server can't accepts any NFS mount request since today. Every attempt
> fails with following mesage:
> rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request...
> rpc.mountd: getfh failed: operation not
"Sebastian Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> it seems that you have not enough rights
>
> do you do this as root?
> is the portmapper started?
>
> sebastian
do you have the rpcuser in /etc/{group,passwd} ?
--
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [Cooker] NFS problems
My server can't accepts any NFS mount request since today. Every attempt
fails with following mesage:
rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request...
rpc.mountd: getfh failed: operation not permitted
I didn't modify anything prior to this.
My server can't accepts any NFS mount request since today. Every attempt
fails with following mesage:
rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request...
rpc.mountd: getfh failed: operation not permitted
I didn't modify anything prior to this. I attemped upgrading latest
nfs-utils, kernel and initscript, b
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My server can't accepts any NFS mount request since today. Every attempt
> fails with following mesage:
> rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request...
> rpc.mountd: getfh failed: operation not permitted
> I didn't modify anything prior to this. I attem
I've switched back to the 2.2.17 kernel as shipped with Mandrake 7.2,
and NFS to/from cooker is now working fine.
It appears that the NFS problem only occurs with the 2.2.18 kernel,
the puzzling thing is that this problem did not occur with early cookers.
*
Further update:
With this morning's rsynced cooker, NFS to the Sun boxes (Solaros 2.6),
and HP boxes (HP-UX 11.00) appears to be working fine,
but still no joy with Mandrake 7.2, and kernel 2.2.18 boxes.
John Allen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
[EMAIL PRO
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
With the latest cooker I cannot copy files via nfs, the clienthangs after receiving a varying amount of data.I can copy no problem using scp.
what kernel version on the client and on the server.
Client:
John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With the latest cooker I cannot copy files via nfs, the client
> hangs after receiving a varying amount of data.
>
> I can copy no problem using scp.
what kernel version on the client and on the server.
--
MandrakeSoft Inc http://w
With the latest cooker I cannot copy files via nfs, the client
hangs after receiving a varying amount of data.
I can copy no problem using scp.
--
John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Orbiscom Ltd,Web:http://www.orbiscom.com/
3 Sandyf
Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> nfs-utils turns the service off during the installation.
>
> [root@linux1 /root]# chkconfig nfs --list
> nfs 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on4:on5:on6:off
> [root@linux1 cooker]# rpm -ivh nfs-utils-0.3.1-1mdk.i586.rpm --replacepkgs
> nfs
nfs-utils turns the service off during the installation.
[root@linux1 /root]# chkconfig nfs --list
nfs 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on4:on5:on6:off
[root@linux1 cooker]# rpm -ivh nfs-utils-0.3.1-1mdk.i586.rpm --replacepkgs
nfs-utils #
Is there any chance these fixes will find their way into the 2.2.19 mdk
kernel?
On 20 Feb 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The last cooker kernel should fixes all reiserfs problems with nfs and
> nfs in general with the inclusion of patchset from Neil
> Brown[1]. Please test it and let
Hi,
The last cooker kernel should fixes all reiserfs problems with nfs and
nfs in general with the inclusion of patchset from Neil
Brown[1]. Please test it and let me know if you still have problems
with nfs..
Footnotes:
[1] http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/
--
MandrakeSoft Inc
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems over the last 3 months or so that I have had to report every
> problem I am finding with cooker at least several times before any
> attention is paid to it. I think (hope) I am providing quality bug
> reports. I try to be brief but inclu
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:33:38AM +, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> canb you check 0.3.1 where initscripts has completely changed.
I will when it shows up on a mirror somewhere.
> can you moderate your language, we are not your slaves..
No you
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
