Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
You need to run urpmi.update -a first. However, it may have simply been that
updates were simply
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 10:54, John Keller wrote:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
You need to run urpmi.update -a first.
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:54, John Keller wrote:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
Really it should give a message of some sort,
Bellegarde Cedric [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
fixed in urpmi-4.4-29mdk.
François.
Kim Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# urpmi.update -a
unable to access hdlist file of main1, medium ignored
unable to access hdlist file of main3, medium ignored
unable to access hdlist file of contrib1, medium ignored
unable to access hdlist file of contrib3, medium ignored
Can you send
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 10:54, John Keller wrote:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if
there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
You need to
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
hi
I have a problem with the latest couple of version(packages) of urpmi.
Whenever I add a new source (main and contrib) via urpmi.setup, then it
works for one done download (or actually until I do urpmi.update -a the
next time). After that it sets ignore on some of the sources - which
ones seems
Kim Schulz wrote:
hi
Hi.
I have a problem with the latest couple of version(packages) of urpmi.
Whenever I add a new source (main and contrib) via urpmi.setup, then it
works for one done download (or actually until I do urpmi.update -a the
next time). After that it sets ignore on some of
Hi
When I used urpmi.update --wget -a urpmi --wget --auto-select --auto
I got bugreport:
...
write config file [/etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg]
ftp://ftp.uninett.no/linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/ldconfig-2.3.2-13mdk.i586.rpm
Brian Tyndall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well after the problem occurred, check rpm -q --whatprovides
libexpat.so.0 just to see ?
I can't really do that... slbd is running, installing packages into the
chroot, rebuilding the src.rpm and then de-installin the installed
packages.
Well, in
François Pons wrote:
Fabien ILLIDE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In case of :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] fabien]# ll /var/cache/urpmi/partial/
-rw-r--r--1 root root 356352 aoû 22 14:31 hdlist.cz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 98 aoû 20 11:01 MD5SUM
For sure an hdlist is not 356352
, unless you have
used them before and silently ?
Nope.
Anyway, I changed slbd to use --split-length 0 and here's the result:
http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/urpmi/i586/k3b-0.9-2mdk
All packages install as expected -- the old behavior is back my
problem seems fixed.
Question remains
Fabien ILLIDE wrote:
François Pons wrote:
...
Try again updating and check it still works, do you have used symlink in
/var/cache/urpmi or /var/lib/urpmi to perform some tasks ?
Well, I've update many many times, with always same result :
For update_source for example : the all file is
Fabien ILLIDE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I know about the mirror problem, but it seems that urpmi have a problem too.
When I do urpmi.update -a, it download good the lists, but :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] urpmi]# urpmi.update -a
récupération du hdlist source (ou synthèse) de « update_source
Fabien ILLIDE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In case of :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] fabien]# ll /var/cache/urpmi/partial/
-rw-r--r--1 root root 356352 aoû 22 14:31 hdlist.cz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 98 aoû 20 11:01 MD5SUM
For sure an hdlist is not 356352 bytes longs, you have
Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
Fabien ILLIDE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I know about the mirror problem, but it seems that urpmi have a problem too.
When I do urpmi.update -a, it download good the lists, but :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] urpmi]# urpmi.update -a
récupération du hdlist source (ou
Fabien ILLIDE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I've think of it, but even if my disk is overloaded, it's not full :
Ok.
[...]
Is it these files which are writen when urpmi.update ?
strace would help much :).
use strace -eopen urpmi blabla..
--
Guillaume Cottenceau -
/resent, sorry if get twice/
François Pons wrote:
Fabien ILLIDE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In case of :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] fabien]# ll /var/cache/urpmi/partial/
-rw-r--r--1 root root 356352 aoû 22 14:31 hdlist.cz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 98 aoû 20 11:01 MD5SUM
For
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Fabien ILLIDE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Is it these files which are writen when urpmi.update ?
strace would help much :).
use strace -eopen urpmi blabla..
Thanks a lot for the tip ! :o)
--
Les brevets de logiciels : une menace extrêmement grave pèse sur
Hi,
I know about the mirror problem, but it seems that urpmi have a problem too.
When I do urpmi.update -a, it download good the lists, but :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] urpmi]# urpmi.update -a
récupération du hdlist source (ou synthèse) de « update_source »...
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 16:53:29 -0400
Frank Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim Schulz wrote:
I'm not sure what you're upgrading from. I did it from base 9.1, and
I'd say that it involved at least 300 packages. And, like I said, you
get some scary prompts. I don't recall the components
More than 80% of the tim ewhen I try to install something I get this error
message. Even updated my media sources.
-- Installation failed:
liblirc_client.so.0 is needed by xawtv-3.88-2mdk
Installation failed, some files are missing:
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 13:11, Buchan Milne wrote:
...
If you have a mildly recent urpmi, it should not be necessary, since:
# urpmi --auto-select --auto --keep
should work (BTW, I run this in cron)
Yep, urpmi is getting even better than manual installs. Very good work.
One question, though.
Ainsi parlait Ken Thompson :
More than 80% of the tim ewhen I try to install something I get this error
message. Even updated my media sources.
-- Installation failed:
liblirc_client.so.0 is needed by xawtv-3.88-2mdk
Installation failed, some files are missing:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 08:51:09 -0400
Frank Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim Schulz wrote:
I had similar problems on another thread, and the suggestion was to
use
--allow-nodeps --allow-force
I had to respond to some scary prompts, but urpmi urpmi eventually
installed the latest
On Thu Aug 07 18:44 -0700, Quel Qun wrote:
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 13:11, Buchan Milne wrote:
...
If you have a mildly recent urpmi, it should not be necessary, since:
# urpmi --auto-select --auto --keep
should work (BTW, I run this in cron)
Yep, urpmi is getting even better than manual
Frank Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kim Schulz wrote:
just tried this and it wanted to install around 300 rpm's but ended up
with this:
Installation failed:
arts = 3001:1.1.3-1mdk is needed by libarts-devel-1.1.3-1mdk
arts = 3001:1.1.3-1mdk is needed by
The --keep option for urpmi is very welcome, when packages cannot be
updated because some of them had to be removed, at least the updating
process does not stop.
What about making the --keep option the default behaviour of urpmi, and
replace it by its counterpart : a --not-keep or
Kim Schulz wrote:
[snip]
Use --keep
not an option for my version of urpmi. and when I try to upgrade urpmi,
then I get alot of other deps (especially alot of kde and mozilla
stuff).
I had similar problems on another thread, and the suggestion was to use
--allow-nodeps --allow-force
[snip]
Use --keep
not an option for my version of urpmi. and when I try to upgrade urpmi,
then I get alot of other deps (especially alot of kde and mozilla
stuff).
--
Navn : Kim Schulz | Let the people think they govern and they
Email : kim @ schulz.dk | will be governed. -- William
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 14:21:32 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote:
Kim Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Use --keep
not an option for my version of urpmi. and when I try to upgrade
urpmi, then I get alot of other deps (especially alot of kde and
mozilla stuff).
I
Kim Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Im trying to get my cooker to update (it's been almost a month due to
missing internet con.), but I get this when I do an auto select:
# urpmi --auto-select
One of the following packages is needed:
1- ksymoops-2.4.8-2mdk.i586
2-
Kim Schulz wrote:
just tried this and it wanted to install around 300 rpm's but ended up
with this:
Installation failed:
arts = 3001:1.1.3-1mdk is needed by libarts-devel-1.1.3-1mdk
arts = 3001:1.1.3-1mdk is needed by libarts-1.1.3-1mdk
libxml2.so is needed by
Kim Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Use --keep
not an option for my version of urpmi. and when I try to upgrade urpmi,
then I get alot of other deps (especially alot of kde and mozilla
stuff).
I may do an unsupported update of urpmi for 9.1, but not yet.
François.
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 20:42, Dave Cotton wrote:
What is going on?
urpmi --auto-select
suddenly in the middle of everything there's this
installing /mnt/Cooker/libfreetype6-2.1.4-5mdk.i586.rpm
removing
Im trying to get my cooker to update (it's been almost a month due to
missing internet con.), but I get this when I do an auto select:
# urpmi --auto-select
One of the following packages is needed:
1- ksymoops-2.4.8-2mdk.i586
2- kernel-utils-0.1-1mdk.i586
What is your choice? (1-2) 2
Some
On Friday 01 August 2003 07:04 am, John van Spaandonk wrote:
On Friday 01 August 2003 10:43, Duncan wrote:
On Wed 30 Jul 2003 10:56, Olivier Thauvin posted as excerpted below:
Le Mercredi 30 Juillet 2003 17:42, John van Spaandonk a écrit :
My reply to John is somewhere in the mail,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Joe Baker wrote:
Running Urpmi dhcp-server
Yeilded:
ftp://10.0.0.93/pub/Mandrake9.2beta1/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/dhcp-server-3.0-2pl2.5mdk.i586.rpm
The following packages have bad signatures:
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/dhcp-server-3.0-2p12.5mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid
signature (sha1
On Wed 30 Jul 2003 10:56, Olivier Thauvin posted as excerpted below:
Le Mercredi 30 Juillet 2003 17:42, John van Spaandonk a écrit :
My reply to John is somewhere in the mail, other guys can simply delete it.
I want to know how many time he need to find it ;)
While I agree with your
Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I have a dsl connection, dynamic IP, and my provider changes my address every
few hours.
Whenever it happens, and I use urpmi in a meantime - urpmi just freezes.
Maybe it's more of wget issue than of urpmi, but it would have been nice r if
On Friday 01 August 2003 10:43, Duncan wrote:
On Wed 30 Jul 2003 10:56, Olivier Thauvin posted as excerpted below:
Le Mercredi 30 Juillet 2003 17:42, John van Spaandonk a écrit :
My reply to John is somewhere in the mail, other guys can simply delete
it. I want to know how many time he
Le Vendredi 01 Août 2003 13:04, John van Spaandonk a écrit :
On Friday 01 August 2003 10:43, Duncan wrote:
On Wed 30 Jul 2003 10:56, Olivier Thauvin posted as excerpted below:
Le Mercredi 30 Juillet 2003 17:42, John van Spaandonk a écrit :
[...]
While experimenting with urpmi I tried
John van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While experimenting with urpmi I tried
urpmi --auto-select --bug --media cooker
and I noticed that the --bug supresses my explicit media selection, so
in my case packages from cooker, plf and contrib were installed...
urpmi --auto-select
On Friday 01 August 2003 13:39, François Pons wrote:
urpmi --auto-select --bug urpmibug --media cooker
will work better.
Thanks!
, unless you have
used them before and silently ?
Nope.
Anyway, I changed slbd to use --split-length 0 and here's the result:
http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/urpmi/i586/k3b-0.9-2mdk
All packages install as expected -- the old behavior is back my
problem seems fixed.
Question remains
Before latest upgrade (1-8, 13:00, ftp.uninett.no):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]$ rpm -q kdebase
kdebase-3.1.2-30mdk
kdebase-3.1.3-3mdk
After this upgrade:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]$ rpm -q kdebase
kdebase-3.1.2-30mdk
kdebase-3.1.3-3mdk
kdebase-3.1.3-4mdk
sigh.
Im trying to upgrade my urpmi to latest version (to get rid of the curl
error messages) but I keep getting this:
# urpmi urpmi
Some package requested cannot be installed:
kdebase-3.1.3-4mdk.i586 (due to missing
kdebase-kdm-config-file-3.1.3-3mdk.i586)
kdebase-kdm-config-file-3.1.3-3mdk.i586 (due
Kim Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Im trying to upgrade my urpmi to latest version (to get rid of the curl
error messages) but I keep getting this:
# urpmi urpmi
Some package requested cannot be installed:
kdebase-3.1.3-4mdk.i586 (due to missing
On Friday 01 August 2003 08:33 am, François Pons wrote:
Kim Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Im trying to upgrade my urpmi to latest version (to get rid of the curl
error messages) but I keep getting this:
# urpmi urpmi
Some package requested cannot be installed:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kim Schulz wrote:
Im trying to upgrade my urpmi to latest version (to get rid of the curl
error messages) but I keep getting this:
# urpmi urpmi
Some package requested cannot be installed:
kdebase-3.1.3-4mdk.i586 (due to missing
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:33:22 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote:
urpmi urpmi perl-URPM --keep
# urpmi urpmi perl-URPM --keep
urpmi: unknown option --keep, check usage with --help
On Fri 01 Aug 2003 06:18, John van Spaandonk posted as excerpted below:
Before latest upgrade (1-8, 13:00, ftp.uninett.no):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]$ rpm -q kdebase
kdebase-3.1.2-30mdk
kdebase-3.1.3-3mdk
After this upgrade:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]$ rpm -q kdebase
On Friday 01 August 2003 18:29, Duncan wrote:
On Fri 01 Aug 2003 06:18, John van Spaandonk posted as excerpted below:
Before latest upgrade (1-8, 13:00, ftp.uninett.no):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]$ rpm -q kdebase
kdebase-3.1.2-30mdk
kdebase-3.1.3-3mdk
After this upgrade:
What is going on?
urpmi --auto-select
suddenly in the middle of everything there's this
installing /mnt/Cooker/libfreetype6-2.1.4-5mdk.i586.rpm
removing libgdk-pixbuf2-devel-0.22.0-2mdk.i586
XFree86-static-libs-4.3-13mdk.i586 libfontconfig1-devel-2.2.1-2mdk.i586
lsb-1.3-7mdk.noarch
Running Urpmi dhcp-server
Yeilded:
ftp://10.0.0.93/pub/Mandrake9.2beta1/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/dhcp-server-3.0-2pl2.5mdk.i586.rpm
The following packages have bad signatures:
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/dhcp-server-3.0-2p12.5mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid
signature (sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#70771ff3 NOT OK)
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 20:42, Dave Cotton wrote:
What is going on?
urpmi --auto-select
suddenly in the middle of everything there's this
installing /mnt/Cooker/libfreetype6-2.1.4-5mdk.i586.rpm
removing libgdk-pixbuf2-devel-0.22.0-2mdk.i586
XFree86-static-libs-4.3-13mdk.i586
Le Vendredi 1 Août 2003 23:29, Joe Baker a écrit :
Running Urpmi dhcp-server
Yeilded:
ftp://10.0.0.93/pub/Mandrake9.2beta1/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/dhcp-server-3.0-2p
l2.5mdk.i586.rpm The following packages have bad signatures:
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/dhcp-server-3.0-2p12.5mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid
John van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Next, made a bug report if possible, and cut the uneed lines...
Good that you use the words if possible.
Currently I am not able to file a bug report,
bugzilla complains about a missing legal version
Olivier was talking about --bug option of
Hi,
I have a dsl connection, dynamic IP, and my provider changes my address
every few hours.
Whenever it happens, and I use urpmi in a meantime - urpmi just freezes.
Maybe it's more of wget issue than of urpmi, but it would have been nice
r if urpmi checks from time to time if something is
First of all, please do not post with Reply-To: set...
On Wed Jul 30 2:05 +0200, lolomin wrote:
answer, but i'm always amazed of this ( in a precedent message you were
also advising to upgrade perl-URPM manually to solve failure of urpmi
while upgrading some packages )
Generally in those
Bingo !!
Yep that is obviously the issue extent.
Bob
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 02:08 am, Levi Ramsey wrote:
First of all, please do not post with Reply-To: set...
On Wed Jul 30 2:05 +0200, lolomin wrote:
answer, but i'm always amazed of this ( in a precedent message you were
also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Levi Ramsey wrote:
The main problems at the moment involve broken rpm autogenerated
dependencies. To be completely honest, I think that auto-deps are a bad
idea; the situation wasn't that bad before, right now it's worse, and I
don't think I
On Wed Jul 30 14:52 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
You're going to have to be more specific. Which auto-generated deps?
library deps (which have been in place for a long time, was it 9.0?),
devel deps (which seem to be ok now), perl deps (which we inherited from
Redhat who had them for RH 9 I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Wed Jul 30 14:52 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
To some extent, I'm not keen on the idea of automatic dependencies;
afaik, debian (to pick the most prominent distribution) seems to get by
fine on about 3 million platforms
Hi all,
See this copy of my terminal session of 10 minutes ago...
It contains several things I do not understand:
- segmentation fault
- At one point I had installed two versions of kdenetwork
- Some strange interdependencies
I seemed to have installed everything in the end
What other
On Wed Jul 30 18:42 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
To some extent, I'm not keen on the idea of automatic dependencies;
afaik, debian (to pick the most prominent distribution) seems to get by
fine on about 3 million platforms without an auto-deps system (the fact
that no package gets uploaded
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would guess it's something like this:
50% perl deps that don't exist
30% epoch problems
15% packages which need rebuilding against a new library (which is
something we can't drop unless you want people to have broken software)
5% -devel deps
Le Mercredi 30 Juillet 2003 17:42, John van Spaandonk a écrit :
My reply to John is somewhere in the mail, other guys can simply delete it.
I want to know how many time he need to find it ;)
Hi all,
See this copy of my terminal session of 10 minutes ago...
It contains several things I do
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 19:56, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le Mercredi 30 Juillet 2003 17:42, John van Spaandonk a écrit :
My reply to John is somewhere in the mail, other guys can simply delete it.
I want to know how many time he need to find it ;)
Next, made a bug report if possible, and
Once again - right on the money about off-loading responsibility.
Bob
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 11:17 am, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Wed Jul 30 14:52 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
You're going to have to be more specific. Which auto-generated deps?
library deps (which have been in place for a long
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:07:52PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Well, if you have any other packages broken by kerberos, grab
libcom_err.so.3 from http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/cooker/
or better
http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/libcom_err3-1.2.7-0mdk.i586.rpm
which will also keep urpmi
Another urpmi weirdness : this morning, I wanted to update perl, perl-URPM
and urpmi. Strangely, it had to remove gaim (because perl was not
version-matching). So it removed gaim and installed the updates. However, I
did urpmi gaim and it installed it without any problem then.
This is strange
Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another urpmi weirdness : this morning, I wanted to update perl, perl-URPM
and urpmi. Strangely, it had to remove gaim (because perl was not
version-matching). So it removed gaim and installed the updates. However, I
did urpmi gaim and it installed it
Anyway, when you can get such behaviour, please make a bug report using
urpmi
because I may not be capable of reproducing them, bug report have been done
for
that, please use them.
OK, but how can I do when the update has already been done ?
Should I use urpmi --bug each time I want to use urpmi
At least when something seems wrong, restart using --bug.
Some people use --bug all the time, and when something is wrong, send the
bug
report. It may be hard to use efficiently, especially when a cron is used
for
that, the first approach is far better than nothing, but if I manage to
Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, when you can get such behaviour, please make a bug report using
urpmi
because I may not be capable of reproducing them, bug report have been done
for
that, please use them.
OK, but how can I do when the update has already been done ?
On Tue Jul 29 10:35 +0100, Eric Fernandez wrote:
OK, thanks, I shall do it this way now. I've read other people have reported
the gaim problem from this morning, it must be reproducible then. Keep the
good work :)
I've seen the gaim/perl-base issues for a few weeks now... basic problem
is that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Berra wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:07:52PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Well, if you have any other packages broken by kerberos, grab
libcom_err.so.3 from http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/cooker/
or better
Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue Jul 29 10:35 +0100, Eric Fernandez wrote:
OK, thanks, I shall do it this way now. I've read other people have reported
the gaim problem from this morning, it must be reproducible then. Keep the
good work :)
I've seen the gaim/perl-base issues
Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue Jul 29 10:35 +0100, Eric Fernandez wrote:
OK, thanks, I shall do it this way now. I've read other people have reported
the gaim problem from this morning, it must be reproducible then. Keep the
good work :)
I've seen the gaim/perl-base issues
Ug
(sigh)
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 05:10 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Berra wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:07:52PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Well, if you have any other packages broken by kerberos, grab
libcom_err.so.3 from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
So urpmi works correctly (relative to rpm) and is not broken, but gaim need to
be fixed with a requires on perl-base = 2:5.8.0.
ok, done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
w9ya wrote:
Ug
(sigh)
???
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch
Hello
using cooker for now 6 months and not the first time i saw this type of
answer, but i'm always amazed of this ( in a precedent message you were
also advising to upgrade perl-URPM manually to solve failure of urpmi
while upgrading some packages )
What is the meaning of urpmi if we have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
lolomin wanted us to know:
What is the meaning of urpmi if we have to upgrade manually every week
at least one package and by the way find which package we have to
upgrade ( because that's never a simple thing for the normal user to
This is Cooker.
Hello,
I'm having some issues with urpmi lately. Take a look here:
http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/urpmi/i586/k3b-0.9-2mdk
As you can see 2 packages are basically being installaed by urpmi:
kdelibs-devel (fails) and libcdda0-devel (is installed)
I can't judge the interals of urpmi (I'm
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Hello,
I'm having some issues with urpmi lately. Take a look here:
http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/urpmi/i586/k3b-0.9-2mdk
There is a strange things with your rpm database, at the very beginning,
libexpat0 is installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
You can get the previous behaviour by using --split-level 0
Sorry, I misprinted, it is available with --split-level 1 or
--split-length 0
There are effectively a problem with the split, after testing, it has some
problem as without split, it works
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
You can get the previous behaviour by using --split-level 0
Sorry, I misprinted, it is available with --split-level 1 or
--split-length 0
There are effectively a problem with the split, after
Hi
Have you noticed another weirdness : when trying to install several
packages from different sources using :
urpmi foo bar
with foo and bar two packages located e.g on contrib and PLF, it fails
to install bar and you have to run again urpmi bar to install it ?
Eric
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 10:33, François Pons wrote:
The nice things of the version shipped with 9.1 are:
- it does the calculation first;
- if something isn't right then it gives the reason why something has failed;
- when something is wrong in the calculation it doesn't install any
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
evolution-1.4.3-1mdk.i586 (due to missing libcom_err.so.3) (y/N) n
My options there are: hit Y and lose Evolution, or hit N and get nothing
installed. Surely there should now be an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
François Pons wrote:
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
evolution-1.4.3-1mdk.i586 (due to missing libcom_err.so.3) (y/N) n
My options there are: hit Y and lose Evolution,
Am Montag, 28. Juli 2003, 11:58:38 Uhr MET, schrieb Eric Fernandez:
Have you noticed another weirdness : when trying to install several
packages from different sources using :
urpmi foo bar
with foo and bar two packages located e.g on contrib and PLF, it fails
to install bar and you have to
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
François Pons wrote:
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
evolution-1.4.3-1mdk.i586 (due to missing libcom_err.so.3) (y/N) n
My options there are: hit Y and lose Evolution,
to see ?
In fact, did you used --test because this option cannot run with splited
transactions ? But it seems no according to your logs, unless you have used them
before and silently ?
Anyway, I changed slbd to use --split-length 0 and here's the result:
http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:51:31 +0200
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe in this features, since all available docs tells me
there is no such feature ;-).
Good for you Buchan because it does not work in this situation.
Skip works fine if there is a upgrade pkg avaiable that you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:51:31 +0200
What will work, where there are pkgs which will be removed but that you
wish to retain, is 'urpmi --auto-select --allow--nodeps --allow-force'
But I don't think this will work well in
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Hello,
I'm having some issues with urpmi lately. Take a look here:
http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/urpmi/i586/k3b-0.9-2mdk
There is a strange things with your rpm database, at the very beginning,
libexpat0 is installed
101 - 200 of 1196 matches
Mail list logo
