urpmi-2.1-4mdk (3mdk was broken too, same way)
[root@tyan gio]# urpmi.addmedia GioCooker
http://ftp.uninett.no/pub/linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/
with ../base/hdlist.cz
retrieve of [/../base/hdlist.cz] failed
no hdlist file found for medium "GioCooker"
unable to update
Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> rpm -Uvh autoirpm-2.1-3mdk.i586.rpm gurpmi-2.1-3mdk.i586.rpm
> urpmi-2.1-3mdk.i586.rpm
> Preparing...### [100%]
>2:urpmi ### [ 50%]
>
Hi,
What's this?
rpm -Uvh autoirpm-2.1-3mdk.i586.rpm gurpmi-2.1-3mdk.i586.rpm
urpmi-2.1-3mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
2:urpmi ### [ 50%]
3:gurpmi ##
On 26 Nov 2001 15:25:05 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
>
> > Rainer Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > urpmi works. if called as gurpmi (from rpmdrake) it fails
> > > and does installations instead of updates where requir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
> Rainer Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > urpmi works. if called as gurpmi (from rpmdrake) it fails
> > and does installations instead of updates where required.
>
> Ok, I will take a look at grpmi so.
grpmi was not called correctly, this i
Rainer Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> urpmi works. if called as gurpmi (from rpmdrake) it fails
> and does installations instead of updates where required.
Ok, I will take a look at grpmi so.
Thanks, François.
le lun 26-11-2001 à 13:56, François Pons a écrit :
> Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > le lun 26-11-2001 à 10:55, François Pons a écrit :
> > > Curt Siffert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the
> > > > downloaded rpm in /v
le lun 26-11-2001 à 14:18, François Pons a écrit :
> Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On my systems the problem has existed several days and still
> > exist even with urpmi-2.0-7mdk.
>
> Can you check your /etc/urpmi/inst.list ?
>
> The package listed into this file will be i
Hello François,
Monday, November 26, 2001, 2:18:42 PM, you wrote:
FP> Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On my systems the problem has existed several days and still
>> exist even with urpmi-2.0-7mdk.
FP> Can you check your /etc/urpmi/inst.list ?
FP> The package listed into this
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On my systems the problem has existed several days and still
> exist even with urpmi-2.0-7mdk.
Can you check your /etc/urpmi/inst.list ?
The package listed into this file will be installed instead of upgraded, does
other packages have been install
On 26 Nov 2001 13:56:26 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote:
> Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > le lun 26-11-2001 à 10:55, François Pons a écrit :
> > > Curt Siffert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the
> > > >
Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> le lun 26-11-2001 à 10:55, François Pons a écrit :
> > Curt Siffert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the
> > > downloaded rpm in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and
> > > rpm -Uvh it, it installs perfectly.
le lun 26-11-2001 à 10:55, François Pons a écrit :
> Curt Siffert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the
> > downloaded rpm in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and
> > rpm -Uvh it, it installs perfectly.
>
> What gives urpmi only ?
urpmi package : works
urpm
Curt Siffert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the
> downloaded rpm in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and
> rpm -Uvh it, it installs perfectly.
What gives urpmi only ?
François.
>
>
>
>And what gives "grep libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas2 /var/lib/urpmi/depslist.ordered"
>
[root@alpha root]# grep libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas2
/var/lib/urpmi/depslist.ordered
libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas2-0.13.0-1mdk.alpha 19128
>
> "grep libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas2 /var/lib/urpmi/provid
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [root@alpha cooker]# ls libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas2-0.13.0-1mdk.alpha.rpm -l
> -rw-r--r--1 cooker cooker 12864 Nov 15 18:05
> libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas2-0.13.0-1mdk.alpha.rpm
>
> [root@alpha cooker]# urpmi -p bono
omecanvas2-0.13.0-1mdk.alpha.rpm -l
-rw-r--r-- 1 cooker cooker 12864 Nov 15 18:05
libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas2-0.13.0-1mdk.alpha.rpm
[root@alpha cooker]# urpmi -p bonobo-devel
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to
>
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > O.K. some explanation.
> >
> > Mandrake install CDs all have the same structure:
> >
> > CD1: Mandrake/base/hdlisr*.cz, Mandrake/RPMS
> > CD2: Mandrake/RPMS2
> > CD3: Mandrake/RPMS3
>
> I will try to fix such things by allowing creating me
Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here we go for a fresh new round of bugs and features:
>
> error: open of /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/galeon-0.12.8-1mdk.i586.rpm
> failed: No such file or directory
> Installation failed
> Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N)
>
> One would expect u
Han ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> François Pons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Sorry, please upgrade to 6mdk for that.
> Thanks for providing us a working version so soon. :)
Here we go for a fresh new round of bugs and features:
error: open of /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/galeon-0.12.8-1mdk.i586.rpm
François Pons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Sorry, please upgrade to 6mdk for that.
Thanks for providing us a working version so soon. :)
Cya, Han.
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>
> > Salane King wrote:
> >
> >> The packages that it could not find it does find when you say #urpmi emacs-nox
> >> then it installs it.
> >>
> > True. So only the --auto-select feature seems to be broken.
>
>
> Uh.
Big Woz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> first of all, I'm not angry and I'm not bob
>
> Whenever I install a new Mandrake system for myself or someone else I
> always set up urpmi to go snatch it's rpms from an external source
> instead of the default CD's. to do this I of course have to
> u
now got one case where it also does it with
an "urpmi -p" command:
[root@alpha cooker]# urpmi -p bonobo-devel
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (47 MB):
libbonobo2-1.0.17-1mdk libbonobo2-devel-1.0.17-1mdk
libesound0-0.2.23-1mdk libesound0-devel-0
Salane King wrote:
>The packages that it could not find it does find when you say
>#urpmi emacs-nox
>then it installs it.
>
True. So only the --auto-select feature seems to be broken.
The packages that it could not find it does find when you say
#urpmi emacs-nox
then it installs it.
On Friday 16 November 2001 07:59 pm, you wrote:
> did you try 'urpmi.update xxx' before that?
> I guess some packages have been updated, so urpmi couldn't find some old
> names.
>
> Good luck,
> /
Jun Liu wrote:
>did you try 'urpmi.update xxx' before that?
>
Yes, I did an urpmi.update -a
>I guess some packages have been updated, so urpmi couldn't find some old
>names.
>
The packages it says it can't find are there, I was able to add them
manually.
This only seems to happen with an --aut
Le Samedi 17 Novembre 2001 01:12, Stefan van der Eijk a écrit :
> Is anybody else experiencing this:
>
Yes,
I've experience exactly the same thing.
I've updated with rpmdrake and it went fine.
--
Blaise aka Meles
did you try 'urpmi.update xxx' before that?
I guess some packages have been updated, so urpmi couldn't find some old
names.
Good luck,
/Jun
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 08:12:34AM +0800, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
:Is anybody else experiencing this:
:
:[root@taz RPMS]# urpmi --auto-select
:To satisfy
Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [root@taz RPMS]# urpmi --auto-select
> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
> installed (33 MB):
> emacs-21.1-3mdk emacs-X11-21.1-3mdk emacs-nox-21.1-3mdk losetup-2.11m-1mdk
> Is it ok? (Y/n)
> package emacs-nox-21.1-3mdk
Is anybody else experiencing this:
[root@taz RPMS]# urpmi --auto-select
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (33 MB):
emacs-21.1-3mdk emacs-X11-21.1-3mdk emacs-nox-21.1-3mdk losetup-2.11m-1mdk
Is it ok? (Y/n)
package emacs-nox-21.1-3mdk.i586 is not found.
pac
easiest to do a
#urpmi.removemedia -a
On Friday 16 November 2001 03:03 pm, you wrote:
> first of all, I'm not angry and I'm not bob
>
> Whenever I install a new Mandrake system for myself or someone else I
> always set up urpmi to go snatch it's rpms from an external source
> instead of the
first of all, I'm not angry and I'm not bob
Whenever I install a new Mandrake system for myself or someone else I
always set up urpmi to go snatch it's rpms from an external source
instead of the default CD's. to do this I of course have to
urpmi.removemedia all of the existing sources, an
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> {pts/1}% rpm -q urpmi
> urpmi-2.0-1mdk
>
> {vc/1}:~%> sudo urpmi msec
> installing /mnt/hd/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/msec-0.16-2mdk.i586.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> chkconfig >= 1.2.24-3mdk is needed by msec-0.16-2mdk
> Installation
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> O.K. some explanation.
>
> Mandrake install CDs all have the same structure:
>
> CD1: Mandrake/base/hdlisr*.cz, Mandrake/RPMS
> CD2: Mandrake/RPMS2
> CD3: Mandrake/RPMS3
I will try to fix such things by allowing creating medium by only using the
f
O.K. some explanation.
Mandrake install CDs all have the same structure:
CD1: Mandrake/base/hdlisr*.cz, Mandrake/RPMS
CD2: Mandrake/RPMS2
CD3: Mandrake/RPMS3
...
with hdlists being only on the first CD. When I first cut cooker
"distro" (on two Jaz drives) I made the first media with cooker
in
{pts/1}% rpm -q urpmi
urpmi-2.0-1mdk
{vc/1}:~%> sudo urpmi msec
installing /mnt/hd/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/msec-0.16-2mdk.i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
chkconfig >= 1.2.24-3mdk is needed by msec-0.16-2mdk
Installation failed
Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N)
Philip Van Hoof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> int we_have_been_executed_by_a_tty=0;
>
> if (!isatty(fileno(stdout))) { /* not sure if correct */
fileno(stdout) is always 1.
> we_have_been_executed_by_a_tty=1;
> }
>
> if (we_have_been_executed_by_a_tty) {
>
> printf("We ha
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Nice. Let's make urpmi call eject after installation is done :-)
> > >
> > > BTW what it does with processes that possible hold device open?
> >
> > Sorry?
> >
>
> less /mnt/cdrom/readme.txt
> switch to another shell
> eject cdrom
>
> wh
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nice. Let's make urpmi call eject after installation is done :-)
>
> BTW what it does with processes that possible hold device open?
Sorry?
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
>
> > Assuming we are using normal (not supermounted) media, many people
are
> > complaining that they cannot eject CD after installing something
with
> > urpmi/rpmdrake. The reason is obvious - they (programs) mount CDs
but do
> > not umount them. You may be surprised, but the fact that you have
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Assuming we are using normal (not supermounted) media, many people are
> complaining that they cannot eject CD after installing something with
> urpmi/rpmdrake. The reason is obvious - they (programs) mount CDs but do
> not umount them. You may be su
Assuming we are using normal (not supermounted) media, many people are
complaining that they cannot eject CD after installing something with
urpmi/rpmdrake. The reason is obvious - they (programs) mount CDs but do
not umount them. You may be surprised, but the fact that you have to
unmount CD
Hi,
Urpmi hangs up after each succesful download. If you update a lot of
files or simply updating the list this takes a lot of time. Would it
be possible to change that behaviour so that urpmi does not disconnect
anymore and can continue downloading?
Cya, Han.
Tried installing PHP and it listed several packages containing php.
Notably absent was... php (as in php-4.0.6)
I was finally getting used to using urpmi for doing my updates, but I
still end up using rpm -Uvh very often for the packages I install after
doing a relatively minimalist install of Co
On Wed, 05 Sep 2001 22:06:13 Frederik Himpe wrote:
> [root@Jupiter rpms]# urpmi gdm
> No such file `gdm-2.2.4.1-1mdk.i586.rpm'.
^
i.e.: the file is not yet on your mirror. Try again later or use another
mirror :)
--
Michael Reinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since the last rpm/urpmi update I've got this problem frequently:
[root@Jupiter rpms]# urpmi gdm
--22:01:31--
ftp://ftp.surfnet.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gdm-2.2.4.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
=> `/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/.listing'
Connecting to ftp.surfne
Sorry, had to read man better :-(
--update
use only update media. This means urpmi will search
and resolve dependencies only in media marked as
update.
And how do I define "update media"? I cannot find it anywhere in
documentation. Not with urpmi.addmedia?
-andrej
On 31 Aug 2001 10:36:57 +0200, François Pons wrote:
> Mark Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > starting today urpmi has been failing to install any packages from my
> > cooker source. If it matters, the files are on an SMB share. I removed
> > the media, and re-added it, and still get the sam
>
> > O.K. this was dev package. Obviously urpmi tried to stat every file
in
> > it - triggering devfsd into all sort of actions ... what is worse, I
> > tried rpm -Fvh - and it did the same, and even worse, it appeared to
> > *loop* contantly statting the same files in /dev.
> >
> > Strange eno
"Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> O.K. this was dev package. Obviously urpmi tried to stat every file in
> it - triggering devfsd into all sort of actions ... what is worse, I
> tried rpm -Fvh - and it did the same, and even worse, it appeared to
> *loop* contantly statting the sam
O.K. this was dev package. Obviously urpmi tried to stat every file in
it - triggering devfsd into all sort of actions ... what is worse, I
tried rpm -Fvh - and it did the same, and even worse, it appeared to
*loop* contantly statting the same files in /dev.
Strange enough, I tried to put dev in
[root@cooker root]# ps -ef --width 300 | grep urpmi
root 2542 2541 0 12:20 pts/000:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/sbin/urpmi --auto-select
root 2543 2541 0 12:20 pts/000:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/sbin/urpmi --auto-select
root 2541 1465 1 12:20 pts/000:00:20 /usr/bin/perl
Mark Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> starting today urpmi has been failing to install any packages from my
> cooker source. If it matters, the files are on an SMB share. I removed
> the media, and re-added it, and still get the same thing.
>
>unable to parse correctly [/var/lib/urpmi/hdl
starting today urpmi has been failing to install any packages from my
cooker source. If it matters, the files are on an SMB share. I removed
the media, and re-added it, and still get the same thing.
unable to parse correctly [/var/lib/urpmi/hdlist.Cooker.cz]
...
package xemacs-extras-21.
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi --auto-select
> > One of the following packages is needed:
> > 1- lsbdev-1.0.0.1-1mdk
> > 2- libncurses5-5.2-16mdk
> > What is your choice? (1-2) 2
> > Can't use string ("1") as an
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi --auto-select
> One of the following packages is needed:
> 1- lsbdev-1.0.0.1-1mdk
> 2- libncurses5-5.2-16mdk
> What is your choice? (1-2) 2
> Can't use string ("1") as an ARRAY ref while "strict refs" in use at
>
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> [root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi --auto-select
> One of the following packages is needed:
> 1- lsbdev-1.0.0.1-1mdk
> 2- libncurses5-5.2-16mdk
> What is your choice? (1-2) 2
> Can't use string ("1") as an ARRAY ref while "strict refs" in use at
[root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi --auto-select
One of the following packages is needed:
1- lsbdev-1.0.0.1-1mdk
2- libncurses5-5.2-16mdk
What is your choice? (1-2) 2
Can't use string ("1") as an ARRAY ref while "strict refs" in use at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/urpm.pm line 1081
During the bombing raid on Fri, 27 Jul 2001 08:55:13 +0200, Warly was heard
mumbling in fear:
> "Vox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >3. Why is urpmi's list so big? when you do "apt-get update" you get a
> > 1.44meg file, when you do "urpmi update" (or whatever the command is...haven't
"Vox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 3. Why is urpmi's list so big? when you do "apt-get update" you get a
> 1.44meg file, when you do "urpmi update" (or whatever the command is...haven't
> used urpmi in ages due to the damn size of the depfile) you get an 8+meg file!
> why? can't this be fi
>
> Yep. And introduce a new option which allows you to force the location
> of the file.
>
Why not
urpmi.addmedia foo URL1 [with URL2]
where optional URL2 points to hdlist? That would answer my question about
local hdlist for remote site as well.
Compatibility won't suffer as we can fallbac
François Pons wrote:
> There are other data available which are printed. Note here this is not indexed
> and correspond to raw data (or raw compressed).
>
> This correspond effectively to 1.4 megs.
>
> François.
file /var/lib/urpmi/hdlist.jungle.metalab.unc.edu.cz
/var/lib/urpmi/hdlist.jungle
So sprach »David Walluck« am 2001-07-25 um 12:55:33 -0400 :
> the depslist from the base URL, instead of me having to remember not
> only the URL for the site, but the exact path for the depslist.
Yep. And introduce a new option which allows you to force the location
of the file.
Alexander Skw
During the bombing raid on 26 Jul 2001 19:44:55 +0200, François Pons was heard
mumbling in fear:
> "Vox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > > 3. Why is urpmi's list so big? when you do "apt-get update" you get a
> > > > 1.44meg file, when you do "urpmi update" (or whatever the comma
"Vox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 3. Why is urpmi's list so big? when you do "apt-get update" you get a
> > > 1.44meg file, when you do "urpmi update" (or whatever the command is..haven't
> > > used urpmi in ages due to the damn size of the depfile) you get an 8+meg file!
> > > why? ca
During the bombing raid on 26 Jul 2001 11:13:01 +0200, François Pons was heard
mumbling in fear:
> "Vox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >3. Why is urpmi's list so big? when you do "apt-get update" you get a
> > 1.44meg file, when you do "urpmi update" (or whatever the command is..haven
"Vox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 3. Why is urpmi's list so big? when you do "apt-get update" you get a
> 1.44meg file, when you do "urpmi update" (or whatever the command is...haven't
> used urpmi in ages due to the damn size of the depfile) you get an 8+meg file!
> why? can't this be fi
David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's not mentioned in the help that 'with' is optional. And when I look at
> /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg, it appears to need three things in order to work. Ideally,
> you'd probably only want to have to specify one thing --
Yes, with is optional and is not sa
During the bombing raid on Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:55:33 -0400, David Walluck was
heard mumbling in fear:
> François Pons wrote:
>
> > This is "easy", release numbering is not consistent with rpm vision of sorting
> > release (or version).
> >
> > I checked rpmtools version_compare (which do
François Pons wrote:
>
> Idem as above, /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg is compatible with older version too.
It's not mentioned in the help that 'with' is optional. And when I look
at /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg, it appears to need three things in order to
work. Ideally, you'd probably only want to have to s
David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since someone finally seems to be on top of the urpmi problems, the most recent
> Mandrake Community Newsletter (I stopped receiving this by email for some
> reason, but I read it on http://www.linuxtoday.com/) had a review of urpmi vs.
> apt-get.
>
>
François Pons wrote:
> This is "easy", release numbering is not consistent with rpm vision of sorting
> release (or version).
>
> I checked rpmtools version_compare (which do the same as rpmvercmp of rpmlib)
> and it return the first argument as always greater than the second (which is
> absurd)
Stefan Siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems to work, but urpmi still has a bug:
>
> --
> # urpmi fetchmail
> --14:22:45--
>
>ftp://ftp.uni-bayreuth.de/pub/linux/Mandrake/updates/8.0/RPMS/fetchmail-5.7.4-5.1mdk
Am 2001-07-2, um 14:10:51 (+0200) schrieb François Pons:
> > # grep ldconfig /var/lib/urpmi/provides
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ldconfig-2.2.2-4mdk.i586
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ldconfig-2.2.2-4mdk.i586
> >^
>
> This sounds normal for me if
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ainsi parlait François Pons :
> [..]
> > But --auto-select does not run ?
> It works now for me.
>
> > This is sensed to fix this one (and not found bug on local packages too).
> You fix bug you don't find ? Wow, i want a HOWTO :-)
No :-) not found
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
[..]
> But --auto-select does not run ?
It works now for me.
> This is sensed to fix this one (and not found bug on local packages too).
You fix bug you don't find ? Wow, i want a HOWTO :-)
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://bohm.snv.jussieu.fr/
Stefan Siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello François,
Hello Stefan,
> Am 2001-07-2, um 13:23:47 (+0200) schrieb François Pons:
> > Ok, 3mdk seems to have correct bahaviour now.
>
> I am sorry, but no change :-\
>
> # rpm -q urpmi
> urpmi-1.7-3mdk
> # urpmi.update -a -f
> [...]
> # ls -l
Hello François,
Am 2001-07-2, um 13:23:47 (+0200) schrieb François Pons:
> Ok, 3mdk seems to have correct bahaviour now.
I am sorry, but no change :-\
# rpm -q urpmi
urpmi-1.7-3mdk
# urpmi.update -a -f
[...]
# ls -l /var/lib/urpmi/provides
-rw-r--r--1 root root 284646 Jul 25 13:29 /var/l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
> > I am sorry, but same result with your newest "urpmi-1.7-2mdk":
>
> Yes, I saw, partially fixed on some cases only.
>
> I still work on it, expect fix soon (I hope so).
Ok, 3mdk seems to have correct bahaviour now.
François.
Stefan Siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, François,
>
> I am sorry, but same result with your newest "urpmi-1.7-2mdk":
Yes, I saw, partially fixed on some cases only.
I still work on it, expect fix soon (I hope so).
François.
Hello, François,
I am sorry, but same result with your newest "urpmi-1.7-2mdk":
# rpm -q urpmi
urpmi-1.7-2mdk
# urpmi.update -a -f
[...]
# ls -l /var/lib/urpmi/provides
-rw-r--r--1 root root 284646 Jul 25 12:30 /var/lib/urpmi/provides
# grep ldconfig /var/lib/urpmi/provides
[EMAIL PROTECT
Hello, François,
Neulich schrieb François Pons:
> Try rebuilding media, using urpmi.update -a -f if you don't see
> something like :
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> instead of
>rpmtools@rpmtools
> in /var/lib/urpmi/provides
>
> François.
# urpmi.update -a -f
[...]
# ls -l /var/lib/urpmi/provides
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
[..]
> > What's this -f(orce) option not forcing anything :-) ?
>
> It force rebuild of depslist.ordered and other files like provides.
>
> But maybe an inches here as hdlist is up to date.
Well, even removing media and re-adding it doesn't change anything...
I'll try
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
[..]
> Try rebuilding media, using urpmi.update -a -f if you don't see something
> like : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> instead of
>rpmtools@rpmtools
> in /var/lib/urpmi/provides
[root@silbermann guillaume]# cat /var/lib/urpmi/provides | grep rpmtool
perl(rpmtools)@rpmtool
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This morning, just after updating my favorite mirror (sunet.se):
> [root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi --auto-select
> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed
> (1327 MB):
> drakfloppy-0.43-3mdk drakfont-0.58-14mdk r
This morning, just after updating my favorite mirror (sunet.se):
[root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi --auto-select
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed
(1327 MB):
drakfloppy-0.43-3mdk drakfont-0.58-14mdk rpm-devel-4.0.3-0.17mdk
egcs-cpp-1.1.2-49mdk rpm-python-
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You should have the same with rpm -Uvh ...
>
> Uhm, no. rpm prints the name of the current package.
Ok, problem found in rpm, fixes will come soon (proprably 0.17mdk or above).
François.
So sprach »François Pons« am 2001-07-23 um 10:12:25 +0200 :
> You should have the same with rpm -Uvh ...
Uhm, no. rpm prints the name of the current package.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalproject
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexander Skwar
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 4:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] urpmi: Missing information/Hiding *WAY* too
> much - what's it doing?
So sprach »François Pons« am 2001-07-23 um 10:12:25 +0200 :
> You should have the same with rpm -Uvh ...
Nope, rpm -Uvh prints more useful information
[root@teich RPMS-COOKER]# rpm -Uvh yudit-2.4-1mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...###
[100%]
1:yu
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of François Pons
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 12:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] urpmi: Missing information/Hiding *WAY* too
> much - what's it do
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So sprach »Stefan Siegel« am 2001-07-23 um 00:23:36 +0200 :
> > ls -l /var/log/urpmi*
>
> I know - it contains the same useless output that urpmi prints on the
> console:
This is a problem of invoking rpm so, I'll take a look.
You should have the s
So sprach »Stefan Siegel« am 2001-07-23 um 00:23:36 +0200 :
> ls -l /var/log/urpmi*
I know - it contains the same useless output that urpmi prints on the
console:
###
[ 74%]
mkfontdir: unable to proce
Hi Alexander,
Am 2001-07-22, um 23:03:20 (+0200) also vor ¾ Stunde schrieb Alexander Skwar:
>[...]
> Also I'm missing a log of updated packages. It used to be the case that
> syslog contained entries like "rpm installed foo.rpm" and "rpm removed
> bar.rpm". Where did those go?
ls -l /var/log/u
Hi!
I'm right now doing a "urpmi --auto-select". While it does something,
it prints:
###
[ 50%]
Now, that's BY FAR not enough information. urpmi used to print the name
of the current package - why
David Walluck wrote:
> Also urpmi.addmedia -a -f says it can't find a dependencies file,
> besides, how would this fix anything as long as the cd installation
> media are still listed. As I just said, I tried to have on;y cooker
> media but it crashed. Also, it's good to keep the cd media in
Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
> I've only "cooker" medium.
>
> Could I just copy the /var/lib/urpmi/* of working system?
Well, I tried to have only cooker medium, but at the point when I
removed all of the sources and tried to add only a cooker source,
rpmdrake crashed on me. Futhermore, how would
1001 - 1100 of 1217 matches
Mail list logo
