On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:51:31 +0200
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't believe in this features, since all available docs tells me
> there is no such feature ;-).
Good for you Buchan because it does not work in this situation.
Skip works fine if there is a upgrade pkg avaiable that
hem
before and silently ?
> Anyway, I changed slbd to use --split-length 0 and here's the result:
>
> http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/urpmi/i586/k3b-0.9-2mdk
>
> All packages install as expected --> the old behavior is back & my problem
> seems fixed.
>
>
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> François Pons wrote:
> > Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
> >>evolution-1.4.3-1mdk.i586 (due to missing libcom_err.so.3) (y/N) n
> >>
> >>My options there are: hit
Am Montag, 28. Juli 2003, 11:58:38 Uhr MET, schrieb Eric Fernandez:
> Have you noticed another weirdness : when trying to install several
> packages from different sources using :
> urpmi foo bar
> with foo and bar two packages located e.g on contrib and PLF, it fails
> to install bar and you hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
François Pons wrote:
> Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
>>evolution-1.4.3-1mdk.i586 (due to missing libcom_err.so.3) (y/N) n
>>
>>My options there are: hit Y and lose
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
> evolution-1.4.3-1mdk.i586 (due to missing libcom_err.so.3) (y/N) n
>
> My options there are: hit Y and lose Evolution, or hit N and get nothing
> installed. Surely there should now
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 10:33, François Pons wrote:
> > The nice things of the version shipped with 9.1 are:
> > - it does the calculation first;
> > - if something isn't right then it gives the reason why something has failed;
> > - when something is wrong in the calculation it doesn't install any
Hi
Have you noticed another weirdness : when trying to install several
packages from different sources using :
urpmi foo bar
with foo and bar two packages located e.g on contrib and PLF, it fails
to install bar and you have to run again urpmi bar to install it ?
Eric
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
>
> > You can get the previous behaviour by using --split-level 0
>
> Sorry, I misprinted, it is available with --split-level 1 or
> --split-length 0
>
> There are effectively a problem with the split, aft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
> You can get the previous behaviour by using --split-level 0
Sorry, I misprinted, it is available with --split-level 1 or
--split-length 0
There are effectively a problem with the split, after testing, it has some
problem as without split, it works
"Stefan van der Eijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
Hello,
> I'm having some issues with urpmi lately. Take a look here:
>
> http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/urpmi/i586/k3b-0.9-2mdk
There is a strange things with your rpm database, at the very
Hello,
I'm having some issues with urpmi lately. Take a look here:
http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/urpmi/i586/k3b-0.9-2mdk
As you can see 2 packages are basically being installaed by urpmi:
kdelibs-devel (fails) and libcdda0-devel (is installed)
I can't judge the interals of
On Thursday 24 July 2003 11:42 am, Olivier Blin wrote:
> > I've just started one for KDE as well :)
> > See a screenshot of the work so far here:
> > http://www.davidsansome.com/mutray.png
>
> Nice :)
> Is it a KDE app or Qt only ?
It's KDE - it even has a DCOP interface so other apps/scripts can
> What about just making an icon on specified users desktop. That will work
> on all DE as well I think. And it is easy to do with a script.
Good idea, this would be quite easy, I'll try to code this on-desktop notification
this Week-End.
--
Olivier Blin
> I've just started one for KDE as well :)
> See a screenshot of the work so far here:
> http://www.davidsansome.com/mutray.png
Nice :)
Is it a KDE app or Qt only ?
--
Olivier Blin
> >> (and
> >> you really don't want to do an applet for that..)
> > Please read the thread named "[Cooker] For 9.2 - automatic update"
> notification.
>
> I've read it.. And you really SHOULD do a notification tray application,
> not an applet..
Damned, I didn't understood what you said this mor
Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2003, 11:39:08 Uhr MET, schrieb Buchan Milne:
> Fred, do you know if the "balloon messages" mentioned in
> http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/systemtray-spec/0.1-onehtml/#balloon
> work in GNOME or KDE?
This is OT, but I'd like to mention that the system tray of the ROX
p
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:39:08 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Frederic Crozat wrote:
>> Le Thu, 24 Jul 2003 02:48:45 +0200, Olivier Blin a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>Hi
>>>
>>>I've started a GNOME applet that notifies when a urpmi media has been
> updated.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Le Thu, 24 Jul 2003 02:48:45 +0200, Olivier Blin a écrit :
>
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I've started a GNOME applet that notifies when a urpmi media has been
updated.
>>For now, it only supports ftp media whitout proxy.
>>I may write a KDE ve
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Olivier Blin wrote:
> > This is WRONG.. Use the Notification Area specification
> > (www.freedesktop.org) to do that, it will work for both KDE and GNOME
>
> Thanks, I'll have a look this evening.
> But why do applets and notification area coexist ?
>
> > (and
> > you really
On Thursday 24 July 2003 1:48 am, Olivier Blin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've started a GNOME applet that notifies when a urpmi media has been
> updated. For now, it only supports ftp media whitout proxy.
> I may write a KDE version soon.
> I've written a minimalist webpage here :
> http://olivierblin.free.f
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:21:06 +0200, Olivier Blin wrote:
>> This is WRONG.. Use the Notification Area specification
>> (www.freedesktop.org) to do that, it will work for both KDE and GNOME
>
> Thanks, I'll have a look this evening.
> But why do applets and notification area coexist ?
What you wan
> This is WRONG.. Use the Notification Area specification
> (www.freedesktop.org) to do that, it will work for both KDE and GNOME
Thanks, I'll have a look this evening.
But why do applets and notification area coexist ?
> (and
> you really don't want to do an applet for that..)
Please read the th
Le Thu, 24 Jul 2003 02:48:45 +0200, Olivier Blin a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I've started a GNOME applet that notifies when a urpmi media has been updated.
> For now, it only supports ftp media whitout proxy.
> I may write a KDE version soon.
This is WRONG.. Use the Notification Area specification
(www.f
Le Jeudi 24 Juillet 2003 02:48, Olivier Blin a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I've started a GNOME applet that notifies when a urpmi media has been
> updated. For now, it only supports ftp media whitout proxy.
> I may write a KDE version soon.
> I've written a minimalist webpage here :
> http://olivierblin.free.
Hi
I've started a GNOME applet that notifies when a urpmi media has been updated.
For now, it only supports ftp media whitout proxy.
I may write a KDE version soon.
I've written a minimalist webpage here :
http://olivierblin.free.fr/mdk-check-update/index.html
The package will be soon (this mornin
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 21:28, Paul Misner wrote:
> I might agree, except I really am trying to help, I am not an expert with
> either Linux, or the Mandrake tools, and I don't know what urpmi --bug is,
> since it is not list in man urpmi.
Really? You have urpmi-4.4-9mdk. So do I.
On the man pag
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 11:22, François Pons wrote:
> Well, urpmi --bug kderemoved --auto-select --auto will be a little better.
When I did urpmi --auto-select, it had actually removed kdebase and
kdemultimedia even though I said no. I only became aware of this when I
tried to open a console and I
Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue Jul 22 23:28 -0500, Paul Misner wrote:
> > I might agree, except I really am trying to help, I am not an expert with
> > either Linux, or the Mandrake tools, and I don't know what urpmi --bug is,
> > since it is not list in man urpmi. Typing urpm
On Tue Jul 22 23:28 -0500, Paul Misner wrote:
> I might agree, except I really am trying to help, I am not an expert with
> either Linux, or the Mandrake tools, and I don't know what urpmi --bug is,
> since it is not list in man urpmi. Typing urpmi --bug told me everything was
> installed.
Try
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 07:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 03:38, Paul Misner wrote:
> > This was really odd. I did a urpmi --auto-select --auto, and the listing that
> > follows was the result. I proceeded to urpmi the packages it removed, and
> > they all installed fine. My
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 07:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 03:38, Paul Misner wrote:
> > This was really odd. I did a urpmi --auto-select --auto, and the
> > listing that follows was the result. I proceeded to urpmi the
> > packages it removed, and they all installed fine. M
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 03:38, Paul Misner wrote:
> This was really odd. I did a urpmi --auto-select --auto, and the listing that
> follows was the result. I proceeded to urpmi the packages it removed, and
> they all installed fine. My question is, why did urpmi think it needed to
> uninstall K
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 19:38, Paul Misner wrote:
> This was really odd. I did a urpmi --auto-select --auto, and the listing
> that follows was the result. I proceeded to urpmi the packages it removed,
> and they all installed fine. My question is, why did urpmi think it needed
> to uninstall KD
I might agree, except I really am trying to help, I am not an expert with
either Linux, or the Mandrake tools, and I don't know what urpmi --bug is,
since it is not list in man urpmi. Typing urpmi --bug told me everything was
installed. I am running the current cooker, which should be obvious
Those kind of mail are fully unusefull. Please, generate a bugreport with
urpmi --bug and send it to françois Pons.
He reproduce this without your urpmi version and your rpm db infos.
Le Mercredi 23 Juillet 2003 04:38, Paul Misner a écrit :
> This was really odd. I did a urpmi --auto-select --a
This was really odd. I did a urpmi --auto-select --auto, and the listing that
follows was the result. I proceeded to urpmi the packages it removed, and
they all installed fine. My question is, why did urpmi think it needed to
uninstall KDE, and why did it not ask me for permission to remove t
"Vincent Meyer, MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone else noticed URPMI segfaulting lately? It looks like it segfaults
> when spanning groups of files dependent on each other. This is with using
> the options --auto-select --wget. (curl not working at all with urpmi on
Hi,
Has anyone else noticed URPMI segfaulting lately? It looks like it segfaults
when spanning groups of files dependent on each other. This is with using
the options --auto-select --wget. (curl not working at all with urpmi on my
machine at present)
Some files load as singl
urpmi.update -a
récupération du fichier de description de « cook »...
...échec de la récupération : échec de curl : sorti avec 22 ou tué par le
signal 0
récupération du hdlist source (ou synthèse) de « cook »...
curl: option - is unknown
curl: try 'curl --help' for more information
ftp://sun
Chris Picton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> aleph-null:~$ rpm -q urpmi perl-URPM
> urpmi-4.4-8mdk
> perl-URPM-0.91-11mdk
>
> I tried to upgrade nautilus with the following results:
> Basically, urpmi coundn't install nautilus, as it couldnt find
> libcroco.so.1 (provided by libcroco1). Installing
aleph-null:~$ rpm -q urpmi perl-URPM
urpmi-4.4-8mdk
perl-URPM-0.91-11mdk
I tried to upgrade nautilus with the following results:
Basically, urpmi coundn't install nautilus, as it couldnt find
libcroco.so.1 (provided by libcroco1). Installing the packages manually
in the correct order worked.
--
François Pons wrote:
If you mirror directly packages on your machine, you may want to use --virtual
of newer urpmi in order to avoid using urpmi.update, because the medium will
*always* be up-to-date, but it works only for local medium (ie file://
protocol).
The 9.1 urpmi doesn't support --virt
well, you dont need updates and texstar and the java. So "urpmi.removemedia
-a" then http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/urpmiweb.php add ONLY cooker stuff.
Do the urpmi urpmi, and urpmi.update -a && urpmi --auto-select
--no-verify-rpm.
right now I got this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bjorn]# urpmi.update
Bjorn wrote:
http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/urpmiweb.php "type urpmi.removemedia -a first"
remove whatever file that you have in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and then use
urpmi.update -a && urpmi --auto-select --no-verify-rpm
Bjørn Jørgensen
[SNIP]
It's better, but not good enough. I get this outp
http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/urpmiweb.php "type urpmi.removemedia -a first"
remove whatever file that you have in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and then use
urpmi.update -a && urpmi --auto-select --no-verify-rpm
Bjørn Jørgensen
On Thursday 10 July 2003 17:13, Per Lindström wrote:
> Adam Williamson
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 01:19, Per Lindström wrote:
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 03:34 pm, Per Lindström wrote:
When I use urpmi --auto-select I get thismessages:
Some package requested cannot be installed:
galaxy-kde-kwin-0.2-22.1mdk.i586 (för
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 01:19, Per Lindström wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday 09 July 2003 03:34 pm, Per Lindström wrote:
> >
> >
> >>When I use urpmi --auto-select I get thismessages:
> >>
> >>Some package requested cannot be installed:
> >>galaxy-kde-kwin-0.2-22.1mdk.i586 (för att kd
Frank Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I *might* want to update my urpmi database if I had any idea of how to do
> it other than by telling urpmi to do it via these commands
>
> I haven't gone through this list completely, but I know for a fact that on my
> cooker update (done imme
Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I use urpmi --auto-select I get thismessages:
>
> Some package requested cannot be installed:
>...
> kdegames-3.1-11mdk.i586 (trying to promote libkdegames.so by selection of
> URPM::Package=SCALAR(0x87fddcc))
Ok, anyway I should take a look at th
Well, I *might* want to update my urpmi database if I had any idea of how to
do it other than by telling urpmi to do it via these commands
urpmi.update -a
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assistant
Department
Following advice from the ML to install 9.1 and use urpmi --auto-select
to upgrade packages to cooker level using a urpmi source of the local
cooker directory image, I have been getting the same results for about a
week, except the the list of packages in the final "Installation failed"
message
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 03:34 pm, Per Lindström wrote:
When I use urpmi --auto-select I get thismessages:
Some package requested cannot be installed:
galaxy-kde-kwin-0.2-22.1mdk.i586 (för att kdebase-3.1-83mdk.i586 saknas)
k3b-0.8.1-3mdk.i586 (för att kdebase-3.1-83.3mdk.i5
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 03:34 pm, Per Lindström wrote:
> When I use urpmi --auto-select I get thismessages:
>
> Some package requested cannot be installed:
> galaxy-kde-kwin-0.2-22.1mdk.i586 (för att kdebase-3.1-83mdk.i586 saknas)
> k3b-0.8.1-3mdk.i586 (för att kdebase-3.1-83.3mdk.i586 saknas)
>
When I use urpmi --auto-select I get thismessages:
Some package requested cannot be installed:
galaxy-kde-kwin-0.2-22.1mdk.i586 (för att kdebase-3.1-83mdk.i586 saknas)
k3b-0.8.1-3mdk.i586 (för att kdebase-3.1-83.3mdk.i586 saknas)
kdeaddons-3.1-5mdk.i586 (för att kdebase-3.1-83.3mdk.i586 saknas)
kd
Le mar 08/07/2003 à 11:56, François Pons a écrit :
> No, for a so old perl-URPM (;-)) you need to update it to at least 9mdk in order
> to allow perl to install correctly.
done this morning. perl installed fine, but urpmi uninstall
postgresql-pl. But urpmi postgresql-pl install it fine ...
[EMAIL
FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le lun 07/07/2003 à 15:30, François Pons a écrit :
>
> > It could have been caused by your forced installation, but anyway, newer
> > perl-URPM should fix this strange behaviour...
>
> Hum, hum.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi --wget --auto-selec
FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le lun 07/07/2003 à 15:30, François Pons a écrit :
>
> > It could have been caused by your forced installation, but anyway, newer
> > perl-URPM should fix this strange behaviour...
>
> Hum, hum.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi --wget --auto-selec
Le lun 07/07/2003 à 15:30, François Pons a écrit :
> It could have been caused by your forced installation, but anyway, newer
> perl-URPM should fix this strange behaviour...
Hum, hum.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi --wget --auto-select
Some package requested cannot be installed:
drakfirsttime-0
On Monday 07 July 2003 11:30, François Pons wrote:
> Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've got a bit of an issue rendering urpmi useless - is this known?
> >
> > Even after I force install an RPM urpmi thinks it's not installed.
>
> It could have been caused by your forced installatio
Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 07 July 2003 11:30, François Pons wrote:
> > Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I've got a bit of an issue rendering urpmi useless - is this known?
> > >
> > > Even after I force install an RPM urpmi thinks it's not installed.
>
I've got a bit of an issue rendering urpmi useless - is this known?
Even after I force install an RPM urpmi thinks it's not installed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm -Uvh --force kdebase-3.1.2-26mdk.i586.rpm
warning: kdebase-3.1.2-26mdk.i586.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
70771ff3
Preparin
Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got a bit of an issue rendering urpmi useless - is this known?
>
> Even after I force install an RPM urpmi thinks it's not installed.
It could have been caused by your forced installation, but anyway, newer
perl-URPM should fix this strange behav
On Thu 03 Jul 2003 03:10, Buchan Milne posted as excerpted below:
> Levi Ramsey wrote:
> > On Wed Jul 02 19:54 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> >
> > Even if I wasn't making mdk rpms, I'd never do this. Having to use
> > either option indicates a bug
Please be a bit more careful with your attributions. I
Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed Jul 02 19:54 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> > I understand those creating mdk rpm packages can't do this, and that's a fair
> > portion of the regulars on this list, but here, I always use --allow-force
> > and --noclean.
>
> Even if I wasn't making mdk
On Thu Jul 03 3:07 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> The thing is.. they aren't TOTALLY broken. Most of that "brokenness" can be
> fixed with a one-time force-upgrade.
I'm not strictly talking about urpmi... all I've urpmi'd lately is urpmi
and it's dependencies. Basically, I judge whether or not to even
On Thu 03 Jul 2003 02:17, Levi Ramsey posted as excerpted below:
> On Wed Jul 02 19:54 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> > I understand those creating mdk rpm packages can't do this, and that's a
> > fair portion of the regulars on this list, but here, I always use
> > --allow-force and --noclean.
>
> Even if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Levi Ramsey wrote:
> On Wed Jul 02 19:54 -0700, Duncan wrote:
>
> Even if I wasn't making mdk rpms, I'd never do this. Having to use
> either option indicates a bug
I agree. At present the only packages that you should have forced are
the gcc-3.3 rel
On Wed Jul 02 19:54 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> I understand those creating mdk rpm packages can't do this, and that's a fair
> portion of the regulars on this list, but here, I always use --allow-force
> and --noclean.
Even if I wasn't making mdk rpms, I'd never do this. Having to use
either option
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 03:54, Duncan wrote:
> And.. yes, force installing could conceivably create a rather screwed up
> system, but hey, this is cooker, and I shouldn't be running it on a box that
> can't afford to be screwed up anyway, so the risk isn't really that bad since
> I've already cho
On Tue 01 Jul 2003 14:53, Gary Walsh posted as excerpted below:
> Ryan T. Sammartino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >For the last, oh, two months or so, I have been completely unable to do
> >urpmi --auto-select" due to many and various missing or out-of-date
> >dependencies.
>
> I have the same
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:38:40AM +0200, François Pons wrote:
> Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
> > > OpenOffice.org-1.0.3-2mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied OpenOffice.org-libs ==
> > > 1.0.3-2mdk, due to unsatisfied
Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ryan T. Sammartino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For the last, oh, two months or so, I have been completely unable to
> > do "urpmi --auto-select" due to many and various missing or out-of-
> > date dependencies. The full output is a bit long to includ
Ryan T. Sammartino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>For the last, oh, two months or so, I have been completely unable to do
>urpmi --auto-select" due to many and various missing or out-of-date
>dependencies.
I have the same problem, see the thread "Can't use urpmi --auto-select".
My partial solution
Ryan T. Sammartino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the last, oh, two months or so, I have been completely unable to
> do "urpmi --auto-select" due to many and various missing or out-of-
> date dependencies. The full output is a bit long to include, but an
> example would be what happens when I t
For the last, oh, two months or so, I have been completely unable to do
"urpmi --auto-select" due to many and various missing or out-of-date
dependencies. The full output is a bit long to include, but an example
would be what happens when I try to upgrade gcc:
$ sudo /usr/sbin/urpmi --no-verify-
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:03, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> I hope this hasn't been reported before, otherwise, please ignore.
>
> With urpmi-4.4-6mdk I can't seem to add a file:// urpmi media. It asks
> about a hdlist file. urpmi-4.4-4mdk still worked fine.
>
I've got the same type of problem
# u
I hope this hasn't been reported before, otherwise, please ignore.
With urpmi-4.4-6mdk I can't seem to add a file:// urpmi media. It asks
about a hdlist file. urpmi-4.4-4mdk still worked fine.
example of output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# urpmi.addmedia test file://build/RPMS/cooker/
added medium
Charles Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With installed version: urpmi-4.4-4mdk, I update with:
>
> urpmi --auto-select
>
> which installs updated packages, but urpmi finishes up with:
>
> "Everything already installed"
>
> As though there was nothing to update, even though there were
>
With installed version: urpmi-4.4-4mdk, I update with:
urpmi --auto-select
which installs updated packages, but urpmi finishes up with:
"Everything already installed"
As though there was nothing to update, even though there were
several packages installed.
-Charles
--
+-% He's a real UNI
"Robert Kulagowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Note the "would install {null} instead of..." lines.
> > I think it means "the action would be to install, instead of
> > upgrading".
>
> Just curious, but why is it telling me this in the first place? I've
> got:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] myth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > Note the "would install {null} instead of..." lines.
> I think it means "the action would be to install, instead of
> upgrading".
Just curious, but why is it telling me this in the first place? I've
got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mythtv]$ rpm -qa|grep
"Robert Kulagowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is a somewhat problematic writing of perl code from me,
> > but anyway this is
> > fixed now (urpmi-4.4-2mdk, as it is written,
> > perl-URPM-0.91-2mdk is out too).
>
> OK, I'll wait until my local mirror has synced and try again.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> This is a somewhat problematic writing of perl code from me,
> but anyway this is
> fixed now (urpmi-4.4-2mdk, as it is written,
> perl-URPM-0.91-2mdk is out too).
OK, I'll wait until my local mirror has synced and try again.
Thanks.
-BEGI
"Robert Kulagowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> More weirdness: it tried to install twice, with the second time
> failing because it had already installed the first time.
This is a somewhat problematic writing of perl code from me, but anyway this is
fixed now (urpmi-4.4-2mdk, as it is writ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
More weirdness: it tried to install twice, with the second time
failing because it had already installed the first time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] docs]# urpmi linuxdoc
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (5 MB):
libope
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Robert Kulagowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Note the "would install {null} instead of..." lines.
>
> I think it means "the action would be to install, instead of
> upgrading".
YES ! IANAGESM
François.
"Robert Kulagowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Note the "would install {null} instead of..." lines.
I think it means "the action would be to install, instead of
upgrading".
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Note the "would install {null} instead of..." lines.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cooker]# urpmi urpmi
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (2 MB):
perl-URPM-0.91-1mdk.i586
urpmi-4.4-1mdk.noarch
Is this OK? (
Hi,
I see some strange behaviour from time to time when installing packages.
Take a look at:
http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/urpmi/i586/gnome-terminal-2.3.1-1mdk
It shows this:
@@@ Installing: libgnomeui2-devel
Installation failed:
libfontconfig.so is needed by libbonoboui2_0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kim Schulz wrote:
> On 09 Jun 2003 15:01:07 +0100
> Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 13:22, Kim Schulz wrote:
>>
>>>hi
>>>When I try to update my cooker box, then I get these errors. What is
>>>it I need to get it to
On 09 Jun 2003 15:01:07 +0100
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 13:22, Kim Schulz wrote:
> > hi
> > When I try to update my cooker box, then I get these errors. What is
> > it I need to get it to work correctly.
> > Why is it that urpmi doesnt move the correctly dow
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 13:22, Kim Schulz wrote:
> hi
> When I try to update my cooker box, then I get these errors. What is it
> I need to get it to work correctly.
> Why is it that urpmi doesnt move the correctly downloaded files from
> pratial/ to rpms/ ? (the first lines of errors)
First set of
hi
When I try to update my cooker box, then I get these errors. What is it
I need to get it to work correctly.
Why is it that urpmi doesnt move the correctly downloaded files from
pratial/ to rpms/ ? (the first lines of errors)
unable to install package
ftp://ftp.uninett.no/pub/unix/linux/Mandrak
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 20:45, Curtis H wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 07:37, Buchan Milne wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 08:10, John Allen wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>This means that existing installed applicatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 08:10, John Allen wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday 04 June 2003 07:21, Curtis H wrote:
>>
>>>urpmi doesn't seem to pull in the correct dependencies for KDE. I was
>>>about a week behind cooker, and when updating,
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 08:10, John Allen wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 June 2003 07:21, Curtis H wrote:
> > urpmi doesn't seem to pull in the correct dependencies for KDE. I was
> > about a week behind cooker, and when updating, I can't install most
> > things KDE related. I've never --force installed
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 03:45, Curtis H wrote:
> > To me, it seems like you're making assumptions, and not giving people
> > the benefit of the doubt ...
>
> Thank you, Buchan. This has been a cooker machine since around 8.0, and
> as I originally wrote, I'm only about a week or two behind in updat
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 07:37, Buchan Milne wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 08:10, John Allen wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>This means that existing installed applications required older
> versions of
> >>libraries that you are goin
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 07:21, Curtis H wrote:
> urpmi doesn't seem to pull in the correct dependencies for KDE. I was
> about a week behind cooker, and when updating, I can't install most
> things KDE related. I've never --force installed anything and don't
> want to start.
>
>
> Installation
201 - 300 of 1217 matches
Mail list logo
