On 11 Mar 2002, François Pons wrote:
urpmi counts size of package (but uncompressed) but there is a bug, it doesn't
substract package size that will be removed (it let rpm do it for its checking),
this means you don't have to wory about not having 53Mo of free space, but you
need some free
Blindauer Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Today upgrading my system like other days, I only have 6 packages to upgrade:
# urpmi --auto-select
Pour satisfaire les dépendances, les paquetages suivants vont être installés
(53 Mo):
kdetoys-2.2.2-8mdk.i586 kdebase-2.2.2-91mdk.i586
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:55:40PM +0100, François Pons wrote:
Jochen Schoenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The size of total downloaded package is around 27Mo.
But urpmi has calculed 53Mo.
Why is a difference between these two numbers ? shouldn't be equal ?
Size to download ==
Jochen Schoenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11 Mar 2002, François Pons wrote:
urpmi counts size of package (but uncompressed) but there is a bug, it doesn't
substract package size that will be removed (it let rpm do it for its checking),
this means you don't have to wory about not
Can I use urpmi through http proxies yet? I've tried setting it up in
rpmdrake, but with no success :¬(
On Friday 08 March 2002 13:45, David Barker wrote:
Can I use urpmi through http proxies yet? I've tried setting it up in
rpmdrake, but with no success :¬(
Check wget or curl manual pages, depending on which you use. wget
uses /etc/wgetrc to specify proxies, and curl uses environment
Getting urpmi to work through an http proxy is rather easy, once you
know how to do it :) This only works using wget, not curl.
either edit the /etc/wgetrc file or create a $HOME/.wgetrc file and put
the following lines in it:
http_proxy = proxyaddress:port
use_proxy = on
proxy_user =
Turn's out Teemu Torma was right - it was just a case of rtfm... I'm using
curl with a few exported variables. Urpmi now works fine as does rpmdrake :)
I don't suppose there's any chance of rpmdrake being updated b4 release to
either remove the option to set proxies (since it doesn't work as
So rpmdrake should configure proxy for wget and curl.
In fact after updating to latest rpmdrake and urpmi from cooker, I could
retrieve the hdlist and add the media, but I COULD NOT upgrade packages
since curl cannot resolve URL because the proxy is not configured.
Teemu Torma wrote:
On
÷ ðÔÎ, 08.03.2002, × 17:23, David Barker ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
Turn's out Teemu Torma was right - it was just a case of rtfm... I'm using
curl with a few exported variables. Urpmi now works fine as does rpmdrake :)
I don't suppose there's any chance of rpmdrake being updated b4 release to
either remove
÷ ðÔÎ, 08.03.2002, × 18:51, Christophe Combelles ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
So rpmdrake should configure proxy for wget and curl.
In fact after updating to latest rpmdrake and urpmi from cooker, I could
retrieve the hdlist and add the media, but I COULD NOT upgrade packages
since curl cannot resolve URL
On Fri, 08 Mar 2002 16:51:40 +0100
Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So rpmdrake should configure proxy for wget and curl.
In fact after updating to latest rpmdrake and urpmi from cooker, I could
retrieve the hdlist and add the media, but I COULD NOT upgrade packages
since
Le Vendredi 8 Mars 2002 14:56, Chevalley, Scott a écrit :
Getting urpmi to work through an http proxy is rather easy, once you
know how to do it :) This only works using wget, not curl.
either edit the /etc/wgetrc file or create a $HOME/.wgetrc file and put
the following lines in it:
Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They are now back to using wgit instead of curl.
Just for rpmdrake (for proxy).
François.
On 08 Mar 2002 19:31:26 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote:
Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They are now back to using wgit instead of curl.
Just for rpmdrake (for proxy).
Can it be manually set to use curl instead?
Charles
On Friday 08 March 2002 4:02 pm, you wrote:
÷ ðÔÎ, 08.03.2002, × 17:23, David Barker ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
Turn's out Teemu Torma was right - it was just a case of rtfm... I'm
using curl with a few exported variables. Urpmi now works fine as does
rpmdrake :) I don't suppose there's any chance of
÷ ðÔÎ, 08.03.2002, × 23:32, David Barker ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
rpmdrake edits ~/.wgetrc so it sets proxies for wget so it does work.
it does? I'm running beta 4 atm, clean install and yet /root/.wgetrc is empty
(it exists, just 0 bytes)
Have you ever defined proxy in rpmdrake?
Also,
the
On Friday 08 March 2002 8:48 pm, you wrote:
÷ ðÔÎ, 08.03.2002, × 23:32, David Barker ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
rpmdrake edits ~/.wgetrc so it sets proxies for wget so it does work.
it does? I'm running beta 4 atm, clean install and yet /root/.wgetrc is
empty (it exists, just 0 bytes)
Have you ever
Todd Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was going to install a new kernel and decided not to:
[root@fiji ~]# urpmi kernel
One of the following packages is needed:
1- kernel-enterprise-2.4.17.22mdk-1-1mdk
2- kernel-linus2.4-2.4.18-1mdk
3- kernel-secure-2.4.17.22mdk-1-1mdk
4-
Bryan Paxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That damn enter key : P
Anyway... A build option would be nice in urpmi, for the power users.
ala `make world` on *BSD. Yet, you could either say something like
urpmi --build packagename
And it would locate the src rpm that the package came
Todd Lyons wrote:
I was going to install a new kernel and decided not to:
[root@fiji ~]# urpmi kernel
One of the following packages is needed:
1- kernel-enterprise-241722mdk-1-1mdk
2- kernel-linus24-2418-1mdk
3- kernel-secure-241722mdk-1-1mdk
4- kernel-smp-241722mdk-1-1mdk
5-
{pts/2}% LANGUAGE=en sudo urpmi sendmail
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (1 MB):
cyrus-sasl-1.5.27-2mdk.i586 sendmail-8.12.1-4mdk.i586
Is it OK? (Y/n)
installing
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/cyrus-sasl-1.5.27-2mdk.i586.rpm
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
well, urpmi does know about these conflicts so it could warn me as well
... I mean, to start rpm you have to download all this stuff (assuming
net sources) and you probably do not do it several times (do not know
what happens currently with caches).
As plain user:
{pts/1}% LANGUAGE=en urpmi /mnt/jaz/kernel-2.4.17.20mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm
it sits and sits there
^D
package libbinutils2-devel-2.11.92.0.12-6mdk.i586 is not found.
package tetex-dvips-1.0.7-40mdk.i586 is not found.
package transfig-3.2.3d-7mdk.i586 is not found.
unable
{pts/1}% LANGUAGE=en sudo urpmi
/mnt/jaz/kernel-2.4.17.20mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (31 MB):
transfig-3.2.3d-7mdk.i586 tetex-dvips-1.0.7-40mdk.i586
kernel-2.4.17.20mdk-1-1mdk.src
^^ not quite true :-)
[root@iap-pxy-mow1 bor]# rpm -qR urpmi
...
perl-DateManip = 5.40
...
perl-base
^
[root@iap-pxy-mow1 bor]# rpm -qR perl-DateManip
perl = 5.600
^
Does perl-DateManip really need perl and not perl-base? In any case
perl-base in urpmi currently is useless
I'd prefer that
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[root@iap-pxy-mow1 bor]# rpm -qR urpmi
...
perl-DateManip = 5.40
...
perl-base
^
[root@iap-pxy-mow1 bor]# rpm -qR perl-DateManip
perl = 5.600
^
Does perl-DateManip really need perl and not perl-base? In any case
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And does it still work if you removed perl? Maybe the dep is
real, maybe not :-).
urpmi dep is worng :(
[root@iap-pxy-mow1 bor]# urpmq -r --auto-select
Can't locate Fcntl.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
I don't what would be the best way to
Ainsi parlait Fabrice FACORAT :
le mar 19-02-2002 à 14:21, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
I wrote a paper about urpmi for french LinuxMagazine journal. François
already read and commented it, but maybe some other people could be
interested. It is available (french-only, sorry) at
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bor@cooker% sudo urpmi rpmdrake-1.4-13mdk.src.rpm
everything already installed
bor@cooker% rpm -bp SPECS/rpmdrake.spec
error: failed build dependencies:
doxygen is needed by rpmdrake-1.4-13mdk
It's a build dependency, it's normal urpmi
bor@cooker% sudo urpmi rpmdrake-1.4-13mdk.src.rpm
everything already installed
bor@cooker% rpm -bp SPECS/rpmdrake.spec
error: failed build dependencies:
doxygen is needed by rpmdrake-1.4-13mdk
-andrej
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
bor@cooker% sudo urpmi rpmdrake-1.4-13mdk.src.rpm
everything already installed
bor@cooker% rpm -bp SPECS/rpmdrake.spec
error: failed build dependencies:
doxygen is needed by rpmdrake-1.4-13mdk
_Installing_ an src.rpm
Christian Bricart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
bor@cooker% sudo urpmi rpmdrake-1.4-13mdk.src.rpm
everything already installed
bor@cooker% rpm -bp SPECS/rpmdrake.spec
error: failed build dependencies:
doxygen is needed
I wrote a paper about urpmi for french LinuxMagazine journal. François
already read and commented it, but maybe some other people could be
interested. It is available (french-only, sorry) at
http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/linux/urpmi.html
Feedback appreciated.
--
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL
le mar 19-02-2002 à 14:21, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
I wrote a paper about urpmi for french LinuxMagazine journal. François
already read and commented it, but maybe some other people could be
interested. It is available (french-only, sorry) at
Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Es schrieb Warly:
does this fixed the pb ? (for urpmi not rpmdrake gtk pb)
on urpm.pm
--- urpm.pm.warly Sat Feb 16 19:57:51 2002
+++ urpm.pm Sat Feb 16 19:57:21 2002
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@
Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej:
I try to add new local media. If I manually type in directory nmae it is
ignored, like
adding medium of type: Local: '/usr/sbin/urpmi.addmedia' '-h' 'test'
'file://export'
added medium test
unable to access medium test
If I use file election
On óÂÔ, 2002-02-16 at 19:37, Stefan Siegel wrote:
It's a bug in urpmi:
No it is brain damaged Gtk+ file selection dialog + bug in gtk+mdk
directory selection dialog.
-andrej
Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej:
I try to add new local media. If I manually type in directory nmae it is
ignored, like
adding medium of type: Local: '/usr/sbin/urpmi.addmedia' '-h' 'test'
'file://export'
added medium test
unable to access medium
Es schrieb Warly:
does this fixed the pb ? (for urpmi not rpmdrake gtk pb)
on urpm.pm
--- urpm.pm.warly Sat Feb 16 19:57:51 2002
+++ urpm.pm Sat Feb 16 19:57:21 2002
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@
#- remove any multiple /s or trailing /.
#- then split all
Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Es schrieb Warly:
does this fixed the pb ? (for urpmi not rpmdrake gtk pb)
on urpm.pm
--- urpm.pm.warly Sat Feb 16 19:57:51 2002
+++ urpm.pm Sat Feb 16 19:57:21 2002
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@
#- remove any multiple /s or trailing /.
Warly wrote:
Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Es schrieb Warly:
does this fixed the pb ? (for urpmi not rpmdrake gtk pb)
on urpm.pm
--- urpm.pm.warly Sat Feb 16 19:57:51 2002
+++ urpm.pm Sat Feb 16 19:57:21 2002
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@
#- remove any
Le Wednesday 13 February 2002 20:47, vous avez écrit :
»pascal« sagte am 2002-02-13 um 19:55:30 +0100 :
all this could be disabled when not called by rpmdrake, humm ?
Hmm, haven't had a look at rpmdrake, but does rpmdrake *ALWAYS*
automatically do a urpmi.update? If not, then it might be
Liam Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:04:37AM +0300, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
How would you manage corrupted downloads?
check the size isn't 0 (a common failure case), and check the checksum?
Already taken into account in urpmi (or at least it should be).
bor@cooker% sudo urpmi rpmdrake-1.4-10mdk.src.rpm
no package named rpmdrake-1.4-10mdk.src
-andrej
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bor@cooker% sudo urpmi rpmdrake-1.4-10mdk.src.rpm
no package named rpmdrake-1.4-10mdk.src
It is a bug of mine, sorry fixed now, will be in next urpmi uploaded.
François.
Hi cookers,
I think urpmi doesn't like supermount...
How to reproduce problem:
1. insert cooker CD#1, copy something from CD, ex. ./dosutils
2. urpmi wine, asks for cooker CD#2
3. insert CD#2 and press Enter
result: never ending story :(
Note: my box is Beta2 installed over Beta1 choosing
Le Mercredi 13 Février 2002 15:24, Radek Vybiral a écrit :
Hi cookers,
I think urpmi doesn't like supermount...
How to reproduce problem:
1. insert cooker CD#1, copy something from CD, ex. ./dosutils
2. urpmi wine, asks for cooker CD#2
3. insert CD#2 and press Enter
result: never
Stéphane Teletchéa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Mercredi 13 Février 2002 15:24, Radek Vybiral a écrit :
Hi cookers,
I think urpmi doesn't like supermount...
How to reproduce problem:
1. insert cooker CD#1, copy something from CD, ex. ./dosutils
2. urpmi wine, asks for cooker
On 13 Feb 2002, [iso-8859-15] Franois Pons wrote:
With rpmdrake i encountered the same problem.
Isn't there a way to prevent supermount to mount many times device (some lock
...) ?
But again, the same problem appears when one activate supermount.
Stef
This should have been fixed
Hello,
urpmi is looking for the file description, like here:
/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/descriptions but none of
the 3 mirrors I use has it at this location. (I tried the latest
uprmi-3.3-4mdk)
Regards,
Helge
Helge Hielscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
urpmi is looking for the file description, like here:
/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/descriptions but none of the 3
mirrors I use has it at this location. (I tried the latest uprmi-3.3-4mdk)
This is not a bug but a features
mhm, then I have no clue why urpmi is still using an old database. For
instance I tried to install
# urpmi mozilla-js-debugger
and urpmi is looking for mozilla-js-debugger-0.9.7-5mdk.i586.rpm:
--20:15:01--
Le Wednesday 13 February 2002 19:05, François Pons a écrit :
Helge Hielscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
urpmi is looking for the file description, like here:
/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/descriptions but none of
the 3 mirrors I use has it at this location. (I
»pascal« sagte am 2002-02-13 um 19:55:30 +0100 :
all this could be disabled when not called by rpmdrake, humm ?
Hmm, haven't had a look at rpmdrake, but does rpmdrake *ALWAYS*
automatically do a urpmi.update? If not, then it might be the case that
the user (for whatever reason) calls
On Ñðä, 2002-02-13 at 22:47, Alexander Skwar wrote:
»pascal« sagte am 2002-02-13 um 19:55:30 +0100 :
all this could be disabled when not called by rpmdrake, humm ?
Hmm, haven't had a look at rpmdrake, but does rpmdrake *ALWAYS*
automatically do a urpmi.update?
It never automatically does
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
»Borsenkow Andrej« sagte am 2002-02-12 um 10:18:07 +0300 :
It should delete if newer version has been downloaded. That assumes
intelligent cache management. I do not say it not doable, may be
everything is already there.
Okay, I can agree with
Alexander Skwar wrote:
»Borsenkow Andrej« sagte am 2002-02-08 um 17:57:49 +0300 :
I remember, many peoples complained that urpmi never cleaned up
downloaded RPMs. Just as reminder. I cannot see easy solution that would
please both.
That's right, and I also complained about this. But the
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:04:00AM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
»Liam Quin« sagte am 2002-02-08 um 14:26:56 -0500 :
It would help if urpmi removed packages that were installed OK.
Against. If I download some large package and install it, I'd like to
keep it around for whatever reason.
I
On ÷ÔÒ, 2002-02-12 at 20:48, David Walluck wrote:
I agree, and you want to know why? It's because urpmi is so buggy.
urpmi is not buggy. It can resolve only those dependencies that are
listed in RPMs.
Lots
of times installation fails,
Lots?! Come on, really.
but you can go into the cache
OK nice option, because what happens when you realize your new rpm does not
work as expected and u wanna revert back to older version, but the mirrors do
not have it anymore, or it is a very big package long to download.
what is lacking (for the next version) is a mean to revert back to the
»Liam Quin« sagte am 2002-02-12 um 13:11:46 -0500 :
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:04:00AM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
»Liam Quin« sagte am 2002-02-08 um 14:26:56 -0500 :
It would help if urpmi removed packages that were installed OK.
Against. If I download some large package and
Now, if urpmi would only delete files from /var/cache if they are
obsoleted (ie. a newer file is to be downloaded), than I would not
have
to do this by hand. So I think that /var/cache is the right
mechanism.
How would you manage corrupted downloads? You download, get truncated
RPM and
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:04:37AM +0300, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
How would you manage corrupted downloads?
check the size isn't 0 (a common failure case), and check the checksum?
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:04:37AM +0300, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
How would you manage corrupted downloads?
check the size isn't 0 (a common failure case), and check the
checksum?
Yes, that is what I meant under intelligent cache management. It much
more job than just delete once in a
It installs BuildRequires but not src.rpm itself. Is it intentional?
-andrej
»Borsenkow Andrej« sagte am 2002-02-08 um 17:57:49 +0300 :
I remember, many peoples complained that urpmi never cleaned up
downloaded RPMs. Just as reminder. I cannot see easy solution that would
please both.
That's right, and I also complained about this. But the issue back in
the day was
»Liam Quin« sagte am 2002-02-08 um 14:26:56 -0500 :
It would help if urpmi removed packages that were installed OK.
Against. If I download some large package and install it, I'd like to
keep it around for whatever reason.
Then remove packages older than a week, is my suggestion, for a
»Borsenkow Andrej« sagte am 2002-02-08 um 17:57:49 +0300 :
I remember, many peoples complained that urpmi never cleaned up
downloaded RPMs. Just as reminder. I cannot see easy solution that
would
please both.
That's right, and I also complained about this. But the issue back in
the
Vincent Jaubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When i try do install some packages with urpmi and the installation fails, why
does urpmi refetch the packages again instead of using the packages already in
the cache ?
You problably have called urpmi with different command line between, and urpmi
You problably have called urpmi with different command line between, and urpmi
clean cache before installing instead of after installing.
Would it be possible to add an option to preserve the cache (like apt-get does) ?
--
bor@cooker% sudo urpmi bootsplash-1.0-1mdk mkinitrd-3.1.6-25mdk
long wait then ^C
zsh: segmentation fault sudo urpmi bootsplash-1.0-1mdk
mkinitrd-3.1.6-25mdk
bor@cooker% l /var/lib/rpm/__*
/var/lib/rpm/__db.001 /var/lib/rpm/__db.002
I do not ask why it hangs. But why it segfaults?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You problably have called urpmi with different command line between, and urpmi
clean cache before installing instead of after installing.
Would it be possible to add an option to preserve the cache (like apt-get
does) ?
Oh, yes ?
François.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You problably have called urpmi with different command line
between, and
urpmi
clean cache before installing instead of after installing.
Would it be possible to add an option to preserve the cache (like
apt-get
does) ?
Oh, yes ?
I remember, many
I remember, many peoples complained that urpmi never cleaned up
downloaded RPMs. Just as reminder. I cannot see easy solution that would
please both.
So, could it be possible to update the packages list for apt-get so that we could use
it instead (it has all the features i need).
Thx
I remember, many peoples complained that urpmi never cleaned up
downloaded RPMs. Just as reminder. I cannot see easy solution that
would
please both.
So, could it be possible to update the packages list for apt-get so
that we
could use it instead (it has all the features i need).
Or
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 05:57:49PM +0300, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
I remember, many peoples complained that urpmi never cleaned up
downloaded RPMs. Just as reminder. I cannot see easy solution that would
please both.
A cache generally has two main parameters:
(1) how large the cache can grow
A nice feature of urpmi would be the ability to urpmi from a URL and
have it load all of the required dependencies. For instance:
# urpmi http://guillaume.cottenceau.free.fr/fb/frozen-bubble-0.9.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
would download frozen-bubble-0.9.1-1mdk.i586.rpm and figure out what
dependencies
When i try do install some packages with urpmi and the installation
fails, why does urpmi refetch the packages again instead of using the
packages already in the cache ?
Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# rpm -ivh http://guillaume.cottenceau.free.fr/fb/frozen-bubble-0.9.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
[ get dependeny errors ]
# urpmi dependent packages
# rpm -ivh http://guillaume.cottenceau.free.fr/fb/frozen-bubble-0.9.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
Why not doing the following
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[root@bastard root]# urpmi urpmi
Pour satisfaire les d¨¦pendances, les paquetages suivants vont ¨ºtre
install¨¦s (26 Mo):
rpm-python-4.0.3-4mdk popt-1.6.3-4mdk rpmtools-4.1-4mdk
popt-devel-1.6.3-4mdk cups-common-1.1.13-3mdk rpm-4.0.3-4mdk
[root@bastard root]# urpmi urpmi
Pour satisfaire les dépendances, les paquetages suivants vont être
installés (26 Mo):
rpm-python-4.0.3-4mdk popt-1.6.3-4mdk rpmtools-4.1-4mdk
popt-devel-1.6.3-4mdk cups-common-1.1.13-3mdk rpm-4.0.3-4mdk
rpm-build-4.0.3-4mdk rpm-devel-4.0.3-4mdk
Est-ce correct ?
[root@bastard root]# urpmi urpmi
Pour satisfaire les d¨¦pendances, les paquetages suivants vont ¨ºtre
install¨¦s (26 Mo):
rpm-python-4.0.3-4mdk popt-1.6.3-4mdk rpmtools-4.1-4mdk
popt-devel-1.6.3-4mdk cups-common-1.1.13-3mdk rpm-4.0.3-4mdk
rpm-build-4.0.3-4mdk rpm-devel-4.0.3-4mdk
Est-ce
Now, when urpmi is almost perfect, it is even more annoying.
{pts/2}% sudo strace -p 2660
stat64(/mnt/hd/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/emu10k1-tools-0.9.4-1mdk.i586.rpm,
0xb4b0) = -1 ENOTDIR (Not a directory)
stat64(/mnt/hd/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2, {st_mode=S_IFLNK|0777,
st_size=22,
...})
Fabrice FACORAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From my point of view mdksoft should not released urpmi with curl as
default webfetch programm. Seems to be broken and error messages are not
usefull :
Beware that curl does not support get of ftp files with time stamp checked and
size checked, so
{pts/1}% LANGUAGE=en sudo urpmi kdebase
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (29 MB):
kdebase-nsplugins-2.2.2-30mdk kdebase-2.2.2-30mdk
Is it OK? (Y/n)
installing
/mnt/hd/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kdebase-nsplugins-2.2.2-30mdk.i586.rpm
I wanted to do urpmi gcc made a typo and did urpmi dcc. To my surprise,
urpmi silently installed
{pts/1}% sudo urpmi dcc
ÕÓÔÁÎÏ×ËÁ /mnt/hd/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/irssi-0.7.98.4-2mdk.i586.rpm
ðÏÄÇÏÔÏ×ËÁ...
##
irssi
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
{pts/1}% LANGUAGE=en sudo urpmi kdebase
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (29 MB):
kdebase-nsplugins-2.2.2-30mdk kdebase-2.2.2-30mdk
Is it OK? (Y/n)
installing
On óÂÔ, 2002-01-26 at 16:53, Warly wrote:
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
{pts/1}% LANGUAGE=en sudo urpmi kdebase
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (29 MB):
kdebase-nsplugins-2.2.2-30mdk kdebase-2.2.2-30mdk
Is it OK? (Y/n)
From my point of view mdksoft should not released urpmi with curl as
default webfetch programm. Seems to be broken and error messages are not
usefull :
+ as you can see, urpmi.update -a with curl doesn't work.
+ urpmi.update --wget -a doesn't use wget
+ if I remove curl and use wget everything
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And for urpmi, the nice support for conflicts should be to
propose
to remove the conflicting package.
Yes, but a bit too dangerous to code now, this will be introduced for
next
release.
But what you do if you cannot remove it
You should really check apt in contrib.
I do not want to check apt because
- urpmi works just fine
- if it does not do something I want *it* to work correctly not apt. We
are on mandrake no Debian list here
If you wont to install package A but it conflicts with B and C
requires B
you
Daouda LO [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
urpmi use wget (or curl) at the backend to get files.
For wget there is a -c (or --continue ) option to continue getting a
partially-downloaded file if the ftp or http servers support range
header which is mostly the case.
Francois, what could be done
cooker a urpmi medium was not accessable, so I created a further cooker
medium from another ftp mirror and tried to take rpm from cooker b,
but
$ urpmi --mediums cooker b rpm
tries to get it from cooker a!
$ rpm -q urpmi rpmtools
urpmi-3.2-2mdk
rpmtools-4.0-7mdk
$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
when attempting an update from cooker via MandrakeUpdate, I get an error stating
Installation files missing. Perhaps you should update your urpmi database. I
have ran urpmi.update -a in an attempt to do this without success. Help out
there?
What is /var/lib/urpmi
Yura Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the man page it tells me:
All users belonging to group urpmi are allowed to install packages.
But i cant find urpmi group in the /etc/group file.
This has been dropped, man page will be fixed.
François.
hi,
maybe what I going to say is stupid, but would it be
possible to have urpmi checking for the reconnection of the
modem, cos it's oblige to re-download the whole file, if the
modem has been interreputed even a few seconds :-
regards ben
Ben V [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi,
maybe what I going to say is stupid, but would it be
possible to have urpmi checking for the reconnection of the
modem, cos it's oblige to re-download the whole file, if the
modem has been interreputed even a few seconds :-
urpmi use wget (or curl) at
In the man page it tells me:
All users belonging to group urpmi are allowed to install packages.
But i cant find urpmi group in the /etc/group file.
--
4:08am up 24 days, 15:18, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.15, 0.08
O//
==-} -
Hello,
just something I noticed with urpmi-3.2-2.. I think installing rpm's
supplying their pathnames used to work?
[root@localhost mirror]# urpmi
./cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kernel-2.4.17.7mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
./cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kernel-source-2.4.17.7mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
801 - 900 of 1196 matches
Mail list logo
