On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 23:50:50 +0100
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "an error occurred
> error ordering package list: cannot open Requirename index using db3 -
> No such file or directory (2)"
took me some time to figure the meaning of this message. The file
(/mnt)/var/lib/rpm/R
Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Is this the correct file?
> >
> > According to the logs, you didn't format your / partition, which
> > is pretty strange if you really want to do an install. Maybe
> > there is some sort of problem during this "pseudo" update which
> > makes that th
onsdagen den 25 september 2002 15.19 skrev Guillaume Cottenceau:
> Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > tisdagen den 24 september 2002 13.35 skrev du:
> > > Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I have problems installing Linux Mandrake. When I reach network
> > > > configurat
Please remove my name from the mailing list
Marcos colome
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes:> tisdagen den 24 september 2002 13.35 skrev du:> > Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes:> > > I have problems installing Linux Mand
Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tisdagen den 24 september 2002 13.35 skrev du:
> > Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I have problems installing Linux Mandrake. When I reach network
> > > configuration I get this error message:
> > >
> > > cannot write /etc/resolv.conf
[
tisdagen den 24 september 2002 13.35 skrev du:
> Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have problems installing Linux Mandrake. When I reach network
> > configuration I get this error message:
> >
> > cannot write /etc/resolv.conf
>
> can you attach the report.bug?
> to get it:
>
> durin
Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have problems installing Linux Mandrake. When I reach network configuration
> I get this error message:
>
> cannot write /etc/resolv.conf
can you attach the report.bug?
to get it:
during install, switch to console 2,
put a dos floppy in floppy dr
Igor Izyumin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm still suspecting the DNS resolving code. Have you tried in
> > static IP to not provide any IP for the DNS server, does it make
> > any change?
>
> OK, you're absolutely right. When you remove the DNS server, it brings up the
Nice, we're at lea
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 08:29, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 192.168.2.1, into which our systems (between two and five, depending)
> > are plugged; on both systems that failed I tried DHCP and static IP
> > addresses with the same crash. In the spir
On Thursday 01 August 2002 05:00 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Can you try with the following image? It has an option that is
> supposed to fix some problems in applications segfaulting with
> gcc 3.x.
>
> http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/files/network.img
Just tried it. Same thing. "insta
On Thursday 01 August 2002 03:21 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Wait, maybe this could originate from a mirroring problem (beuh,
> 0% chance but anyway); is the latest network.img from your mirror
> the same md5sum than me?
>
> 72b12e8fdd829acee960ad73cbca186d
No, my disk has the same md5sum a
On Thursday 01 August 2002 03:29 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 192.168.2.1, into which our systems (between two and five, depending)
> > are plugged; on both systems that failed I tried DHCP and static IP
> > addresses with the same crash. In the
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 192.168.2.1, into which our systems (between two and five, depending)
> are plugged; on both systems that failed I tried DHCP and static IP
> addresses with the same crash. In the spirit of scientific enquiry, next
I'm still suspecting the DNS resolv
Igor Izyumin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 31 July 2002 01:26 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > Yep, I'd really like we could fix it. I've posted a request for
> > testing to the developers of our office, maybe one of them can
> > reproduce and then it would be real easy for me to
Igor Izyumin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ouch, you too? What is your hardware?
> - 3com PCI network card (3c590, I think). Anyway, it uses the 3c59x driver.
My test machine uses the very same driver and I have no problem
:-(.
Wait, maybe this could originate from a mirroring problem (beuh,
Igor Izyumin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 31 July 2002 05:13 pm, Roland wrote:
> > Me too, I have done a network installation with a 3com 509 without
> > problems.
> The md5sums for the network.img in 9.0 beta1 and cooker are different. Could
> that be why? I was having problems
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > By the way, I'm beginning to ask myself if we're not trapped in a
> > gcc-3.2 miscompilation since the whole network code of stage1 has
> > not changed at all for the past months :-(.
> >
> > If only I could have a machine at hands with the problem
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 18:41, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > what is your network card? (lspcidrake -v)
>
> Sorry, I didn't read your other mail at that time.
>
> By the way, I'm beginning to ask myself if we're not trapped in a
> gcc-3.2 mis
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 19:19, David Walser wrote:
> If I've been following the discussion successfully,
> people are having problems with network.img?
>
> I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
> with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
It's not consistent; there's three of us e
OK, my relevant extra info:
Theories about differing versions in Cooker, beta 1, from different
sites don't really wash IMO because I have the same problem with the 8.2
network bootdisk; can others having the problem check this?
It seems some people with the problem use 3Com cards, but i'm afrai
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 12:25 pm, you wrote:
> Igor Izyumin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after
> > you tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
>
> Ouch, you too? What is your hardware?
>
> > 4. Also, I th
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 05:13 pm, Roland wrote:
> Me too, I have done a network installation with a 3com 509 without
> problems.
The md5sums for the network.img in 9.0 beta1 and cooker are different. Could
that be why? I was having problems with beta1.
--
-- Igor
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 02:26 pm, Andy Neillans wrote:
> > If I've been following the discussion successfully,
> > people are having problems with network.img?
> >
> > I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
> > with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
>
> You follow it right -
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 01:26 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Yep, I'd really like we could fix it. I've posted a request for
> testing to the developers of our office, maybe one of them can
> reproduce and then it would be real easy for me to debug & fix.
How does one go about debugging a bo
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 01:25 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Igor Izyumin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after
> > you tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
>
> Ouch, you too? What is your hardware?
-
> > If I've been following the discussion successfully,
> > people are having problems with network.img?
> >
> > I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
> > with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
> Me too, I have done a network installation with a 3com 509 without
> problems.
David Walser a écrit :
>
> If I've been following the discussion successfully,
> people are having problems with network.img?
>
> I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
> with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
>
> __
> Do You Y
--- Andy Neillans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You follow it right - can I ask a silly question -
> which mirror / site
> did you use to get the cooker build from?
sunsite.uio.no/ftp.uninett.no (same thing I think)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health
>
> If I've been following the discussion successfully,
> people are having problems with network.img?
>
> I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
> with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
>
You follow it right - can I ask a silly question - which mirror / site
did you use to
If I've been following the discussion successfully,
people are having problems with network.img?
I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live b
>
> Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > what is your network card? (lspcidrake -v)
>
> Sorry, I didn't read your other mail at that time.
>
> By the way, I'm beginning to ask myself if we're not trapped in a
> gcc-3.2 miscompilation since the whole network code of stage1 has
"Andy Neillans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some info on my setup:
> - Local network, one running PDC Domain server running Samba 2.2.3a
> - IP Address: 169.254.x.x Subnet: 255.255.0.0 Gateway: 169.254.100.1
> - PDC running BIND 9.2.1rc1 and dhcpd v3.0.1rc8
> - Mixture of Win2k, 98, XP
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what is your network card? (lspcidrake -v)
Sorry, I didn't read your other mail at that time.
By the way, I'm beginning to ask myself if we're not trapped in a
gcc-3.2 miscompilation since the whole network code of stage1 has
not changed at all
Igor Izyumin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after you
> tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
Ouch, you too? What is your hardware?
> 4. Also, I think the user should be able to choose between quiet and r
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after you
> > tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
>
> Hey, that's three of us having this problem now! Come on, we gotta be
> able to figure out some kind
> > 1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits
> abnormally after you
> > tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
>
> Hey, that's three of us having this problem now! Come on, we gotta be
> able to figure out some kind of common feature between us...
> --
>
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 04:10, Igor Izyumin wrote:
> I have several install nitpicks for 9.0beta1. I'm sorry if these have already
> been reported; they are not in bugzilla.
>
> 1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after you
> tell it the IP addresses or tell it to
here too,
I have
AMD K6-200
on ASUS P55TVP4
with S3 875 Video
gives me:
(console 1)
error opening security file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy
install exited abnormally ;-( -- received signal 13
(console 2)
*trying to load i810fb module with xres<640> (vga was <785>)
*running:/usr/b
Pixel,
Thanks for the VERY quick fix on the mouse.
Any ideas on the other install issues ? (they also happened when
I used standard 2 button mouse with no errors)
Cheers,
Robin
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Robin Pollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > an error occured: unknown
"Robin Pollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> an error occured: unknown device atibm (caller is
>install_steps_gtk:/usr/bin/perl_install/install_steps_gtk:198
fixed.
"L. A. Lawless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've tried with three 2.2 kernels and three 2.4 kernels. I've tried
> XFree 3.3 and XFree 4. I've tried with different x servers
> pre-installed. Even if I don't use framebuffer on reboot, if I dare
> click on drakx in graphical mode everything freeze
François Pons wrote:
>
> "L. A. Lawless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm bringing up a question or two on this because although it's not the
> > same problem, there are similarities. P200MMX, 3.3GB HDD, 160MB RAM,
> > S3Virge 86c325 graphics card with 4MB video RAM. X cannot be installed
>
very common card, but maybe I should get an nVidea instead..
if a PCI version exists.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of L. A. Lawless
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm bringing up a question or two on this because although it's not the
> > same problem, there are similarities. P200MMX, 3.3GB HDD, 160MB RAM,
> > S3Virge 86c325 graphics card with 4MB video RAM. X cannot be installed
> > in 8 at all, any version. Even doing a
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 06:01, you wrote:
> Juhan Leemet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > ...It's currently running RedHat 6.1 very nicely. I would like to...
> > for my attempt at installing using hd.img, I get:
> > install exited abnormally :-(
> > (Alt-F2)DrakX v1.510
Juhan Leemet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ...It's currently running RedHat 6.1 very nicely. I would like to
> > > move my machines to a common code base, and Mandrake looks like the best
> > > for me. However, I cannot install 8.0 into that machine
>
> > What gives Alt-F2, Alt-F3 and Alt-
. Lawless
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Cooker] install problems with DrakX?
François Pons wrote:
>
> Juhan Leemet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > Pentium. It's currently running RedHat 6.1 very nicely. I would like
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 12:42, you wrote:
> Juhan Leemet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> > ...I have a Compaq Prolinea 4/50s with PODP upgrade so it looks like a
> > 83MHz Pentium...
>
> Is it a pentium or not ? what looks like means for you ?
[juhan@compaq2 /]$ more /proc/cpuinfo
processor
>
> I'm bringing up a question or two on this because although it's not the
> same problem, there are similarities. P200MMX, 3.3GB HDD, 160MB RAM,
> S3Virge 86c325 graphics card with 4MB video RAM. X cannot be installed
> in 8 at all, any version. Even doing an expert text install, along comes
>
François Pons wrote:
>
> Juhan Leemet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > Pentium. It's currently running RedHat 6.1 very nicely. I would like to move
> > my machines to a common code base, and Mandrake looks like the best for me.
> > However, I cannot install 8.0 into that machine. I've tried
Anton Graham wrote:
> I tried installing 8.0 on a friend's 800Mhz Thunderbird box and ran into
> some problems with diskdrake. The first install attempt seemed to go
> well, I set up the partitions within driskdrake, but I got the dreaded
> "LI" on reboot. Several attempts to reinstall lilo gav
Anton Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Looking at the partion tables with another utility (Rannish Partition
> Manager) showed a fairly scrambled partition table,
what is a fairly scrambled partition table? could you give it?
[...]
> Pre-generating the partition table with Rannish,
John Grange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> First problem is as noted before , I can not mount My /home partion
> using the disk partion utility in the installer, as it is where I am
> installing the files from, so it is mounted as /mnt/hd, and will not let
> Me unmount the partion and remou
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> webmedic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > /usr/bin/pearl-install/install_any.pm line 88 (#1)
> > > > Use of uninitialized value at /usr/bin/pearl-install/pkgs.pm
> > > > line 340 (#1)
> > >
> > > are you sure line 340?
> >
> > Sorry its line 61
> >
>
> ok,
webmedic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > /usr/bin/pearl-install/install_any.pm line 88 (#1)
> > > Use of uninitialized value at /usr/bin/pearl-install/pkgs.pm
> > > line 340 (#1)
> >
> > are you sure line 340?
>
> Sorry its line 61
>
ok, i removed this uninitialized value warning. But it doe
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > 3) When I got to the installing packages, the install
> > broke and gave me this.
> >
> > Use of uninitialized value at /usr/bin/pearl-install/fsedit.pm
> > line 112 (#1)
> > Use of uninitialized value at /usr/bin/pearl-install/diskdrake.pm
> > line 340 (#
webmedic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Here are my observations for panoramix:
> 1) I had to use the show all packages to actually
> install most of the packages I use regularly. If i had not the
> total install would have been about 80megs.
>
It will be fix, hopefully soon (i just ask
57 matches
Mail list logo
