le lun 17-12-2001 à 09:19, Ciprian Csordas a écrit :
> What is the diference between:
>
> kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk
>
> and
>
> kernel-linus2.4-2.4.16-4mdk
read description and changelog
--
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html
-
Les dynosaures n'ont pas tous disparu
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:19:03AM +0200, Ciprian Csordas wrote:
:What is the diference between:
:
: kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk
this is the latest one
:
:and
:
: kernel-linus2.4-2.4.16-4mdk
kind of old? not for sure.
:
:?
:
:
: Wye.
:
> What is the diference between:
>
> kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk
>
> and
>
> kernel-linus2.4-2.4.16-4mdk
>
Approximately the same as between newbie and cooker lists.
Sorry, could not resist.
Quoth Pixel
Robert L Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> that would be part of the "other deps" thing and besides if you have a
> SCSI drive
> and didn't do SCSI in kernel YOU ARE CRAZY!!
uh? yet again someone having something against modules? as for me, i
don't have
the time to build my own k
Robert L Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> that would be part of the "other deps" thing and besides if you have a
> SCSI drive
> and didn't do SCSI in kernel YOU ARE CRAZY!!
uh? yet again someone having something against modules? as for me, i don't have
the time to build my own kernel (and my
If you have a SCSI boot drive, and you haven't built SCSI into the
kernel, but
have it load as a module, you also have to use mkinitrd to create a new
initrd.img.
--
that would be part of the "other deps" thing and besid
** Reply to message from Robert L Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat,
24 Feb 2001 17:31:18 -0500
If you have a SCSI boot drive, and you haven't built SCSI into the kernel, but
have it load as a module, you also have to use mkinitrd to create a new
initrd.img.
> assuming you have a valid 2.4 kern
assuming you have a valid 2.4 kernel and the other deps have been taken
care of
all you would have to do is
1 copy the kernel file to /boot/
2 copy the system.map file over
3 tell your boot loader about the new kernel
This assumes you are starting from an installed system
Robert L Martin
xscreensaver and fortune-mod both contain .bz2 files?
Jorg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Can you please bzip2 all the patches on the SPEC CVS tree
Do you know what is the interest of CVS with text files ? i means the
very interest of cvs ?
ReiserFS was added in 2.4.1 pre7 and is in the 2.4.0-12mdk file, just not
turned on I think, since 2.4.0-12mdk is 2.4.0-ac12 which does indeed have
reiserfs support.
Jorg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> / reiserfs
>
>
Hi
I think they might have excluded the required hdreiser.img because of
prior problems, so probably it might pop up later.
regards
guran
ReiserFS is only available in kernel 2.4.1. Cooker has not yet
taken that step, so you must either manually install reiserfs support or
install kernel-2.4.1-linus and remember to boot from that rather than the
standard kernel.
At 05:12 PM 2/1/01 -0500, you wrote:
>I installed 1.30.01
Yo!
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:37:05PM -0800, Alan Olsen wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, josh mann wrote:
>
> > i just subscribed to the list, so i apologise if this message is redundant,
> > but where does mandrake linux stand on the 2.4 kernel? will it be in the
> > next release? aproximately
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, josh mann wrote:
> i just subscribed to the list, so i apologise if this message is redundant,
> but where does mandrake linux stand on the 2.4 kernel? will it be in the
> next release? aproximately when will the the next release be? what other
> 'features' should be in
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, OS wrote:
> Thanks for everyones help so far.
>
> How do I modprobe for eth0 !!! eth0 is not a real module is it ? I've tried
> to ascertain what it is modprob'ing but so far I haven't discovered which one
> it is. If 2.2 could find it perhaps a module which is no longer su
Thanks for everyones help so far.
How do I modprobe for eth0 !!! eth0 is not a real module is it ? I've tried
to ascertain what it is modprob'ing but so far I haven't discovered which one
it is. If 2.2 could find it perhaps a module which is no longer supported in
2.4 (I find that hard to beli
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:57:56PM +, OS wrote:
>> Could someone tell me how to get NFS, Samba and eth0 working on the new
>> kernel please !
On 7.2rc1, all I did was rpm -i the hackkernel and it all went like it was
supposed to (at least, eth0 and Samba, didn't get to try NFS).
--
And so
Geoffrey Lee a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:57:56PM +, OS wrote:
> > Could someone tell me how to get NFS, Samba and eth0 working on the new
> > kernel please !
> >
> > I thought I would try the new kernel-2.4.0-0.7mdk (at work not home). It was
> > exactly as I had found before. I am
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, OS wrote:
> I thought I would try the new kernel-2.4.0-0.7mdk (at work not home). It was
> exactly as I had found before. I am starting to beleive that there is some
> extra configuration required for the above to work with 2.4 kernels. After
> all, such rudimentary things
Yo,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:57:56PM +, OS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone tell me how to get NFS, Samba and eth0 working on the new
> kernel please !
>
> I thought I would try the new kernel-2.4.0-0.7mdk (at work not home). It was
> exactly as I had found before. I am starting to bel
Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's why the include/pcmcia directory is missing from source*mdk.rpm
> packages?
no it's an error of my, i'll fix it, thank you.
--
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
--Chmouel
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> kernel-headers doen't provide anymore a link to the source kernel but
> the real headers file, we should recompile the glibc with the last
> kernel-headers before releasing.
>
> ::Notes on kernel::
>
> We use the pcmcia modules from the user space package (aka: pcmci
Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> kernel-2.4-toolkit
> Some features have changed between k-2.2 and k-2.4
> It would be useful to make a package with configuration
> examples, and documentation about what have changed
>
> modules.conf should be is one chapter of this.
as keith an
24 matches
Mail list logo
