Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So sprach »Juan Quintela« am 2001-12-04 um 23:15:20 +0100 :
--=-=-=
Name: kernel-2.4.16.3mdk Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk
le mer 05-12-2001 à 15:00, Yves Duret a écrit :
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So sprach »Juan Quintela« am 2001-12-04 um 23:15:20 +0100 :
--=-=-=
Name: kernel-2.4.16.3mdk Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1
Really, what's gained by changing the *name* of the package each
time?
to have two or more kernel 2.4 in cooker
for example a stable one, and an another one whwere juanchmou can
apply
patches from everywhere without the risk of breaking cooker. if the
new one
is
stable enough, the older
i dont understand this. if this nameing is to allow 2 versions of the
kernel (one stable and one not) why not just name one
kernel-experimental-2.4.16-3mdk, or somthing to that effect?
--
Brad Wyman
bradw at sta-care.com
PGP Fingerprint: 8B1E E12F 3982 0D54 E01C DFD3 898B 6CA3 ED6F 3E56
--
alexander == Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
alexander So sprach »Juan Quintela« am 2001-12-04 um 23:15:20 +0100 :
--=-=-=
Name: kernel-2.4.16.3mdk Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release :
oden == Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
oden On Tuesdayen den 4 December 2001 23.47, Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »Juan Quintela« am 2001-12-04 um 23:15:20 +0100 :
Really, what's gained by changing the *name* of the package each time?
Won't this break stuff that Requires: kernel
On Wednesdayen den 5 December 2001 16.08, Juan Quintela wrote:
alexander == Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
alexander So sprach »Juan Quintela« am 2001-12-04 um 23:15:20 +0100 :
--=-=-=
Name: kernel-2.4.16.3mdk Relocations: (not
relocateable) Version : 1
borsenkow == Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If it were only this script. Even urpmi does not know how to handle
these versions and refuses to update both kernel and kernel-source.
borsenkow Not mentioning that CVS has no entries for new kernels. If they are
borsenkow built from
borsenkow Not mentioning that CVS has no entries for new kernels. If
they
are
borsenkow built from some private repository, PLEASE, move them to
contrib.
Fixed in 2.4.16.4mdk
What? CVS or contribs?
- Cooker has an old kernel that has _all_ the features and a new
kernel soon that is
Fabrice FACORAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
If you want to remove a kernel just use the plain name :
rpm -e kernel-2.4.13-10mdk
So I can't see the point for this new naming scheme. On top of that
mirrors seems to have problem with as I can't find them on rpmfind and
ftp.ciril.fr.
borsenkow == Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
borsenkow Not mentioning that CVS has no entries for new kernels. If
borsenkow they
are
borsenkow built from some private repository, PLEASE, move them to
borsenkow contrib.
Fixed in 2.4.16.4mdk
borsenkow What? CVS or contribs?
So sprach »Yves Duret« am 2001-12-05 um 15:00:24 +0100 :
patches from everywhere without the risk of breaking cooker. if the new one is
stable enough, the older goes away and so on...
Hm, if that's the goal, what about having:
Name: kernel
Version: something-which-is-stable
Release: 1mdk (or
Ainsi parlait Yves Duret :
[..]
You now could be sure to reboot your station after a kernel/cooker
upgrade..
Where the thrill of bleeding edge then :-) ?
--
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Skwar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So sprach »Yves Duret« am 2001-12-05 um 15:00:24 +0100 :
patches from everywhere without the risk of breaking
cooker. if the new one is
stable enough, the older goes away and so on...
Hm, if that's the
So sprach »Cain Brian-BCAIN1« am 2001-12-05 um 10:37:53 -0600 :
Isn't this the whole purpose for Cooker? I use cooker on my
production machine, knowing all along that it shouldn't be
considered stable. It seems like you're advocating yet another
unstable branch for Mandrake Linux? The
Ainsi parlait Borsenkow Andrej :
- our (your) own tools like urpmi do not know what to do with them;
you'd have to at least add all of them into inst.list or add support for
wildcards
Yep. Urpmi --auto-select fetches kernel-source-2.4.13-12mdk and
kernel-headers-2.4.16-16mdk
- how can i have
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Skwar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So sprach »Cain Brian-BCAIN1« am 2001-12-05 um 10:37:53 -0600 :
Isn't this the whole purpose for Cooker? I use cooker on my
...
Did you read Juans mail? He explained that he wants to have multiple
Feelin'
le mer 05-12-2001 à 18:53, Cain Brian-BCAIN1 a écrit :
b) Your lines are *WAY* too long! Keep it down to ~72 chars!
Sorry about that. Perhaps I should know better than to
use Outlook as a mail client (manually wrapping lines sucks).
-Brian
Outlook ,! I believed you were under Linux
le mer 05-12-2001 à 18:04, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Ainsi parlait Borsenkow Andrej :
- our (your) own tools like urpmi do not know what to do with them;
you'd have to at least add all of them into inst.list or add support for
wildcards
Yep. Urpmi --auto-select fetches
On Tuesdayen den 4 December 2001 23.47, Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »Juan Quintela« am 2001-12-04 um 23:15:20 +0100 :
Really, what's gained by changing the *name* of the package each time?
Won't this break stuff that Requires: kernel = 2.4?
It's even worse if you study the subject...
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 17:56, Oden Eriksson wrote:
On Tuesdayen den 4 December 2001 23.47, Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »Juan Quintela« am 2001-12-04 um 23:15:20 +0100 :
Really, what's gained by changing the *name* of the package each time?
Won't this break stuff that Requires: kernel
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 17:56, Oden Eriksson wrote:
On Tuesdayen den 4 December 2001 23.47, Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »Juan Quintela« am 2001-12-04 um 23:15:20 +0100 :
Really, what's gained by changing the *name* of the package
each time? Won't this break stuff that Requires:
So sprach »Blue Lizard« am 2001-12-04 um 18:11:50 -0500 :
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 17:56, Oden Eriksson wrote:
3mdk-1-1mdk-1.0-145mdk-ac12-167.14.mdk-23-mdksmp ?
Well it looks like Juan has semi fixed it, but why replace the dash with
a dot?
Hm? Where did Juan semi fix it? And actually,
Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »Blue Lizard« am 2001-12-04 um 18:11:50 -0500 :
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 17:56, Oden Eriksson wrote:
3mdk-1-1mdk-1.0-145mdk-ac12-167.14.mdk-23-mdksmp ?
Well it looks like Juan has semi fixed it, but why replace the dash with
a dot?
Hm? Where did Juan semi fix
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 18:52, Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »Blue Lizard« am 2001-12-04 um 18:11:50 -0500 :
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 17:56, Oden Eriksson wrote:
3mdk-1-1mdk-1.0-145mdk-ac12-167.14.mdk-23-mdksmp ?
Well it looks like Juan has semi fixed it, but why replace the dash with
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:03, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »Blue Lizard« am 2001-12-04 um 18:11:50 -0500 :
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 17:56, Oden Eriksson wrote:
3mdk-1-1mdk-1.0-145mdk-ac12-167.14.mdk-23-mdksmp ?
Well it looks like Juan has semi fixed it, but
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cooker-owner@linux-
mandrake.com] On Behalf Of Charles Shirley
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kernel-2.4.16.3mdk-1-1mdk
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 17:56, Oden
If it were only this script. Even urpmi does not know how to handle
these versions and refuses to update both kernel and kernel-source.
Not mentioning that CVS has no entries for new kernels. If they are
built from some private repository, PLEASE, move them to contrib.
And why 2.4.13 is
So sprach »Stefan van der Eijk« am 2001-12-05 um 08:03:39 +0800 :
Yes! Can't you see this is a great innovation? Let's do the rest of the
packages in cooker this way too!
The adavantages are obvious: When you update a package, there's no need
to think about the version in the changelog
29 matches
Mail list logo
