Re: [Crm-sig] E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member)

lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig -- ---- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technolo

Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc

n identify the part of that activity that the person carried out and assert a role classification on it via P2_has_type. Rob On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:44 AM Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote: Dear All, I don't think it is correct to make

Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc

__ > Crm-sig mailing list > Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig ___ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc

attern -- to assert a role of a particular individual in an activity, we can identify the part of that activity that the person carried out and assert a role classification on it via P2_has_type. Rob On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:44 AM Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:

Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc

of a particular individual in an activity, we can identify the part of that activity that the person carried out and assert a role classification on it via P2_has_type. Rob On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:44 AM Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote: Dear All, I don't thin

Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc

/crm-sig -- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) N.Plastira 100

Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc

. Cheers, George On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:27 PM Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote: Dear Francesco, This is an excellent paper. I cite: "However, reification has no formal semantics, and leads to a high increase in the number of triples, hence, it does not scale well. &qu

Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc

one or the other form of existing RDF reifications practices seems to be the good way to go. Best Francesco Le 10.05.23 à 18:48, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig a écrit : Dear All, I suggest to resolve the issue of referring to the provenance of .1 properties more specifically: Solution a: Add properties

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 625: O13 *triggers* scope note [HW reminder]

l effect and the starting of the device, but the device ticking can be regarded as part of the triggered process. All the best, Martin Best, Wolfgang Am 30.04.2023 um 17:56 schrieb Martin Doerr via Crm-sig : Dear Wolfgang, Your questions well-taken, but please do not seek a logical surrogate o

[Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Statements about Statements.

odelling now depends on a particular technology?  Can someone provide some clarification on this? Which solution is tech independent? Are they all independent of this tech discussion? One is at least. D On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 16:18, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote: Dear Robert, We have

Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Statements about Statements.

You are all welcome! I'll send you soon an outline of what I have in mind. All the best, Martin n 5/14/2023 10:55 PM, Dominic Oldman wrote: Hi Martin, I would like to be involved. Thanks, Dominic On Sun, 14 May 2023 at 19:34, Martin Doerr wrote: Dear Dominic, all, Yes, I

Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc

------ Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR70013 Heraklion,C

Re: [Crm-sig] PC0_Typed_CRM_Property in CRMpc

ce! Cheers, G On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 1:25 PM Martin Doerr wrote: Dear George, I agree with you below about the historical aspects. The annotation model has the same historical aspect, but is not limited to a single link. Let us discuss!

[Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Core and Application Models

l procedures associated with the relationship between them". This should also be a didactic goal. Best, Martin. -- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Inst

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 588 Implementing the .1 Properties of Base and Extensions in RDF

astira 100, Vassilika Vouton, 70013 Heraklion, Greece Tel: +30-2810-391619 ___ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig -- Dr. Martin Doerr Hono

Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Statements about Statements.

://enterprise-knowledge.com/rdf-what-is-it-and-why-do-i-need-it/ best, Martin -- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research

[Crm-sig] CRM applications

i/publications/2021/hyvonen-sampo-model-2021.bib>pdf <https://seco.cs.aalto.fi/publications/2021/hyvonen-sampo-model-2021.pdf>link <https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223034> Many of the "Sampos" use CIDOC CRM -based data models. All the best, Martin -- -

[Crm-sig] New ISSUE: Quantifiers of P140,P141,P177

sigments for *ISSUE 602*, this *must *be resolved. best, Martin -- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foun

Re: [Crm-sig] [NEW ISSUE]: missing inverse labels P81, P82, P171, P172

abels). Best, Eleni ___ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig -- ---- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 657: new example for P32 used general technique

-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig -- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 656 Homework

2024 14:15, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote: > Accepted! > > But, it seems it should be: > > "This property identifies an instance of E53 Place that falls wholly > within the extent of another instance of E53 Place, where both places > are

[Crm-sig] New Issue: link related examples

frame". It is very complicated to find these out by browsing! I propose "[example connects to P146]" and vice versa "[example connects to P145]" Best, Martin -- ---- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Info

[Crm-sig] Editorial Issue

Hierarchy and in the declaration of E92 is obsolete. To be corrected with that in the property declaration of P133. No decision needed. Best, Martin -- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: link related examples

or overlap or inclusion. The current city further covers completely previous up to the Roman settlement, and was continuously inhabited. Best, Marin Rgds SdS Stephen Stead Mob: +44 (0)7802 755 013 ste...@paveprime.com *From:*Crm-sig *On Behalf Of *Martin Doerr via Crm-sig *Sent:* Wednesday

[Crm-sig] Example for propositional objects

Dear All, I suggest to create an example using Bekker numbers. They constitute excellent examples of identifiers for propositional content. See https://guides.library.duq.edu/c.php?g=1030408=7468217 -- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head

Re: [Crm-sig] Example for propositional objects

in order to be able to find the original passage, read it, translate it and cogitate on what was really meant there (the propositions encoded). But perhaps you have another use in mind?  Best, George On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:25 PM Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote: Dear All,

[Crm-sig] Issue: Replace fictitious example

). "Harry Benson's photos of the Beatles sparked career" <http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/harry-benson-s-photos-of-the-beatles-sparked-career-1.2428648>. CBC News. Accessed 4 December 2023. Best, Martin -- -------- Dr. Martin Doerr

[Crm-sig] Issue 656 Homework

(E53) /falls within/ the area of Salisbury Plain (E53). (Pryor, 2016) In first-order logic: P89(x,y) ⇒E53(x) P89(x,y) ⇒E53(y) [P89(x,y) ∧P89(y,z)] ⇒ P89(x,z) P89(x,x) -- ---- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 656 Homework,

Dear All, We just observed that the FOL statements of P89 should also contain the formulation that both places need to be at rest to each other (i.e., fall into the same geometric system). This needs to be checked for all place to place relations. On 2/1/2024 9:04 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 656 Homework

place at (witnessed), /from E4 Period through P161 has spatial projection, E53 Place, P89 falls within to E53 Place, where both places are defined in the same geometric system. Stephen Stead Mob: +44 (0)7802 755 013 ste...@paveprime.com *From:*Crm-sig *On Behalf Of *Martin Doerr via Crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 656 Homework

PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote: Accepted! But, it seems it should be: "This property identifies an instance of E53 Place that falls wholly within the extent of another instance of E53 Place, where both places are defined in the same geometric system, i.e. they are at rest to each

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 490 -- E VOTE

: +30 2810391488 -- -------- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) N.Plastira 100,

Re: [Crm-sig] New ISSUE: Quantifiers of P140,P141,P177

, Christian-Emil *From:* Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr via Crm-sig *Sent:* 24 January 2024 19:09 *To:* crm-sig *Subject:* [Crm-sig] New ISSUE: Quantifiers of P140,P141,P177 Dear All, I remember a discussion about

Re: [Crm-sig] [NEW ISSUE]: missing inverse labels P81, P82, P171, P172

lt directed. So, "we should define inverse properties" is not the real question. It is only if the inverse label is of any use in a semantic graph or query as starting point. best, Martin On 2/8/2024 4:13 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote: Dear Eleni, I'd suggest not to assig

[Crm-sig] New Issue, inverse: Harmonizing CRMgeo logically with CRMbase

acetime_Primitive Range: SP7 <#_SP7_Declarative_Spacetime> Declarative Spacetime Volume *to be suproperty of P169, OR: **P168(x,y) ⇒SP6(x) * (SP6_Declarative _Place) *P169(x,y) ⇒SP7(y) P170(x,y) **⇒SP10(y) *All the best, martin On 2/25/2024 8:40 PM, Martin Doerr wrote: Dear All, In the co

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue, inverse: Harmonizing CRMgeo logically with CRMbase

acetime_Primitive Range: SP7 <#_SP7_Declarative_Spacetime> Declarative Spacetime Volume *to be suproperty of P169, OR: **P168(x,y) ⇒SP6(x) *  (SP6_Declarative _Place) *P169(x,y) ⇒SP7(y) P170(x,y) **⇒SP10(y) *All the best, martin On 2/25/2024 8:40 PM, Martin Doerr wrote: Dear All, In the co

[Crm-sig] New Issue: Harmonizing CRMbase logically with CRMgeo

)* P170(x,y) ⇒E61(x) P170(x,y) ⇒E52(y) P170(x, y) ⇒P81i(x, y) ∧P82i(x, y) *P170(x,y) ⇒ **(¬∃z)[E2(z) **⋀ P4(z,y)] *Excluding an instance of Temporal Entity to happen *at* this Time-Span Best, Martin -- Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head

[Crm-sig] FORTH and the CIDOC CRM, update

for Cultural Informatics that engages in the maintenance of the CIDOC CRM explicitly as part of their job description. Looking forward to many more years of fruitful and pleasant collaboration between FORTH and CIDOC, Martin Doerr chair, CRM-SIG -- Dr

<    2   3   4   5   6   7