On Mar 24, 2009, at 2:07 PM, david wrote:
> Kenny Leu wrote:
>> I've had similar issues before, where certain browsers would load
>> certain
>> images and others wouldn't. I hope the following helps you out:
>>
>> e.g. Windows IE7 would understand the following...
>>
>> background-image: url(r
Christopher R wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:36 PM "David Laakso"
> wrote:
>> Christopher R wrote:
>>> http://www.thecreativesheep.ca/site/imagepage5.html
>>>
>>> Here is the link, hopefully it can get figured out in case I run into the
>>> same problem on my other pages.
>>
>> Please botto
bottom posting means post after the words of the previous poster, not
before... just to clarify so the people on the list don't get any more
upset.. lol
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailma
Christopher R wrote:
> http://www.thecreativesheep.ca/site/imagepage5.html
>
> Here is the link, hopefully it can get figured out in case I run into the
> same problem on my other pages.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:04 PM "David Laakso"
> wrote:
>> Christopher R wrote:
>>> Has anyone has
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:36 PM "David Laakso"
wrote:
>Christopher R wrote:
> > http://www.thecreativesheep.ca/site/imagepage5.html
> >
> > Here is the link, hopefully it can get figured out in case I run into the
> > same problem on my other pages.
> >
>
>
> Please bottom post in reply. W
Kenny Leu wrote:
> I've had similar issues before, where certain browsers would load certain
> images and others wouldn't. I hope the following helps you out:
>
> e.g. Windows IE7 would understand the following...
>
> background-image: url(root/imageFolder/image.jpg);
>
> But Windows FireFox3 w
Christopher R wrote:
> http://www.thecreativesheep.ca/site/imagepage5.html
>
> Here is the link, hopefully it can get figured out in case I run into the
> same problem on my other pages.
>
Please bottom post in reply. What OS/browser does not load all the images?
_
http://www.thecreativesheep.ca/site/imagepage5.html
Here is the link, hopefully it can get figured out in case I run into the same
problem on my other pages.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:04 PM "David Laakso"
wrote:
>Christopher R wrote:
> > Has anyone has this problem whereas the browser does n
Christopher R wrote:
> Has anyone has this problem whereas the browser does not load all the images
> for the page, and is there
> a way to fix or force it too?
>
Validate the CSS and the markup. Put the page on a public server and
provide a clickable link to it in your post. Bottom post in r
Alright, I have put the quotations within the brackets and it seems to be only
fetching some parts
of a few 200K images from the server when using FF3. When I use IE7 / IE6 it
loads fine so how come FireFox is not getting the full
images from the server?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM "Kenn
>
> Can someone point me in the direction of coding idea or solution for this?
I
> suppose, strictly speaking, the info can be presented as a table of data
but
> there's still the alphabetical order issue when adding or removing
artists.
>
One thing that I would do is reorganize the the columns by
>
> I'd like to re-code that page in css rather than a table. For one thing it'd
> be lots easier to retain the alphabetical order when adding or removing a
> new artist. The current code is certainly a mess and could certainly benefit
> from a cleansing:-)
>
>
>
> Can someone point me in the direc
Giuseppe Craparotta wrote:
> http://www.giuseppecraparottacv.co.uk/doubts/about.html
> Is it any way to force IE6 to consider the image as going out of the
> div's width instead of widening the div accordingly to it.
Yes. Declare overflow: hidden on container and position: relative on
overflowin
Hi all
I volunteered for a non profit who recently lost their web person to do some
updates on their website. The page in question can be found here:
http://www.oregonwca.org/gallery.html The gallery is a 7-col table
containing an artist's name, a thumbnail, a thumbnail, artist's name,
thumbnail,
Hi everybody,
please take a look at this:
http://www.giuseppecraparottacv.co.uk/doubts/about.html
the div including the copy also contains an image (quote) on top, being this
wider than the div's declared width.
As a consequence IE6 increases the width of the div as equal to the width of
the imag
Jack Blankenships wrote:
> It seems to be that the table within the div or body element is
> pushing the content out beyond the specified widths in Internet
> Explorer. [...]
If you have problems: link to the case, page, you have problems with.
Bits of CSS don't make much sense without it.
rega
Jack Blankenships wrote:
> Apparently there was a table there as well, and max-width does not
> apply to a table very nicely in Safari or Internet Explorer. Can
> anyone offer some more explanation on this?
Have only tested for CSS table a year or so back, and it's a known
behavior in Safari 3.
It seems to be that the table within the div or body element is
pushing the content out beyond the specified widths in Internet
Explorer. If I set the width on the table to 100% it forces the
containing dom element to expand if the elements within the table can
possibly have a width to do so (that
I've had similar issues before, where certain browsers would load certain
images and others wouldn't. I hope the following helps you out:
e.g. Windows IE7 would understand the following...
background-image: url(root/imageFolder/image.jpg);
But Windows FireFox3 wouldn't! After some poking aroun
After experimenting some more I have come up with some code that seems
to work in most browsers:
.content {
width:100%;
max-width:960px;
min-width:640px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
This can be applied to a body or div tag with an embedded table a
Apparently there was a table there as well, and max-width does not
apply to a table very nicely in Safari or Internet Explorer. Can
anyone offer some more explanation on this?
Thanks,
Jack
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Jack Blankenships
wrote:
> Apparently there was a table there as well, an
> -Original Message-
> From: polar_anima...@zenbe.com [mailto:polar_anima...@zenbe.com] On
> Behalf Of Christopher R
> Sent: 23 March 2009 15:29
> To: Ian Young
> Cc: 'CSS-D'
> Subject: RE: [css-d] Browser doesn't load all images?
>
> Alright I still have a few things to check, but som
> To: CSS-D
> Subject: [css-d] Browser doesn't load all images?
>
> Has anyone has this problem whereas the browser does not load all the
> images for the page, and is there
> a way to fix or force it too?
In my experience there are a few things to check if images don't load
There is an html err
Alright I still have a few things to check, but some of it is working but my
"a" links don't seem to be working, odd. I'm going to
check over a few things and know by later on.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:13 AM "Ian Young" wrote:
>> To: CSS-D
> > Subject: [css-d] Browser doesn't load all image
Has anyone has this problem whereas the browser does not load all the images
for the page, and is there
a way to fix or force it too?
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
L
Is there a way to get a max-width attribute to work in Safari and
Internet Explorer? Supposedly both browsers suppourt it, but I can't
find an example of either doing so.
In theory I would like to add a class to a div like so:
.container {
width:100%;
max-width: 960px;
}
I would
On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> .hide and .paging have the same specificity. The last one in the
> source .css file then wins.
Yep see it now! Sorry couldn't see the wood for the trees.
Thanks,
Alex
__
--- On Mon, 3/23/09, Els wrote:
> That's what I thought at first too, but it's
> actually the letter 'l'.
> (lowercase L).
Good call! I guess that proves:
a) Firebug's default font is poorly chosen
b) Using lowercase ELL as an ID (or a name, or a variable, ...) is a pretty
stupid idea, even
Bobby Jack wrote:
> As ever, Firebug is your friend. The extra space is not a margin,
> but the slightly strange image at the end of your document. The one
> with an ID of "1" which, BTW, is invalid.
That's what I thought at first too, but it's actually the letter 'l'.
(lowercase L).
--
Els
_
--- On Mon, 3/23/09, Robert O'Rourke wrote:
> The page is at http://www.sanchothefat.com/dev/tc/ and the
> unwanted
> space is at the bottom of the page in the latest Firefox
> and Opera but
> not in Safari or Chrome.
As ever, Firebug is your friend. The extra space is not a margin, but the
Els wrote:
> Robert O'Rourke wrote:
>
>> I've been working on a site and just at the stage of tidying up the
>> CSS however I have a strange problem with margin collapsing. It
>> looks like there is some unwanted margin on the HTML element itself
>> which is really confusing me. I've been trying al
On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Alex James wrote:
>
> Probably missing something obvious but why doesn't the hide class
> override?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CSS
> ---
> .hide { display: none;}
> .paging { background-color: #d6d6d6; display: block; padding:
> .5em 1em; width: 100%;}
>
> My only
Probably missing something obvious but why doesn't the hide class
override?
CSS
---
.hide { display: none;}
.paging { background-color: #d6d6d6; display: block; padding:
.5em 1em; width: 100%;}
My only thought is the display block, but can't explain why? Currently
only using IE6
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
> I've been working on a site and just at the stage of tidying up the
> CSS however I have a strange problem with margin collapsing. It
> looks like there is some unwanted margin on the HTML element itself
> which is really confusing me. I've been trying all sorts to fix
> t
Hi all,
I've been working on a site and just at the stage of tidying up the CSS
however I have a strange problem with margin collapsing. It looks like
there is some unwanted margin on the HTML element itself which is really
confusing me. I've been trying all sorts to fix this problem. Putting a
35 matches
Mail list logo
