Re: [css-d] What´s wrong

2005-11-18 Thread Michael Wilson
Adam Kuehn wrote: > Michael Wilson wrote: >>In the above, adding the background color (#DDD) to 'background:' will >>provide a default color for the element in the case images are >>unavailable or undesired. > Just a quick note that the background color is ALWAY

Re: [css-d] What´s wrong

2005-11-18 Thread Michael Wilson
image when it doesn't exists with color > something like this In the above, adding the background color (#DDD) to 'background:' will provide a default color for the element in the case images are unavailable or undes

Re: [css-d] Website Check

2005-11-09 Thread Michael Wilson
pieces of content significantly overflow their containers at my browsers "minimum font size" setting of 16. You might want to install and test with Firefox yourself; the problem may be a clearing issue [01]. 01 http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html -- B

Re: [css-d] an alternative to if ie hack

2005-11-02 Thread Michael Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there an alternative to the hack > > > > something I can put in the external style sheet? Hi,

Re: [css-d] site check - Omega-Tek.com

2005-10-31 Thread Michael Wilson
Christian does regarding Firefox's link highlighting. I do see the "border" Firefox /overlays/ when I focus (using tab) links, but they cause no strange behavior or additional horizontal scroll at any resolution I've tested. Good luck! -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __

Re: [css-d] Dreamweaver 8: is it's code truly standards-compliant?

2005-10-27 Thread Michael Wilson
ill don't rely on design view for accuracy. All I care about is that it is close enough for me to get and idea of how things look and that it allows me to edit copy quickly. I do all of my formal testing in browsers and all of my markup in code view. Altogether, I love it. -

Re: [css-d] New article on PIE - "In Search of the One True Layout"

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Wilson
click the example link on : Anyone else, since Alex needs confirmation? I get the exact same in Firefox v1.0.7. -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d Lis

Re: [css-d] Good looking fluid-width sites

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Wilson
n't know what else to tell you other than I am done with this thread and with any attempt to try and help with the issue. -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/l

Re: [css-d] Good looking fluid-width sites

2005-10-25 Thread Michael Wilson
et to (an honored) 720px then that should not happen. I have a default IE 6 installation on Windows XP, SP2. Take it or leave it. I was just offering feedback on an otherwise nice layout. 01 <http://www.961media.com/__temp/ll2.png> Regards, Michael Wilson ___

Re: [css-d] Good looking fluid-width sites

2005-10-25 Thread Michael Wilson
961media.com/__temp/ll3.png> -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] site check mepush.com/sandbox/village/

2005-10-17 Thread Michael Wilson
lurring on me. Other than this, the page worked well for me. HTH -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/

Re: [css-d] Which browsers do you support?

2005-09-22 Thread Michael Wilson
I support: * Internet Explorer 5.0+ * Firefox * Mozilla * Safari * Netscape 6.0+ * Opera 7+ (6+ if I can) For older and other browsers, I just try to make sure the site is usable and I don't concern myself much with the look and feel of things. -- Best regards, Michael W

Re: [css-d] Descendant Selectors

2005-06-14 Thread Michael Wilson
#header {foo:foo;} would cover your needs in most scenarios. Just keep in mind that you do not have to name every element in the document tree for every rule set an you should be fine. -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-di

Re: [css-d] Class=3d"something" ????

2005-06-13 Thread Michael Wilson
ing, whenever the "=" symbol is used as content (within quoted printable encoding) and not as an escape, it also must be encoded as "=3d". Have you recently changed email clients? [01] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quoted_printable [02] h

Re: [css-d] Can someone explain this to me

2005-06-10 Thread Michael Wilson
Jessica Mays wrote: Ex.#nav li.nav-fanzone.sfhover a.img-fanzone Does this mean inside the #nav id area > the li that has a class of both nav-fanzone and sfhover and followed by a an tag with a class of img-fanzone Yes. The markup would look something like this: class="img-fanzone">

Re: [css-d] Allegedly simple positioning problem with CSS

2005-06-09 Thread Michael Wilson
Hi... It may help you even further *if* I include the link. :) http://iqmax.com/downloads/mike/css-examples/profile-sets-simple/index.htm Sorry about that... -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [css-d] Allegedly simple positioning problem with CSS

2005-06-09 Thread Michael Wilson
this should look OK in IE 6 and Firefox 1.0+. -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by

Re: [css-d] Newbie-Question: Problem with Background Image

2005-06-07 Thread Michael Wilson
also remove the font-size: 14px; rule since you already specified that in your h1 rule set. -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ

Re: [css-d] using percentages, paragraph too small within tables

2005-05-31 Thread Michael Wilson
has a higher specificity, the latter rule is ignored. HTH, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evo

Re: [css-d] CSS list numbering - non-contiguous lists in XHTML 1. 1

2005-05-24 Thread Michael Wilson
aced outside the list; perhaps before as an introduction or after as a footnote. At the end of the day, I don't think you will be committing semantic hara-kiri by using this method to structure your list. Best regards, Michael Wilson

Re: [css-d] Site Check - Windows Users

2005-05-23 Thread Michael Wilson
ry.png Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Win (2k?) IE 5+ odity

2005-05-18 Thread Michael Wilson
Ingo Chao wrote: Michael Wilson schrieb: I ran a site I'm working on through BrowserCam and noticed that on Widows 2000 in IE 5.01-6.0 the floated sidebar on one of the pages [01] was missing from the captures. I'd also like to know if this can be confirmed on a Windows XP box.

[css-d] Win (2k?) IE 5+ odity

2005-05-18 Thread Michael Wilson
Hi, I posted this issue to another, broader scoped list (Webdesign-L) yesterday to try and get a handle on what my issue is and I believe it may be CSS related, so I thought I would seek help here as well. Overview: I ran a site I'm working on through BrowserCam and noticed that on Widows 2000 i

Re: [css-d] Problems with simple layout

2005-05-12 Thread Michael Wilson
On Thu, 12 May 2005 13:07:39 -0400, The Idol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] I have revised that example page to be more clear. Hi, Try this approach... you may have to play with padding to tweak it into something you like; this is pretty much a sta

Re: [css-d] Problems with simple layout

2005-05-11 Thread Michael Wilson
the Idol wrote: As you can see in IE the thumbnail is hugging the top left corner of my background image and I see the background color behind it (which is correct) Any help with this simple thing would be greatly appreciate. ( I hope that it is possible to look the same in both browsers) I supp

Re: [css-d] NavMenu problem

2005-05-06 Thread Michael Wilson
ed the issue in Firefox v1.0.3 on Win XPPro. -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evo

Re: [css-d] Browser compatibility information?

2005-05-05 Thread Michael Wilson
/index.html> <http://www.corecss.com/properties/full-chart.php> -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.

Re: [css-d] order of content

2005-05-04 Thread Michael Wilson
and in those cases I fall back on absolute positioning, but over all I find floats to be much more forgiving and easier to work with. -- Best regards, Michael Wilson __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailma

Re: [css-d] Can you help me code this?

2005-05-02 Thread Michael Wilson
solution may work better than others in a given situation. The following provides a few examples of various ways to markup and style this basic layout. <http://www.iqmax.com/downloads/mike/css-examples/image-description-sets/index.htm> -- Best regards, Michael

Re: [css-d] Weird hover effect in firefox

2005-04-28 Thread Michael Wilson
Adam Kuehn wrote: Michael Wilson wrote: This rule would be applied to all of #col1, to all links in #col2, and to all hovered links in #col2. Just to nit-pick a bit, when written exactly as you have it there, the rules apply to whatever element has id="col1", all anchors that o