Re: [css-d] media queries following prior rules

> On 11 Jul 2016, at 18:13, John J wrote: > > At the link below, the name, email, subject fields don't appear to be > obeying rules governing width as in the previous media breaks.. > > at 360 and 320, those fields exceed the width of their parent, rather than > respecting padding set prior..m

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

n 14 Apr 2016, at 23:03, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > I don't believe this is correct. Widths and heights hard coded or inline > trump external. > Unless I missed something along the way. (: )) > > Best, > Karl DeSaulniers > > > >> On Apr 14, 2016, at 2:

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

If you specify any img width in the css then the html widths will have no effect. But beware that if you haven't specified any heights, then the html 'height' may cause havoc with your layout. In the css, even height:auto; is sufficient to overide the html. Maybe 508 compliance requires image

Re: [css-d] rendering of Open Sans on my project site vs. Typekit

;a' looks fine and correct. Mac 10.6.8, FF v34.0.8 and iPad with retina, iOS 7.1.2 Perhaps it's an OS or graphics rendering thang rather than a problem with your code. Peter H. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.c

[css-d] Fwd: Grids: what's all the fuss ?

De: Tim Dawson Fecha: 11 de agosto de 2014 12:25:24 GMT+02:00 Para: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Asunto: Re: [css-d] Grids: what's all the fuss ? On 11/08/2014 09:43, MiB wrote: > 11 aug 2014 kl. 10:02 skrev Tim Dawson : >> what I'd do with an eight or twelve column design (or why I'd need it, >>

Re: [css-d] Do modern mobile browsers deliberately ignore font size?

On a Motorola G phone with Android Kitkat the text is quite large and the text is tiny. On an iPhone 4 all the text is the same size, and tiny. Peter El 13/03/2014, a las 23:31, Ezequiel Garzón escribió: Thanks again for your reply. Now I'm really beginning to second-guess

Re: [css-d] Will the unsemantic HTML elements B and I be soon phased out?

> El 17/02/2014, a las 11:29, Barney Carroll escribió: > > While bikeshedding around 'how semantic' people feel any given element to be > is a great laugh (although definitely off-topic for this list), I would > highly recommend the HTML specification for insight into the purpose of any > HTML

Re: [css-d] Will the unsemantic HTML elements B and I be soon phased out?

> El 17/02/2014, a las 11:01, Philip Taylor escribió: > > Peter H. wrote: >> I've always had a problem understanding why and are >> supposedly more semantic than and . > > Because means "emphasised" and means "strongly emphasised" > (s

Re: [css-d] Will the unsemantic HTML elements B and I be soon phased out?

ery unsemantic. But seeing as and will be legit for the foreseeable future I'll prefer them over and . They're quicker to key, too. Peter H. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailm

Re: [css-d] html email with css

, google, yahoo or email programmes like outlook and mail. Peter H. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://cs

Re: [css-d] css-based flyout menu for mobile?

> El 15/06/2013, a las 01:20, COM escribió: > > Can anyone point me to a 100% css-based flyout menu for use with mobile > devices? By flyout, I mean that when User presses a Menu icon, the menu > slides out or otherwise appears, User presses their choice and menu hides, > chosen page loads. >

Re: [css-d] Simple Floats on Multiple Rows Getting "Stuck"

it's ideal for lining up floated items of variable height regardless of window width: display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; I notice that the link that Georg posted is still functioning so I'll take the liberty of repeating it here: http://www.gunlaug.com/con

Re: [css-d] Floating boxes with variable heights

thanks Georg, that's very handy. Peter > - > El 27/07/2012, a las 17:27, Georg escribió: > > an alternative to equal height floats, and inline-block are very often the > best > __ css-d

Re: [css-d] Floating boxes with variable heights

Georg, I'm intrigued by your example and have wanted that behaviour several times in the past and couldn't figure a way to achieve it without fixed height divs. But from your test page there's a bit of css that I don't understand: .floating { float-:left; width:140px; ma

Re: [css-d] ie 6/7/8

> El 23/04/2012, a las 17:13, David Laakso escribió: > > Your comments and suggestion on this site in > Internet Explorer 6/7/8 are appreciated. > David, an oldish Acer portable running XP, browser windows at full width of the screen: in IE6 & 7 the page draws very vertica

Re: [css-d] Finding fallback fonts (for Calibri)

e handy for describing the quirks of Lucida Sans and Lucida Sans Unicode on Windows: http://www.brownbatterystudios.com/sixthings/2007/03/14/lucida-hybrid-the-grande-alternative/ Hope this is useful, Peter H. __ css-discuss [css-

Re: [css-d] desktop. tablet. mobile.

> El 31/01/2012, a las 03:31, David Laakso escribió: > > First pass: > Constructive comments and suggestions are always appreciated. > Thanks. > designery comments: really like the feel of it, nice sparseness, tasty use of colour, intriguing, slightly enig

Re: [css-d] Container shifts, one page to another

n the second page, though I'm pretty sure its well within the bounds > of the area it's sitting in. > Could it be just that the 2nd page draws a scroll bar, which causes everything to shift to the left ? Hth, best regards, Peter H. _

Re: [css-d] Vertical centering? And another problem.

, not matter > how much text, or what size image, I put int there. > in case this is of any help: the only way I've ever found to reliably centre vertically, is to use a good old-fashioned table. In this case, say, a single row with a cell each for your text and your image would proba

Re: [css-d] Browser Stacking Issues

d that "transparent" needs a lot more cpu power and that for z-index purposes only, "opaque" is better. However, I see that your .swf is within javascript tags so I'm not sure whether the above is