> you may do better to contact your browser vendor directly and ask them to
investigate the rendering issues you have reported
I'm wondering how differently my career might have worked out if all those
times IE came up I'd just told the client to get onto Bill Gates about it.
Maybe I'm just a suck
Barney Carroll wrote:
This begs the question: how much should one expound on browsers that one
is unfamiliar with, in general?
One should not expound on them at all : one should simply state "Our
HTML and CSS are W3C-compliant and W3C-validated, and, as far as we are
aware, render correctl
Yeah, the impression I get it is that they're not really concerned about
CSS validity. They do care about HTML validity, though – they use an
automated validation reporter (no more having to open email, scan email for
URL, paste URL into validator, copy link into email reply, hit send) for
their is
Barney Carroll wrote:
Bootstrap's pragmatic approach deems validity not to be a concern:
https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/6398
I am afraid that "mdo" does not understand the concept of validity.
He (or she) writes :
All the CSS we use is valid, and while some lines are hacks (* fo
7 okt 2014 kl. 10:16 skrev Barney Carroll :
> The specifics in Bootstrap's CSS are legacy IE hacks
> and vendor-prefixed CSS3.
Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Those are irrelevant errors that
you can ignore as you know you’re using vendor-prefixes and IE hacks. That’s
not what I
Bootstrap's pragmatic approach deems validity not to be a concern:
https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/6398
In theory, total W3 compliance will make your code behave completely
predictably in any environment you care to mention. In practice, popular
browsers have deviated from the spec time
Going back to the original “tangent”…
Philip did raise a valid point. A site should validate and validation is also a
great way to catch the “silly mistakes” we introduce form copying/pasting,
typing etc.
However, in this age of building sites with bootstrap, jquery plugins we find
to help res
okt 6 2014 20:20 Barney Carroll :
> So 'validate your markup', as much as it may be good advice, wouldn't have
> caught this particular fish. In fact, I might assert that 'validate your
> markup' hasn't taught us anything with regards to this particular problem.
> The reason people come to this l
Going back to the original problem for a second, the fish in question is
making the links on Bob's site work on touch-enabled devices.
To catch the fish, I opened the provided URL in Chrome on my laptop with
the DOM inspector open. The links worked as expected by default, but when I
enabled device
So in other words. Philip is teaching to fish. Not just giving you a fish.
Kudos Philip!
Best,
Karl
Sent from losPhone
> On Oct 6, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Philip Taylor wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Barney Carroll wrote:
>
>> CSS discuss often reminds me of my doctor, to whom I'll often go with
>> queries
Barney Carroll wrote:
CSS discuss often reminds me of my doctor, to whom I'll often go with
queries about an acute injury and come away with advice to stop smoking
– wise & well-intentioned, but somewhat short of the assumed benefits in
seeking expert advice for a specific problem.
But your
CSS discuss often reminds me of my doctor, to whom I'll often go with
queries about an acute injury and come away with advice to stop smoking –
wise & well-intentioned, but somewhat short of the assumed benefits in
seeking expert advice for a specific problem.
Bob, your problem is down to Javascri
Bob Schwartz wrote:
> Validation fixed, but still not working.
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://www.dlp-distribution.fr/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/li
Validation fixed, but still not working.
Bob Schwartz
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-disc
Bob Schwartz wrote:
I’m going slightly mad.
On a site: http://www.dlp-distribution.fr
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.dlp-distribution.fr/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
I’m going slightly mad.
On a site: http://www.dlp-distribution.fr
below the carousel on the home page are four blue boxes with icon-like images
in them.
If you touch (or hover with the mouse on a computer) one of these some text
slides in.
At the bottom of the text is a link (decoverez) which
16 matches
Mail list logo
