Ken,
Thank you for the reply, this is great news!
Looking forward to speedier rsyncs with Cygwin.
Keith
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021, 16:49 Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 9/16/2021 6:00 PM, Keith Christian via Cygwin wrote:
> > I've been following his thread with interest both here a
On 9/16/2021 6:00 PM, Keith Christian via Cygwin wrote:
I've been following his thread with interest both here and on the Cygwin
developers list. I, too rsync between Cygwin and Linux machines.
Lots of good debate showing the genius of the folks that support the cygwin
infrastructure.
Looks li
I've been following his thread with interest both here and on the Cygwin
developers list. I, too rsync between Cygwin and Linux machines.
Lots of good debate showing the genius of the folks that support the cygwin
infrastructure.
Looks like the lively discussion on both lists has stopped. What
On Sep 6 21:34, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2021-09-06 15:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 9/6/2021 4:54 PM, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 14:40 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > > No, wait. I get what you say. The optimzation settings o
On 07/09/2021 23:44, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
>
> MS can't add a new named field to a documented struct without
breaking a lot of code. I think it's extremely unlikely that they would
do that. On the other hand, I think it's very likely that a reader of
the Cygwin code would be confused by c
On 9/7/2021 5:52 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
With undocumented structure member initialization an issue, maybe better to
future proof using e.g.
MEM_EXTENDED_PARAMETER mmap_ext = { 0 }; // or memset or bzero
I don't see what this would accomplish. We're already init
> >
> > With undocumented structure member initialization an issue, maybe better to
> > future proof using e.g.
> >
> > MEM_EXTENDED_PARAMETER mmap_ext = { 0 }; // or memset or bzero
>
> I don't see what this would accomplish. We're already initializing every
> member
> after Corinna's last
Hi Ken,
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 17:24 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> You're looking at the wrong source code. The bug didn't occur until
> the code
> was changed to do the following:
You are right. I do not know why i looked at an old checkout of the
code. Shame on me! Sorry for wasting you
On 9/6/2021 11:34 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2021-09-06 15:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/6/2021 4:54 PM, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 14:40 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
No, wait. I get what you say. The optimzation settings of the test
case should h
On 2021-09-06 15:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/6/2021 4:54 PM, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 14:40 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
No, wait. I get what you say. The optimzation settings of the test
case should have no influence on the code inside the DLL
On 9/6/2021 5:24 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/6/2021 4:54 PM, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 14:40 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
No, wait. I get what you say. The optimzation settings of the test
case should have no influence on the code inside the DLL
On 9/6/2021 4:54 PM, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 14:40 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
No, wait. I get what you say. The optimzation settings of the test
case should have no influence on the code inside the DLL. That
doesn't
make sense for sure. However, I r
Hi there,
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 14:40 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > No, wait. I get what you say. The optimzation settings of the test
> > case should have no influence on the code inside the DLL. That
> > doesn't
> > make sense for sure. However, I ran the testcase under GDB, I could
Hi there,
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 14:40 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > No, wait. I get what you say. The optimzation settings of the test
> > case should have no influence on the code inside the DLL. That
> > doesn't
> > make sense for sure. However, I ran the testcase under GDB, I could
On 9/6/2021 2:07 PM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Sep 6 19:59, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Sep 6 13:38, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/6/2021 1:12 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/6/2021 11:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Sep 5 09:24, Ken Brown via Cyg
On Sep 6 19:59, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> On Sep 6 13:38, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 9/6/2021 1:12 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > On 9/6/2021 11:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > On Sep 5 09:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > > On 9/4/2021 8:04 PM,
On Sep 6 13:38, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 9/6/2021 1:12 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 9/6/2021 11:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > On Sep 5 09:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > On 9/4/2021 8:04 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > > On 9/4/2021 6:58 PM, Ken
On 9/6/2021 1:38 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/6/2021 1:12 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/6/2021 11:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Sep 5 09:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 8:04 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 6:58 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wr
On 9/6/2021 1:12 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/6/2021 11:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Sep 5 09:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 8:04 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 6:58 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
Here are the correct commits:
8169e39ab Cyg
On 9/6/2021 11:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Sep 5 09:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 8:04 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 6:58 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
Here are the correct commits:
8169e39ab Cygwin: C++17: register keyword is deprecated
3ca80b3
On Sep 5 09:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 9/4/2021 8:04 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 9/4/2021 6:58 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > Here are the correct commits:
> > >
> > > 8169e39ab Cygwin: C++17: register keyword is deprecated
> > > 3ca80b360 Cygwin: dumper: fix up GCC pr
05.09.2021 17:11, Brian Inglis:
The suggestion was intended as a tip to ensure *complete* locally
rebuilt package contents are installed,
Setup has its "from_cwd" installation mode for precisely that reason:
installing a local package without the need to create a full install
hierarchy and s
On 2021-09-05 02:18, Achim Gratz wrote:
04.09.2021 18:45, Brian Inglis:
[...]
then to install all binary packages for dogfooding:
Would you please stop telling folks to do things that potentially breaks
their systems?
There are quite a few more steps to take if you want to emulate what
set
On 9/4/2021 8:04 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 6:58 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 6:54 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 6:37 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
I've reduced the procps failure to the following test case:
$ cat mmap_test.c
#include
#include
04.09.2021 18:45, Brian Inglis:
[...]
then to install all binary packages for dogfooding:
Would you please stop telling folks to do things that potentially breaks
their systems?
There are quite a few more steps to take if you want to emulate what
setup does. Then again you cannot do that o
On 9/4/2021 6:58 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 6:54 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 6:37 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
I've reduced the procps failure to the following test case:
$ cat mmap_test.c
#include
#include
#include
int
main ()
{
void *addr;
int pa
On 2021-09-04 16:37, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
I've reduced the procps failure to the following test case:
$ cat mmap_test.c
#include
#include
#include
int
main ()
{
void *addr;
int page_size = getpagesize ();
addr = mmap (0, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP
On 9/4/2021 6:54 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/4/2021 6:37 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
I've reduced the procps failure to the following test case:
$ cat mmap_test.c
#include
#include
#include
int
main ()
{
void *addr;
int page_size = getpagesize ();
addr = mmap (0, page
On 9/4/2021 6:37 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
I've reduced the procps failure to the following test case:
$ cat mmap_test.c
#include
#include
#include
int
main ()
{
void *addr;
int page_size = getpagesize ();
addr = mmap (0, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP
I've reduced the procps failure to the following test case:
$ cat mmap_test.c
#include
#include
#include
int
main ()
{
void *addr;
int page_size = getpagesize ();
addr = mmap (0, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
if (addr == MAP_FA
On 2021-09-03 14:59, Chris Roehrig wrote:
On Fri Sep 3 2021, at 12:55 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 2 12:03, Chris Roehrig wrote:
On Thu Sep 2 2021, at 8:25 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/1/2021 5:11 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
I rebuild procps 3.3.17.29-2480 from source and it appea
Am 03.09.2021 um 22:59 schrieb Chris Roehrig:
I got procps working I think (both with and without the revert).
That likely wasn't what Corinna wanted to know, though.
Please re-install the procps-ng, cygwin and cygwin-devel packages from
setup (and revert any other alterations you may have ma
On Fri Sep 3 2021, at 12:55 PM, Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
> [resent, this time with the ML in To]
>
> On Sep 2 12:03, Chris Roehrig wrote:
>>
>> On Thu Sep 2 2021, at 8:25 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin
>> wrote:
>>> On 9/1/2021 5:11 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
I rebuild procps 3.3.17.29-2480 fro
[resent, this time with the ML in To]
On Sep 2 12:03, Chris Roehrig wrote:
>
> On Thu Sep 2 2021, at 8:25 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 9/1/2021 5:11 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
> >> I rebuild procps 3.3.17.29-2480 from source and it appears to work, so
> >> maybe the stock procps packag
On 9/2/2021 3:03 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
On Thu Sep 2 2021, at 8:25 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 9/1/2021 5:11 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
I rebuild procps 3.3.17.29-2480 from source and it appears to work, so maybe
the stock procps package is incompatible with the current master branch.
On Thu Sep 2 2021, at 8:25 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 9/1/2021 5:11 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
>> I rebuild procps 3.3.17.29-2480 from source and it appears to work, so maybe
>> the stock procps package is incompatible with the current master branch.
>
> Maybe, but it could also be a C
On 9/1/2021 5:11 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
I rebuild procps 3.3.17.29-2480 from source and it appears to work, so maybe
the stock procps package is incompatibility with the current master branch.
Maybe, but it could also be a Cygwin bug. I'll do a bisection of the Cygwin
sources to see if I c
I rebuild procps 3.3.17.29-2480 from source and it appears to work, so maybe
the stock procps package is incompatibility with the current master branch.
(However, I built it against the stock /usr/include, not the current branch...)
I first needed to 'make /proc/libprocps.la', and there was an
I've found you must also copy the matching cygwin-console-helper.exe
for everything to work correctly!
On 2021-08-31 14:23, Chris Roehrig wrote:
I did a 'git pull' of the latest topic/pipe and rebuilt and I now do indeed get
100MB/s transfers using both rsync and scp (without pipe_byte).
(It t
I did a 'git pull' of the latest topic/pipe and rebuilt and I now do indeed get
100MB/s transfers using both rsync and scp (without pipe_byte).
(It turns out last time I forgot 'make install' -- Doh!)
I still get the procps error however.
On Tue Aug 31 2021, at 12:53 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
Thanks, I did some more tests:
scp also shows no improvement with topic/pipe.I tried running
cygsshd with CYGWIN=pipe_byte as well as empty (in the registry
HKLM/SYSTEM/CurrentControlSet/Services/cygsshd/Parameters/Environment/), using
net stop cygsshd + net start cygsshd to restart
On 8/30/2021 7:58 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
I got it to build and tried out the topic/pipe branch (checked out on Monday
around 4:30pm PDT):
1. I didn't see any improvement in my sshd+rsync time, still 3-4 MB/sec.
2. I get the following error from procps: procps:ps/output.c:2195: please
re
I got it to build and tried out the topic/pipe branch (checked out on Monday
around 4:30pm PDT):
1. I didn't see any improvement in my sshd+rsync time, still 3-4 MB/sec.
2. I get the following error from procps: procps:ps/output.c:2195: please
report this bug
(I also get this using the main
On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 22:15:29 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/29/2021 8:22 PM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 09:13:14 +0900
> > Takashi Yano wrote:
> >> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 17:04:56 -0400
> >> Ken Brown wrote:
> >>> On 8/29/2021 5:07 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> O
On 8/29/2021 8:22 PM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 09:13:14 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 17:04:56 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/29/2021 5:07 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:41:02 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 09:13:14 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 17:04:56 -0400
> Ken Brown wrote:
> > On 8/29/2021 5:07 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:41:02 +0900
> > > Takashi Yano wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
> > >> Corinna Vinsche
On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 17:04:56 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/29/2021 5:07 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:41:02 +0900
> > Takashi Yano wrote:
> >> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
>
On 8/29/2021 4:41 AM, Takashi Yano wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:55:52 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/28/2021 11:43 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 13:58:08 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 28 18:41, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27
On 8/29/2021 3:24 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
I'd be happy to test it out if you can give me some commands to git it and
build it to replace my existing stock Cygwin installation.
(Or it is just the cygwin.dll I'd need to replace?)
My daily backup scripts use a lot of pipes and named pipes.
It's
On 8/29/2021 3:37 PM, Takashi Yano wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 11:57:04 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/29/2021 5:07 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:41:02 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano vi
On 8/29/2021 5:07 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:41:02 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
Two years ago I thought I
On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 11:57:04 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/29/2021 5:07 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:41:02 +0900
> > Takashi Yano wrote:
> >> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
>
I'd be happy to test it out if you can give me some commands to git it and
build it to replace my existing stock Cygwin installation.
(Or it is just the cygwin.dll I'd need to replace?)
My daily backup scripts use a lot of pipes and named pipes.
-- Chris
On Sun Aug 29 2021, at 8:57 AM, Ken Br
On 8/29/2021 5:07 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:41:02 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
Two years ago I thought I
On Aug 29 00:43, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 13:58:08 +0200
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Aug 28 18:41, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
> > > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > >
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:41:02 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
> > > Ken Brown wrote:
> > > > Two years ago I thought I needed nt_create to avoid probl
Hi Ken,
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:55:52 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/28/2021 11:43 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 13:58:08 +0200
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Aug 28 18:41, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
> >>> Corinna Vinsche
On 8/28/2021 11:43 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 13:58:08 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 28 18:41, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 13:58:08 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 28 18:41, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
> > > > Ken Brown wrote:
>
On 8/28/2021 4:43 AM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
Two years ago I thought I needed nt_create to avoid problems when calling
set_pipe_non_blocking. Are you saying that's not an issue? Is
On Aug 28 18:41, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
> > > Ken Brown wrote:
> > > > Two years ago I thought I needed nt_create to avoid problems whe
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:43:27 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
> > Ken Brown wrote:
> > > Two years ago I thought I needed nt_create to avoid problems when calling
> > > set_pipe_non_blocking. Are you saying that
On Aug 28 02:21, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
> Ken Brown wrote:
> > Two years ago I thought I needed nt_create to avoid problems when calling
> > set_pipe_non_blocking. Are you saying that's not an issue? Is
> > set_pipe_non_blocking unnecessary? Is that
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:00:24 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:21:11 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
> > Ken Brown wrote:
> >
> > > On 8/27/2021 7:24 AM, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:18:29 -0400
> > > > Ken Brown wrote:
>
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:21:11 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
> Ken Brown wrote:
>
> > On 8/27/2021 7:24 AM, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:18:29 -0400
> > > Ken Brown wrote:
> > >> On 8/26/2021 11:56 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > [...]
> > >>
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:00:50 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/27/2021 7:24 AM, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:18:29 -0400
> > Ken Brown wrote:
> >> On 8/26/2021 11:56 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> [...]
> >> In case you want to try out my proposed change, I've just rebased the
>
On 8/27/2021 7:24 AM, Takashi Yano wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:18:29 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/26/2021 11:56 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
[...]
In case you want to try out my proposed change, I've just rebased the patches to
the current master and pushed them to a new topic/pipe branch.
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:18:29 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/26/2021 11:56 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 8/25/2021 5:29 PM, Takashi Yano wrote:
> >> On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:52:19 -0400
> >> Ken Brown wrote:
> >>> On 8/25/2021 7:18 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021
On 8/26/2021 11:56 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 8/25/2021 5:29 PM, Takashi Yano wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:52:19 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/25/2021 7:18 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:49:52 -0700
Chris Roehrig wrote:
I have a network of Windows, Linux and M
On 8/25/2021 5:29 PM, Takashi Yano wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:52:19 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/25/2021 7:18 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:49:52 -0700
Chris Roehrig wrote:
I have a network of Windows, Linux and Mac machines and I use rsync to
synchronize various
On 8/25/2021 4:33 PM, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
On 25.08.21 19:52, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
A couple years ago I had an idea for changing the pipe implementation to avoid
overlapped I/O:
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2019q2/009393.html
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-p
On 8/25/2021 2:18 PM, Chris Roehrig wrote:
On Wed Aug 25 2021, at 10:52 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
A couple years ago I had an idea for changing the pipe implementation to avoid
overlapped I/O:
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2019q2/009393.html
https://cygwin.com/pipermai
On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:52:19 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/25/2021 7:18 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:49:52 -0700
> > Chris Roehrig wrote:
> >> I have a network of Windows, Linux and Mac machines and I use rsync to
> >> synchronize various directories between them.
On 25.08.21 19:52, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
A couple years ago I had an idea for changing the pipe implementation to avoid
overlapped I/O:
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2019q2/009393.html
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2019q2/009423.html
I never followed up
It looks like there was a previous (2013) patch and attempt to add a
pipe_nooverlap CYGWIN option that was rejected by the maintainers:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10385424/good-alternatives-to-cygwin-cygwin-doesnt-support-natively-support-win32-app
Is this something that can be revisite
On Wed Aug 25 2021, at 10:52 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> A couple years ago I had an idea for changing the pipe implementation to
> avoid overlapped I/O:
>
> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2019q2/009393.html
> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2019q2/009423.html
>
On 8/25/2021 7:18 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:49:52 -0700
Chris Roehrig wrote:
I have a network of Windows, Linux and Mac machines and I use rsync to
synchronize various directories between them.
I'm trying to figure out why my rsync transfers are so slow (<4 MB/s
The FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED avenue looks promising. I get exactly the same
results as you using 'scp': 4MB/s in either direction (with either remote
endpoint.)
I guess the next step is to install a build environment and build rsync and
sshd ...
On Wed Aug 25 2021, at 4:18 AM, Takashi Ya
It was set to "Programs".Changing it to "Background services" didn't make
a difference.
TCPOptimizer can adjust 2 registry entries that I think are related to that
Windows Setting:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
NT\CurrentVersion\Multimedia\SystemProfile]
"NetworkT
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:49:52 -0700
Chris Roehrig wrote:
> I have a network of Windows, Linux and Mac machines and I use rsync to
> synchronize various directories between them.
>
> I'm trying to figure out why my rsync transfers are so slow (<4 MB/s) only
> when the remote endpoint is Cygwin rsy
NightStrike via Cygwin wrote:
Older versions of windows had a setting to optimize the OS for either
background services or foreground applications. One of the things this did
was throttle network usage. I don't know if windows 10 has the same setting
though.
Yes, it does. Getting to it is a pa
Here's the other direction with rsync also in --daemon mode:
# ON WINDOWS (from a mintty terminal):
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/tmp/bigfile.bin bs=1M count=2000 # create 2GB
file
printf "[TMP]\npath = /tmp\n" > /etc/rsyncd.conf
# create rsyncd.conf
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021, 09:50 Chris Roehrig wrote:
> I have a network of Windows, Linux and Mac machines and I use rsync to
> synchronize various directories between them.
>
> I'm trying to figure out why my rsync transfers are so slow (<4 MB/s) only
> when the remote endpoint is Cygwin rsync over
Here's my test in a nutshell:
# ON WINDOWS: install Cygwin and enable cygsshd
ssh-host-config -y
# set up authorized keys, etc to make things easier
# LINUX: Create a 2GB random file on Linux:
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/tmp/bigfile.bin bs=1M count=2000
# WINDOWS: rsync "pull"
Chris Roehrig wrote:
I have a network of Windows, Linux and Mac machines and I use rsync to
synchronize various directories between them.
I'm trying to figure out why my rsync transfers are so slow (<4 MB/s) only when
the remote endpoint is Cygwin rsync over sshd (with both a Linux or Cygwin r
I have a network of Windows, Linux and Mac machines and I use rsync to
synchronize various directories between them.
I'm trying to figure out why my rsync transfers are so slow (<4 MB/s) only when
the remote endpoint is Cygwin rsync over sshd (with both a Linux or Cygwin
rsync client). In all
86 matches
Mail list logo
