Harmon Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone noticed that when you go to this "opt-out" page and get
> the doubleclick cookie set to optout, that three new cookies get set at
> that moment? One for imigis.com, one for www.britannica.com, and another
> for avenuea.com.
> So poss
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Check Out U.S. Crush
Date: 14 Feb 00 22:53:13 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [209.85.221.61] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
MHotMailBA72422300A4D82197AAD155DD3D0B7C0; Mon Feb 14 22:50:11 2000
Received: from fatboy.dnastudio.com
Gee,
I sent a test message and got a Tim May custom
plonk/death threat. Why can you do it with impunity?
Bill Stewart wrote:
>
> Well, one subscriber out there saw it, even if I didn't...
>
> Thanks!
> Bill
> Bill Stewart
I voted for you as many times as they'd let me.
MacN
> -Declan
> (who tried to get the Internet as Man of the Year in '97 but got outvoted.
> sigh.)
>
>
This thing has occasioned an untoward measure of shock, for the
fact is the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do provide for it,
see Rule 34, in appropriate circumstances--the argument should be
whether the circumstances are appropriate.
MacN
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Secret Squirrel wrote:
> From:
At 18:38 2/14/2000 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>Yet another wrongheaded interpretation of "trust." Insofar as key signings
>go, political views are not important. Golda Meier could have signed the
>Ayotallah Khomeini's key with complete equinimity. Think about it.
Right. This shouldn't need to be expl
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/2214/aponline221350_000.htm
At 6:02 PM -0800 2/14/00, Anonymous Sender wrote:
>Here a punkly (?) site seems to suggest that trusting the government
>is a reasonable policy.
> This problem exemplifies the problems you encounter when dealing with a
> web of trust model. You must actively monitor those to whom you give your
>
At 02:12 PM 2/14/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Do you even know how to program, Reese?
If I say "yes" you'll want a proof, if I say "no" to cut through the BS,
you'll feel you've made some stunning discovery and may get ran over while
you dance in the streets in wild celebration.
Which l
Here a punkly (?) site seems to suggest that trusting the government
is a reasonable policy.
The web of trust model can break very quickly if those you
trust in turn trust
everyone, regardless of their merit. A real world example
surfaced last
At last Saturday's physical meeting in the SF Bay Area, I mentioned HIPAA,
recent federal health care legislation which includes a privacy component.
In the absence of further Congressional action, the federal Department of
Health and Human Services has created draft regulations intended to
r
Pete Chown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> suggested a PKC formulation:
>>>Whereas in RSA you form a modulus n as the product of two primes p and
>>>q, in my scheme you set n = pqr, where all three are prime. The order
>>>of the multiplicative group modulo n is now (p - 1)(q - 1)(r - 1).
>>>You cho
*
You are receiving this information because you have previously registered for
Multex Investor
*
Dear Multex Investor Member,
Multex
TO FUSD 185 IMMEDIATE
TO RESEARCH DEPT 234 IMMEDIATE
TO MOD 913 IMMEDIATE
TO CABINET OFFICER 721 IMMEDIATE
TO SECURITY SERVICE 1G0 IMMEDIATE
BT
IMMEDIATE
LEDGER UK S E C R E T/DELICATE SOURCE/UK EYES ALPHA
REQUIREMENTS: 2LIAPX01
LEDGER DISTRIBUTION:
"Secret Squirrel" writes:
> Asked by a newspaper reporter from the Minneapolis-based Star Tribune
> why she did not fight harder against the searching of home computers,
> she said the union had nothing to hide and we believe there was enough
> privacy protection.
Bwahahahahahahahah!
First o
From:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/feb2000/nwa-f11.shtml
Date: 2/14/00
Time: 8:41:33 AM
Remote Name: 205.188.192.174
Comments
WSWS : Workers Struggles : Airlines
Action against dissidents in airline contract
struggle
US court orders seizure of Northwest flight
attendants' home computer
This isn't all that difficult. If the attacks keep changing, so should the
defenses. Follow CPAN's lead (cpan.org) and install a crontab daemon to
fetch the latest anti-doubleclickware. Market it, and you're an instant dot
com entrepreneur!
Oh, wait. Nobody really gives a damn. Never mind.
-
>>Whereas in RSA you form a modulus n as the product of two primes p and
>>q, in my scheme you set n = pqr, where all three are prime. The order
>>of the multiplicative group modulo n is now (p - 1)(q - 1)(r - 1).
>>You choose e and find d such that de is congruent to 1 modulo
>>(p - 1)(q - 1)(r
Yeah, I know how to do that. But it has the same problem that it does in
using grep to check your system logs every day -- it misses stuff you haven't
thought of. Finding a way to defeat the doubleclicks would be better, if you could
keep up with all their various personas and nyms. But p
According to well-informed sources in Her Majesty's Government,
Pete Chown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is a bit late since the patent expires in September. However,
>what do people think about this scheme? Firstly is it
>cryptographically reasonable, and secondly does it genuinely
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 12:14:26AM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> At 01:55 PM 02/10/2000 -0700, Forrest Halford wrote:
> >I am wondering what the consensus is on the security of the
> >newer versions of PGP vs the 2.x series?
> >What think all ye Cypherpunks?
>
> It's all been discussed long ago
Harmon Seaver wrote:
>
> I used to run a nightly cron job that deleted my cookies, but that
> presents a different problem -- such as deleting the mp3.com cookies means
> that I have to re-register every time I go there, which sometimes is daily.
> Likewise deleting the amazon cookies m
We offer the 1995 secret UK report on the plot to
overthrow Kadaffi reported in Britain Saturday:
http://cryptome.org/qadahfi-plot.htm
At 12:51 AM -0800 2/14/00, Reese wrote:
>At 12:12 AM 2/14/00 -0500, Lucky Green wrote:
>>Reese wrote:
>>> I doubt that a true cypherpunk has ever mistaken anothers car,
>>> for his own.
>>> Forget the precise lat and lon coordinates maybe, but not mistake someone
>>> elses property. The balance
At 03:51 AM 2/14/00 -0500, Reese wrote:
>
>Anecdotal, and heresay to boot. Point is, you weren't paying attention to
>detail when you walked up, got in and tried the guhnition switch --- these
>are not cypherpunk qualities, as I've come to understand them,,,
>
>Reese
Do you even know ho
At 7:45 AM -0800 2/14/00, Duncan Frissell wrote:
>At 08:55 PM 2/12/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
> Or will bother to look in the future.
>
>> What is considered legal/moral/rational today *might* change in
>> the future. Do you really want to take that chance?
>>
>> It's a lot ea
Yes, my mistake actually. Our press guy told me about it briefly over the
phone while I was out of town and painted a rather favorable picture of it
which warranted my more "positive" comments. You're right, Declan, this is
not a good idea and we'll be watching it cautiously, as I'm sure you w
At 8:32 AM -0800 2/14/00, David Kane-Parry wrote:
>You wrote:
>
>> At 9:40 PM -0800 2/13/00, David Kane-Parry wrote:
>>
>> >http://www.spielen.at/action/defaulte.htm
>> >Search by title for "Big Brother".
>>
>> It would be nice if all you folks who suggest that we go to some site and
>> search fo
At 08:55 PM 2/12/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
Or will bother to look in the future.
> What is considered legal/moral/rational today *might* change in
> the future. Do you really want to take that chance?
>
> It's a lot easier to remove your eye-glasses to hide your
> intelle
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Allan Hunt-Badiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> government is is more and more beholden to corporate power and the
> trend will continue.
I don't believe in the "corporations are evil" mantra. The government is to
blame, not the corporations.
> and why should
> citizens ha
At 04:06 PM 2/13/00 -1000, Reese wrote:
> >Active clothing, accessories, and "makeup" defeats camera and other
> >surveillance systems. Not a real problem.
>
>there was discussion, in this forum (cypherpunk list), of cameras that
>would see not only human visible wavelenths - but other wavelenth
Forgot your password?
If you did not forget your password, please ignore this email.
To choose a new password, please go to the URL below:
(please use it exactly as is including all trailing fullstops)
http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/pass/$1$26743$2VFN6qqQFqexkMbi.H914/a
This request was made fro
Reese wrote:
> I didn't bother to check - I delete any and all cookies, at regular and
> frequent intervals,,,
>
I used to run a nightly cron job that deleted my cookies, but that
presents a different problem -- such as deleting the mp3.com cookies means
that I have to re-register ever
This is a bit late since the patent expires in September. However,
what do people think about this scheme? Firstly is it
cryptographically reasonable, and secondly does it genuinely avoid the
scope of the patent?
Whereas in RSA you form a modulus n as the product of two primes p and
q, in my s
At 12:12 AM 2/14/00 -0500, Lucky Green wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>> I doubt that a true cypherpunk has ever mistaken anothers car,
>> for his own.
>> Forget the precise lat and lon coordinates maybe, but not mistake someone
>> elses property. The balance of your text is based on this false premise,
At 9:40 PM -0800 2/13/00, David Kane-Parry wrote:
>http://www.spielen.at/action/defaulte.htm
>Search by title for "Big Brother".
>
It would be nice if all you folks who suggest that we go to some site and
search for some story give us some hints as to why we should bother. The
opening paragraph
Harmon Seaver wrote:
> Has anyone noticed that when you go to this "opt-out" page and get
> the doubleclick cookie set to optout, that three new cookies get set at
> that moment? One for imigis.com, one for www.britannica.com, and another
> for avenuea.com.
> So possibly the "opt-out" is
37 matches
Mail list logo
