Richard Darst wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:19:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
No. You (leader@, auditor@) will need to do this on their own.
If you want to keep track of the money separately, you'd better keep
it marked Debconfn and give leader@, auditor@ authority over it as
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
to know the actual total amount of reserves would need to check two
accounts instead of one.
Maybe it's easier to write this as relation like in databases:
account/login 1 n earmarks for money
The auditors account is totally separate from your
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 07:51, Martin Schulze j...@infodrom.org wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Additionally, keeping the separation will further the feeling in the
community that DebConf and Debian are two separate entities, while they
That's up to you. You don't need to tell the community
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:51:59PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Same reason as above: it shouldn't be me asking for that.
That's rediculous. If you would like to have access and view, you
should ask. We cannot process your request unless the Debconf people
agree, though, howver putting
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:19:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
No. You (leader@, auditor@) will need to do this on their own.
If you want to keep track of the money separately, you'd better keep
it marked Debconfn and give leader@, auditor@ authority over it as
well.
That is what
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:02:00AM -0500, Richard Darst wrote:
How do you all imagine the DebConf/Debian money separation would work
if accounts are merged?
The basic principle which is at stake here is that DebConf/Debian money
should *not* be separated.
There are two reasons for that: 1)
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
To me this sounds more like it would would be helpful for you all if
the money would continue to be earmarked differently in the future but
that the Debian project leader and accountant should get a view to
that money as well.
Hi!
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
To me this sounds more like it would would be helpful for you all if
the money would continue to be earmarked differently in the future but
that the Debian project leader and accountant should get
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:24:24PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
I already wrote that it's no problem to enrich the leader account with
Debconf information.
Yes, and I got that, but as long as the accounts are separate, I don't
think it should be me asking for that, but rather the current
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Current SPI setting allows for that, while current FFIS setting
(i.e. the split) does not. Obviously, I hope something like the above
will *never* happen, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be worried about
similar scenarios.
Sorry, but... Why didn't you
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:47:50PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
That would solve the problems outlined in this thread, but it would
still be worse than the merge, for a very simple reason: either me or
the auditors, to know the actual total amount of reserves would need to
check two
Clint Adams wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:47:50PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
That would solve the problems outlined in this thread, but it would
still be worse than the merge, for a very simple reason: either me or
the auditors, to know the actual total amount of reserves would
Martin Schulze wrote:
Since this is a general decision, I assume that Ganneff and Michael
are fine with joining the money?
I'm fine with joining the money.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Samstag, 12. Februar 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
So, if this is consensus (as I believe), it looks like the proper
solution of merging DebConf FFIS account into the Debian one is just at
hand. I'd like to receive comments on this.
I agree and the
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:32:39PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
There are two options you may want to discuss further:
(a) move Debconf10 money to Debian account
If you did this, could you keep track of the money which was
raised/spend for DebConf separately from the other Debian money? I
Hi Richard!
Richard Darst wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:32:39PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
There are two options you may want to discuss further:
(a) move Debconf10 money to Debian account
If you did this, could you keep track of the money which was
raised/spend for DebConf
Hi,
On Samstag, 12. Februar 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
So, if this is consensus (as I believe), it looks like the proper
solution of merging DebConf FFIS account into the Debian one is just at
hand. I'd like to receive comments on this.
I agree and the comments below assume we have
Hi,
On Freitag, 4. Februar 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On the same subject, can we please pour the other DebConf money we have
in Europe where they can be seen by DPL and Auditors (i.e. the Debian
FFIS account)? Currently there is no visibility of those money to us,
beside the mention
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:28:59AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Freitag, 4. Februar 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On the same subject, can we please pour the other DebConf money we have
in Europe where they can be seen by DPL and Auditors (i.e. the Debian
FFIS account)?
Hi,
Joey, please comment on this, what options do you see for us?
On Freitag, 11. Februar 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
No, I cannot see *debconf* money at FFIS and that is the main problem
I'm trying to solve. The same is true for auditors, which make the
problem even worse. At the very
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
Joey, please comment on this, what options do you see for us?
On Freitag, 11. Februar 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
No, I cannot see *debconf* money at FFIS and that is the main problem
I'm trying to solve. The same is true for auditors, which make the
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 12:20:36PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:01:29PM -0500, Brian Gupta wrote:
I recently spoke with Jimmy about this the other day, and he still has
them. He is busy with school at the moment, so he isn't actively
following the mailing
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:01:29PM -0500, Brian Gupta wrote:
I recently spoke with Jimmy about this the other day, and he still has
them. He is busy with school at the moment, so he isn't actively
following the mailing lists. (He still is on IRC if you need him.) If
you like, I can coordinate
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:25:30PM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 22:47:27 -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz ji...@debconf.org wrote:
Hi everyone!
I know I'm perpetually optimistic, but in this case I have physical
evidence to
back it up. At the end of DebConf9, we had a bunch
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:25:30PM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 22:47:27 -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz ji...@debconf.org
wrote:
Hi everyone!
I know I'm perpetually optimistic, but in this case I have
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 22:47:27 -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz ji...@debconf.org wrote:
Hi everyone!
I know I'm perpetually optimistic, but in this case I have physical evidence
to
back it up. At the end of DebConf9, we had a bunch of leftover physical
currency in euros, which I counted and brought
Hi everyone!
I know I'm perpetually optimistic, but in this case I have physical evidence to
back it up. At the end of DebConf9, we had a bunch of leftover physical
currency in euros, which I counted and brought back to the US for DebConf10's
use, intending to convert it to USD once we got our
27 matches
Mail list logo
