On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Mark Hedges wrote:
>
> I apologize for filing multiple bug reports about this
> before seeking consensus on the list.
>
> Is someone going to put perlapi-5.6.1 back into sarge?
> Lots of packages indirectly depend on this and cannot
> be installed now. Should there be a dummy
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 06:44:06PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Is there any approach that we can avoid publicizing the third party code
> > while porting to Linux? Do we need to write some shim layer code in Linux
> > kernel to interface the third party code? How can we do that? Is there a
The upstream maintainer of XMLTV, which I package for Debian, has
temporarily forked the Perl Date::Manip module. He says:
Over the past six months or so I've accumulated various bug fixes to
the Date::Manip module, most of them because of xmltv bug reports
sent by users. Rather than wa
Version 3.39-1 of the file utility changed the format of the output line
for MIPS shared libraries again.
Older versions of libtool.m4 use the file utility and a regular
expression to determine if something is a shared library or not. This
regular expression does not match the new file output for
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:24:23PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:44:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:04:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > ports - NetBSD gives us the potential to bring Debian to _many_ new
> > > platforms.
> >
>
Le ven 27/06/2003 à 04:27, G. C. a écrit :
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
> Currently we are trying to port some third party code to Linux kernel. Some
> modules of third party code need to be ported into Linux kernel and some
> drivers need to be ported from Vxworks to Linux drivers. The problem we hav
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:43:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems sthat changing the font have solved the problem
> so we can close this bug report ?
>
> Cheers,
I am very belatedly catching up with this question. It doesn't seem
to me the bug should be closed.
It appears th
I apologize for filing multiple bug reports about this
before seeking consensus on the list.
Is someone going to put perlapi-5.6.1 back into sarge?
Lots of packages indirectly depend on this and cannot
be installed now. Should there be a dummy package
for compatibility with perl 5.8.0?
Thank yo
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:15:37PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Vel?zquez wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:39:36PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > [Please cc me; I'm very behind on -devel]
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm very confused by this bug and am su
Corrin Lakeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So, i think if there .diff's exist, maybe apt-get can patch the
>> Changes into the files on the client, or a small wrapper arround
>> apt-get can do this..
>
> Goodness, you are the second person to ask for this in a month. Diff is not
> suitable
OK, let me see if I can address all the comments I've received so far.
1. Description too long.
OK, I will change it to a shorter one, once I work out how to do that
with an ITP.
2. Various questions along the line of "What does email do that a
certain shell sequence doesn't".
This from Upstream
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:15:37PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Vel?zquez wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:39:36PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >
> > [Please cc me; I'm very behind on -devel]
> >
> >
> > I'm very confused by this bug and am sufficiently busy this week that
> > I'm not going to be a
* Julian Mehnle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030627 21:05]:
> I understand that the your proposed extensions to the Debian package system
> are based on the concepts of "sub-archs" and "meta-sub-archs" (I'd call
> these "pseudo-sub-archs" or "alias-sub-archs", though). I have already
> proposed a more gen
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 07:56:37AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/188740
> That's a documentation issue. debian/changelog is not the place for
> documenting random features.
Messages that close bugs are, however, the place for docum
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:04:55AM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> No it doesn't. I've yet to even hear of an architecture that NetBSD runs
> on but which Linux doesn't.
pc532
> They just have a different definition of
> "architecture" than us. (ie: our "hppa" may be three or four arches to
> the
On 27 Jun 2003, Philippe Troin wrote:
> I have been receiving bugs.d.o emails which are unrelated to my
> package for the last two-three days.
>
> And their headers seem quite garbled: they include part of other
> messages...
>
> Included five of them.
>
> Is there anything fishy going on? Or is t
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 04:27:36PM -0600, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
>
> Is there anyone else out there trying to run Connector on
> Debian (sid)?
>
> Although Ximian strongly discourages a direct download of
> Connector (because Ximian urges the use of Red Carpet), the
> binaries are available at
Em Sex, 2003-06-27 às 02:14, Adam Majer escreveu:
> Then they should't delete anything with .* After all, shoudn't most
> "user friendly" applications hide those directories in the first place?
> Even ls does it unless you use -a
But the question is: These files and directories uses a lot of disk
Well, it may be included in the wishlist for cruft, the program I called
userconfpurge may be a part of it. But before this would be necessary a
change in the debian packages, to include which files are created in the
user's home.
Em Qui, 2003-06-26 às 14:31, Drew Scott Daniels escreveu:
> Is conn
Hi all,
(I'm sending this message again, since the copy I sent yesterday seems not
to have made it onto the list. If you receive it twice, please excuse.)
Andreas Barth wrote:
> DRAFT - Subarchitectures for debian [0.1]
First, thanks for creating a prototype proposal.
I understand that the you
On Friday 27 June 2003 01:32, Millis Miller wrote:
> Description : Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP,
> with optional encryption
> Also, if gpg is installed, it can digitally sign and encrypt outgoing
> emails.
Just out of curiosity: inline PGP, or PGP/MIME
cheers
-- vb
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 01:50, Ryan Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 06:48:06PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Don't reopen bugs just because you think it's not fixed, I've spent
> > three or four hours testing libtool on mips this evening and I've not
>
> I'm not convinced it'
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:04:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> ports - NetBSD gives us the potential to bring Debian to _many_ new
>> platforms.
>
>It's not that many actually. The only CPU that NetBSD claims to support
>but Linux doesn't is the pc532. Also the (umerge
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:04:55AM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:04:54 -0500
> Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And not only 80386 needs this - There is the Sparc64 port which would
> > also benefit from this (http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/#64bit). If we
> > ha
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:33:16PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
> > E) Email does binary attachments and uses MIME (mime types, base64
> > encoding) to "attach" and send them with the message. You can't do this
> > by doing what is d
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:19:14PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Are you proposing that we list important upstream changes regardless of
> whether they fix bugs or not?
>
> If so then this may be worth considering.
Hmm, I've always tried to do that, actually. And I appreciate it when
other develope
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:02:04PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>> What if the packages tells to dpkg which files or directories it will
>> create on the user's home directory and when a package is purged the
>> user could run a program to purge the fil
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Do I look in Packages.gz for Conflicts:, and then look in Description:
> for "this is the GNU version of..."?
No need for such a fastidious search. Use this instead:
apt-get install `apt-cache search gnu | sed 's/ .*//'`
Cheers,
--
Sam.
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> I don't know why my previous message on this topic didn't get
> through, so let me try again...
murphy has been having load issues, amoung other things.
> I'm planning to file bugs against source packages which currently
> don't build in unstable bec
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:04:55AM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:04:54 -0500
> Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And not only 80386 needs this - There is the Sparc64 port which would
> > also benefit from this (http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/#64bit). If we
> > ha
I don't know why my previous message on this topic didn't get
through, so let me try again...
I'm planning to file bugs against source packages which currently
don't build in unstable because of build dependencies on libgdbmg1-dev
or imlib-dev. Currently, the packages involved would be:
For libg
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
> This from Upstream:
> A) Email users SMTP or Sendmail. (Main purpose!)
Which would make it the only piece of mail-aware software on the system
that doesn't depend on a working /usr/sbin/sendmail; so this is great as
long as you nev
"Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: email
>
> I understand that email is the name of the upstream client but I'd
>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:27:40PM -0400, G. C. wrote:
> Currently we are trying to port some third party code to Linux kernel. Some
> modules of third party code need to be ported into Linux kernel and some
> drivers need to be ported from Vxworks to Linux drivers. The problem we
> have is that
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
> possible recently due to sysvinit.
> I guess the problem is that sysvinit related postinst
> scripts are calling 'init' inside chroot, which fails,
> failing the whole installation pro
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: email
> Version : 1.9.0
> Upstream Author : Dean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.cleancode.org/emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 28. Juni 2003 04:09 schrieb Junichi Uekawa:
> Hi,
>
> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
> possible recently due to sysvinit.
>
> I guess the problem is that sysvinit related postinst
> scripts are calling 'i
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 10:26:08AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Afaik the basic mode of operation and options are compatibel,
> inews even diverts the inews from cnews. Using alternatives sounds
> nice.
and of course it must be installed in /usr/sbin/ in that case, just like
/usr/sbin/sendmail.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:54:30AM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> I have been receiving bugs.d.o emails which are unrelated to my
> package for the last two-three days.
That would be because you're subscribed to
debian-bugs-{dist,closed,forwarded}...
> And their headers seem quite garbled: they i
"G. C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
> Currently we are trying to port some third party code to Linux
> kernel. Some modules of third party code need to be ported into Linux
> kernel and some drivers need to be ported from Vxworks to Linux
> drivers. The problem we have i
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> I have a better idea :) What if packages don't leave droppings in my
> home directory in the first place? I have all sorts of dotfiles (and
> even dot-directories) that I never asked for. It's reasonable for a
> program to install a dotfile when
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I maintain slrn, which can run inews to post news. We apparently have
> three inews programs in debian; inewsinn puts it in /usr/bin/inews,
> while inews and cnews put it in /usr/lib/news/inews.
Actually inewsinn puts it in /usr/lib/news/bin/, /usr/bin/inews
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:44:11PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:21:22AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:49:54AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:23:01AM +020
Gentlemen, after I installed "Debian GNU/Linux", I found I had to take
extra steps to get the GNU version of a program installed, as some
other leading brand alternative was in its stead.
So what is the single command to apt-get install all the GNU versions
of everything?
Last year I discovered m
Content rejected.
Based on an automated review of the content in a message you sent,
the message appears to be unsolicited commercial e-mail or to contain
content that we deem inappropriate for our business environment. The
message has been blocked from delivery. If you feel you received
this mes
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: email
> Version : 1.9.0
> Upstream Author : Dean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
> * License
Hi,
Millis Miller wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: email
> Version : 1.9.0
> Upstream Author : Dean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
> * License : Custom
> De
Hi Torsten,
Thank you for your feedback. I
have sent your email to Olaf Meeuwissen, the Lead Developer
for Image Scan! for Linux at EPSON Kowa.
Please feel free to contact him if you
have any related questions specific to iScan. Otherwise, I am always here
to help.
Best regards,
G. C. wrote:
Is there any approach that we can avoid publicizing the third party code
while porting to Linux? Do we need to write some shim layer code in
Linux kernel to interface the third party code? How can we do that? Is
there any document or samples?
In general, this is not possible. It is
Please confirm your identity, otherwise I will not open this file.
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
Please confirm your identity, otherwise I will not open this file.
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Huh? The bug report was a feature request with a patch. The bug was
> closed with the description of "New Upstream Release". No indication
> was given whether the patch was integrated upstream, or implemented
> differently (with a different interface)
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:04:55AM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:04:54 -0500
> Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And not only 80386 needs this - There is the Sparc64 port which would
> > also benefit from this (http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/#64bit). If we
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 05:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The swallow applet can "eat" any X11 window into the GNOME 2 panel. The
> application then displays inside the panel instead of being in a window.
>
> Its primary goal is to allow use of dockapps with the GNOME desktop.
Just for
Recipient of the infected attachment: Byers, Matthew E\Inbox
Subject of the message: Re: Application
One or more attachments were quarantined.
Attachment your_details.zip was Quarantined for the following reasons:
Virus UNAUTHORIZED FILE was found.
<>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:29:41PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> > Also, please note that at least half of the dpkg-maintainers don't read
> > -devel, you probably want to post this to -dpkg. Incidently, there is a
> > proposal and patch by Gerhard Tonn f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to advocate a developer, although my recomendation bounces from
nm.debian.org, with following message:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more o
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Mark Hedges wrote:
> Package: general
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-28
> Followup-For: Bug #198479
>
> There needs to be a backwards-compatible perlapi-5.6.1 module
> which apt-file and other depend on to install. Since rolling
> out perl 5.8.0, many packages that
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:08:46PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >* what opcodes need to be emulated?
>
> >* all 386->486 opcodes (there's just a few of them, right?)
> This is the correct answer. :-) Then all programs can be compiled with
> gcc --arch=i486 --tune=i686 (which should probab
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-29
Severity: wishlist
Since the ffmpeg ITP (#157719) was closed almost one year ago, I
assume no one is interested anymore, thus this ITP. I use ffmpeg daily
and I am not satisfied with the reasons given for closing the ITP. If
anyone disagre
62 matches
Mail list logo
