Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > There are currently 72 things that link against imlib. I suspect that
> > > about half were linked with the 'old' imlib and half with the 'new' imlib.
> >
> > That's to be expected. The current situation demands that all those
> > apps should be
> > There is apparantly an EGCS patch called libapi, available in the
> > Debian egcs package, which is supposed to implement the above.
> > Adopting and improving this patch would definitely solve your GNOME
> > problems, Jim.
>
> Can you give us some pointers? This sounds like a good thing for
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If glib, gtk, gnome, imlib, etc used versioned symbols then yes you
> -might- advoid this.
>
> -HOWEVER- my understanding how how versioned symbols would need to be
> implemented would make this pretty much impossible for a large portion of
> the lib
"Phillip R. Jaenke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kernel and hardware incompatibilities can lead to binary
> incompatibilities.
> Plus, IIRC, the current PowerPC distributions are all
> compiled for UP. As I said, most RS/6000's are SMP.
You'd have a separate RS/6000 kernel which would be comp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale E. Martin) writes:
> Oscar Levi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In my opinion, this problem is not sufficient to warrant an upload at
> > this time since, contrary to the bug reporters claim, it does not
> > prevent the packing from functioning. It is annoying, yes.
>
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1 Feb 1999, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > > libgdk-imlib1 in slink did not seem to depend on any glib, in potato it
> > > depends on a new and incompatible glib from potato BUT the soname was not
> > > changed. So
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 12:19:48PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > > In short, we have only three choices, regardless of what happens in
> > > libtool:
> > >
> > > 1) Implement Red Hat's ugly patch in our libc5 ld.so, and thereby be
> > >
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:52:48 -0700 (MST)
>From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> That's not what I'd like libtool to do. I agree there is a problem to
>> be fixed, I just think that libtool is not the only piece of softwa
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1 Feb 1999, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > > I somehow sense that slink/potato gtk/gnome is going to be painfull..
> >
> > I agree. I'm only planning to support Gnome 0.99.x/1.0 on potato.
>
> Oh, I was just
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1 Feb 1999, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > > And note that it links to libglib twice. Turns out this is because there
> > > is two 'gdk-imlib1' packages with the same soname but linked against
> > > d
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is kinda neat, considering what we were talking about with libtool
> and all, examine this ldd output:
>
> Wakko{jgg}~/work/apt#ldd `which wmakerconf `
> libgdk_imlib.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgdk_imlib.so.1 (0x4000f000)
> libgtk.so.1
"Phillip R. Jaenke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A bit of history first, as it is somewhat important. For those of you who
> don't know; Linux runs on PowerPC's. Yes. It does. Now, what big names do
> we know that have PowerPC based systems? Let's see. Apple. Amiga. UMax.
> IBM RS/6000 (RISC Sys
Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, January 29 1999, Ionutz Borcoman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
> te:
> |Hi,
> |
> |Is the gnuclient/gnuserv broken in XEmacs ? Using the latest versions
> |from potato I am no more able to start a gnuclient :-( Is anybody else
> |experiencing this ?
>
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Bialasinski) writes:
>
>Hmm, with a strong enough improbability field, you will see dragons in
>the sky.
>
> Dragons and octopi in the sky are Somebody Else's Problem.
Flying Octopi? Sounds like a Detroit Red Wings gam
"Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /usr/lib/libgnomeui.so.0: undefined symbol: argp_program_version
>
> This happens with some of the GNOME based packages I've installed
> from both slink and potatoe lately...
>
> Any ideas what I'm missing or what I did???
You probably have mixe
Brent Fulgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Try Japhar/Classpath:
>
> www.japhar.org -- free JDK (compiler, runtime, debugger, etc.)
> www.classpath.org -- free implementation of the essential java libraries
Plus...
www.transvirtual.com -- Kaffe JIT
www.mozilla.org -- ElectricalFire JIT
Cheer
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A package I maintain uses libtool. To remove the rpath stuff, I
> apply this patch to configure.in.
Actually, I sort of like the following technique better:
Add the following to debian/rules right before calling "$(MAKE) all"
(but after configure):
Why don't we officially not have an official logo?
If 5 years from now, everybody likes a certain "unofficial logo"
(ie. Debian equivalent of the BSD daemon), we could go with that.
Cheers,
- Jim
Lalo Martins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OTOH, we could just sign all packages with a same key ("the
> Debian key"); when dinstall verifies the signature and md5sum in
> the .changes file, it signs the package and updates
> Packages.pgp).
I prefer this method. Then we have less key distributi
Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can the 2.1/2.2 kernels handle a gigabyte of memory?
Yes.
For more than 1GB, go to:
http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/more_than_1GB.html
There was a lot of discussion about this on the linux-kernel mailing
list lately.
> Also, I remember reading
Greg Hedger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just installed Debian Linux - just the kernal and the core system, no
> XWindows, no frills. So where can someone new to Linux (indeed Unix)
> find answers to very basic questions like "how do I mount a floppy
> drive," "can I read a FAT32 partition,"
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> giflib3g-dev gdk-imlib-dev
> giflib3g-dev imlib-dev
> giflib3g-dev libfnlib-dev
The full dependencies for these is more like:
libungif3g-dev | giflib3g-dev
Basicall
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> > > OK, in the past week or so I've seen several people posting from
> > > California. Has anyone thought of having a gathering in some semi-central
> > > location? Get to know faces, sign keys, etc?
> >
> > I would be
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >Essentially, Cygnus has forked the code.
> >>
> >> Huh.
> >
> >That might be a bit strong - I haven't really looked into the
> >differences in depth. They are
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I understand that Gnome needs db2* scripts... why do they need the Cygnus
> >> stylesheets?
> >
> >They use them internally at Cygnus for their documentation.
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Essentially, Cygnus has forked the code.
>
> Huh.
That might be a bit strong - I haven't really looked into the
differences in depth. They are being maintained separately, and they
are tracking Norm Walsh's stuff.
> I understand that Gnome needs d
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >Soon, I'm going to upload a "cygnus-stylesheets" package. It's
> >basically the same thing as the docbook-stylesheets package, but it
> >has some modifications and additional hacks that Mark Galassi has
> >a
Hi,
Soon, I'm going to upload a "cygnus-stylesheets" package. It's
basically the same thing as the docbook-stylesheets package, but it
has some modifications and additional hacks that Mark Galassi has
added.
This package is based on the same source as what the Red Hat people
are using. The Gno
Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Stephen Crowley wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 03:03:26PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > > and how the unfortunate of us who already have upgraded to 1.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Pfaff) writes:
> This morning I uploaded a version of w3-el that doesn't compile upon
> installation--instead, there are separate precompiled packages for
> Emacs 19 and Emacs 20, plus a shared documentation package. I see
> this as a better way to go than forcing the end-
Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Craig Sanders wrote:
> >
> > maybe a compromise would be to leave the packages in slink, make sure
> > the Description: field highlights their alpha status, and automatically
> > close all non-packaging bugs (and forward them up
Chris McKillop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quick One...
>
> I know that the gnome 0.30 deb files are alittle messed up,
> but I don't remeber every seeing a "fix" to the segv problems. Was
> it a gtk/gdk problem with 1.0.x vs 1.1.x? I am trying to get eeyes
> to work and not having muc
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, everybody... It's that time again. I've gone through the bug logs
> and made my list of packages to keep/remove should they still have
> release-critical (i.e. critical, grave, or important) bugs at ship time.
What do you think we should do with
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
ARM is nowhere near being release ready (we just started).
Cheers,
- Jim
Andrew Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 11:49:26PM +0800, Stephen Darragh wrote:
> > Is there any way to get Debian to rebuild or repair a corrupted
> > package information database (e.g. on beldin)?
>
> Not that I know of unfortunately. I'll ask on debian-devel as th
(RedHat does use the the upstream soname.) Until somebody gets around
> > to releasing a "libjpeg62" package, we should stick with libjpeg6a.
> Oooh. Interesting snag. So. We need to make a joint decision. I talked
> to Jim Pick last night about putting 6b in slink, and ge
Kenneth Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After you freeze slink, what will be then name of the new 'unstable'
> release (debian 2.2 or 3.0 that is).
If "Bug's Life" is any good, maybe we could snarf names from there...
Cheers,
- Jim
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I should probably add that to the README - and maybe a note to try
> > running "panel" to get to all the other applications. Anything else I
> > should put into
"Meskes, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, I tried starting icewm and then some gnome applets resp. some of
> the desktop tools. But they all seg fault. And I get a message that
> imlib is lacking the file in /usr/etc. Do I have to set an environment
> variable?
>
> I think we should
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I correct that we currently do not have a complete desktop with gnome?
> Since there is no wm yet, it's pretty difficult to judge it.
This is a Gnome FAQ item.
Gnome is not meant to have a single window manager. In it's final
form, it will work w
Hi,
I've uploaded the Gnome 0.20 Debian packages to incoming on
master.debian.org (also available at http://www.jimpick.com/ )
I had some problems with the gnome-admin package, so I didn't finish
it. I will be travelling for 4 days, and I will figure it out when I
am back. I also did not packag
Hi,
I'm helping to organize an effort to port Debian GNU/Linux to run
on the new Corel NetWinder NCs ( http://www.corelcomputer.com/ ).
Debian GNU/Linux is the largest Linux distribution, with over 1500
packages and ports to Intel, Alpha, m68k, PowerPC and Sparc. It is
being developer entirely
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As for the machines, he says the developers versions are the
> top-of-the-line model, with a 3.1 GB hard drive and 64 MB of RAM. I
> think they are based on a 233MHz StrongARM.
^^
Oops, make that a 275MH
Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks like you guys can talk to Chris or San directly about Netwinder
> development if you wish.
I just phoned Chris Herrnberger (the OCLUG guy), and quizzed him.
He says Corel has loaned OCLUG ten Netwinders for development
purposes. If we want to g
Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I also have an offer from one of Brian's friends (he was lent one of the
> Netwinders). He is willing to give a few people accounts on his
> Netwinder. He just has a few security concerns to address first (he's
> got to pick up a hub to connect the Ne
Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When/if they are ready and Corel doesn't want to sell them directly,
> someone like varesearch or linuxmall could be convinced to become
> resellers. (Or even Red Hat would be interesting...)
Even non-traditional channels could resell them (as long as
Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They are only giving discounts to OCLUG members, but since I'm in OCLUG,
> I could probably approach the appropriate people to do some enquiries.
> I wouldn't hold your breath though. OCLUG is very RedHat based.
I've talked to some of the Corel guys
Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I bet we could brow-beat Corel into donating a few boxes. I heard
> > they go as cheap as $300 US for a diskless configuration.
>
> It's all just rumors, I've heard nothing back from them. We might
> have to brow-beat them into selling boxes.
You
Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 21:20 -0700 1998-06-05, Steve Dunham wrote:
> >Does anyone have any definite information on the Corel Network
> >computers? Is anyone else interested in doing a Debian port?
>
> Vincent Renardias is apparently working on an arm port of Debian (In bu
Pre-release .debs (still under construction). 24 of 'em, more to
come.
ftp://ftp.jimpick.com/pub/debian/testing/
Be fore-warned - they've hardly been tested. Also, the imlib packages
aren't the real ones - they're just quick hacks so I could compile the
rest. Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What news servers besides slrn support reading news directly from the news
> > spool w/o a news server?
>
> tin (rather than tin -r or rtin).
Gnus (in emacs).
Cheers,
- Jim
pgppKPgXPsA90.pgp
Description: PGP signature
John Labovitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > The whole exim package is about 500k, which only takes 5 minutes or so
> > to download via modem - so I'd probably stick with that (unless
> > something better comes alo
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think smail or exim would do fine.
I'm in love with exim myself. :-)
The whole exim package is about 500k, which only takes 5 minutes or so
to download via modem - so I'd probably stick with that (unless
something better comes along). MTA choices
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The discussions of the last days have shown me clearly, that I can't
> implement my ideas WRT policy/QA anymore.
> Therefore, I've decided to leave the Debian project.
Sorry to see you leave.
I must admit, I've been entirely negligent in followin
Drake Diedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1 May 1998, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see more people announce that they want to develop their
> > own "subset" Linux distributions based on Debian. I'd be willing to
> > collaborate on to
Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 01, 1998 at 11:10:39PM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > - targetted towards desktop use only, no server apps, just a few games
> >
> > - minimal size - optimized for installation via 28.8k modem via FTP,
&g
Hi all,
I read with interest Bruce's post that he wants to work on another
Linux distribution. :-)
As long as we are talking "pie in the sky" stuff, I thought I'd let
loose with the news that I am also developing an alternative Linux
distribution. I've sort of hinted about it on several of my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
> From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For what it's worth, GIF support is doable with free software, just not
> > compressed gifs. [gif supports a variety of compression mechanisms,
> > including "none".]
>
> The patent expires in August.
>
>
David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very
> > rapidly. Jim Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more
> > weeks and I think you will see more.
I've got most of the packaging for gnome 0
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We should modify our libc so that opening a file in /tmp or /var/tmp -
> determined by simple string comparison of the filename passed to
> open(2) - fails if O_CREAT is specified without O_EXCL.
>
> We should do this in slink. That way almost any progr
Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bummer! I can't help here unfortunately (I'm a jdk source licencee) but
> I thought Jim Pick had expressed an intention of persuing free JVM
> implementations.
>
> Jim?
I'm freeing up the rest of this week, so I w
Corey Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I try to install jdk1.1-dev (I want to install JavaICQ, which
> makes use of the jdk), it says that it depends on jdk1.1-runtime. I was
> wondering where I could find this package? I looked in incoming, frozen,
> unstable, and even used the pa
Brian Bassett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After both Manoj Srivastava and Bob Hilliard pointed out to me the faults
> in using the Maintainers file for determining the number of maintainers, I
> have decided to use the Debian PGP keyring. After deleting duplicate keys,
> the keyring says that
the bug was in under ten
lines of description.
>
> guile (1.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Removed --with-threads and --enable-dynamic-linking options
> (should fix #14213, 14214 - Thanks John Goerzen)
> * Added ldconfig to postinst
> Fixes Bug #41212 -
Sorry,
For those holding their breath...
I had system problems this weekend. I'll have dwww ready
next weekend.
Cheers,
- Jim
pgpFTRhdIqcvr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anybody already noted this here?
[ Cut - Posting about Yggdrasil packages - RPM/deb/slackware/yggdrasil from
common source ]
Looks interesting!
I wonder if they are proposing a new source packaging format - or if they
are building all the b
> > Look for an updated dwww package and a new "kaffe+kore" package this week
>
>
> Yuhuu!
>
> Is it the version with the "big step forward", you promised some time ago?
Unfortunately, not. It's more of a "fix as many of the 40 bugs as possible"
release. It'll be a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I like it but...
I like it too.
> 1) How about dwww? (Yes, I know dwww needs a web server...)
I think I'll add support for .dhelp files to dwww too.
> 2) I really dont like to have 2/3/... methods of building indexes
> of documentation installed in the debian syst
> Pardon me for a nosy question. Does Debian have any money flowing in
> from users that is used to compensate full-time Debian developers?
Debian does solicit donations to Bruce Peren's "Software in the Public
Interest, Inc." non-profit to help defray costs (like Internic fees,
etc.).
Here's a
[ Sorry for the exploding cc: list - this is a Debian packaging issue,
so please limit the follow-ups to debian-devel. ]
Mark Galassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jim> Perhaps I should declare a dependency on the slib package,
>
> Absolutely not! It would be a great loss if Guile were *
> I don't know if this is a bug with procmail(3.10.7-1.5), exim (1.81-1), or
> me, so I thought I would ask. I recently switched to exim from smail on my
> hamm (currently as up to date as possible) which unfortunately bounced all
> of my mail. It seems that exim doesn't like the mail filter pipe
> Yes, it is discussed in the Debian Packaging Manual, section 12.
> See:
> /usr/doc/dpkg/packaging.html/ch-sharedlibs.html
>
> You should just go ahead and file bugs against packages which don't
> include the .so link as part of the package.
If I understand this correctly, there is no need to
Hi,
This is a minor annoyance, but it always bothers
me. When upgrading or reconfiguring, I chronically
end up with "orphaned" lines in /etc/ld.so.conf.
ie.
Currently, on my main Pentium system...
ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk.so.1.0 (No such file or
directory), skippin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) writes:
> > Check out the forwarded message below. I get the same error using
> > Debian unstable. Does this mean that Red Hat has thread-safe X libs
> > and we don't?
>
> Well, I wouldn't mistake that for a bug report... no indication of
> *what* is produci
Check out the forwarded message below. I get the same error using
Debian unstable. Does this mean that Red Hat has thread-safe X libs
and we don't?
Cheers,
- Jim
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 9 Dec 1997, Sascha Ziemann wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/szi$ phaser_chess
> warning -- no way
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I intend to package the beta enlightenment window manager, imlib, and
> the default themes. If anyone wants to do it instead, I'll happily
> fall back to kibitz mode -- let me know.
Lalo Martins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did a package of beta 12, back in Augu
> The logo I chose is
>
> http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-logo/profile/si02.html
Good choice. You forgot to give some credit to the artist (Simon?) though.
Do you think SPI should trademark it? What sort of licensing do you think
would be best? What does the original
Sounds slick. It wouldn't be too hard to do. It would be slick to
have some more network smarts (like DHCP, and dialup to an ISP) on
the boot disks (or some variant thereof).
As for configuration via the web - check out the GPL'd Java telnet applet
I've got installed on my webserver (http://ww
> I couldnt help but notice that there are no Canadian or even American
> (South or Central) mirrors of debian with the non-us category.
Actually, I do have one on my server (in Canada):
ftp://ftp.jimpick.com/pub/mirrors/debian-non-US/
Canada doesn't have a NSA-like organization that has to pr
> Hi,
>
> Also, 11M may not be a typical install. I get a far higher number:
> __> du -s /usr/doc
> 92026 /usr/doc
>
> Uncompressing this is very likely to annoy me.
11M was for my old 386 box (no X installed) - I'm only using about
200M total on that system. That works out to ab
> > I just did a "du -s /usr/doc" on my 386DX/33 (8MB RAM, 2-200MB HD) - and
> > it only has 11MB of docs installed. So uncompressing those isn't going
> > to kill me - I'm sure most other people using old hardware have similar
> > usage.
> >
> > Who objects?
>
> I do.
> text/html/ps usua
> I only advocated this as a compromise. I am for #1. And I would go further
> and abolish all compression everywhere. Compression should only be done if
> its transparent for all apps (e2compr or zlib?). I have seen so many
> broken packages because of manpage compression etc etc. The clean solut
One complication I can think of - dselect and the ftp sites have the
concept of "overrides", where Guy can change the section a package
is assigned to. This wouldn't be reflected in the /usr/doc
directory - of course, this might not really matter.
Cheers,
- Jim
pgpkROZcuIbKB.pgp
Description
> >You can't fix the browsers, because we don't have the source for important
> >browsers like netscape.
>
> You mean the Debian Project caving in and changing its standards because
> some non free product cannot be changed? Where is our commitment to free
> software?
We shouldn't be changing
Karl wrote:
> > Can't apache do that? I think there's a mod-rewrite that will do
> > what we need. Though I suppose not everyone runs apache... You tell
> > me and we'll both know. I think it's a good idea to have a
> > light-weight server that can launch from xinetd.
I wrote:
> The only way
> I really want the glimpse searching that TkMan has, but within the
> XEmacs interface. `dwww' has it, but for some reason it does not find
> as many manual entries as Tkman does for the same search. I wonder
> why? Perhaps a generalized perl script (or pull the tcl out of tkman
> that does i
[ I hate to wade into this, but ]
> >However, as you surely know, this does not work without web server, since
> >the browsers are not looking for "foo.html.gz" if "foo.html" is
> >referenced.
>
> Yes. But if you change the references then the web-serverws will no longer
> do on the fly dec
Hi!
Sorry for being absent from most of the conversation, and not getting
my latest release of dwww out... - I was working in Vancouver last
week, came back, got sick, one of my main modems burnt out (lightning?),
I replaced it, upgraded my server, messed up PPP, didn't configure
the modem corr
Thomas Koenig wrote:
> I think we should start moving away from MD5 as our main hash function.
> An attractive alternative would be RIPEMD-160.
> http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~bosselae/ripemd160.html
This is probably a good thing to agree to do, before Klee redesigns dpkg to
handle verificatio
> I have some computers up running in that challenge and I could easily
> contribute there output to the debian group, if we are going to have
> one.
>
> So will we have one, or will we do it each one by himself?
It's up to you - nobody's really organized anything. Some people are
already run
> People did complain that we were promoting Debian to the
> detriment of Linux.
Yes - but remember, some of the people participating in these
contests were acting pretty infantile. Instead of focusing on solving
the problem, they want their team to be at the top of the
list at all costs, inclu
> > I suggest to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as common identifier for Debian
> > friends. In case we get the money (why should we ?) I suggest to pass
> > 50% to Linux International and keep 50% for Debian.
>
> Please use an address at Linux International, not one in the Debian
> domain. It is not our
I'm going to be away from my computer for approximately a week, while I travel
to Vancouver and Nanaimo (B.C., Canada) on business. I probably won't be
able to fetch my mail.
Unfortunately, I slipped behind schedule for a few things - so I won't be
uploading the "experimental" version of dwww to
> > All packages that provide HTML documentation should register these
> > documents to the menu system, too. Check out section section 4.1, `Web
> > servers and applications' for details.
>
> Is that as well as registering with dwww?
I'm changing the way documents register themse
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The real reason I'm replying to this: I wonder what the other developers
> > think about bug reports that just say a new version is available (as opposed
> > to, a new version is available, and fixes this nasty bug).
> I think it's a good idea. I don'
> Jim,
>
> why didn't you upload shared Motif library version of jdk1.1-runtime?
> I just wonder if there is any reason for that.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alex Y.
The jdk1.1-runtime package can be used either way - read the
/usr/doc/jdk1.1/README.linux.gz file for details.
You can use a shared Motif
John Goerzen wrote:
> Back in March, Siggy had indicated that he would be taking over
> PostgreSQL development (the Postgres95 package currently in Debian is
> now very out-of-date). I e-mailed him about this and got no response.
Back on May 7, Siggy posted the following:
> Hi all,
>
> after lo
> Regarding the assignment of copyright, I took that out of the draft
> document.
Yay! I knew you were a good guy! :-)
Cheers,
- Jim
pgptBXGtMKzg2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> Well, it's fine for the author to _require_ that modifications in the
> program be returned to the author. It's just not acceptable for the
> author to not allow modifications to be distributed.
I don't think we should accept licenses that require modifications to be
returned
to the author, or
> On Jun 2, Jim Pick wrote
> > Just so you understand why I'm so interested - I'm working on porting dpkg
> > to cygwin32.
>
> Porting or re-implementing? If it's a port, dpkg is already under
> gpl, so cygwin32 being under gpl shouldn't be an issu
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
