Robert Millan, le Sun 23 Jan 2011 23:00:16 +0100, a écrit :
> 2011/1/23 Samuel Thibault :
> > It used to be used on FreeBSD, it should be just a matter of ioctls and
> > the likes. I guess digging back the old versions of ppp which had the
> > support could be a good ground.
able to install Hurd. Anyone
else should consider starting with Linux as an environment to upgrade
their knowledge.
Rather than focusing on a better install method using a cdrom, I suggest
getting DHCP,PPP, and PPPoE working. I have been going into #hurd on
irc.openprojects.net a lot lately
> Has anyone got ppp running on hurd. I am a newbie and I tried
> compiling the source which I got from the ftp site from the sid tree.
> when I ran ./configure it said that hurd system was not supported. I
> would appreciate some pointers to docs/sites where it is given in
> d
Hi
Has anyone got ppp running on hurd. I am a newbie and I tried
compiling the source which I got from the ftp site from the sid tree.
when I ran ./configure it said that hurd system was not supported. I
would appreciate some pointers to docs/sites where it is given in
detail.
regards
Harsha
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 07:43:17PM -0800, Tristan wrote:
> My other problems are
> 1) ppp isn't logging anything to syslog, even when i set:
> set log Connect Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command
> so i usually have ppp send messages to the screen.
It
I have been trying to get ppp working and manage to connect and I am able
to ping the outside world but I am unable to send/recv large amounts of
data (from what I have read on debian-hurd, everyone else is to).
My other problems are
1) ppp isn't logging anything to syslog, even
On 23-Nov-2001 Neal H Walfield wrote:
>> I don't know if that works, because now I'm not abble to just use wget or
>> lynx.
>
> This is what you are getting when you use diald or when you connect
> using straight ppp?
>
> Try starting with something a b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes:
>
> > 3. Is there a reasonable way to give a user additional uid:s
> >automatically at login?
>
> No, but perhaps there should be.
One way to do it might be analogous to supplimentary groups: Have a
Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> 1. Has anybody thought about partial delegation of networking? Does
> >>that make sense at all?
> >
> > I have some vague ideas. I think it does make sense, but making it
> > work seems hard. But if someone prods me, then I can describe my
> >
Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No, but perhaps there should be.
>
> In fact, it is on the TODO list:
>
> * Currently libshouldbeinlibc (idvec, etc) and password.defs
> and login all think there is one user per-uid, and that
> ain't necessarily so. Ne
> I don't know if that works, because now I'm not abble to just use wget or
> lynx.
This is what you are getting when you use diald or when you connect
using straight ppp?
Try starting with something a bit more simple, for instance, pinging
your gateway. Then, move on to pingi
r include one in a FAQ. (But I have to
>> >> understand what to do)
>> >
>> > One of the problems is that I do not have a modem and have never
>> > actually tested this part of the code -- I normally test using ppp
>> > over a serial cable between two comp
>> 1. Has anybody thought about partial delegation of networking? Does
>>that make sense at all?
>
> I have some vague ideas. I think it does make sense, but making it
> work seems hard. But if someone prods me, then I can describe my
> vague ideas.
Prod, prod.
>> 3. Is there a reasonable w
t; permission on some other nodes as well, to make sure that pfinet gets
> access to ethernet hardware and stuff. And then one should probably
> think a little about what a "privileged (< 1024) port means when
> pfinet doesn't run as root. This seems a little harier than I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes:
> 1. Has anybody thought about partial delegation of networking? Does
>that make sense at all?
I have some vague ideas. I think it does make sense, but making it
work seems hard. But if someone prods me, then I can describe my
vague ideas.
> 3. Is t
> > One of the problems is that I do not have a modem and have never
> > actually tested this part of the code -- I normally test using ppp
> > over a serial cable between two computers. So, I think it is pretty
> > evident why I am not the best ppp maintainer.
> &g
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > "LP" == Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> LP> It could be possible for example to let the Linux apt-get/dpkg
> LP> unpack the debs using --root and just run a `dpkg --pending
> LP> --configure' on the H
> "LP" == Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LP> It could be possible for example to let the Linux apt-get/dpkg
LP> unpack the debs using --root and just run a `dpkg --pending
LP> --configure' on the Hurd. It's not a big difference but such
LP> things make life easier..
philippe brochard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but I think it's a good thing if we can run it with an unprivileged user.
I'm not sure if there's any sensible way to delegate control over just
some parts of the networking (e.g different network interfaces), but
until someone comes up with a good
;> very happy to make one or include one in a FAQ. (But I have to
>> understand what to do)
>
> One of the problems is that I do not have a modem and have never
> actually tested this part of the code -- I normally test using ppp
> over a serial cable between two computers. So, I
: Like I don't find docs on this subjet (only messages), I'll
> very happy to make one or include one in a FAQ. (But I have to
> understand what to do)
One of the problems is that I do not have a modem and have never
actually tested this part of the code -- I normally test using ppp
On 21-Nov-2001 Neal H Walfield wrote:
>> But I have a little probleme: I can't make a device /dev/tun0 (or N)
>> with ./MAKEDEV tun0 in /dev like it's said in the ppp man pages.
>
> Well, the man pages are BSD centric. In the Hurd, pfinet will
> automatically c
> But I have a little probleme: I can't make a device /dev/tun0 (or N)
> with ./MAKEDEV tun0 in /dev like it's said in the ppp man pages.
Well, the man pages are BSD centric. In the Hurd, pfinet will
automatically create the tunnel device for you. Just run
settrans
Hello,
I'm a new user of the Hurd, and I try to use ppp to connect to the net.
But I have a little probleme: I can't make a device /dev/tun0 (or N)
with ./MAKEDEV tun0 in /dev like it's said in the ppp man pages.
So, I try to rebuild the gnumach with the option: pseudo-devi
(sorry, I send this message to Laurent Pelecq, but not for all.
So there it is)
Hi,
Thanks a lot, that works fine on my box.
On 18-Nov-2001 Laurent Pelecq wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm a new Hurd user. I connect to my ISP with a ppp connection. Since
> ppp support doesn'
Milan Zamazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "LP" == Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> LP> I'm interested in any simpler method. This one requires to boot
> LP> on Linux first and reboot again on the Hurd.
> If you can't access the network from the Hurd, I doubt you can
> "LP" == Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LP> I'm interested in any simpler method. This one requires to boot
LP> on Linux first and reboot again on the Hurd.
If you can't access the network from the Hurd, I doubt you can upgrade
from network without rebooting to another sy
Hello,
I'm a new Hurd user. I connect to my ISP with a ppp connection. Since
ppp support doesn't appear to be available, I use the following method
to install/update packages with apt-get. Maybe a better way exists. I
didn't find anything in docs I read (but I didn't read
> I mean I setup two tunnel device:
>
> tun1 on /tmp/foo
> tun0 on /tmp/foo2
No, tun0 on /servers/socket/2 and tun1 on /tmp/foo.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 10:22:35PM +0200, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> >> You have the tun0 interface setup on /servers/socket/2, right?
> >> Additionally, you should be running as root.
> >
> > As I told last time, /servers/socket/2 is used for eth0. I setup tun0 on
> > /tmp/foo2, is it enough?
>
>
>> You have the tun0 interface setup on /servers/socket/2, right?
>> Additionally, you should be running as root.
>
> As I told last time, /servers/socket/2 is used for eth0. I setup tun0 on
> /tmp/foo2, is it enough?
No. Two ppps, two tunnel devices.
does not help,
> can you send your ppp config file and anything of interest in your log
> files.
I copied the example config file from ppp package as /etc/ppp/ppp.conf, I
didn't modifie it.
This is from daemon.log. I've tried to use a different interface using the
options "
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 11:03:14PM +0200, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> You have the tun0 interface setup on /servers/socket/2, right?
No. I've eth0 on the /servers/socket/2. Is it possible to setup a different
translator for tun0?
I try to do:
settrans -acp /servers/socket/3 ...
But it complain tha
You have the tun0 interface setup on /servers/socket/2, right?
Additionally, you should be running as root. If this does not help,
can you send your ppp config file and anything of interest in your log
files.
Hello,
I tryed the GNU/Hurd ppp port, but I can't reproduce the configuration
explained in `examples/ppp/ppp.conf.hurd.virtual.link'.
Following the istruction I made the those steps:
1)
hurd-developer:~/src/ppp# settrans -acp /tmp/foo /hurd/pfinet -i tun1
hurd-developer:~/src/ppp# ps
Soete Joel wrote:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2001/debian-hurd-200108/msg00218.html
...
>
> Re: How to upgrade without ppp
>
>
...
>
> There's an APT Offline Howto (included in the Debian package...),
> which explains how to upgrade a system via
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 11:54:26PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> We don't recommend trying to cross-install packages from Linux. What I
> would recommend is that you use your Linux system to download everything
> you want onto your disk (you can write your Hurd partitions from Linux, or
> access
Tristan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just installed Debian GNU/Hurd for the first time using the
> F2 cds, and have managed to install most of the packages i need. But
> since I use a dialup internet connection and ppp is not ready for
> use (and i assume it won'
We don't recommend trying to cross-install packages from Linux. What I
would recommend is that you use your Linux system to download everything
you want onto your disk (you can write your Hurd partitions from Linux, or
access a Linux filesystem no larger than about 1GB from your Hurd).
I have just installed Debian GNU/Hurd for the first time using the F2
cds, and have managed to install most of the packages i need. But since
I use a dialup internet connection and ppp is not ready for use (and i
assume it won't be ready for quite a while?) is there a way for me to
up
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 08:50:09AM -0700, James Morrison wrote:
> Also how much of the pthreads implementation is finished? I want to
> try tekNap on hurd, but it needs pthreads.
Not useable yet. The development was stalled because I needed to learn
more about glibc internals. But then I got si
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 08:50:09AM -0700, James Morrison wrote:
> I'm wondering if ppp is in a usable enough state that I would be
> able
> to use irc or icq with it?
PPP is not usable as it is pushes select() hard which afaik is very broken. I
cannot eve apt-get anything nor
I'm wondering if ppp is in a usable enough state that I would be
able
to use irc or icq with it?
Also how much of the pthreads implementation is finished? I want to
try tekNap on hurd, but it needs pthreads.
=
James Morrison
University of Waterloo
Computer Science - Di
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I intend to package um-pppd, the user-mode ppp daemon, for The
Hurd. Though it can be used on other architectures, I'm not planning
to compile it for anything but the Hurd (at least, not now).
Upstream URL is: http://www.Awfulhak.org/~brian/src.uue
However
I am very pleased to announce the availability of a new version of ppp
entitled 20010804, which shall also to be known as the `Emily Street
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> put her bank account on the line to get me
Internet access because France Telecom is lame appreciation release.'
As usual, t
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Dios Del Tiempo wrote:
> --- Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > I do hope you have a later pfinet than this:
> >
> > 2001-06-08 Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> By the way, the F3 CDs will have the latest version of pfinet?
>
If the latest version
--- Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> I do hope you have a later pfinet than this:
>
> 2001-06-08 Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By the way, the F3 CDs will have the latest version of pfinet?
=
-
| | |Cronos
| | |"No
over the serial line. I few the problem
> > is that ppp pushes select harder than any other application in the Hurd.
> > Which is to say: this is now a Hurd problem and not a ppp problem. I
> > found that hitting enter on the ppp command prompt sometimes woke the
> > progra
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:35:35AM +0200, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> > Only problem is that it hangs a lot, especially when doing a
> > large transfer.
>
> I saw the exact same behavior over the serial line. I few the problem
> is that ppp pushes select harder than any oth
> OK, after monkeying around like neal said and setting the gateway address by
> hand doing fsysopts /servers/socket/2 -g x.x.x.x I am able to access the
> outside
> world with ppp.
Great!
> Only problem is that it hangs a lot, especially when doing a
> large transfer.
I
OK, after monkeying around like neal said and setting the gateway address by
hand doing fsysopts /servers/socket/2 -g x.x.x.x I am able to access the outside
world with ppp. Only problem is that it hangs a lot, especially when doing a
large transfer. Seems the only thing that works all the time is
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:13:46AM +0800, csj wrote:
> Is ppp now working in the Hurd? I read some months back in the list that
> there are still problems with it.
No it is not working. I will be getting back to the list shortly with the
status of
things, but I am busy with work right now
Is ppp now working in the Hurd? I read some months back in the list that
there are still problems with it.
ThanX .
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:57:08PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:54AM -0700, Pankaj kaushal wrote:
>> who is working on PPP ?
>
>Daniel Baumann is, although just right now he is busy elsewhere (that
>doesn't mean he has abandoned it,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:54AM -0700, Pankaj kaushal wrote:
> who is working on PPP ?
Daniel Baumann is, although just right now he is busy elsewhere (that
doesn't mean he has abandoned it, he has just stalled it).
> what are the things I need to brush up to contribute?
Get Dan
Hello
A Few months back marcus floated news about PPP
As at home i'm runnin a hurd box and updating it
is not possible without ppp. I was intrested to know
how far has it gone is ppp available yet.
I also talked with him and wanted to contribute but
was just waiting for some one senior t
ifconfig, eventually
PPP)
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:01:04AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded glibc 2.2.2-1 packages. They are currently in
> http://incoming.debian.org, and will beinstalled with the next dinstall run
> if everything goes well. They work fine fo
('i', 91, struct ifreq_int)/* set IF name */
A working ifconfig utility is in GNU inetutils CVS version (head branch). To
compile it you need to add it to the top level Makefile.am and conigure.in,
though. It should also be included in the next version of the Debian package
of inetut
These bugs are no reason not to post your code.
On Wednesday 10 January 2001 11:49, Petros Sidiropoulos wrote:
> I would like to hear good news about support for ppp in GNU/hurd
> 'Life is miserable without sex and ppp' :)
>
> thanks in advance
> --Petros
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The good news is I have ported user sp
I would like to hear good news about support for ppp in GNU/hurd
'Life is miserable without sex and ppp' :)
thanks in advance
--Petros
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 07:45:27PM -0500, Igor Khavkine wrote:
> If I remember correctly, 2 is there because the value of the PF_INET macro
> is 2. If you want more modularity you might watn to do something like
> this: sprintf(file_name, "/servers/socker/%d", PF_INET);
alse defines _SERVERS and
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:30:40AM -0600, Daniel E Baumann wrote:
> Hi, I am currently hacking around the routing stuff in PPP by just allowing
> you to do "add default HISADDR", which makes the peer at the other end the
> gateway and no other routing entries can be made or re
> I heard recently that HURD now has ppp. Is this true? Who wrote it?
> How mature is it? etc.
Marcus has written a tunnel interface for the pfinet server. I have now
started to port BSD user space PPP. So it will be coming soon :)
Hi,
I was unable to find a link to a mailing list archive at the debian
hurd webpage.
I heard recently that HURD now has ppp. Is this true? Who wrote it?
How mature is it? etc.
I used to follow the hurd a bit but it didn't have PPP so it wasn't
much use to me...
Thanks for any i
> > completely. The principle example of this is the port name space: in the
> > hurd, the port name space is the file system while in OSF/Mach, there is
> > a separate name space.
>
> Does this mean that the hurd does not have a name sever as discussed in the
> server writer's guide?
Yes. The
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> An equally great benefit (or greater) would be an afternoon spent reading
> the source code :) All I know I learned from the source code and asking
> specific questions on the list.
That's right, but the problem is where to start with. Anyway, the rest of your
message
> > completely. The principle example of this is the port name space: in the
> > hurd, the port name space is the file system while in OSF/Mach, there is
> > a separate name space.
>
> Does this mean that the hurd does not have a name sever as discussed in the
> server writer's guide?
This is c
> completely. The principle example of this is the port name space: in the
> hurd, the port name space is the file system while in OSF/Mach, there is
> a separate name space.
Does this mean that the hurd does not have a name sever as discussed in the
server writer's guide?
-
> can you please put up a document explaining the various concepts and
> real examples from say your implementation of tun device, on how to use the
> various interfaces like trivfs etc etc (or update these on the Hurd Reference
> Guide)? Programmers coming from Unix, who want to contribu
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:57:07AM +0530, Ramakrishnan M wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > You should make yourself familiar with libtrivfs and pfinet first.
>
> Hi Marcus
> can you please put up a document explaining the various concepts and
> real examples from say your implem
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> You should make yourself familiar with libtrivfs and pfinet first.
Hi Marcus
can you please put up a document explaining the various concepts and
real examples from say your implementation of tun device, on how to use the
various interfaces like trivfs etc e
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:44:00PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> b. Porting ppp.
I have now prepared a ppp source tar file which is hacked to compile the lot
of the source files cleanly. This involved providing a few preprocessor
symbols (MAXHOSTNAMELEN, MAXPATHLEN, _BSD_VA_LIST_) and mess
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 07:53:29PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Here is what you need:
> > Current CVS Hurd, at least the pfinet directory.
> > The patch from
> > http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/files/pfinet-tun-20001005.diff.gz
>
> You should go ahead and check your code in, Marcus.
Done.
T
s with this. When I suggested mpd, I didn't realize that netgraph
was its only option.
> b. Porting ppp.
This is the one to use for now. I don't think there is too much to it.
Hi,
I have finished my work on the tunnel interface so far[1] that I think someone
can have a go at porting user space ppp. Don't count on me[2], I took a look at
it, and it's quite ugly, because ppp does a lot of things we don't support,
so you have to butcher to code a bit. See
go for the real ideal solutiopn to the problem (the
> channel abstraction explained by Roland), then libstore is the analogy. But
> there is nothing that libstore has to do with this apart from being a good
> analogy, so libstore will tell you a lot about the Hurd, but nothing about
> pfi
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 12:32:01AM -0500, Daniel E. Baumann wrote:
> Hello all as I hope some of you know I am attempting to get PPP to work for
> the HURD.
Great. I was already giving up waiting and started to take a look myself
yesterday. There's a lot of work to be done.
> As
Hello all as I hope some of you know I am attempting to get PPP to work for
the HURD. As of right now I am still trying to figure out some of the HURD
internals, Mach and all how it all works. I am making some progress and I
am writing a Programming HOWTO. I heard that there was a patch
for pfinet
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 06:51:37PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 03:42:55AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > This was all discussed awhile ago on this list in various threads, and
> > several people made summaries.
>
> Whenabouts in the archive should I loo
be it gets faster when we cooperate, and settle on a common approach.
>
> > So far, I've got the ppp network interface device mostly wired into
> > gnumach (slip, too). I've got a few critical pieces ifdef'd out so I
> > can see if I've got the build flags
Doh.
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 03:42:55AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > So far, I've got the ppp network interface device mostly wired into
> > gnumach (slip, too). I've got a few critical pieces ifdef'd out so I
> > can see if I've got the build fl
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 09:27:19PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > So far, I've got the ppp network interface device mostly wired into
> > gnumach (slip, too).
>
> This is an entirely wrong approach that is just not likely to get you very
> far towards something usef
;s going to take awhile so be patient.
> I may come back to the list a few times for questions/guidance.
Maybe it gets faster when we cooperate, and settle on a common approach.
> So far, I've got the ppp network interface device mostly wired into
> gnumach (slip, too). I've go
> So far, I've got the ppp network interface device mostly wired into
> gnumach (slip, too).
This is an entirely wrong approach that is just not likely to get you very
far towards something useful for the Hurd. There is nothing the kernel
should have to do with it.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 08:14:48PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> So, who was going to work on PPP?
Well, I'm not sure about volunteering to take the lead on this, but I
have started working on it. It's going to take awhile so be patient.
I may come back t
should work now (who was going to work on ppp?)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 17:31:06 -0500
From: Daniel E. Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just fixed a relevant bug in gnumach:
>
> 2000-09-29 Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
So, who was going to work on PPP?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server
Marcus Brinkmann GNUhttp://www.gnu.orgfor public PGP Key
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
http://h
http://licensing.qnx.com/
- Original Message -
From: "dP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marcus Brinkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Farid Hajji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ;
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Porting FreeBSD'
Take a look at http://www.qnx.com
search for 1.44Demo... ( asingle floppy takes you on to the net!!)
search for the download area of qnx RTP... it´s a 25MB download,
but worth to try... a RTOS in search of development... POSIX standarts...
so any linux apps could be easylly ported... and so.
use the ttyS? notation as linux (although we could).
> Thanks Marcus. I figured this out and was able to use serial devices and
> term as expected. I didn't pursue porting *BSD's ppp(8) to the Hurd now,
> since I'm not sure how to access pfinet in a canonical manner. At
}/$I device $I;;
>
> So, "settrans /dev/com1 /hurd/term /dev/com1 device com1"
>
> would connect /dev/com1 with com1 in GNU Mach.
> The Hurd doesn't use the ttyS? notation as linux (although we could).
Thanks Marcus. I figured this out and was able to use serial devic
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 04:32:20AM +0200, Farid Hajji wrote:
>
> > 2. If there is no such translator, is there an officially approved or
> >preferred way to access native gnumach drivers? Of course, there is
> >always the possibility to get the master device port from the PROC
> >serve
> I am trying to make sense of the current pfinet, but I don't have the
> Mach/HURD programming basics down.
I'm in roughly the same place, since I am adding an entropy
driver to the kernel to power a /dev/random translator and
then from there, adding IPv6 support.
lot of discussions on "HOwto do it" has happened in
> this
> list, without any logical conclusion. I do not claim to understand each and
> every method suggested. Why is it so difficult to fix up a way to implement
> it?
>
> I think once we fix the way to go,
- Original Message -
From: "Ramakrishnan M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "debian-hurd" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 200
do not claim to understand each and
every method suggested. Why is it so difficult to fix up a way to implement it?
I think once we fix the way to go, rest of the job will be smooth.
Without PPP, I don't think, individuals (particularly in Asia), will be able to
try out GNU/Hurd, and hence the
here is some more ppp info
http://kt.linuxcare.com/debian-hurd/dh2816_57.epl#2
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "debian-hurd"
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: State
urd"
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: State of ppp
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Ramakrishnan M wrote:
> > Hello
> > I would like to know the present status of ppp support into the
GNU/Hurd
> > system. I read the documents at the following li
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Ramakrishnan M wrote:
> Hello
> I would like to know the present status of ppp support into the GNU/Hurd
> system. I read the documents at the following links.
>
> http://lyonfyre.net/hurd/
> http://lyonfyre.net/hurd/discussions.html
>
> What e
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo