Re: [sparc64] mkfs.btrfs bus error / align issue?

essor fun is kept to a minimum. :) --Patrick

Re: [sparc64] mkfs.btrfs bus error / align issue?

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:40 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 07/27/2016 03:59 PM, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: >> Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error. >> 0x0015e160 in write_raid56_with_parity (info=0x2b17b0, >> eb=0x2c7fe0, multi=0x2c2870,

Re: Please upgrade your machines to sparc64

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:42 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 06/23/2016 05:06 PM, David Miller wrote: > > I think what irks people the most about what happened, is that the > > choosen a path is not the most optimal situation for the target > > platform.

Re: Debian Sparc 7.10.0 Install Problems

with hardware to test and report bugs so that the community can work on fixing it. --Patrick

Re: Bug#806208: src:gegl: FTBFS on sparc64, tools/introspect segfaults

On Saturday, June 4, 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 06/03/2016 11:49 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > So, maybe we're lucky and just the above patch will be enough :). > > > > Will build gegl now to verify this. > > And, indeed, gegl now builds

Re: Enable module aliases for vio on sparc/sparc64

You guys are my heroes. Keep up the great work! On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 04/14/2016 01:01 AM, David Miller wrote: > > Ok those are the block devices, where are the networking interfaces? > > Whoops, sorry: > >

Re: Bug#813649: emoslib; FTBFS on sparc64, needs different -mcmodel option

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:55 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 02/03/2016 11:48 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-sparc64-linux-gnu/libemos-dp && /usr/bin/cc >> -DBUFR_TABLES_PATH=\"/usr/share/emos/bufrtables\" -DFOPEN64

Re: Bug#812928: udev: cdrom_id terminated by signal BUS

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 23:54 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> Control: reassign -1 src:linux >> Control: found -1 4.3.0-1 >> Control: retitle -1 getauxval(AT_RANDOM) broken on sparc64 >> >> On

Re: Need help: xsltproc segfaulting on sparc64

] that supposedly fixes the issue? Or is your request to somehow modify the C code so that is supports recursion more efficiently (tail recursion)? Patrick [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?filename=nonrecursive-string-subst.patch;bug=765567;msg=72;att=1 On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John

Re: Need help debugging silo

Nice job everyone! On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 6:18 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 12/29/2015 12:24 PM, Frans van Berckel wrote: > >> The unsigned long probably becomes 64 bit on sparc64. I'll check > >> whether Oracle has a patched version. > > > > The

Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors

char b[2] = { 0, 0 }; printf("%d\n", strcmp(a,b)); } --- compile as: gcc -O0 test.c If the output is -1, the bug has been fixed. If the output is 0, then the bug is still present. 0 indicates the two strings are equal. Clearly they are not. :) Patrick >

Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 11/12/2015 11:28 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote: > > If the output is -1, the bug has been fixed. If the output is 0, then > > the bug is still present. 0 indicates the two strin

Re: Resurrecting Debian on SPARC

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:32 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 09/15/2015 04:10 PM, waz0wski wrote: > > I would love to see Debian-on-SPARC continue on, even if not fully > > supported, similar to how the FreeBSD project handles sparc64[1] > > Ok, the

Re: Debian drops support for sparc

that it means 32-bit code targeting sparcv9 ISA. Patrick

Re: Debian drops support for sparc

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote: But I think the focus should probably be on the sheer redness of the sparc columns at: https://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_qualify.html (current release) From the link above: sparc Upstream Support According to

Re: Good news on Debian Sparc port stability

I would ask David S. Miller about the sparc ASM stuff - he seems to be the resident sparc genius and linux kernel maintainer. On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:18 PM, James Y Knight jykni...@google.com wrote: On Jun 4, 2015, at 11:07 AM, James Y Knight jykni...@google.com wrote: GLibc = After

Re: Debian Jessie regression under qemu-system-sparc64

. Patrick

Re: Ultra-5 freezing

Ultra 80 or SB 2500 on Linux. I also don't keep them on for weeks at a time though -- although I used to without issues. Patrick On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:45 PM, scar s...@drigon.com wrote: hi i have an Ultra-5 which has been housed in a datacenter for several years. It used to be running SunOS

Re: Wanted: sparc64 porterbox

Any modern SPARC kernel will run 64-bit sparc code, and the multilib gcc will generate both 32-code and 64-bit code. I believe that is enough, but I'm not 100% sure. Patrick On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Camm Maguire c...@maguirefamily.org wrote: Greetings! Does anyone know

Re: Wanted: sparc64 porterbox

in pure 64-bit environment? Or just a gcc that can build 64-bit sparc programs on sparc? - Patrick On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Camm Maguire c...@maguirefamily.org wrote: Greetings! I've tried in the past building sparc64 on smetana with gcc switches and environment variables and failed

Re: Problem implementing USB on Ultra 5/10

So if I'm understanding you correctly, when you don't have the card plugged in, your system boots normally, but when you do, it doesn't even make to the boot screen? Maybe you should check whether the card is correctly inserted into the slot. This sounds closer to a hardware error, not driver

Re: Problem implementing USB on Ultra 5/10

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, BERTRAND Joël joel.bertr...@systella.fr wrote: Fred a écrit : Hello, A recent post mentioned having USB on a U10. I bought a StarTech PCIUSB7 card because it is said to be Linux compatible. With the PCI USB card installed the U5 flashes the keyboard leds

Re: Problem implementing USB on Ultra 5/10

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Fred f...@blakemfg.com wrote: On 07/22/2014 12:18 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 05:50:44AM -0700, Fred wrote: A recent post mentioned having USB on a U10. I bought a StarTech PCIUSB7 card because it is said to be Linux compatible.

Re: problem booting Debian on X1

` binary and replace it with the newest one? I would think that if you had a USB port you could do this pretty easily using a flash drive (perhaps PCI USB card + flash drive, like I had in my Ultra 10), but if not, you might be able to utilize tftp and pull it from a server using BusyBox. Patrick

Re: problem booting Debian on X1

Ah yeah, I forgot that after 1.4.14, the version number hasn't really increased (despite development). Can you figure out which Debian package you are using? On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Jeremy Kister debian-sp...@jeremykister.com wrote: On 7/21/2014 5:09 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote

Re: problem booting Debian on X1

wrote: On 7/21/2014 4:59 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote: please correct me if I am mistaken!] In that case, perhaps you could backup the old `silo` binary and replace it with the newest one? I would think that if you had a USB port you could do this pretty easily using a flash drive (perhaps PCI USB

Re: problem booting Debian on X1

://swoolley.org/man.cgi/1/builtins If you recently modified the layout of the disks, perhaps you need to just run 'silo' again to make sure that 'second.b' can be found? On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Jeremy Kister debian-sp...@jeremykister.com wrote: On 7/21/2014 4:59 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote

Re: problem booting Debian on X1

-r /mnt -S backup1 -f all yield Fast Data Access MMU Miss wow, i got it. ends up silo needed -u -- i found that by this post: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570264 Thanks Patrick (and anyone else) for your input. boxes are all happy now. debian-sparc maintainers

Re: preparing for GCC 4.9

, and electricity to burn. Where do I start? Patrick On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release) architectures

Re: Bug#746310: Acknowledgement (libc6: strcmp returns false equality between two strings)

This has been fixed upstream by David Miller and applied to all branches from glibc-2.15 all the way to master. It should be backported to wheezy and and definitely sid. Patrick On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.netwrote: Here's the bug filed against debian

Re: the future of sparc in unstable

BTW, the sparc buildd looks like gcc 4-8.2-21 is successful and so is gcc-4.9.0-1. I've installed them from sid. Crisis averted? Patrick On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.netwrote: Le 30/04/2014 20:36, Patrick Baggett a écrit : On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1

Re: the future of sparc in unstable

major bugs report and fix them. I haven't checked but I think that SILO is currently a version or two ahead of what debian is using for it's installs. That might be the issue. Wish I had more time to invest in this. -Kieron On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Patrick Baggett baggett.patr

Re: the future of sparc in unstable

I kicked off a gcc build (gcc-4.8_4.8.2-21) last night. It didn't have an errors for me. I now have a bunch of *.deb files: figgles@ghost:~/src$ ls -1 *.deb cpp-4.8_4.8.2-21_sparc.deb g++-4.8-multilib_4.8.2-21_sparc.deb g++-4.8_4.8.2-21_sparc.deb gcc-4.8-base_4.8.2-21_sparc.deb

Re: the future of sparc in unstable

++-dev, but not the base lib64stdc++/libstdc++ And yeah, libgcc1 just isn't built, which is a major problem. Maybe we need to look at diffs in the debian directory. Patrick

Re: the future of sparc in unstable

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.netwrote: Le 30/04/2014 15:39, Patrick Baggett a écrit : I tried to build the gcc-4.8-4.8.2-20 and the build is broken. libstdc++ and lib64stdc++ are not build, neither are build libgcc1. The last good build

Re: the future of sparc in unstable

gcc-4.9 is not installable? Patrick

Re: State of Haskell on sparc?

misaligned data which aren't very difficult to fix once you see the source code. Is there a bug report for the SPARC failure? Help me reproduce it on my local machine and I think I should be able to fix it soon! Patrick

Re: Bug#745938: FWIW -- I consider sparc useful, pity if its support ends completely

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.debian-sp...@telemetry.co.uk wrote: Joël BERTRAND wrote: sun4u : kernel is stable until 2.6.32. All kernels since 2.6.33 hang with a deadlock or similar issue (UP and SMP) on U1E, U2, U5, U60, U80, U420, Blade2000. I have done

Re: State of Haskell on sparc?

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Richard Mortimer ri...@oldelvet.org.ukwrote: Hi, On 29/04/2014 17:26, Colin Watson wrote: Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error. 0x003d8c2c in md5_do_chunk () (gdb) bt #0 0x003d8c2c in md5_do_chunk () #1 0x003d9a10 in md5_update () #2 0x003d2070

Re: Bug#745938: decide on the future of sparc in unstable

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.orgwrote: On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:36:31 +0200, Joël BERTRAND wrote: sun4u : kernel is stable until 2.6.32. [...] sun4v : I have several T1000 for a long time. I haven't seen any stable kernel on these servers.

Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors

Yes, that's the one. Interestingly, in glibc-2.19, this change is reverted. It is present in glibc-2.17 glibc-2.18 as released by GNU. Oddly, in glibc git, the buggy version appears. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Lennart Sorensen lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at

Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Patrick Baggett baggett.patr...@gmail.comwrote: Yes, that's the one. Interestingly, in glibc-2.19, this change is reverted. It is present in glibc-2.17 glibc-2.18 as released by GNU. Oddly, in glibc git, the buggy version appears. I've filed a bug

Re: Sparc status ?

experimental features, but maybe there is something more to this. Perhaps we should compare some kernel configurations and see where the source of instability might be. Patrick

Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.netwrote: Le 28/04/2014 16:05, Patrick Baggett a écrit : strcmp() may well be implemented by word comparisons. But then it is the duty of the implementation to properly handle the ends of the strings even if those

Re: Sparc status ?

No, that is not accurate. The main reason is that there are a number of issues with the sparc port currently that are not being addressed because apparently nobody is interested enough in the sparc port to fix the issues. OK, what are the major issues and the bug # assigned to them? I'd

Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Thomas Schmitt scdbac...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, sorry for mis-posting the first reply for bug 746254 to this bug 731806. Meanwhile it turned out that the SIGBUS vanishes if i do not compile with -O2 or if i replace a-u = by memcpy(). Could you explain the

Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Thomas Schmitt scdbac...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, Patrick Baggett: Could you explain the context around this code? Perhaps the source is not really alignment safe and could use some patching upstream? I'd be happy to provide advice or code samples

Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors

Seb, Yes, I can reproduce this issue. { 1, 0 } { 1, 1 } returns 0, when it should return -1. Interestingly, if you use: { 1, 1, 1, 1, 0 } //i.e. 5 bytes { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 } //i.e. 5 bytes as the strings, it returns -1. So it clearly has a problem if the string is exceptionally short. That

Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Thomas Schmitt scdbac...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, I really need a disassembly and to be able to probe the runtime It's the job of a C union to provide a common hull around objects of different size. One may dispute whether using union is a good idea (like

Re: sparc has been pulled from jessie

had gcc-4.8 installed on my machine for a long time and never had a problem with it. Not really sure what needs to be done for debian version N+1 to get sparc back in. Anyway, I'll try keep it alive as hard as I'm able to. Yeah, same. Too much sparc HW to quit. :) Patrick

Re: Bug#745938: decide on the future of sparc in unstable

I still run Debian on three SPARC machines, so I am definitely interested. Patrick On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.orgwrote: Hi, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes: now that sparc has been dropped from testing, please decide on the fate of sparc

Re: Sparc status ?

just don't buy the debian sparc is a [uniquely] weird use case. It's not even unique to Debian, and it's not even unique to SPARC. Patrick

Re: Sparc status ?

this to be the case. Patrick

Re: Sparc status ?

, or should I say, rebuild under LP64 model. That wouldn't even make sense and would hurt performance. Please refer anyone who believes this to this message. Patrick On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.netwrote: Le 18/04/2014 06:56, Joost van Baal-Ilić a écrit : I'd

Re: Sparc status ?

] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/changes.html On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.netwrote: Le 18/04/2014 14:16, Patrick Baggett a écrit : I really don't understand why this 32-bit gone myth is happening. It was poor wording at least. Debian doesn't even support

Re: Sparc status ?

will be able to confirm this in a heartbeat, and no doubt gcc-sparc maintainers are aware of this as well. Patrick

Re: Problem with sunvdc driver in Solaris 11 LDOM installation

into an LDOM, does it report the correct size for the same disk? That is -- is there a problem with the LDOM software and ISO images, or is there a problem with the Linux driver -- being certain of that would also be really helpful for the kernel developers. Patrick [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian

Re: lnav/0.7.0-2: FTBFS on mips, powerpc, s390x and sparc

Seems like a tiny fix, as mentioned by the owner tstack in line_buffer.cc(185). Upstream should be able to do this easily. this-lb_file_time = *((int32_t *)gz_id[4]); should be something to the effect of: this-lb_file_time = (gz_id[4]) | (gz_id[5] 8) | (gz_id[6] 16) | ( gz_id[7] 24); to

Re: MySQL on T2000

Yes, it does [1], and so does Solaris using SunPro CC using -xmemalign [2] [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2013-March/012435.html [2] https://blogs.oracle.com/d/entry/the_meaning_of_xmemalign On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:39 PM, brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net

Re: MySQL on T2000

. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a way to enable unaligned load fixups automatically in Linux -- probably a kernel option or runtime configuration. Short version - Not getting SIGBUS is NOT proof that unaligned loads are not happening. Patrick On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:59 PM, brian m. carlson

Re: MySQL on T2000

Chris, would you mind posting your C/CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS? Patrick On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Chris Lawrence ch...@nrsys.org wrote: Greetings: Based on some of the discussion so far in this thread (which thank you all by the way for your input!) has led me down some holes I

Re: MySQL on T2000

probably doesn't have any special flags applied, whereas you'd probably want -mtune=niagara. I'm interested in finding out the answer as well -- I've considering picking up a used T2-based, which has similar characteristics, since they are down to a few hundred dollars. Patrick On Mon, Jan 27

Re: [Need HELP!] Please help to test kernel patch (sparc64, NUMA)

: arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c: patch does not apply I'm probably doing something dumb, so let me know what I need to change. ;) Patrick On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Kirill Tkhai tk...@yandex.ru wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a person who has sparc64 machine with NUMA. The patch below adds NUMA

Re: [Need HELP!] Please help to test kernel patch (sparc64, NUMA)

OK, I have a Sun Blade 2500 (2x UltraSPARC III) I can use to test. I'll try to get to this this weekend. Patrick On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Kirill Tkhai tk...@yandex.ru wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a person who has sparc64 machine with NUMA. The patch below adds NUMA kernel text

Re: sparc64 buildd gcc SIGSEGV/SIGBUS?

if you can point me in the right direction. Patrick On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Steven Gawroriski ste...@multiphasicapps.net wrote: Hello, has anyone else been able to reproduce the SIGSEGV/SIGBUS crashes seen on the sompek/sompek2 buildd servers? When creating the packages locally

Re: sparc64 buildd gcc SIGSEGV/SIGBUS?

to. So with that all mentioned, is the end goal to produce a 64-bit binary or 32-bit binary? Patrick On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Steven Gawroriski ste...@multiphasicapps.net wrote: On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:41:35 -0500 Patrick Baggett baggett.patr...@gmail.com wrote: I can't say that I

Re: sparc64 buildd gcc SIGSEGV/SIGBUS?

you verify that: 1) sompek has a 64-bit gcc 2) you have a 64-bit gcc I just want to rule out that 64-bitness matters, since it appears that you both have identical versions of `gcc`. Patrick On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Steven Gawroriski ste...@multiphasicapps.net wrote: On Tue, 15 Oct

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

I'm interesting in helping on ia64. I'm not fluent in ia64 assembly, but I can get around pretty well. I'm very experienced in C/C++/Java and debugging. I've got a fully functional system running Xorg/Mesa3D/sound, so I can reproduce, test, and fix issues as time permits. Patrick Baggett On Wed

Re: Removing old unmaintained X drivers

Off the top of my head, my Sun E3500 (8x 64-bit SPARC CPUs) has an SBUS graphics adapter that is one of those cg{N} adapters, but honestly, Linux support for E3500 is shoddy at best, so it's fine by me. Patrick On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote: On Thu, Sep

Re: Compiling vanilla kernel issues.

recently stop working after 3.8.x series. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Patrick Baggett baggett.patr...@gmail.comwrote: I didn't have any problems, but I'm not using initramfs. To build a kernel 'the debian way', you might need to find a guide

Re: Compiling vanilla kernel issues.

I didn't have any problems, but I'm not using initramfs. To build a kernel 'the debian way', you might need to find a guide or maybe someone else can chime in? On Sep 18, 2013 10:05 PM, Kieron Gillespie ciaran.gilles...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, Was wondering if anyone had any success

Re: Compiling vanilla kernel issues.

messages about the disks it finds. Alternatively, if you know the model of the system (e.g. Sun Ultra 80), then you can look up the hardware / drivers using your favorite search engine or see if anyone knows off hand on the list. Good luck! Patrick Baggett On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Kieron

Re: SIGBUS in elfutils

Short version: likely looks like a bug in the *.c code, should use memcpy() instead of type-punning when the alignment is unknown. Long version: The 'ldd' instruction is *l*oa*d* *d*ouble word, i.e. load 64-bit value. 0xf7d182fc is 4-byte aligned, but not 8-byte aligned, so 'ldd' faults and

Re: SIGBUS libcrypto in Wheezy/Sparc

Hmm, I think I can debug this if you can give me steps to reproduce it. Is it just when you start up the program? Patrick On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Jersey Man jerse...@yahoo.com wrote: Unaligned access? Get this when running 'sipp' or 'freeswitch' when compiled with SSL support

Re: Sparc avaiable

I think you guys should say where you are located. I might be, but not if it is across the ocean. :-) On Jun 23, 2013 6:10 PM, M. Dietrich m...@emdete.de wrote: Hi all, i have a spare sun sparc laying around collecting dust in my wardrobe. anyone interested in it for porting and the like?

Re: qemu FTBFS on sparc: conflicting types of tcflag_t?

system, a bug report would be really helpful with as much information and detective work as possible. Patrick On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote: 01.06.2013 14:44, Michael Tokarev пишет: 28.05.2013 19:02, Michael Tokarev wrote: Hello. One of our packages

Re: sparc / Problems with 3.2-kernel

I have a dual US-III in a Sun Blade 2500 running 3.9 and it's stable for me, but I don't recall having any problems with 3.2 either. Patrick On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 4:38 PM, BERTRAND Joël joel.bertr...@systella.frwrote: Andreas Barth a écrit : Hi, today I tried to resurrect our buildd

Re: Help with Wheezy CD testing on Saturday

It is an HP zx6000, an Itanium (ia64) machine. Please ignore; it was probably CCd to the wrong lists. Patrick On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.debian-sp...@telemetry.co.uk wrote: Peter Chubb wrote: Émeric == Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com writes

Re: Multiscreen systems

situation. Patrick On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.debian-sp...@telemetry.co.uk wrote: Has anybody tested Xinerama and xdmx on SPARC recently, using e.g. 2x Creator 3Ds in a U60? I tried upgrading a must-work system from Etch to Lenny over the weekend, and found

Re: liburcu sparc support, build failure on buildd

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote: Hi, I notice the following build failure here https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=liburcu Tail of log for liburcu on sparc: urcu/static/wfqueue.h:84:2: warning: implicit declaration of

Re: Call for iceweasel testing

, you might look into it as a possible cause. Patrick On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:17:00PM +0100, Hartwig Atrops wrote: Hello. On Friday 15 February 2013 10:24:27 Jurij Smakov wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:27:32PM

Re: Call for iceweasel testing

The backtrace seems to very different. That is in the JIT compiler, while the bug report seems to be in perhaps a general interpreter? Patrick On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Hartwig Atrops hartwig.atr...@arcor.dewrote: Hello. This evening, I tested the packages from wooyd.org on my Blade

Re: QLogic PTI firmware

It appears to be part of the Linux kernel source too. linux-2.6/firmware/qlogic/isp1000.bin.hex It may be the same firmware and may not be the problem. Patrick On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.debian-sp...@telemetry.co.uk wrote: What's the recommended way to get

Re: problem with lesstif2 installation

changes that might have results in a bad package. Patrick On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Fred f...@blakemfg.com wrote: Hello, I am working with Debian Squeeze on a Sun Ultra 5 and am having trouble installing lesstif2-0.95.2-1.1. The package appears to install ok but no files are actually

Re: problem with lesstif2 installation

like skip certain bytes in the file? 'ls -l' will display the file size for sure. Patrick On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Fred f...@blakemfg.com wrote: Hi Patrick, I have both library files. I don't know how to check the MD5 sum. I assume apt-get would do that before install. The .deb file I

Re: Install Linux on Ultra Sparc 10

a DB-25, so I just removed the UPA board all was good. Patrick On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Amy Tran t...@sescoinc.com wrote: Hello there, ** ** I tried to install Debian version 6.0.6 sparc on sparc ultra machine and got an error: Console: color dummy device 80x25

Re: Sun Fire V210 NIC's don't work

. Patrick On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Anonymous anonym...@hoi-polloi.org wrote: SOLARIS 10 SPARC!!! You KNOW you want it! ;-) No Linux, no FSF, no problem! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: Sun Fire V210 NIC's don't work

So you did apt-get install firmware-linux-nonfree and still no go? I didn't seem to have any problems with this, though it was on an ia64 machine. Patrick On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I attempted to configure a second nic on my server and added

Re: Oracle Sun T5120 support getting better in debian 6.0.5 ?

, or heavy large integer usage (RSA encryption, e.g.) would really benefit much. Finding a binary that is faster when compiled as 64-bit code is an exception to the rule. However, using SPARCv9 instructions (which require a 64-bit CPU) in 32-bit binary can improve performance. Patrick And they even

Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy

anywhere that it is useful at, and it should be relatively competitive with a dual US-III as far as build speed. Patrick

Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy

Adam, I didn't see where GCC was dropping 32-bit sparc upstream in the changelogs. This seems inaccurate since a 64-bit userland has negative performance implications, and this is true for both Solaris and Linux and not recommended by anyone. A 64-bit userland is barely available for Linux --

Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.ukwrote: On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:44 -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote: I didn't see where GCC was dropping 32-bit sparc upstream in the changelogs. This seems inaccurate since a 64-bit userland has negative performance

Re: *May I submit you for this high focus, high paying CIRRUS LOGIC position?*

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, b...@inncareers.com wrote: Hello! *May I submit you for this high focus, high paying Cirrus Logic position?* No, I don't think this is what the mailing list is for.

Re: http://developer.gaisler.net/debian/ sparc32 wheezy repostitory

Packages are one thing but...Didn't the linux kernel drop SPARCv7/8 support? I remember reading their atomic ops and they uses 'cas' and 'casx' which are very clearly sparcv9 instructions. It might have been a conditional code path On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Alexander Feld

Re: Any experience with Radeons on SPARC?

I got a GeForce MX 4000 to run OpenArena using a Sun Ultra 10. It crashes after a while, but when I first started, it didn't even really run X, much less full accelerated OpenGL. What SPARC system are you using? I've found that while the GF4 worked, a GeForce 8400GS didn't even get recognized

Re: gcc: Internal Compiler error: Bus error randomly occurs.

I haven't had any bus errors while compiling, and I do a fairly good bit of it on a Sun Ultra 10 (UltraSPARC IIi, not IIIi like the Blade 2500). Do have a *.c/*.cpp test case I can try to compile that gives you SIGBUS? Also, what version of GCC are you using? Patrick On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:09

Re: gcc: Internal Compiler error: Bus error randomly occurs.

right now I am having this system compile the Linux kernel without Xorg running which when Xorg was running the Bus Error happened with the unaligned access errors. So it may just be this driver bug I have been having. Kieron On 04/02/2012 10:57 AM, Patrick Baggett wrote: I haven't had any

Re: gcc: Internal Compiler error: Bus error randomly occurs.

The backtraces mention cheetah, which is the UltraSPARC III CPU IIRC. Also, Blade 100, Ultra 5/10 are single (US-II) CPU systems -- perhaps it is related to also having SMP? You could try running a UP kernel and see what happens... Patrick On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Kieron Gillespie

Re: powerbutton

. Patrick On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:08 AM, mlsp...@mailserver.ipstatico.net wrote: Hi I've installed debian 6 stable on an old sparc sun ultra5 if I type: halt or shutdown -h now or init 0 all works fine If I try to shutdown using the powerbutton, the computer will go off but a lot

Re: powerbutton

the keyboard is enough to get the OBP to use serial port A). Patrick On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM, mlsp...@mailserver.ipstatico.net wrote: I have no problem to report here messages that appear but I don't know how to do Is it possible to save messages in a file? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012

  1   2   3   >