On 06/02/2017 04:03 AM, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 19:34:20 -0500
> Michael Milliman wrote:
>
>> Have you tried the package firmware-realtek?? I'm not absolutely
>> positive that the drivers available in this package will work with your
>> specific 8812/8821 chipset (th
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:53:08PM +, Wei-Shun Lo wrote:
> Yes, that is possible, however this card is supplied as a nano USB card
> that enable old computers that had no wifi card, so I would like to make a
> suggestion to include this card's firmware to Debian live's image.
Oh, you want it i
Hi,
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 19:34:20 -0500
Michael Milliman wrote:
> Have you tried the package firmware-realtek?? I'm not absolutely
> positive that the drivers available in this package will work with your
> specific 8812/8821 chipset (there are more than one), but it does have
> drivers for some
Have you tried the package firmware-realtek?? I'm not absolutely
positive that the drivers available in this package will work with your
specific 8812/8821 chipset (there are more than one), but it does have
drivers for some 8812/8821 chipsets that may work.
On 06/01/2017 05:49 PM, Jessica Litwin
Dear Jessica,
Yes, that is possible, however this card is supplied as a nano USB card
that enable old computers that had no wifi card, so I would like to make a
suggestion to include this card's firmware to Debian live's image.
Best,
Ralic
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:50 PM Jessica Litwin wrote:
>
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Wei-Shun Lo wrote:
> Dear Debian,
>
> Is it possible to include below driver in the kernel for network
> installation?
> Many cards are using this driver.
>
> https://github.com/abperiasamy/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux
>
> Best regards,
> Ralic
> --
> *******
Dear Debian,
Is it possible to include below driver in the kernel for network
installation?
Many cards are using this driver.
https://github.com/abperiasamy/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux
Best regards,
Ralic
--
************************
*******
Dear Debian,
Is it possible to include below driver in the kernel for network
https://github.com/abperiasamy/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux
Best regards,
Ralic
--
************************
************
* Contact Info
michael-spree-michael wrote:
> It used to be that one can use two network cards at the same time, after
> configuring /etc/network/interfaces and making the networks static.
Yes. This is a standard and widely used feature.
> This I did.
>
> The results; the wifi card won
On 2015-05-29, michael-spree-michael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It used to be that one can use two network cards at the same time, after
> configuring /etc/network/interfaces and making the networks static.
>
> This I did.
>
> The results; the wifi card won't connect and the
Hello,
It used to be that one can use two network cards at the same time, after
configuring /etc/network/interfaces and making the networks static.
This I did.
The results; the wifi card won't connect and the wired connected.
Is this something different in Jessie?
Thanks a lot in ad
Hi,
we have USB network cards and udev rules for them, for example:
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Novatel
Wireless*", ATTRS{serial}=="?*", NAME="ethnovatel%n"
when booting, we see e.g., "ethnovatel3" and "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1-Feb-08, at 11:59 PM, Raquel wrote:
I think that I understand what you're saying. However, what's the
difference? If the machine is capable of handling 15 VirtualHosts
with 1 nic and 1 IP number, why can it not handle 15 VirtualHosts with
2 n
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:44:47PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800 Raquel wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
&
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:35:18PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800 Raquel wrote:
> >
> > > I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
> > > card
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 08:59:38PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:45:30 -0500
> "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sure. It would make sense if the hardware could keep up with two
> > NICs going full-out, so it depends on the network speed
> > (10/100/1000), the spe
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:45:30 -0500
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure. It would make sense if the hardware could keep up with two
> NICs going full-out, so it depends on the network speed
> (10/100/1000), the speed and quality of the NICs, and the power of
> the computer. Either
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:28:47PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:54:37 -0500
> "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:37:04PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Doug. Yes. The "9"s are place-holders. I've not been
> > > using the seco
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:54:37 -0500
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:37:04PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Doug. Yes. The "9"s are place-holders. I've not been
> > using the second nic because it wasn't needed. However, now I
> > want to host 2 di
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:37:04PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> Thanks, Doug. Yes. The "9"s are place-holders. I've not been using
> the second nic because it wasn't needed. However, now I want to host
> 2 different SSL hosts using named virtual hosts. So, I need a second
> IP and I'm dipping into
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:44:11 -0500
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800
> > Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have 2 n
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800
> Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
> > cards is setup but now I have need to setup another. T
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800 Raquel wrote:
>
> > I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
> > cards is setup but now I have need to setup another. The
> > current /etc/netwo
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
> cards is setup but now I have need to setup another. The
> current /etc/network/interfaces looks like:
> # The primary network interfa
I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
cards is setup but now I have need to setup another. The
current /etc/network/interfaces looks like:
# The primary network interface
allow-hotplug eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 99.999.999.137
netmask
from Sarge to Etch.
> > >
> > > On this machine, I have 3 network cards.
> > >
> > > 2 networks cards are identical. It is PCI network
> > > cards and it is SMC1233A-TX.
> > >
> > > On Sarge, everything worked well.
> > >
>
--- "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit
:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:06:31PM +0100, David
> MAGNY wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am upgrading a firewall from Sarge to Etch.
> >
> > On this machine, I have 3 network cards.
> &
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:06:31PM +0100, David MAGNY wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am upgrading a firewall from Sarge to Etch.
>
> On this machine, I have 3 network cards.
>
> 2 networks cards are identical. It is PCI network
> cards and it is SMC1233A-TX.
>
> On
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:06:31PM +0100, David MAGNY wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am upgrading a firewall from Sarge to Etch.
>
> On this machine, I have 3 network cards.
>
> 2 networks cards are identical. It is PCI network
> cards and it is SMC1233A-TX.
>
> On
Hello,
I am upgrading a firewall from Sarge to Etch.
On this machine, I have 3 network cards.
2 networks cards are identical. It is PCI network
cards and it is SMC1233A-TX.
On Sarge, everything worked well.
The issue is that only one card of both is available.
The used kernel is 2.6.18
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 20:25:12 -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am having problems when I upgrade the Etch in my servers. The NICs
> designations are changing. For example, in a machine the NIC was eth0
> with 2.6.18-4-686 kernel. After the first upgrade, the NIC was renamed
> to eth1. The sam
Hi!
I am having problems when I upgrade the Etch in my servers. The NICs
designations are changing. For example, in a machine the NIC was eth0
with 2.6.18-4-686 kernel. After the first upgrade, the NIC was renamed
to eth1. The same fact occurs with 2.6.21-2 kernel (Etch-backports).
What is the cau
two network addresses with one network card
> >>> should be possible. Would this make these problems go away?
> >sorry, what are the problems that you are seeing ?
>
> They were described in the first post to this thread. Namely one of the
> two network cards on this
card
> should be possible. Would this make these problems go away?
sorry, what are the problems that you are seeing ?
They were described in the first post to this thread. Namely one of the
two network cards on this machine (the one configured later) behaves
eratically, is only intermitten
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:12:24PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Alex Samad wrote:
>
> >
> >have a look for ip (it part of the iproute package)
> >
> >Usage: ip addr {add|del} IFADDR dev STRING
> > ip addr {show|flush} [ dev STRING ] [ scope SCOPE-ID ]
> >
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:15:25PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> >
> > /sbin/route -n
> >
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> > Iface
> > 152.3.172.0 0.0
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:18:10PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:8C
inet addr:152.3.172.111 Bcast:152.3.173.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:3
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> /sbin/route -n
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 152.3.172.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 0 00 eth1
> 152.3.172.0 0.0.0.0
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:18:10PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:8C
> inet addr:152.3.172.111 Bcast:152.3.173.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:64
> inet addr:152.3.172.60 Bc
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a while. I
recently plugged in the other network card and started using it for a
differe
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:28:29PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Just to be clear, the interfaces are both of the form 152.3.172.*.
If for example they were reconfigured so that one was of the form
152.3.171.* and the other was of the form 152.3.1
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:28:29PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, the interfaces are both of the form 152.3.172.*.
>
> If for example they were reconfigured so that one was of the form
> 152.3.171.* and the other was of the form 152.3.172.& (say) then would the
> problem just
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
Well, there is your problem.
Having two physical interfaces on the same subnet is generally a bad
idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg01633.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, there is your problem.
Having two physical interfaces on the same subnet is generally a bad
idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg01633.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/2005/03/msg00073.html
You have to really k
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, there is your problem.
Having two physical interfaces on the same subnet is generally a bad
idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg01633.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/2005/03/msg00073.html
You have to really k
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 05:39:40PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:20:49PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi everyone,
> >>
> >>I've got a serv
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:20:49PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a
while. I rec
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:20:49PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
> cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a
> while. I recently plugged in the other n
Hi everyone,
I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a
while. I recently plugged in the other network card and started using it
for a different IP address. However, I've b
That's brilliant thanks for that!
I am going to be setting up a proxy server using Squid with 2 network cards. I
am right in saying the routing table should have a default out the external
interface.
Also the reason i was asking about dns is that as im using this box as a proxy
what dns se
Andrew Critchlow wrote:
When you have 2 network cards in use with debian with DNS server
configured on each which one does it choose to query for an address?
Is configuring 2 network cards on debian as simple as configuring one
card?
thanks everyone.
DNS is a map of names to numbers and
When you have 2 network cards in use with debian with DNS server configured on
each which one does it choose to query for an address?
Is configuring 2 network cards on debian as simple as configuring one card?
thanks everyone.
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 08:52, Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
> Andrei Popescu ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:08:57PM +1300, Simon wrote:
> >> Hi There,
> >>
> >> Is there a way to set network cards to full duplex at boot time?
> >>
&
Andrei Popescu ha scritto:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:08:57PM +1300, Simon wrote:
>
>> Hi There,
>>
>> Is there a way to set network cards to full duplex at boot time?
>>
>> Thanks Simon
>>
>
> Mine is set that way automatically. It would
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:08:57PM +1300, Simon wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> Is there a way to set network cards to full duplex at boot time?
>
> Thanks Simon
Mine is set that way automatically. It would be helpful if you would
specify which card and chipset, Debian release,
Hi There,
Is there a way to set network cards to full duplex at boot time?
Thanks Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 16.11.06 08:44, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:44:48AM +0100, Jarek Buczy?ski wrote:
> > PS.
> > My firewall logs me all messages to console, it's good idea to set
> > KLOGD="-c 4" In /etc/init.d/klogd?
>
> /etc/sysctl.conf
I think that the above (KLOGD="-c 4") is much be
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 00:54 +0100, Jarek Buczyński wrote:
> Hello
>
> > /etc/sysctl.conf
>
> Could You give me some more information, please
>
man sysctl; man sysctl.conf? ;o)
I think the one you want is kernel.printk
info on what to set it to, here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/200
Hello
> /etc/sysctl.conf
Could You give me some more information, please
--
Best regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:44:48AM +0100, Jarek Buczy?ski wrote:
> PS.
> My firewall logs me all messages to console, it's good idea to set
> KLOGD="-c 4" In /etc/init.d/klogd?
/etc/sysctl.conf
--
Chris.
==
" ... the official version cannot be abandoned because the implication of
rejecting
Hello
Thank You for replay
> First of all, you probably don't want to start your firewall prior to
> your interface being brought up (pre-up). This would causa ..
You're right, I've moved my script again to /etc/network/if-up.d. I've
thought it's better have script in if-pre-up.d (more secur
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 22:50 +0100, Jarek Buczyński wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have two network cards eth0 (public IP Internet) eth1 (private LAN).
> I have firewall script in "/etc/network/if-pre-up.d". Unfortunately
> when my system boots script runs three times.
>
> H
Hi All
I have two network cards eth0 (public IP Internet) eth1 (private LAN).
I have firewall script in "/etc/network/if-pre-up.d". Unfortunately
when my system boots script runs three times.
How change this (I'd like script starts once)?
--
Best regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Am Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 18:19 schrieb Bob:
> Magnus Therning wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 05:13:02PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>
> [snipped...]
>
> >> Your biggest problem will be to find out what chipset a specific card
> >> you are holding in your hands has. But every project I men
Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 05:13:02PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
[snipped...]
>> Your biggest problem will be to find out what chipset a specific card
>> you are holding in your hands has. But every project I mentioned
>> maintains some sort of compatiblity list.
>
> Yes,
On May 08 2006, Magnus Therning wrote:
> The RT cards are also well supported in Linux, the package is called
> rt2500-source and the module can be built with module-assistant.
I second that. I have D-Link cards with the rt chipsets and they work
well for my needs under Linux.
Regards, Rogério B
Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> Yes, that is a BIG problem. Especially since quite a few manufacturers
> are in the habit of switching the chipset without disclosing that
> anywhere on the boxes :-( When I was shoping around I ended up buying
> from an online store that offered Linux compatible HW. I
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 05:13:02PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>Bob:
>>
>> Is it as easy as pluging the card in and it all just working, or do I
>> need to install some other packages? I'm running Etch with a 2.6 kernel.
>
>It depends on your card. And most probably (if you go out and just buy
>so
Bob:
>
> Is it as easy as pluging the card in and it all just working, or do I
> need to install some other packages? I'm running Etch with a 2.6 kernel.
It depends on your card. And most probably (if you go out and just buy
some random card) it will involve some work. It may even be impossible
i
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 15:42 +0100, Bob wrote:
> Hello list, I've never installed a PCI wireless network card before,
> I've always run my boxes with wires. However, I've moved to a new house
> and the easiest thing to do is put wireless cards in my boxes.
>
> Is it as easy as pluging the card in a
Hello list, I've never installed a PCI wireless network card before,
I've always run my boxes with wires. However, I've moved to a new house
and the easiest thing to do is put wireless cards in my boxes.
Is it as easy as pluging the card in and it all just working, or do I
need to install some ot
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 09:07:50AM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:06:17PM -0400, Leonid Grinberg wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was asked by a friend to install Debian on his system. He asked me
> > about which wireless network cards Debian
Thomas H. George wrote:
Others may have better advice - it was frustrating trying to find the
latest and best information.
Mostly the manufacturer's fault. When there's four devices called
"[model number]" and no version numbers, who's to blame for all the
confusion?
Or perhaps they enjoy
is system. He asked me
> about which wireless network cards Debian supports. Can anybody tell
> me which ones (I personally don't use a wireless network so I
> wouldn't know).
>
> Thanks,
> Leonid Grinberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &
On Thursday 21 July 2005 19:06, Leonid Grinberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was asked by a friend to install Debian on his system. He asked me
> about which wireless network cards Debian supports. Can anybody tell
> me which ones (I personally don't use a wireless network
On Thursday 21 July 2005 19:06, Leonid Grinberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was asked by a friend to install Debian on his system. He asked me
> about which wireless network cards Debian supports. Can anybody tell
> me which ones (I personally don't use a wireless network
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:06:17PM -0400, Leonid Grinberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was asked by a friend to install Debian on his system. He asked me
> about which wireless network cards Debian supports. Can anybody tell
> me which ones (I personally don't use a wireless network
I have an D-link DWL-650 working with Debian Sarge kernel 2.6.
2005/7/21, Leonid Grinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> I was asked by a friend to install Debian on his system. He asked me
> about which wireless network cards Debian supports. Can anybody tell
> me whi
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Leonid Grinberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was asked by a friend to install Debian on his system. He asked me
> about which wireless network cards Debian supports. Can anybody tell
> me which ones (I personally don't use a wireless network so I wouldn'
Hello,
I was asked by a friend to install Debian on his system. He asked me
about which wireless network cards Debian supports. Can anybody tell
me which ones (I personally don't use a wireless network so I wouldn't
know).
Thanks,
Leonid Grinberg
Hello,
I'm trying to replace a 10MBit card in an older computer by a 100MBit
card. The system is an Pentium-133, PIIX chipset, running Sarge with
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386. Previously the system had an 10Mbit Intel
EEPro ISA card, which worked flawlessly. The system is an X terminal.
First I trie
Jason Rennie wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:54:35PM +0200, Andrei Badea wrote:
After my system starts, I want to switch to the other network card (the
sk98lin one), but I only want its module loaded, so I do:
ifdown eth0
rmmod fealnx
modprobe sk98lin
ifup eth0
I'm no expert in networking. Mig
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:54:35PM +0200, Andrei Badea wrote:
...
I've got two network cards: one integrated on my motherboard
(uses the sk98lin driver) and a PCI card (fealnx driver). Both drivers are
compiled as modules and upon startup I'm loading only
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:54:35PM +0200, Andrei Badea wrote:
> ...
> I've got two network cards: one integrated on my motherboard
> (uses the sk98lin driver) and a PCI card (fealnx driver). Both drivers are
> compiled as modules and upon startup I'm loading only fealnx vi
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:54:35PM +0200, Andrei Badea wrote:
> After my system starts, I want to switch to the other network card (the
> sk98lin one), but I only want its module loaded, so I do:
>
> ifdown eth0
> rmmod fealnx
> modprobe sk98lin
> ifup eth0
I'm no expert in networking. Might be
Steven Jones wrote:
I dont quite understand why you need to switch, you could just run everything off eth1, but anyway,
I don't need to switch. It's just that it's not doing what I think it
should do and I want to know why.
I would suggest looking in your bios and either disabling the onboard NIC
.
However Its most likely that the onboard can simply be disabled in the bios.
regards
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Andrei Badea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 8 October 2004 9:55 a.m.
To: Debian User List
Subject: Switching between two network cards
Hello all,
this is not
Hello all,
this is not quite a Debian related problem (except that I'm running sid),
but anyway... I've got two network cards: one integrated on my motherboard
(uses the sk98lin driver) and a PCI card (fealnx driver). Both drivers are
compiled as modules and upon startup I'm load
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 12:23, Robert Fernando -ntlworld wrote:
> Hi all, Is it possible to configure linux to either auto detect a
> change in Ethernet and video card or allow manual selection of the
> correct drivers at boot time. I.e. so that one hardisk can be shared
> between two pc with di
Hi all,
Is it possible to configure linux to either auto detect a change in Ethernet
and video card or allow manual selection of the correct drivers at boot
time.
I.e. so that one hardisk can be shared between two pc with different
hardware.
Can the x Windows system be setup to use Intel Agp 470 v
jleclair wrote:
I'm trying to set up an old 486 as router/nat/firewall server for home network. The 2 nics are dlink 220 isa.
When I run modconf, I choose the NE net module with this parameter:
io=0x300
This works and the module loads for eth0. How do I load the module now for the seco
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:36:35 -0300
jleclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|I'm trying to set up an old 486 as router/nat/firewall server for home network. The 2
nics are dlink 220 isa.
|When I run modconf, I choose the NE net module with this parameter:
| io=0x300
|This works and t
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:36:35PM -0300, jleclair wrote:
|
| I'm trying to set up an old 486 as router/nat/firewall server for
| home network. The 2 nics are dlink 220 isa.
| When I run modconf, I choose the NE net module with this parameter:
|io=0x300
| This works and the module lo
I'm trying to set up an old 486 as router/nat/firewall server for home network. The 2
nics are dlink 220 isa.
When I run modconf, I choose the NE net module with this parameter:
io=0x300
This works and the module loads for eth0. How do I load the module now for the second
nic?
I don
Hello
jleclair (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Can anyone assist me installing a d-link 220 isa nic? The OS is woody,
> and the platform is intel 486. The install routine doesnt see the
> card. Have also tried a few modules but no auto-probing was
> successful. Guess I have been spoiled with PCI p
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 01:32:27PM -0300, jleclair wrote:
>
> Can anyone assist me installing a d-link 220 isa nic? The OS is woody, and
> the platform is intel 486. The install routine doesnt see the card. Have
> also tried a few modules but no auto-probing was successful. Guess I have
> been spo
Can anyone assist me installing a d-link 220 isa nic? The OS is woody, and the
platform is intel 486. The install routine doesnt see the card. Have also tried a few
modules but no auto-probing was successful. Guess I have been spoiled with PCI plug n
play! A nod to a good link with documentatio
Hi!
Is it possible to bind multiple (non matching, or matching) network cards
together to act as one device?
I've got a fileserver here with 2 nics in it, currently both have seperate
ip's but I'd like the box to have just one ip but use both cards... is what
I'm asking
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:16:42AM -0400, D. Clarke wrote:
| Hi!
|
| Is it possible to bind multiple (non matching, or matching) network cards
| together to act as one device?
|
| I've got a fileserver here with 2 nics in it, currently both have seperate
| ip's but I'd like the b
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:16:42AM -0400, D. Clarke wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to bind multiple (non matching, or matching) network cards
> together to act as one device?
>
> I've got a fileserver here with 2 nics in it, currently both have seperate
> ip's bu
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo