On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 07:32:23PM -, Charlie Grosvenor wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to have the ext3 filesystem with woody and if so how do i
go about installing it with the ext3 filesystem?
Yeah, but you don't need to bother with it until after the installation is
over, since ext3 uses
David Roundy wrote:
So make your normal ext2 filesystems, and then run tune2fs -j /dev/hda6 (or
whatever device) to add a journal.
That's it...?
I think it's great.
BTW, are you sure that there's no more complicated things?
Oki
Nope, thats it. Just run the tune2fs and change the fstab to ext3 or
auto.
Beautiful stuff aint it?
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 19:22, Oki DZ wrote:
David Roundy wrote:
So make your normal ext2 filesystems, and then run tune2fs -j /dev/hda6 (or
whatever device) to add a journal.
That's
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 07:22:00AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
David Roundy wrote:
So make your normal ext2 filesystems, and then run tune2fs -j /dev/hda6 (or
whatever device) to add a journal.
That's it...?
I think it's great.
BTW, are you sure that there's no more complicated things?
Well,
Narceu, fico-lhe muito agradecido pelo esclarecimento.
Narceu Menezes Scremin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Caro Iva
Estou usando o ext3 desde o ano passado e posso te assegurar que o fs e
realmente muito bom. Compensa uma atualizacao do kernel (se bem que
atualizar o kernel e sempre
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 07:32:23PM -, Charlie Grosvenor wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to have the ext3 filesystem with woody and if so how do i
go about installing it with the ext3 filesystem?
use the bf2.4 install disks.
begin Charlie Grosvenor quotation:
Is it possible to have the ext3 filesystem with woody and if so how do i
go about installing it with the ext3 filesystem?
First, install Woody with ordinary ext2 partitions.
Then upgrade to a recent 2.4 kernel (2.4.17 is probably best at the
moment;
begin Mike Fedyk quotation:
use the bf2.4 install disks.
So there are now Woody install disks that support ext3? Nice.
Craig
pgpar58YIFWtj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 07:32:23PM -, Charlie Grosvenor wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to have the ext3 filesystem with woody and if so how do i
go about installing it with the ext3 filesystem?
I initiated kind of long thread recently on this topic. Summary from it
is included in Debian
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 12:10:40PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
begin Charlie Grosvenor quotation:
Is it possible to have the ext3 filesystem with woody and if so how do i
go about installing it with the ext3 filesystem?
First, install Woody with ordinary ext2 partitions.
Then
begin Osamu Aoki quotation:
No! You seem to have gone a lot of work to convert system by your self
but standard kernel-image is very impressive work too.
Quite possibly, but at the time, I had no choice. Ext3 wasn't in the
standard kernels when I converted my first system; we didn't even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 11:11 am, Craig Dickson wrote:
begin Mike Fedyk quotation:
use the bf2.4 install disks.
So there are now Woody install disks that support ext3? Nice.
Craig
That is disk # 3 of 8 for the woody Cd's.
- --
Greg C.
Charlie Grosvenor([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Hi
Is it possible to have the ext3 filesystem with woody and if so how do i
go about installing it with the ext3 filesystem?
Have you looked at
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/extra/ext3-mini-HOWTO.gz
?
or
Caro Iva
Estou usando o ext3 desde o ano passado e posso te assegurar que o fs e
realmente muito bom. Compensa uma atualizacao do kernel (se bem que
atualizar o kernel e sempre recomendavel...)
Se pretendes usar a atual versao do kernel, ou mesmo o 2.4.17 nao
precisaras de um patch pois o ext3 ja
* Ivã C. Dias ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
por acaso o path para o ext3 seria o abaixo? pois somente localizei no
testing.
kernel-patch-ext3-2.2 0.0.7a-2
ext3fs support for Linux 2.2.19 and 2.2.20
O proprio. Use o do testing que nao tera problemas. Instale primeiro o
pacote
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 04:38:09PM +0100, Daniel Faller wrote:
Hi,
I am running the ext3 filesystem on a laptop. The default value for the
commit time of ext3 seems to be 30 sec, which is too short for the HD to spin
down. How can I increase this timeout ?
Use tune2fs (man tune2fs for
On Saturday 16 February 2002 17:00, Ben Collins wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 04:38:09PM +0100, Daniel Faller wrote:
Hi,
I am running the ext3 filesystem on a laptop. The default value for the
commit time of ext3 seems to be 30 sec, which is too short for the HD to
spin down. How can I
Hi Daniel!
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Daniel Faller wrote:
I am running the ext3 filesystem on a laptop. The default value for the
commit time of ext3 seems to be 30 sec, which is too short for the HD to spin
down. How can I increase this timeout ?
Has anyone experineces of bad impacts in
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 07:25:32PM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
Hi Daniel!
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Daniel Faller wrote:
I am running the ext3 filesystem on a laptop. The default value for the
commit time of ext3 seems to be 30 sec, which is too short for the HD to
spin
down. How can
Le Fri, 8 Feb 2002 21:49:18 +0100
Yann Aubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivit :
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:17:07 +0100
Dominique Rousset [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour,
avec une woody à jour et le noyau 2.4.17 debian, je voudrais utiliser
de l'ext3 y compris sur la partition root. Je charge
Le Vendredi 8 Février 2002 12:17, Dominique Rousset a écrit :
avec une woody à jour et le noyau 2.4.17 debian, je voudrais utiliser de
l'ext3 y compris sur la partition root. Je charge ext3.o au boot et je
n'ai pas de pb avec les partitions supplémentaires.
Est-ce donc possible autrement
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Alexander List wrote:
Unfortunately, this means that I have to recreate my initrd everytime a
new kernel package is to be installed. What do you think about enabling
ext3 support in the standard kernels by default? I'm not talking about
switching the default fs type
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Sven Schumacher wrote:
5.) edit /etc/fstab replacing ext2 with ext3
You cant use ext3 for root fs if you use ext3 as a module.
Are you sure about this? ext2 is also a module in the latest stock
kernels, have a closer look at the /boot/config.x.y! I was surprised by
this
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Terry Carney wrote:
I opted to compile the initrd-related stuff right into the kernel.
When you use make-kpkg to create your kernel_image just add --initrd as
a make-kpkg option .
I know that I can do this, but it would however be nicer to have ext3 also
in the stock
Alexander List writes:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Sven Schumacher wrote:
5.) edit /etc/fstab replacing ext2 with ext3
You cant use ext3 for root fs if you use ext3 as a module.
Are you sure about this? ext2 is also a module in the latest stock
kernels, have a closer look at the
You can use ext3 as a module if ext2 is also a module, I believe.
That's why the stock 2.4.17-686 kernel works with ext3 out of the box,
whereas 2.4.17-386 and 2.4.17-k7 and probably all others don't--they
have ext2 built into the kernel.
2.4.17-k7 boots my ext3 root partition fine it has
Em 25/01/02, Usuario Infohouse Internet escreveu:
O que pode estar acontecendo, (não sei se é o seu caso ) é de você
alterar as partições e deixar o fstab incorreto...
Por exemplo, você mudou sua partição de boot de hda1 pra hda7,
alterou o lilo, mas esqueceu de alterar o
Submitted 24-Jan-02 by Wayne Topa:
Please describe what you did to change the root partition to ext3
Did you make the filesystems/ext3 option a module or installed in the
kernel? It can't be a module!
Actually, it can if you use an initrd to load the module before the root
fs is mounted.
--
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:06:46PM -0800, Andrew Agno wrote:
Both ext2 and ext3 are modules and everything works fine.
Ah! Hold on one second. I installed 2.4.17-386 on the new
installations, and it seems that on 2.4.17-386, only ext3 is a
module, not ext2, whereas with 2.4.17-686,
Anton Graham([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Submitted 24-Jan-02 by Wayne Topa:
Please describe what you did to change the root partition to ext3
Did you make the filesystems/ext3 option a module or installed in the
kernel? It can't be a module!
Actually, it can if you use
Andrew Agno([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
I'm having a problem with recent installs of Debian. My install
process goes like this:
Install a base potato dist.
Upgrade to testing.
After doing this, I change the root partition to ext3, and install a
2.4 kernel (2.4.17).
Andrew Agno([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
I'm having a problem with recent installs of Debian. My install
process goes like this:
Install a base potato dist.
Upgrade to testing.
After doing this, I change the root partition to ext3, and install a
2.4
Please describe what you did to change the root partition to ext3
Did you make the filesystems/ext3 option a module or installed in the
kernel? It can't be a module!
Sure it can. On one computer I have, I'm running 2.4.17-686 from
Okay, and reading the help for CONFIG_EXT3_FS,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:20:10PM -0800, Andrew Agno wrote:
| Please describe what you did to change the root partition to ext3
| Did you make the filesystems/ext3 option a module or installed in the
| kernel? It can't be a module!
|
| Sure it can. On one computer I have, I'm
Andrew Agno([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Andrew Agno([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
I'm having a problem with recent installs of Debian. My install
process goes like this:
Install a base potato dist.
Upgrade to testing.
After doing
dman writes:
What is your root fs there? If either
a) root fs is not ext3
or
b) ext3 module is in your initrd and loaded by the kernel during
boot
you can have it as a module. (this is a general statement; perhaps
there is something special regarding ext3 that
Wayne Topa writes:
So it seems you have a setup that people would be very interested in.
Surely I'm not the only one that runs 2.4.17-686 with an ext3 root
partition, which just works after installing it via apt-get? And
hopefully I'm not the only one who's tried it with 2.4.17-386...
Andrew.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:34:56PM -0800, Andrew Agno wrote:
| dman writes:
| What is your root fs there? If either
| a) root fs is not ext3
| or
| b) ext3 module is in your initrd and loaded by the kernel during
| boot
|
| you can have it as a module. (this is a
W liście z czw, 10-01-2002, godz. 13:02, Robert Litwiniec pisze:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Sylwester Hendzel wrote:
Korzystajac z okazji moze wywolam jakas dyskusje...
co lepsze ext3 czy reiserfs i do czego i dlaczego ?
reiserfs - na duza ilosc malych plikow - duza
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-polish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: EXT3
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Sylwester Hendzel wrote:
t... zamiast ext2 najlepiej dac auto lub ext3
Korzystajac z okazji moze wywolam jakas
Załączanie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Sylwester Hendzel wrote:
t... zamiast ext2 najlepiej dac auto lub ext3
Korzystajac z okazji moze wywolam jakas dyskusje...
co lepsze ext3 czy reiserfs i do czego i dlaczego ?
To zalezy od Twoich priorytetow:
ext3:
- prostota instalacji
Wiem ze to troche na latwizne - doca przegladnalem - ale jak wlaczyc
ext3 do dzialania (w jaderku jest).
tune2fs -j /dev/hdx (lub sdx)
przydadza sie jeszcze zmiany w /etc/fstab
btw, jakie makie wielkosci journalingu ustawionoe? ja na kazda partycje
mam about 30 mega (2gb i 5 gb).
--
Z
- Original Message -
From: =?iso-8859-2:utf-8?Q?Rafa=B3?= Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-polish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: EXT3 przydadza sie jeszcze zmiany w /etc/fstab
t... zamiast ext2 najlepiej dac auto lub ext3
btw
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Sylwester Hendzel wrote:
t... zamiast ext2 najlepiej dac auto lub ext3
Korzystajac z okazji moze wywolam jakas dyskusje...
co lepsze ext3 czy reiserfs i do czego i dlaczego ?
Pozdrawiam
--
Voder
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:22:49AM -0500, Edward Kear wrote:
Anyone have any thoughts on which file system to use? ext3 or xfs?
The decision is arbitrary, really. It sounds like the fs will not be
heavily loaded, so you don't care about any performance issues. You
just need the thing to
Edward Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just received a 160 gb hard drive that I plan to partition as one
big partition and mount as /home/public on the family file server
(woody). Most of the files in this directory are mp3, mpg, avi, etc.
I've constructed a 2.4.16 kernel with the
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:22:49 -0500
Edward Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any thoughts on which file system to use? ext3 or xfs?
A bit of background; I used ReiserFS as my root partition(several gigs),
/home, and /var for about a year and a half. I've been using XFS for
about eight
Thus spake William P Martin:
If I install woody or sid for that matter and use the ext3 ata100 disks can I
upgrade the kernel to 2.4 with ext3. Is there something I have to build into
the kernel specifically?
Thanks
WP
ext3 support - use one of the newer 2.4 kernels.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Siemieniak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-polish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:05 AM
Subject: EXT3
Hej
Wiem ze to troche na latwizne - doca przegladnalem - ale jak wlaczyc
ext3 do dzialania (w jaderku jest).
tune2fs
http://qlui.free.fr/Linux/ext3.html, il est notament écrit :
ton lien est mort ...
--
Don't be afraid ... I'm going to give you the choice I've never had
(°
/ ) MadCoder (53 53)
^^
Merci beaucoup, ca marche!
Une chose interessante: mon /dev/hda2 (ext3) a .journal,
mais il y a pas de .journal dans mon /dev/hda7 (ext3 aussi)!
(Il y a pas d'ext2 dans le noyau, donc je suis sur /dev/hda7 est
vraiment ext3 :) ).
Edouard
$ mount
/dev/hda2 on / type ext3 (rw,data=writeback)
Une chose intéressante: mon /dev/hda2 (ext3) a .journal,
mais il y a pas de .journal dans mon /dev/hda7 (ext3 aussi)!
(Il y a pas d'ext2 dans le noyau, donc je suis sur /dev/hda7 est
vraiment ext3 :) ).
.journal est créé si tu lances tune2fs sur une partition montée.
Dans le cas contraire,
Le Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Michel Grentzinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a écrit:
Le Dimanche 6 Janvier 2002 16:49, Edouard GUIRCH a écrit :
Je voudrais savoir comment monter un ext3 avec data=writeback.
Pour un fs ordinaire c'est facile: mount ... -o data=writeback.
Mais pour / ?
edition du fstab passage des ext2 en ext3 puis ensuite:
#init 1
#umount -a
#mount -a
#init 2
et voilou
--
MadCoder (53 53)
Economiquement, puisque l'entreprise qui investit retire tout
le bénéfice de la partie de la fonction de production de la
joint venture qui ne dépend pas du terme de
Le Lundi 7 Janvier 2002 14:34, Dominique ROUSSEAU a écrit :
Le Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Michel Grentzinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Le Dimanche 6 Janvier 2002 16:49, Edouard GUIRCH a écrit :
Je voudrais savoir comment monter un ext3 avec data=writeback.
Pour un fs
Pardon, je me suis mal exprimé...
Je parlais bien sûr du passage de ext2 en ext3 qui n'est pas possible
de faire pour la partition racine sans redémarrer.
il me semble que si :
en faisant un init 1 on peut démonter / enfin je crois.
--
Don't be afraid ... I'm going to give you the choice I've
Marc Climent([EMAIL PROTECTED])@14.12.2001 23:28:08 +:
Por cierto que supongo que el disco si que se monta como ext3 porque al
poner mount me dice ext3 pero no sé porqué me sale 2 veces lo de
errors=remount-ro...
Sí, a mi también me ponía ext3 pero realmente me lo montaba como ext2.
Yo
Gracias por vuestras respuestas pero...
No sé si no me he explicado o que no acabo de coger el concepto.
¿Tiene que ver lo del mount count con que haga el escaneo si no se ha
desmontado bien la unidad? Me decís que lo desactive pero cuando se va
la luz en realidad no llego al final de la cuenta
El mié, 12-12-2001 a las 23:03, Marc Climent escribió:
Hola,
Hace unas semanas, con el 2.4.14 con el parche de ext3, cuando se me
colgaba la máquina o se iba la luz (no sé porqué esto ocurre demasiado a
menudo) al arrancar no me hacía toda la comprobación del disco duro y
arrancaba en
Comprueba que tengas cargado el módulo ext3 o que lo tengas compilado en
el kernel. Puede ser que el 2.4.16 no tenga activado el soporte para
ext3.
Te aclaro que esto ocurre porque si el kernel no reconoce la partición
como ext3 la monta como ext2, que será, seguramente lo que te estará
Marc Climent([EMAIL PROTECTED])@12.12.2001 23:03:56 +:
De un tiempo a esta parte, con el 2.4.16, cuando arranco sin desmontar
correctamente me hece todo el escaneo.
Igual no es nada del kernel y es culpa de Debian Sid ¿alguien sabe algo
de esto?
Comprueba que tengas cargado el módulo ext3
-Mensaje reenviado-
From: Ramón Rey Vicente [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marc Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ext3
Date: 13 Dec 2001 00:57:49 +0100
El mié, 12-12-2001 a las 23:03, Marc Climent escribió:
Hace unas semanas, con el 2.4.14 con el parche de ext3, cuando se me
colgaba la
Manuel Segura écrivait:
Hello,
Est ce que quelqu'un a des info pour ce qui concerne le support
du quota disque sous ext3, et si des travaux vont bientot aboutir ?
Il me semblait avoir lu que ext3 supportait les quotas sans problèmes.
PK
--
|\ _,,,---,,_ Patrice
Le Sun, 2 Dec 2001 11:32:52 +0100
Patrice Karatchentzeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :
Salut,
[...]
Est ce que quelqu'un a des info pour ce qui concerne le support
du quota disque sous ext3, et si des travaux vont bientot aboutir ?
Il me semblait avoir lu que ext3 supportait les
Le Vendredi 23 Novembre 2001 01:24, VALLIET Manu a écrit :
Qu'en est-il exactement ? Les paquets officiels de la potato release 4
empêchent-ils vraiment de passer en ext3 ?
Pour l'EXT3, faut passer en 2.4
La patate est pas faite a la base pour passer en 2.4, mais bon, y'a quand
meme moyen
Le 22/11/01, Michel Grentzinger a ecrit:
Bonjour,
En parcourant les documents relatifs au système de fichier ext3, je me suis
rendu compte que les outils tels que fsck, mount, ne sont pas assez récents
pour être pleinement compatibles avec ext3.
Qu'en est-il exactement ? Les paquets
VM == VALLIET Manu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le 22/11/01, Michel Grentzinger a ecrit:
Bonjour,
En parcourant les documents relatifs au système de fichier ext3, je me suis
rendu compte que les outils tels que fsck, mount, ne sont pas assez récents
pour être pleinement compatibles avec
Tu peux patcher ton noyau ou attendre le 2.4.15.
Ca se fait très bien
Aurélien
Le Vendredi 23 Novembre 2001 01:30, Christian Marillat a écrit :
VM == VALLIET Manu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le 22/11/01, Michel Grentzinger a ecrit:
Bonjour,
En parcourant les documents relatifs au
Le 23/11/01, Aurelien Jarno a ecrit:
Tu peux patcher ton noyau ou attendre le 2.4.15.
Ca se fait très bien
Aurélien
Bref, d'un cote comme de l'autre, faut patcher. Je pensais que l'ext3,
c'etait tou jeune, comme machin, donc introuvable dans les 2.2.
Finalement non :=), a en croire
On Sun 18 Nov 2001 03:20, Áncor González Sosa wrote:
El tipo de partición es el mismo. Cambia el sistema de ficheros.
ext3 tiene journaling (no me sale ahora en español ;-) ) y ext2,
evidentemente, no. De hecho ext3 es simplemente ext2+journaling.
Ambos son compatibles, de modo que un sistema
Hola Jaume, el 18 de nov de 2001, a las 06:46 +0100, Jaume decías:
On Sun 18 Nov 2001 03:20, Áncor González Sosa wrote:
El tipo de partición es el mismo. Cambia el sistema de ficheros.
ext3 tiene journaling (no me sale ahora en español ;-) ) y ext2,
evidentemente, no. De hecho ext3 es
El tipo de partición es el mismo. Cambia el sistema de ficheros.
ext3 tiene journaling (no me sale ahora en español ;-) ) y ext2,
evidentemente, no. De hecho ext3 es simplemente ext2+journaling.
Ambos son compatibles, de modo que un sistema de ficheros ext3 lo
puedes montar en un momento dado
Hi, Karsten.
I'm Kazuhiko Uebayashi.
I used kernel-patch(patch-2.4.15-pre3.gz from http://www.linuxhq.com/ ,it
contains ext3 patch)
,using config-file kernel-2.4.13+ext3patch.
It works well.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:54:27 -0800
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I'm looking for
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:54:27 -0800
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I'm looking for either an ext3fs patch to the 2.4.14 kernel sources (the
2.4.13 patch errors out), or would like the 2.4.15 kernel sources, which
don't appear to be available yet -- any idea on when they're going to
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:32:00AM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
OK, with ext3 in 2.4.15, what packages in sid will the adventurous want
to have installed to deal with the shiny new fs?
Where have you got 2.4.15 from - is this a pre kernel or an ac kernel?
It's just AFAIK 2.4.14 is the
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
I'm looking for either an ext3fs patch to the 2.4.14 kernel sources (the
2.4.13 patch errors out), or would like the 2.4.15 kernel sources, which
don't appear to be available yet -- any idea on when they're going to be
out for Sid?
The 2.4.15
on Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 01:52:26AM -0800, Eric G. Miller (egm2@jps.net) wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:54:27 -0800
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I'm looking for either an ext3fs patch to the 2.4.14 kernel sources (the
2.4.13 patch errors out), or would like the 2.4.15 kernel
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Matthew Sackman wrote:
Where have you got 2.4.15 from - is this a pre kernel or an ac kernel?
Prerelease. Linus finally blessed ext3 into his tree.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/10/0319202mode=thread
It's just AFAIK 2.4.14 is the latest - am I wrong here?
No.
Matthew Sackman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:32:00AM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
OK, with ext3 in 2.4.15, what packages in sid will the adventurous want
to have installed to deal with the shiny new fs?
Where have you got 2.4.15 from - is this a pre kernel or an ac kernel?
Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
OK, with ext3 in 2.4.15, what packages in sid will the adventurous want
to have installed to deal with the shiny new fs?
An upgraded e2fsprogs. If you're using sid and upgrade it quite so
often, you've got no problem on that department.
Paolo Alexis Falcone
Robert L. Harris wrote:
If I want to convert a blank disk to ext3, compile the kernel then
what? Is there a simple how to?
make an ext2 filesystem from that partition by
issuing
mkfs -t ext2 -j -c0 -i0 /dev/your_disk_no
This will also create a journal inode then disable the 180-day
http://www.symonds.net/~rajesh/howto/ext3/index.html
--- Robert L. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If I want to convert a blank disk to ext3, compile
the kernel then
what? Is there a simple how to?
Thus spake Stephen Rueger
([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:32:00AM
On Thursday 15 November 2001 08:32 am, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
OK, with ext3 in 2.4.15, what packages in sid will the adventurous want
to have installed to deal with the shiny new fs?
AFAIK all the progs are already 'ready' to go . I have been using Ext3 fs
in Woody for awhile and use the
Gunnar Wolf, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:51:38(-0600):
El journaling significa que hay una región especial de tu sistema de
archivos que registra las operaciones con metadatos que van a realizarse
antes de hacerlas.
Deduzco que esa información se guarda en el disco de forma
síncrona
El journaling significa que hay una región especial de tu sistema de
archivos que registra las operaciones con metadatos que van a realizarse
antes de hacerlas.
Deduzco que esa información se guarda en el disco de forma
síncrona ¿verdad? Porque si no, que alguien me
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:32:00AM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
OK, with ext3 in 2.4.15, what packages in sid will the adventurous want
to have installed to deal with the shiny new fs?
None, everything is already there (also in woody, btw.)
greets,
Stephen Rüger
--
... and on the
If I want to convert a blank disk to ext3, compile the kernel then
what? Is there a simple how to?
Thus spake Stephen Rueger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:32:00AM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
OK, with ext3 in 2.4.15, what packages in sid will the adventurous want
Robert L. Harris writes:
If I want to convert a blank disk to ext3, compile the kernel then
what? Is there a simple how to?
mke2fs -j /dev/hdc
or whatever device you want.
To convert to use a journal, try:
tune2fs -j /dev/hdc
Andrew.
Robert L. Harris wrote:
If I want to convert a blank disk to ext3, compile the kernel then
what? Is there a simple how to?
Compile a kernel with ext3 support (not in a module if you want your
root fs to be ext3!), boot with the new kernel, then...
To create a new ext3 partition, use
El Dom 11 Nov 2001 18:38, Pablo Giménez escribió:
El Lunes 12 Noviembre 2001 01:39, Ricardo Marcelo Alvarez escribió:
Alguien uso ext3, es mejor que reiserfs.
Yo parchee el kernel 2.4.13 y vi el help y creo que no hay que volver a
formatear todo de vuelta.
Gracias de antemano y saludos.
Hasta donde sé del ext3, que es poco, si quieres un verdadero journaling
vete a por un reiser o xfs, el ext3 según tengo entendido es una especie de
ext2 pero con journaling, aunque según he leido son mejores los que te he
citado antes.
Me gustaria saber mas informaciòn acerca del
El Martes 13 Noviembre 2001 05:22, Ivan Rodriguez escribió:
El Dom 11 Nov 2001 18:38, Pablo Giménez escribió:
El Lunes 12 Noviembre 2001 01:39, Ricardo Marcelo Alvarez escribió:
Alguien uso ext3, es mejor que reiserfs.
Yo parchee el kernel 2.4.13 y vi el help y creo que no hay que volver
El Lun 12 Nov 2001 00:39, Ricardo Marcelo Alvarez escribió:
Alguien uso ext3, es mejor que reiserfs.
Yo parchee el kernel 2.4.13 y vi el help y creo que no hay que volver a
formatear todo de vuelta.
Gracias de antemano y saludos.
ext3 no pero tengo instalado sid con XFS, y funciona muy bien
El Lunes 12 Noviembre 2001 01:39, Ricardo Marcelo Alvarez escribió:
Alguien uso ext3, es mejor que reiserfs.
Yo parchee el kernel 2.4.13 y vi el help y creo que no hay que volver a
formatear todo de vuelta.
Gracias de antemano y saludos.
Hasta donde sé del ext3, que es poco, si quieres un
#include hallo.h
Karsten M. Self wrote on Sat Nov 10, 2001 um 02:48:33PM:
Now that you said this... I'd like to see how reiserfs and
ext3 in writeback mode perform. I'd think ext3 would still be
outperformed by reiser for the large dir listings.
The issue isn't writing the directories,
on Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 11:59:55AM +0100, Eduard Bloch ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
#include hallo.h
Karsten M. Self wrote on Sat Nov 10, 2001 um 02:48:33PM:
Now that you said this... I'd like to see how reiserfs and
ext3 in writeback mode perform. I'd think ext3 would still be
#include hallo.h
Karsten M. Self wrote on Sun Nov 11, 2001 um 03:49:33AM:
the list and searched for that entry. Ext3 stores the position the
last found entry, so when accessing again, the search begins an this
position and you get your entry wery fast, in best case within the
first search
On Saturday, November 10, 2001, at 05:03 PM, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 03:16:54PM -0500, Tom Allison
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So, unlike what I read in ReiserFS, I can just hang out on this for a
while and then upgrade at my leisure? This is so totally cool
Is
on Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 04:35:06PM +0100, Eduard Bloch ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
#include hallo.h
Karsten M. Self wrote on Sun Nov 11, 2001 um 03:49:33AM:
the list and searched for that entry. Ext3 stores the position the
last found entry, so when accessing again, the search begins an
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 11:10:50AM -0600, DvB wrote:
... it's in as of 2.4.15-pre2
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/testing/patch-2.4.15.log
Great, they're weren't even done with 2.4.14 yet. Is it just me, or are
they churning out releases too damn fast for comfort? I am reassured
701 - 800 of 872 matches
Mail list logo
