On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:05:09AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Yes, it's a bug in his script. Not in bash.
>
> Resource limits are quite low-level; they are implemented as kernel
> system calls (see setrlimit(2)). Processes which violate a resource
> limit are signalled by the kernel.
>
> In
On 26/01/18 16:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:45:22PM +, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
>> On 26/01/18 10:47, Felipe Salvador wrote:
>>> $ while true; do echo a>>a; done
>>>
>>> makes bash crash when file size is reached
>
>> A crash is always a bug. I suggest that you
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:45:22PM +, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> On 26/01/18 10:47, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > $ while true; do echo a>>a; done
> >
> > makes bash crash when file size is reached
> A crash is always a bug. I suggest that you report it as such - if not
> already
On 26/01/18 10:47, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> Hi list,
> setting
>
> ulimit -f 1024
>
> and running (for example)
>
> $ while true; do echo a>>a; done
>
> makes bash crash when file size is reached
>
> Warning: Program '/bin/bash' cras
Hi list,
setting
ulimit -f 1024
and running (for example)
$ while true; do echo a>>a; done
makes bash crash when file size is reached
Warning: Program '/bin/bash' crashed.
$ du a
1024/home/felipe/a
I would expect an error or something else
El Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:25:10 +0100
Trujillo Carmona, Antonio antonio.trujillo.s...@juntadeandalucia.es
escribió:
El jue, 15-11-2012 a las 14:40 +, Camaleón escribió:
El Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:04:08 +0100, Trujillo Carmona, Antonio escribió:
Estamos teniendo problemas con el proxy. He
El jue, 15-11-2012 a las 14:40 +, Camaleón escribió:
El Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:04:08 +0100, Trujillo Carmona, Antonio escribió:
Estamos teniendo problemas con el proxy. He encontrado le error:
Your cache is running out of filedescriptors
(...)
Me adelanto sólo por si acaso...
- nofile 4096
(la ultima anotación la hice por probar)
El caso es que si me logeo al poxy como usuario obtengo:
gdxtrujo@proxy-00:~$ ulimit -n
4096
como root:
root@proxy-00:/home/HVN/gdxtrujo# ulimit -n
1024
como proxy (le he puesto un passwd paras probar)
$ ulimit -n
1024
/limits.conf
.../...
* - nofile 4096
proxy - nofile 4096
(la ultima anotación la hice por probar)
El caso es que si me logeo al poxy como usuario obtengo:
gdxtrujo@proxy-00:~$ ulimit -n
4096
como root:
root@proxy-00:/home/HVN
El Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:25:10 +0100, Trujillo Carmona, Antonio escribió:
El jue, 15-11-2012 a las 14:40 +, Camaleón escribió:
El Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:04:08 +0100, Trujillo Carmona, Antonio escribió:
Estamos teniendo problemas con el proxy. He encontrado le error: Your
cache is running
cuestiones de seguridad.
Te vuelvo a pegar los comandos para especificarlo a nivel S.O.
echo 4096 /proc/sys/fs/file-max
ulimit -Hn 4096
/etc/security/limits.conf
* - nofile 4096
ulimit -s 4096
ulimit -n 4096
Saludos
P.D. Requiere reinicio de Squid - y me parece que también del S.O
El Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:04:08 +0100, Trujillo Carmona, Antonio escribió:
Estamos teniendo problemas con el proxy. He encontrado le error:
Your cache is running out of filedescriptors
(...)
Me adelanto sólo por si acaso... ¿puede estar relacionado con este otro
hilo? (era para squeeze pero
a ulimit command in the init
script is the way to do this.
(...)
I can be wrong but I had understood ulimits (per user/daemon) are set
from /etc/security/limits.conf :-?
From [1]
/etc/security/limits.{d,conf} are only processed by pam_limits.
Processes started from init generally do
Greetings,
I am trying to increase the number of open files the sendmail daemon
may have. I have read that inserting a ulimit command in the init
script is the way to do this. I have adjusted the init script as so:
# head -n 25 /etc/init.d/sendmail
#!/bin/sh
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:04:19 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
I am trying to increase the number of open files the sendmail daemon may
have. I have read that inserting a ulimit command in the init script is
the way to do this.
(...)
I can be wrong but I had understood ulimits (per user/daemon
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:04:19 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
I am trying to increase the number of open files the sendmail daemon may
have. I have read that inserting a ulimit command in the init script is
the way to do
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:15:19AM +0100, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
sorry:D
i wanted to write: it's not working. :\
what happens when you type ulimit -a
plus you need
# Sets up user limits according to /etc/security/limits.conf
# (Replaces the use of /etc/limits in old login)
session
How can I set ulimit?
when I give:
ulimit -n 10240
ok,
ulimit -n
gives 10240. But. after a few minutes, it 1024 again!
How can I set the ulimit to be permanently 10240?
It would be important! :S
Thank you :\
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 11:54:49 Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
How can I set ulimit?
when I give:
ulimit -n 10240
ulimits is an inheritable aspect of processes, like an environment variable.
The ulimit command is actually a shell built-in that tell the shell process
to increase its limit
On 2010-01-26 at 12:54:49 -0500, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
How can I set ulimit?
when I give:
ulimit -n 10240
ok,
ulimit -n
gives 10240. But. after a few minutes, it 1024 again!
How can I set the ulimit to be permanently 10240?
It would be important! :S
Thank you :\
man bash
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:47:31PM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
On 2010-01-26 at 12:54:49 -0500, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
How can I set ulimit?
when I give:
ulimit -n 10240
ok,
ulimit -n
gives 10240. But. after a few minutes, it 1024 again!
How can I set the ulimit
:
* hardnofile 1048
I then shutdown and rebooted.
I login as a normal user and issue
$ ulimit -n
1024
$ ulimit -n 1048
$ ulimit -n
1048
$ ulimit -n 2000
-bash: ulimit: open files: cannot modifiy limit: Operation not permitted
The limit starts at the default
so the question still is: how can I set ulimit to be permanent? e.g.:
10240 after reboot? :D
there's no way for it?:O
On k, 2010-01-26 at 15:42 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
On 2010-01-26 at 14:40:23 -0500, Alex Samad wrote:
have a look at /etc/security/limits.conf
I have 2 lines
On 2010-01-26 at 15:53:37 -0500, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
so the question still is: how can I set ulimit to be permanent? e.g.:
10240 after reboot? :D
there's no way for it?:O
I believe that Alex and I just told you, in effect.
But if you need detailed instructions, OK. :-(
First of all
On 2010-01-26 at 16:44:33 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
In /etc/security/limits.conf, add the following line:
databasehardnofile 10240
In /home/database/.bash_profile add the following line:
ulimit -n 10240
I just thought of another way, which I think is even better
the following line:
databasehardnofile 10240
In /home/database/.bash_profile add the following line:
ulimit -n 10240
I just thought of another way, which I think is even better.
In /etc/security/limits.conf, add *two* lines, in this order:
databasehard
On 2010-01-01 at 19:04:22 -0500, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
i wrote this two lines:
*hardnofile10240
*softnofile10240
in /etc/security/limits.conf, reboot
but its now working.
That does not make sense. Do you mean and it's now working,
or do you mean but it's not
sorry:D
i wanted to write: it's not working. :\
On k, 2010-01-26 at 19:42 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
On 2010-01-01 at 19:04:22 -0500, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
i wrote this two lines:
*hardnofile10240
*softnofile10240
in /etc/security/limits.conf, reboot
In 560840.34719...@web114116.mail.gq1.yahoo.com, Tudod Ki wrote:
is
echo 'ulimit -n 10240' /etc/profiles
a bad idea? [because it runs every time when someone logins]
Is it a BAD idea OR NOT?
It is a bad idea, since global limits can already be managed by editing
/etc/security/limits.conf
is
echo 'ulimit -n 10240' /etc/profiles
a bad idea? [because it runs every time when someone logins]
Is it a BAD idea OR NOT? :D:O
thank you
how can I set apache [1.3] ulimit from the default 1024?
thanks
Hi People
I set some limits (/etc/security/ limits.conf) but when you restart the
server the same did not apply the rules, as follows:
* softnproc 8188
* hardnproc 65536
* softnofile 8192
* hardnofile 824692
core file
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:28:21PM -0200, Márcio Luciano Donada wrote:
Hi People
I set some limits (/etc/security/ limits.conf) but when you restart the
server the same did not apply the rules, as follows:
Hi, check if the server PAM config under /etc/pam.d includes pam_limits.so,
which is
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:14:43PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Having read the manual and examples on the Internet, still confused.
As far as I understand it, ulimit is per process. RSS only addresses how
much of the process is resident in RAM, and some googling suggests that
it may not actually
Having read the manual and examples on the Internet, still confused.
Some suggest it is the limit of a session (as
http://www.svantech.com/node/4.
* Was it the size limit of a single process?
* Was it the size limit of a single session?
* If it is for a session, what counts a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
Is there a way to fix at bootup for all users the ulimit -n statement
(lenny) ?
The default value is ridiculously 1024
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http
In 4aa76c0d.8080...@esiee.fr, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Is there a way to fix at bootup for all users the ulimit -n statement
(lenny) ?
Yes.
The default value is ridiculously 1024
If you think this is not a sane default, you should probably file a bug.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
In 4aa76c0d.8080...@esiee.fr, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Is there a way to fix at bootup for all users the ulimit -n statement
(lenny) ?
Yes.
More specificly, maybe in /etc/security/limits.conf ?
The default
spaces and being able to realloc is nice.
Completely turning off swap is not possible since this is a multiuser
system and there are many sleeping processes lying around.
I'll attach my testing program, in case someone would like to play
around with ulimit.
Any hints, pointers to documentation
del servidor rsync o del cliente ? Quien es el que
no puede hacer la lista ?
2. He leído por ahí que es problema de configurar el ulimit -s, pero
por mucho que se lo aumento en el script, me devuelve el mismo error.
Cual es la manera de hacer esto correctamente ?
3. Alguna otra sugerencia ? (en los
Buenas,
Después de actualizar de sarge a etch noto que el comando ulimit -u
16384 -n 65536 para los usuarios convencionales ya no tiene permisos y
sale con el siguiente error:
su - usuario
-su: ulimit: open files: cannot modify limit: Operación no permitida
/etc/security/limits.conf
serverde bazı aksaklıklar başlamıştı. apache zamansız olarak
duruyordu. bazı hata loglarında too many open file: ./htaccess
pcfg_openfile gibi bir hata mesajı buldum. biraz araştırdım ve ulimit
komutu çözüm oldu gibi. fakat makine reboot ettikten sonra ulimit -n ile
kontrol ettiğimde eski değeri
Hola,
Una consulta, si quiero decirle al sistema que el usuario de apache pueda abrir
mas de 1024
archivos en debian por defecto es 1024, esta el comando ulimit -n 4096, esto lo
hace para todos
los usuarios? hay forma de decirle al sistema que solo el usuario de apache
pueda abrir 4096 y el
El jue, 12-04-2007 a las 14:31 -0300, Ricardo Marcelo Alvarez escribió:
Hola,
Una consulta, si quiero decirle al sistema que el usuario de apache
pueda abrir mas de 1024
archivos en debian por defecto es 1024, esta el comando ulimit -n
4096, esto lo hace para todos
los usuarios? hay forma
will apply to use users belonging to the
group 'root'. However, when I run uname -a I get 32 kb instead of
unlimited for the max locked memory:
$ ulimit -a
core file size(blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
max locked
Hallo Christian,
Christian Knoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:22:01PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
Christian Knoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ich nutze den Gnome Desktop in Debian Sarge mit gdm, und möchte, das
ulimit -c unlimited
für alle Programme gilt, die ich
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 08:39:38PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
Was sagt grep '^[^#].*limits' /etc/pam.d/*?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep '^[^#].*limits' /etc/pam.d/*
/etc/pam.d/ftp:session requiredpam_limits.so
/etc/pam.d/gdm:session requiredpam_limits.so
Hallo Christian,
Christian Knoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
ich nutze den Gnome Desktop in Debian Sarge mit gdm, und möchte, das
ulimit -c unlimited
für alle Programme gilt, die ich dort ausführe. Leider klappt das nur für
Terminalfenster, nicht jedoch für Programme, die ich vom
Hallo Jörg,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:22:01PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
Christian Knoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ich nutze den Gnome Desktop in Debian Sarge mit gdm, und möchte, das
ulimit -c unlimited
für alle Programme gilt, die ich dort ausführe. Leider klappt das nur für
* Christian Knoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [18-09-05 20:04]:
Hallo Jörg,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:22:01PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
Christian Knoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ich nutze den Gnome Desktop in Debian Sarge mit gdm, und möchte,
das
ulimit -c unlimited
für alle
,
das
ulimit -c unlimited
für alle Programme gilt, die ich dort ausführe. Leider klappt das
nur für Terminalfenster, nicht jedoch für Programme, die ich vom
Panel aus aufrufe.
Du kannst das auch in /etc/security/limits.conf einstellen.
Danke. Das habe ich
* Christian Knoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [18-09-05 23:01]:
Danke. Das habe ich bereits versucht. Ich habe
#domain type item value
chris hardcore 30
dort eingetragen, doch es funktioniert nicht. Ich habe im GUI immer noch
ulimit -c = 0. Ist
Hallo,
ich nutze den Gnome Desktop in Debian Sarge mit gdm, und möchte, das
ulimit -c unlimited
für alle Programme gilt, die ich dort ausführe. Leider klappt das nur für
Terminalfenster, nicht jedoch für Programme, die ich vom Panel aus aufrufe.
Ein
/usr/bin/X11/xterm -fg black -e bash
Moin,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:02:49PM +0200, Christian Knoke wrote:
[...]
/usr/bin/X11/xterm -fg black -e bash --noprofile --norc
'Starte im xterm eine bash ohne startdateien zu lesen'
vom Panel aus gestartet, ergibt
bash-2.05b$ ulimit -c
0
vom 'normalen' Terminal bekomme ich
startdateien zu lesen'
Genau.
vom Panel aus gestartet, ergibt
bash-2.05b$ ulimit -c
0
Wenn die Xsession auf unlimited core files eingestellt wäre, hätte hier aber
*trotzdem* 'unlimited' erscheinen müssen. Die Frage ist, warum das nicht klappt
Ich habe 'ulimit -c unlimited' bisher ohne Erfolg
tudo mais, eu tenho hoje, nesta maquina uns 300 dominios, a questao é
se eu der um ulimit -n eu tenho um valor 1024, oque ocorre, é que esse
valor é muito baixo para a minha necessidade, entao no minimo eu jogo
ele pra 2048, mas sempre, sempre mesmo, esse valor volta para 1024 ( sem
reiniciar
a
aplicaçao plesk ( é um painel de controle, caso alguem nao conheça ),
bom, praticamente, é isto que controla as paradas, adiciona os dominios
e tudo mais, eu tenho hoje, nesta maquina uns 300 dominios, a questao é
se eu der um ulimit -n eu tenho um valor 1024, oque ocorre, é que esse
valor
Does anybody know where the defaults for ulimit are set ?
I couldn't find anything in /etc.
Thanks
Paulo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 30 Jun 2005 20:41, Paulo M C Aragão wrote:
Does anybody know where the defaults for ulimit are set ?
I couldn't find anything in /etc.
/etc/security/limits.conf
--
Lee.
Please do not CC replies directly to me. I'll read them on the list.
Paulo M C Aragão wrote:
Does anybody know where the defaults for ulimit are set ?
I couldn't find anything in /etc.
Thanks
Paulo
Probably /etc/security/limits.conf
--
Ugo
- Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail. I read the list.
- Please avoid top-posting, long
Lee Braiden wrote on Jun, 30:
Does anybody know where the defaults for ulimit are set ?
I couldn't find anything in /etc.
/etc/security/limits.conf
Thanks, Lee. That's why 'grep -r ulimit /etc' couldn't find anything.
Paulo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Lee Braiden wrote on Jun, 30:
Does anybody know where the defaults for ulimit are set ?
I couldn't find anything in /etc.
/etc/security/limits.conf
Just looked at the file again and noticed that all entries are commented
out (start with #). So the defaults must be coming from somewhere
On Thursday 30 Jun 2005 23:37, Paulo M C Aragão wrote:
Lee Braiden wrote on Jun, 30:
Just looked at the file again and noticed that all entries are commented
out (start with #). So the defaults must be coming from somewhere else.
Any ideas ?
I think the defaults are just from the same pam
Lee Braiden wrote on Jun, 30:
I think the defaults are just from the same pam module that includes that
file
as an example of what you can change :)
I'm not sure if I understood you. Forgive my ignorance and please correct me:
1. There's a pam module that sets limits for a shell
On Thursday 30 Jun 2005 23:55, Paulo M C Aragão wrote:
I'm not sure if I understood you. Forgive my ignorance and please correct
me:
1. There's a pam module that sets limits for a shell environment
2. These limits are hardcoded but can be changed via
/etc/security/limits.conf
Yep :) At
Hola...
Tengo un pequeño problema.
Estuve mirando en la lista un mensaje en el que decia como hace posible que
hubiese archivos de mas de 2 GB... y pareció funcionar, pero cuando me
descargo una iso de dvd con wget por ejemplo, falla al alcanzar ese limite...
Puse ya que no hubiese limite en
Dear gurus on this list,
I use linux since kernel 0.93 and went through quite a lot of ups and
downs but this is something I simply don't understand:
for running vmware I needed to increase the limit for open files.
ok, ulimit -n is restricted for non-root. I could do a su , ulimit -n
and su
Patrick Petermair wrote:
Habe schon alle möglichen Schreibweisen probiert, allerdings ohne
Effekt.
Für das Google Archiv. Scheint irgendwie ein lokales Problem gewesen zu
sein. Ich habe es auf 2 anderen Rechnern getestet, und da funktionierte
es wunderbar!
MfG
Patrick
--
Haeufig gestellte
Hi!
Wir haben hier einen ziemlich beschäftigten Server mit mehreren Tomcat
Instanzen. Da es häufig zu Performance-Einbußen und Fehlermeldungen
kommt, habe ich mich mal mit ulimit auseinandergesetzt.
ulimit -u gibt nur einen Wert von 256 max user processes an, die der
tomcat User schon längst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Petermair wrote:
Was ist hier die richtige Handhabung beim Setzen der ulimit Werte?
versuch es mal mit vi /etc/security/limits.conf
Gruß
Patrick
- --
IN MEDIAS RES
- -=Operations=-
tel. +49 (0) 2166 - 99 99 - 685
fax. +49 (0
ulimit Werten (sowohl ulimit -S als auch ulimit -H).
MfG
Patrick
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
to a memory leak. You need to close
files after you are through using them.
I was told
1) change /etc/profile to add ulimit -Hn 65536
2)create /etc/initscript as described in man initscript, including
ulimit -Hn 65536
That would only be a temporary workaround. If you are leaking file
descriptors
When running java w/ another program I get this error message-
java.io.IOException: Too many open files
I was told
1) change /etc/profile to add ulimit -Hn 65536
2)create /etc/initscript as described in man initscript, including
ulimit -Hn 65536
Someone else mentioned /etc/security/limits.
Now I
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 06:41:22PM -0600, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
Hello, everyone. I'm having a problem with eclipse spawning many
processes, causing me to go over my process limit. Since this is normal
behavior, I would like to increase my process limit. I have edited
Hello, everyone. I'm having a problem with eclipse spawning many
processes, causing me to go over my process limit. Since this is normal
behavior, I would like to increase my process limit. I have edited
/etc/security/limits.conf, and uncommented the appropriate lines in
/etc/pam.d/* (the lines
I just noticed that in bash ulimit -u is the same as ash's
ulimit -p, while bash has another meaning for ulimit -p ... This
makes writing scripts quite difficult, I'd say you cannot then use
ulimit in /bin/sh scripts, only in scripts specifically for bash or
ash.
Just a thought, posted in case
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:40:30PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
I just noticed that in bash ulimit -u is the same as ash's
ulimit -p, while bash has another meaning for ulimit -p ... This
makes writing scripts quite difficult, I'd say you cannot then use
ulimit in /bin/sh scripts, only
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:40:30 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
I just noticed that in bash ulimit -u is the same as ash's
ulimit -p, while bash has another meaning for ulimit -p ... This
makes writing scripts quite difficult, I'd say you cannot then use
ulimit in /bin/sh scripts, only
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:08:59 -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:40:30 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
I just noticed that in bash ulimit -u is the same as ash's
ulimit -p, while bash has another meaning for ulimit -p ... This
makes writing scripts quite difficult, I'd say you
Charles Goyard writes:
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Morin :
L'implémententation (relativement simple) se trouve dans
mm/oom_kill.c.
Au niveau utilisateur, la commande ulimit permet d'empêcher les
processus de trop grossir.
Mais ulimit est une commande interne de bash, ce n'est donc
Tu fais man bash et tu cherches ulimit. Il y a d'autres options que -a
(-a pour all) cdfmltpnuv
pour voir si tu as la même chose en précisant tes désirs.
Je cherche à faire des fichiers de plus de 2 Go. En ligne de commande, ça
passe :
# ulimit -f
unlimited
#
Sous X (xterm, konsole, etc
Macolu writes:
Je cherche à faire des fichiers de plus de 2 Go. En ligne de commande, ça
passe :
# ulimit -f
unlimited
#
Sous X (xterm, konsole, etc) j'obtiens ça :
# ulimit -f
2097151
#
Cela signifie que quelque part entre le moment ou tu lances X et le
moment ou tu
On mercredi 20 mar 2002, Macolu wrote:
Bonjour tout le monde !
Lorsque je fais un ulimit -a en mode texte, j'obtiens (entre autres)
unlimited.
Tu as essayé avec autre chose que -a
--
jean-michel
Le Jeudi 21 Mars 2002 08:43, Jean-Michel OLTRA a écrit :
On mercredi 20 mar 2002, Macolu wrote:
Bonjour tout le monde !
Lorsque je fais un ulimit -a en mode texte, j'obtiens (entre autres)
unlimited.
Tu as essayé avec autre chose que -a
comment ça ?
Bonjour tout le monde !
Lorsque je fais un ulimit -a en mode texte, j'obtiens (entre autres)
unlimited.
Lorsque je lance cette même commande sous X, j'obtiens ça : 2097151
Du coup, ça me limite, notamment dans la taille maximale des fichiers
(logique).
Comment faire pour que les limites sous
Hi,
I'm running kde on debian woody.
Where can I change my resource limits?
I'm having problems with some programs that I think might be
caused by having ulimit set to:
3|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:rbw $ulimit -s
8196
4|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:rbw $
I tried:
1) Editing /etc/security/limits.conf, addind
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:08:33PM -0200, Ramiro Brito Willmersdorf wrote:
1) Editing /etc/security/limits.conf, addind the line:
rbw softstack unlimited
Had you tried also increasing the hard limit to unlimited?
--
When we reduce our own liberties to stop
--begin quoted message from Ramiro Brito Willmersdorf,
Hi,
I'm running kde on debian woody.
Where can I change my resource limits?
I'm having problems with some programs that I think might be
caused by having ulimit set to:
3|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:rbw $ulimit -s
8196
4|[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Don, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:31:00 +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Hello,
lilo,
I'd like to test an overloaded apache with 2000 httpd processes running
as nobody on it. However, I can't ulimit the maximum number of open
file descriptors for nobody as well as common users. Is there any way
Hello,
I'd like to test an overloaded apache with 2000 httpd processes running
as nobody on it. However, I can't ulimit the maximum number of open
file descriptors for nobody as well as common users. Is there any way
to achieve this?
Thanks.
--
Patrick Hsieh[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE - The Linux
Estou recebendo a seguinte mensagem num servidor que roda cerca de 400
processos, a maior parte deles rodando sobre o telnetd
Fork - Resource temporarily unavailable
Verificando o ulimit -a
vejo que o numro de processos maximos por usuarios é de 256
Mas ao que parece esse limite nao tem sido
Estou recebendo a seguinte mensagem num servidor que roda cerca de 400
processos, a maior parte deles rodando sobre o telnetd
Fork - Resource temporarily unavailable
Verificando o ulimit -a
vejo que o numro de processos maximos por usuarios é de 256
Mas ao que parece esse limite nao tem
On Sat, 03 Nov 2001 13:09:03 -0200 (BRST)
José Claudio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Estou recebendo a seguinte mensagem num servidor que roda cerca de 400
processos, a maior parte deles rodando sobre o telnetd
Fork - Resource temporarily unavailable
Verificando o ulimit -a
vejo que o numro
Hi,
What ulimits need I to start StarOffice. I already adjusted the virtual
memory to 80 Megs, but StarOffice hangs at the startup picture/screen.
Any Ideas?
These are my ulimits:
core file size (blocks) 100
data seg size (kbytes) 102400
file size (blocks) unlimited
max
Hi,
not sure exactly, but I've seen soffice suckdown 215M virtual with 96M
resident, while working with big files...
It's a real pig, but still better than Windows atleast
-Jon
Hi!
Does anybody know how to limit the resorces available for the
program that runs when somebody uses the ability of the .forward file to
pass the contents of the email onto a program?
TIA!
-- p.
To wit, consider that this function, just as 'cd', must be implemented as a
shell
builtin. If it was a program then the value's set wouldn't be able to affect
future
programs which are run.
David Z. Maze wrote:
Stavros [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stavros ianyone knows why i can't find ulimit
ianyone knows why i can't find ulimit in debian potato?
Stavros [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stavros ianyone knows why i can't find ulimit in debian potato?
Because it's a builtin in various Bourne-style shells (bash, zsh,
pdksh), and therefore doesn't have its own package?
--
David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://donut.mit.edu
executed but the error is displayed.
The error displayed is a follows :
sh[28]: ulimit: The specified value exceeds the user's allowable limit.
*
Cron: The previous message is the standard output
and standard error of one of your at commands
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
