Re: what is the difference between a source package and a package (want alsa-lib in stretch)

On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:56 PM, wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 01:38:06PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: >> I'm trying to build some software, and one of the long list of items >> to install prior to configuring is 'alsa-lib'. >> >>

Re: what is the difference between a source package and a package (want alsa-lib in stretch)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 01:38:06PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: > I'm trying to build some software, and one of the long list of items > to install prior to configuring is 'alsa-lib'. > > I tried > 'sudo apt-get install alsa-lib' > but got the message

Re: what is the difference between a source package and a package (want alsa-lib in stretch)

Hi, have a look at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/alsa-lib To the lower left is a list of links titled "binaries". Those are the readily installable packages which stem from source package "als-lib": https://packages.debian.org/source/stretch/alsa-lib Normally you don't build from source

Re: what is the difference between a source package and a package (want alsa-lib in stretch)

On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 01:38:06PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: > I'm trying to build some software, and one of the long list of items > to install prior to configuring is 'alsa-lib'. > > I tried > 'sudo apt-get install alsa-lib' > but got the message > 'E: Unable to locate package alsa-lib' >

what is the difference between a source package and a package (want alsa-lib in stretch)

I'm trying to build some software, and one of the long list of items to install prior to configuring is 'alsa-lib'. I tried 'sudo apt-get install alsa-lib' but got the message 'E: Unable to locate package alsa-lib' So i looked around on the internet, and saw a page for an alsa-lib

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 07:55:50AM -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote: Quite unlikely, but linux-image-3.2.0.5-amd64 could happen. OMG, 3.2.0.5 is considered an upgrade over 3.2.0.4? 5 is bigger than 4, so yes a higher version means it has been upgraded I was under the impression that 3.3 was

What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

During installation of Debian 7.5, one is prompted to install either linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64 or linux-image-amd64 There is no context-sensitive help menu on that page. Could someone tell me what the differences between those two are and which is the better of the two?

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:49:59AM -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote: During installation of Debian 7.5, one is prompted to install either linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64 or linux-image-amd64 There is no context-sensitive help menu on that page. Could someone tell me what the

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

dep: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 - https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/linux-image-amd64 linux-image-amd64 is a meta-package, that installs linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64. If you install the meta-package, I guess an update of the meta-package will replace linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64, if there should be a

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/29/2014 07:49 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote: During installation of Debian 7.5, one is prompted to install either linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64 or linux-image-amd64 There is no context-sensitive help menu on that page. Could someone

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

From: Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 8:02 PM Subject: Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64? linux-image-amd64 is a metapackage which always

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

From: The Wanderer wande...@fastmail.fm To: Debian-user List debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 8:51 PM Subject: Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64? linux-image-amd64 depends on whatever

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

On Jo, 29 mai 14, 13:02:57, Darac Marjal wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:49:59AM -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote: During installation of Debian 7.5, one is prompted to install either linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64 or linux-image-amd64 There is no context-sensitive help menu on

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

On Jo, 29 mai 14, 07:17:24, Horatio Leragon wrote: How likely, do you think, is Debian to release version 3.3? Quite unlikely, but linux-image-3.2.0.5-amd64 could happen. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/29/2014 10:17 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote: [that on 2014-05-29 at 20:51, The Wanderer wrote:] linux-image-amd64 depends on whatever the latest-in-Debian AMD64 version of the Linux kernel is. If you install this package from Debian stable,

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

From: Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:27 PM Subject: Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64? linux-image-amd64 is a metapackage which always

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

From: Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:29 PM Subject: Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64? Quite unlikely, but linux-image-3.2.0.5

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/29/2014 10:55 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote: [that on 2014-05-29 at 22:29, Andrei POPESCU wrote:] Quite unlikely, but linux-image-3.2.0.5-amd64 could happen. OMG, 3.2.0.5 is considered an upgrade over 3.2.0.4? I was under the impression

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/29/2014 10:53 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote: [that on 2014-05-29 at 22:29, Andrei POPESCU wrote:] linux-image-amd64 is a metapackage which always depends on the latest amd64 linux kernel. ... for the given release (e.g. stable, backports,

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

On Thursday 29 May 2014 16:07:04 The Wanderer wrote: The official Debian repositories are each named after a Debian release (by codename, not by number). Not only by release name, but also by generic name. Hence the repositories for Wheezy are either Wheezy or Stable, but never 7.x. Lisi

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

On Jo, 29 mai 14, 07:55:50, Horatio Leragon wrote: Quite unlikely, but linux-image-3.2.0.5-amd64 could happen. OMG, 3.2.0.5 is considered an upgrade over 3.2.0.4? Not quite an upgrade, but a significant (usually security) change. Significant enough to force an ABI break. That is, if you

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

From: The Wanderer wande...@fastmail.fm To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:07 PM Subject: Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64? Thanks, Wanderer

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

From: The Wanderer wande...@fastmail.fm To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:07 PM Subject: Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64? It is. 3.2.0-5 would

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:51 AM, The Wanderer wande...@fastmail.fm wrote: On 05/29/2014 07:49 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote: During installation of Debian 7.5, one is prompted to install either linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64 or linux-image-amd64 There is no context-sensitive help menu on that

Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64?

From: Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:47 PM Subject: Re: What is the difference between linux-image-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0.4-amd64? I'd suggest you don't try upgrading to another

Re: what is the difference between /usr/bin/X and /usr/bin/Xorg?

files are ELF executables, and they are CLEARLY different. so what exactly IS the difference btn them??? In the beginning was MIT's The X Window System. The main server is 'X' as in /usr/bin/X. This was rewritten for the 80386 as Xfree86 with the same names. Later through much controversy

Re: what is the difference between '/usr/bin/X' and '/usr/bin/Xorg'?

29 2011 /usr/bin/Xorg both files are ELF executables, and they are CLEARLY different. so what exactly IS the difference btn them??? TIA... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

Re: what is the difference between /usr/bin/X and /usr/bin/Xorg?

, and they are CLEARLY different. so what exactly IS the difference btn them??? TIA... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aa055d28-5e5c-4029-ade0-e277e2f70

Re: what is the difference between /usr/bin/X and /usr/bin/Xorg?

29 2011 /usr/bin/Xorg both files are ELF executables, and they are CLEARLY different. so what exactly IS the difference btn them??? In the beginning was MIT's The X Window System. The main server is 'X' as in /usr/bin/X. This was rewritten for the 80386 as Xfree86 with the same names. Later

what is the difference between /usr/bin/X and /usr/bin/Xorg?

hi all: is there any difference between /usr/bin/X and /usr/bin/Xorg? On my debian box, /usr/bin/X is not symlink to /usr/bin/Xorg, and i can start X server with /usr/bin/X but fail with /usr/bin/Xorg? i google it but find nothing, could any one here help me? thanks in advance.

What is the difference?

Hello list, I wondered what is the difference between a) dpkg --get-selections * mylist.txt and b) dpkg --get-selections mylist.txt I get different results, but the asterix is a joker, and the results should be the same. The manual did not mention the asterix, and I suppose (as many sites

Re: What is the difference?

On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:59:30 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: I wondered what is the difference between a) dpkg --get-selections * mylist.txt and b) dpkg --get-selections mylist.txt I get different results, but the asterix is a joker, and the results should be the same. The manual did

Re: What is the difference?

Am Mittwoch, 9. März 2011 schrieb Camaleón: On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:59:30 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: I wondered what is the difference between a) dpkg --get-selections * mylist.txt and b) dpkg --get-selections mylist.txt I get different results, but the asterix is a joker

Re: What is the difference?

On 2011-03-09 19:59 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: I wondered what is the difference between a) dpkg --get-selections * mylist.txt and b) dpkg --get-selections mylist.txt This is mentioned in the dpkg manpage: , | --get-selections [package-name-pattern...] | Get list of package

Re: What is the difference?

On 2011-03-09 20:24 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2011-03-09 19:59 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: I wondered what is the difference between a) dpkg --get-selections * mylist.txt and b) dpkg --get-selections mylist.txt This is mentioned in the dpkg manpage: , | --get-selections

Re: What is the difference?

| | Get list of package selections, and write it to stdout. Without a | pattern, non-installed packages (i.e. those which have been | previously purged) will not be shown. Yes, of course I read this. But I thoughtm, the asterisk would mark ANY pattern, and no asterisk

Re: What is the difference?

On 2011-03-09 20:40 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: It is not a great problem, but I wondered, why non-installed packages appeared as to be installed. Because they have been selected for installation (dselect sometimes helpfully does that automatically when you run it as root). When I

Re: What is the difference?

Since this is no longer possible, you should run dpkg --clear-selections prior to dpkg --set-selections to replicate an installation on another computer. Sven Yeah, this is a good advice. I will do this, and play a little bit around with this. Thank you for discussing this with me.

Re: What is the difference?

On 2011-03-09 21:03 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: Since this is no longer possible, you should run dpkg --clear-selections prior to dpkg --set-selections to replicate an installation on another computer. Yeah, this is a good advice. I will do this, and play a little bit around with this.

Re: what is the difference between w95 FAT32 and w95 FAT32 (LBA)

Kamaraju S Kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com writes: Interesting! I searched for difference between w95 FAT32 and w95 FAT32 (LBA) in google. All the results are pretty useless. What did you search for? w95 fat32 w95 fat32 lba cfdisk So I only added cfdisk and my hit is there on the first

Re: what is the difference between w95 FAT32 and w95 FAT32 (LBA)

Le dimanche 22 août, Memnon Anon écrivit : Kamaraju S Kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com writes: Interesting! I searched for difference between w95 FAT32 and w95 FAT32 (LBA) in google. All the results are pretty useless. What did you search for? w95 fat32 w95 fat32 lba cfdisk So

Re: what is the difference between w95 FAT32 and w95 FAT32 (LBA)

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:33:16 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: While running cfdisk, it lists various file system types. Is there a document which explains the difference between similar file systems? It should be... but I have found nothing but excerpts:

Re: what is the difference between w95 FAT32 and w95 FAT32 (LBA)

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:33:16PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: While running cfdisk, it lists various file system types. Is there a document which explains the difference between similar file systems? In particular, if I want to have a windows XP type of filesystem, do I go with 07

what is the difference between w95 FAT32 and w95 FAT32 (LBA)

While running cfdisk, it lists various file system types. Is there a document which explains the difference between similar file systems? In particular, if I want to have a windows XP type of filesystem, do I go with 07 HPFS/NTFS or 86 NTFS volume set or 87 NTFS volume set? Similarly, If I

Re: what is the difference between w95 FAT32 and w95 FAT32 (LBA)

Kamaraju S Kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com writes: While running cfdisk, it lists various file system types. Is there a document which explains the difference between similar file systems? [...] Similarly, If I want to create FAT32 partition so that I can exchange files between

Re: what is the difference between w95 FAT32 and w95 FAT32 (LBA)

Memnon Anon wrote: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com writes: While running cfdisk, it lists various file system types. Is there a document which explains the difference between similar file systems? [...] Similarly, If I want to create FAT32 partition so that I can exchange

what is the difference between hostap and linux-wlan drivers?

I am configuring a Senao 2511 wireless card (prism2.5 chipset) and keep bumping into descriptions of both the hostap and linux-wlan(-ng) drivers for the chipset. what is the difference? tom arnall arcata -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: I favor Seamonkey (Mozilla suite replacement): http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ over Firefox for one reason: When you use a login page to something, and nowadays there are zillions, in FF you *seem* to have to enter the userid first and FF will supply the

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

Marc Shapiro wrote: Actually, I use fvwm2. I see ... you are one of those ... ;-) Matěj -- GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23 Marion St. #3, (617) 876-1259, ICQ 132822213 Home is where ~/.bashrc is.

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

J F wrote: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference? I guess I'm a little confused about which one is better/newer or the one to use? I favor Seamonkey (Mozilla suite replacement): http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ over Firefox for one reason: When you use a login page

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: J F wrote: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference? I guess I'm a little confused about which one is better/newer or the one to use? I favor Seamonkey (Mozilla suite replacement): http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ over Firefox for one reason

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

On Saturday 29 July 2006 14:02, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: J F wrote: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference? I guess I'm a little confused about which one is better/newer or the one to use? I favor Seamonkey (Mozilla suite replacement): http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

Pollywog wrote: I have found that I need three browsers to be able to view/play the most content. Most sites render well in Firefox and Konqueror but Konqueror sometimes will not play video or sound clips when Firefox 'knows' how to bring up the app that plays the media. I have Opera and I

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

Marc Shapiro wrote: I am working on removing the last vestiges of KDE from my box, which will eliminate Konqueror, as well. Just curious (really -- no flame intended), why do you switch from KDE and where (Gnome?)? Matěj -- GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

I favor Seamonkey (Mozilla suite replacement): http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ I did a search for Seamonkey in aptitude and it did not show any packages. Is it not in Debian.org ftp for aptitude yet? ___ Join Excite! -

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

Matej Cepl wrote: Marc Shapiro wrote: I am working on removing the last vestiges of KDE from my box, which will eliminate Konqueror, as well. Just curious (really -- no flame intended), why do you switch from KDE and where (Gnome?)? Actually, I use fvwm2. I have never really

Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference? I guess I'm a little confused about which one is better/newer or the one to use? Thanks in advance, J ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web

Re: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference?

J F wrote: Mozilla or firefox package-what is the difference? I guess I'm a little confused about which one is better/newer or the one to use? * 'mozilla' and 'mozilla-browser' - original Mozilla, it is now considered obsolete and is replaced by SeaMonkey (not yet in Debian). * 'mozilla

adduser: what is the difference between --disabled-password and --disabled-login

adduser(8) states that With the --disabled-login option, the account will be created but will be disabled until a password is set. The --disabled-password option will not set a password, but login are still possible for example through SSH RSA keys. I wonder what

Re: What is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ?

begin Jerome BENOIT quote from Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 11:38:37AM +0300 Thank for the reply. Apt only knows what it is told about distributions/sources through their Release file. My Release file for unstable/main has: Archive: unstable Component: main Origin: Debian Label: Debian

Re: What is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ?

begin Jerome BENOIT quote from Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:42:23PM +0300 Hello List, I have just tried to install vim-gnome (sid): for that you neede vim 1:6.2 (unstable) My point is: if in my `/etc/apt/preference/' file I ask to fetch the `vim' package from `Sid', I do not get it with

Re: What is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ?

Thank for the reply. Apt only knows what it is told about distributions/sources through their Release file. My Release file for unstable/main has: Archive: unstable Component: main Origin: Debian Label: Debian Architecture: i386 so those are the only distinguishing factors that I can use to

What is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ?

it ! Note that my `/etc/apt/sources.list' data file reaches both `Sid' and `unstable'. So what is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ? Thanks, jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:42:23PM +0300, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Note that my `/etc/apt/sources.list' data file reaches both `Sid' and `unstable'. So what is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ? Sid doesn't exist, sid and unstable do

Re: What is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:44:30PM +0300, Jerome BENOIT wrote: I know that, how explain the above trouble. Include one or the other, not both? - -- .''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `-

Re: What is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ?

what is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ? Sid doesn't exist, sid and unstable do. sid and unstable different names for the same thing. I know that, how explain the above trouble. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user

Re: What is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ?

`Sid' and `unstable'. So what is the difference between `Sid' and `unstable' ? Sid doesn't exist, sid and unstable do. sid and unstable different names for the same thing. I know that, how explain the above trouble. Apt only knows what it is told about distributions/sources through

Re: What is the difference between Gnome and Ximian?

not able to get Ximian Gnome to install on Woody. (Using either of the two methods -- script and *.deb packages). What is the difference between the Woody supplied Gnome and Ximian Gnome? Having used both, ximian gnome is slightly more polished and the woody gnome. Ximian gnome was made

What is the difference between Gnome and Ximian?

If I install Woody, it appears that I get an installation of Gnome. I am also not able to get Ximian Gnome to install on Woody. (Using either of the two methods -- script and *.deb packages). What is the difference between the Woody supplied Gnome and Ximian Gnome? Randy

Re: What is the difference between Gnome and Ximian?

On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 09:45, Randolph S. Kahle wrote: If I install Woody, it appears that I get an installation of Gnome. I am also not able to get Ximian Gnome to install on Woody. (Using either of the two methods -- script and *.deb packages). What is the difference between the Woody

RE: What is the difference between Gnome and Ximian? - UNSUBSCRIBE

to spamming the Debian-user mailing list until I am off the list, as all the e-mails I am STILL receiving are now spam to me. -Original Message- From: Scott Henson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 2:46 PM To: debian-user Subject: Re: What is the difference between Gnome

RE: What is the difference between Gnome and Ximian?

I would just install the debian gnome packages if you are using woody. But I feel Nautilus in Ximian will add lot of good looks to the desktop, which does not come otherwise. Though it takes about 35MB of memory, I still like it. -Ramesh

Re: What is the difference between Potato and Woody?

So, instead of looking at Debian as a bunch of interesting packages running on top of a kernel, I should view each release as a stable set of packages that all are known to work together. And that to get a release (such as Woody) ready for release this involves: * Release/Install

Re: What is the difference between Potato and Woody?

On 10-Mar-2002 Randolph S. Kahle wrote: I have started reading details about Woody. (I am running Potato on all of my machines with the 2.4 kernel). I was surprise to see that the 2.4 kernel is optional. This leads me to a fundamental question... What makes Woody different? Are there

Re: What is the difference between Potato and Woody?

On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:13:27PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On 10-Mar-2002 Randolph S. Kahle wrote: I have started reading details about Woody. (I am running Potato on all of my machines with the 2.4 kernel). I was surprise to see that the 2.4 kernel is optional. This leads me

Re: What is the difference between Potato and Woody?

On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 23:13, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On 10-Mar-2002 Randolph S. Kahle wrote: I have started reading details about Woody. (I am running Potato on all of my machines with the 2.4 kernel). I was surprise to see that the 2.4 kernel is optional. This leads me to a

What is the difference between Potato and Woody?

I have started reading details about Woody. (I am running Potato on all of my machines with the 2.4 kernel). I was surprise to see that the 2.4 kernel is optional. This leads me to a fundamental question... What makes Woody different? Are there structure changes (layout, etc.) that are

what is the difference between frozen, potato, and unstable

hello what is the difference between frozen, potato, and unstable. arent they all the same?

Re: what is the difference between frozen, potato, and unstable

joseph de los santos wrote: hello what is the difference between frozen, potato, and unstable. arent they all the same? frozen=potato, upcoming stable unstable=woody Regards, Joey -- Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.

Re: what is the difference between frozen, potato, and unstable

On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 09:33:02AM -0800, joseph de los santos wrote: what is the difference between frozen, potato, and unstable. arent they all the same? potato, as well as slink and woody, are code names for the various Debian releases. Slink is currently designated as stable, meaning