Re: Xawtv - again (was: Xawtv and Xfree86 4.0)

Pedro António Neves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi there: > > I posted a message on this list about xawtv and Xfree 4.0. > Following some solutions given by people on this list, I've managed > to get xawtv working just fine... except for one thing: the sound. > > When I try to change volume (w

Re: Xawtv - again (was: Xawtv and Xfree86 4.0)

On Friday 28 September 2001 22:10, you wrote: > > It might help to try to isolate where the problems lies. Is it with > sound coming out of the TV tuner or going into the soundcard? If you > have a walkman or other device that you know outputs sound properly, try > hooking that to the soundcard

Re: Xawtv - again (was: Xawtv and Xfree86 4.0)

On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 08:54:49PM +0100, Pedro Ant?nio Neves wrote: > On Friday 28 September 2001 16:39, Matthias Richter wrote: > > > > > (How) did you configure your soundcard? I can't see any sound modules > > in your output of lsmod. tvmixer is used by the soundcore-module here: > > It was

Re: Xawtv - again (was: Xawtv and Xfree86 4.0)

On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:54:49 +0100 "Pedro Ant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 28 September 2001 16:39, Matthias Richter wrote: > > > > > (How) did you configure your soundcard? I can't see any sound > modules > > in your output of lsmod. tvmixer is used by the soundcore-module > here: >

Re: Xawtv - again (was: Xawtv and Xfree86 4.0)

On Friday 28 September 2001 16:39, Matthias Richter wrote: > > (How) did you configure your soundcard? I can't see any sound modules > in your output of lsmod. tvmixer is used by the soundcore-module here: It was built in the kernel ... > So try to compile sound support as modules. I did, and

Re: Xawtv - again (was: Xawtv and Xfree86 4.0)

Pedro António Neves wrote on Fri Sep 28, 2001 at 03:52:06PM: > On Friday 28 September 2001 15:41, Matthias Richter wrote: > > I guess tvmixer is missing... which gives you yet another mixer-tab > > (called 'msp3400­c6' here) when using gmix (don't know about the others). > I've loaded the module tv

Re: Xawtv - again (was: Xawtv and Xfree86 4.0)

On Friday 28 September 2001 15:41, Matthias Richter wrote: > I guess tvmixer is missing... which gives you yet another mixer-tab > (called 'msp3400­c6' here) when using gmix (don't know about the others). > I've loaded the module tvmixer and still doesn't work... Module Size Us

Re: Xawtv - again (was: Xawtv and Xfree86 4.0)

Pedro António Neves wrote on Fri Sep 28, 2001 at 03:18:43PM: > Following some solutions given by people on this list, I've managed > to get xawtv working just fine... except for one thing: the sound. [...] > These are the modules I've got: > > Module Size Used by > tuner

Xawtv - again (was: Xawtv and Xfree86 4.0)

Hi there: I posted a message on this list about xawtv and Xfree 4.0. Following some solutions given by people on this list, I've managed to get xawtv working just fine... except for one thing: the sound. When I try to change volume (with the A key) it changes the volume from Muted to 0%. It see

Re: Xawtv and XFree86 4.0

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 12:00:52AM +0100, Pedro Ant?nio Neves wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2001 16:34, Adam McDaniel wrote: > > > What kind of tv card do you have? What version of X? > > It's a pinnacle PCTV Studio Pro and I'm running 4.0.3. > > I managed to write a new XFfree86config, and no

Re: Xawtv and XFree86 4.0

On Monday 17 September 2001 16:34, Adam McDaniel wrote: > What kind of tv card do you have? What version of X? It's a pinnacle PCTV Studio Pro and I'm running 4.0.3. > Also, what colour-depth are you running in? Now I'm running 16 bpp. > To my knowledge, xawtv doesn't REQUIRE XVideo unless i

Re: Xawtv and XFree86 4.0

#include Pedro António Neves wrote on Sun Sep 16, 2001 um 05:31:20PM: > I'm trying to run xawtv on my woody box, and although the program runs Look in your XF86Config-4 file and search a line containing "v4l". Remove or comment this line out. Background: if xawtv finds v4l module loaded, it use

Re: Xawtv and XFree86 4.0

On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 05:31:20PM +0100, Pedro Ant?nio Neves wrote: > > Hi > > I'm trying to run xawtv on my woody box, and although the program runs > I have no sound and the display's only black and white. > On the xterm window from where I run xawtv I get the following error > message: > Xli

Re: Xawtv and XFree86 4.0

Check /usr/share/doc/xawtv/README.bttv.gz, and make sure bttv is initialized with the correct card # of your TV card, as well as using the right TV Norm for your location (NTSC? PAL? NTSC-JP?) On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 05:31:20PM +0100, Pedro Ant?nio Neves wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to run xawtv on

Xawtv and XFree86 4.0

Hi I'm trying to run xawtv on my woody box, and although the program runs I have no sound and the display's only black and white. On the xterm window from where I run xawtv I get the following error message: Xlib: extension "XVideo" missing on display ":0.0" What can I do to make it work right

Re: nvidia: downgrade to XFree86 4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, Okay, it seems that I am under a slight misaprehension. The kernel tarball contains source, but the GLX doesn't. Thanks for clearing that up. Regards, Stephen. On Monday 06 Aug 2001 3:12 pm, Jimmy Richards wrote: > Hi, > > The

Re: nvidia: downgrade to XFree86 4.0

Hi, The tarballs are not source either. They just install an already built binary. You can get the latest .tar.gz of them from www.nvidia.com HTH, Jim R. On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 06:36:38AM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:34:59P

Re: nvidia: downgrade to XFree86 4.0

e know a procedure for getting and downgrading to > XFree86 4.0? > > -- > Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: nvidia: downgrade to XFree86 4.0

On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:34:59PM +0100, Stephen J. Thompson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello all, > > I see this regulary, binary only drivers from nVidia. Where are they? I > downloaded the source for the drivers from the nVidia site and have regulary > comp

Re: nvidia: downgrade to XFree86 4.0

2001 9:45 am, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote: > Does anyone know how to get the nvidia binary-only drivers to work with > XFree86 4.1 (I know I shouldn't use an nVIDIA card, but it came with the > computer)? > > If not, does someone know a procedure for getting and downgrad

nvidia: downgrade to XFree86 4.0

Does anyone know how to get the nvidia binary-only drivers to work with XFree86 4.1 (I know I shouldn't use an nVIDIA card, but it came with the computer)? If not, does someone know a procedure for getting and downgrading to XFree86 4.0? -- Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROT

Re: turning on X extensions with XFree86 4.0.x

On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 10:42:32PM -0700, Rich Rudnick wrote: >> In /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 you will find a section like the following (copied >> from my config): > >Oh! From which deb is XF86Config-4 coming from? i don't have it.

Re: turning on X extensions with XFree86 4.0.x

On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 10:42:32PM -0700, Rich Rudnick wrote: > In /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 you will find a section like the following (copied > from my config): Oh! From which deb is XF86Config-4 coming from? i don't have it. -- Get self-realization at ...

Re: turning on X extensions with XFree86 4.0.x

Thus spake Joshua N Pritikin on Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 10:16:17PM +0530: > i installed xserver-xfree86_4.0.3-4_i386.deb today, and simple things like > the shaped window extension disappeared. xdpyinfo reports: > > number of extensions:8 > LBX > MIT-SHM > SECURITY > XC-APPGROUP

Re: turning on X extensions with XFree86 4.0.x

On Sun, 22 Jul 2001 09:46:17 Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > i installed xserver-xfree86_4.0.3-4_i386.deb today, and simple things like > the shaped window extension disappeared. xdpyinfo reports: > > number of extensions:8 > LBX > MIT-SHM > SECURITY > XC-APPGROUP > XFree86-Big

turning on X extensions with XFree86 4.0.x

i installed xserver-xfree86_4.0.3-4_i386.deb today, and simple things like the shaped window extension disappeared. xdpyinfo reports: number of extensions:8 LBX MIT-SHM SECURITY XC-APPGROUP XFree86-Bigfont XInputExtension XKEYBOARD XTEST However, i see a bunch

Re: question about MTRR and XFree86 4.0

PJS> according to /usr/src/linux/Documentation/mtrr.txt... PJS> A patch is being written for XFree86 which will make this automatic: PJS> in other words the X server will manipulate /proc/mtrr using the PJS> ioctl() interface, so users won't have to do anything. PJS> does anybody know if th

question about MTRR and XFree86 4.0

according to /usr/src/linux/Documentation/mtrr.txt... A patch is being written for XFree86 which will make this automatic: in other words the X server will manipulate /proc/mtrr using the ioctl() interface, so users won't have to do anything. does anybody know if this has been done yet? it

Re: Re: xfree86 4.0

> In reply to:Eduardo Gargiulo > > Quoting Eduardo Gargiulo([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Hi all. > > > > How can I upgrade my potato_r0 to install xfree86 v4.x? > > You would have found that question answered if you had look tru the > archives. All these details are 100% in the archives, just look usi

Re: xfree86 4.0

Subject: xfree86 4.0 Date: Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:59:27PM -0300 In reply to:Eduardo Gargiulo Quoting Eduardo Gargiulo([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi all. > > How can I upgrade my potato_r0 to install xfree86 v4.x? You would have found that question answered if you had loo

xfree86 4.0

Hi all. How can I upgrade my potato_r0 to install xfree86 v4.x? --xgnu

Re: XFree86 4.0.x & tdfx DRI

Ian Eure wrote: > has anyone out there been able to get DRI working properly with XFree86 > 4.0.x and a 3dfx board? > > it _seems_ to work, but framerates are low... not at low as with software > rendering, but low. i also get horrible flicker when polygons are redrawn. >

Re: XFree86 4.0.x & tdfx DRI

> irt point 1, i have the agpgart & tdfx modules that came with 2.4.4 loaded > - afaik the dri stuff is all loaded in the x server, not the kernel. am i > wrong on this point? > > i'm running in 16bpp, and i have xlib[os]mesa3 installed. >From what I remember, you can get dri from both kernel sou

Re: XFree86 4.0.x & tdfx DRI

On Thu, 17 May 2001, Andrei Ivanov wrote: > Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:05:23 -0500 (CDT) > From: Andrei Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.x & tdfx DRI > > > has anyon

Re: XFree86 4.0.x & tdfx DRI

> has anyone out there been able to get DRI working properly with XFree86 > 4.0.x and a 3dfx board? > > it _seems_ to work, but framerates are low... not at low as with software > rendering, but low. i also get horrible flicker when polygons are redrawn. > > i was told that

XFree86 4.0.x & tdfx DRI

has anyone out there been able to get DRI working properly with XFree86 4.0.x and a 3dfx board? it _seems_ to work, but framerates are low... not at low as with software rendering, but low. i also get horrible flicker when polygons are redrawn. i was told that installing libglide3 would help

Re: XFree86-4.0 screen resolution missmatched with monitor viewing area

Quoting John Foster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > The virtual resolution is by default set to the maximum resolution > > for the display (I think). In the display section add the line: > > > > Virtual 1024 768 > > > > You might not be able to switch to a larg

Re: XFree86-4.0 screen resolution missmatched with monitor viewing area

On 8 Feb, John Foster wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> The virtual resolution is by default set to the maximum resolution >> for the display (I think). In the display section add the line: >> >> Virtual 1024 768 >> >> You might not be able to switch to a larger display, howeve

Re: XFree86-4.0 screen resolution missmatched with monitor viewing area

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The virtual resolution is by default set to the maximum resolution > for the display (I think). In the display section add the line: > > Virtual 1024 768 > > You might not be able to switch to a larger display, however. See > man XF86Config. > > -Chris -

Re: XFree86-4.0 screen resolution missmatched with monitor viewing area

On 7 Feb, John Foster wrote: > Damon Muller wrote: >> While I don't know anything much about X4 modelines, and for myself >> using the monitor's onscreen display was enough to fix it up, for your >> problem of starting in the wrong resolution there is an easy fix. >> >> Under section `screen', go

Re: XFree86-4.0 screen resolution missmatched with monitor viewing area

I think I misunderstood your previous posting where you said "In the past I have been able to correct this" so I assumed you were trying to do something that was possible in V3. In fact, you didn't correct it, you just lived with it. > Thanks. I already did that. I'm a perfectionist and prefer to

Re: XFree86-4.0 screen resolution missmatched with monitor viewing area

Damon Muller wrote: > While I don't know anything much about X4 modelines, and for myself > using the monitor's onscreen display was enough to fix it up, for your > problem of starting in the wrong resolution there is an easy fix. > > Under section `screen', go to the line that represents the colo

Re: XFree86-4.0 screen resolution missmatched with monitor viewing area

Quoth John Foster, > I recently upgraded to a full woody/testing installation. After a few > hours of reading & experimenting with "xf86configure" I got the new > XFree86 4.0 server to work well. I still have 1 problem. The > resolutions that are accepted on my moni

Re: XFree86-4.0 screen resolution missmatched with monitor viewing area

Quoting John Foster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I recently upgraded to a full woody/testing installation. After a few > hours of reading & experimenting with "xf86configure" I got the new > XFree86 4.0 server to work well. I still have 1 problem. The > resolutions that are

Re: XFree86 4.0 and the testing distribution

Xfree86 4.x isn't included in the testing tree yet. The way I understand it, it will be added eventually. I *think* that woody is now the same as the testing tree, but the less stable packages in woody got bumped into the new unstable. People who were running woody before the testing tree came a

XFree86 4.0 and the testing distribution

Gee, the testing distribution was announced later in the day when I decided that a lagged unstable was what was really needed . . . :) Anyway, I've tried toinstall it on the kids machine with mixed success. As near as I can tell, the dependencies between XFree 3.3 and 4.0 cross over. When I se

Re: XFree86 4.0

On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: > if i don't upgrade to woody, would it be better to do this from source > packages? > > i'm wondering if X will be linked against woody libraries... In my opinion it should be much more less truble to upgrade only some packages to woody. Then at lea

Re: XFree86 4.0

n user mailing list > Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0 > > Hi! > > I think you want to stick to the package system. > > If you use apt-get, change the /etc/apt/sources.list so that it points to > unstable, then make an > >apt-get update > > then a > >a

Re: XFree86 4.0

On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Jeffrey A Schoolcraft wrote: > * Martin Fluch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > >apt-get install xserver-xfree86 > > > > (this will update not all of your system, but only the part needed by the > > dependencies) > > > > Then fidle around until you get it running, you mi

Re: XFree86 4.0

* Martin Fluch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >apt-get install xserver-xfree86 > > (this will update not all of your system, but only the part needed by the > dependencies) > > Then fidle around until you get it running, you might need to update some > other X related packages. after I did th

Re: XFree86 4.0

, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: > I'd like to upgrade to XFree86 4.0. The way I see it, there's 2 options: > > 1- package > 2- tarball > > I'm running Potato, and don't really want to upgrade to Woody. Based on > that alone, I think tarball is my only

XFree86 4.0

I'd like to upgrade to XFree86 4.0. The way I see it, there's 2 options: 1- package 2- tarball I'm running Potato, and don't really want to upgrade to Woody. Based on that alone, I think tarball is my only option, but I want to make sure of that. Which is the better way

Re: True Type Support of Xfree86 4.0

** On Jun 11, kmself@ix.netcom.com scribbled: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 10:13:34PM +0800, Alex Kwan wrote: > > I have seen the release notes of XFree86 4.0 said that > > it will supported the True Type Fonts. > > Is it mean that if I have installed the 4.0R and I don'

Re: True Type Support of Xfree86 4.0

On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 10:13:34PM +0800, Alex Kwan wrote: > I have seen the release notes of XFree86 4.0 said that > it will supported the True Type Fonts. > Is it mean that if I have installed the 4.0R and I don't need to > install the xfs or xtt server to support true ty

True Type Support of Xfree86 4.0

I have seen the release notes of XFree86 4.0 said that it will supported the True Type Fonts. Is it mean that if I have installed the 4.0R and I don't need to install the xfs or xtt server to support true type fonts any more?

Re: XFree86 4.0 debs ?

Ron Rademaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PS. Make sure to keep the old 3, just in case anything goes wrong, I > didn't the first time, something went wrong, so I tried to fix it and > messed up my system even more. At the end I decided to reinstall the > system, because it was the fastest way o

gs, wmaker debs? (was: Re: XFree86 4.0 debs ?)

On Tue, 23 May 2000, James Sleeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I would like to install XFree 4.0 on my potato machine, are there debs >available yet, or not too far off ? I couldn't even see 4.0 ones in Woody. Take a look at http://www.debian.org/~branden/plans.txt. It seems like the move to the

Re: XFree86 4.0 debs ?

There aren't any deb (yet), but you can compile the sources yourself, works fine here! Ron Rademaker PS. Make sure to keep the old 3, just in case anything goes wrong, I didn't the first time, something went wrong, so I tried to fix it and messed up my system even more. At the end I decided to re

XFree86 4.0 debs ?

I would like to install XFree 4.0 on my potato machine, are there debs available yet, or not too far off ? I couldn't even see 4.0 ones in Woody. Thanks James Sleeman

Re: XFree86 4.0 deb

They don't exist yet. Michael O'Brien wrote: > > Hola~ > > Anyone know of the location of an xfree86 4.0 deb file? > > MO > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

XFree86 4.0 deb

Hola~ Anyone know of the location of an xfree86 4.0 deb file? MO

XFree86 4.0

I finally got up enough courage to install the new X win on my potato box. All I can say is wow! Not perfect but a definate impovement. X no longer feels clunky (seeing as how I have a AMD 200 and I am runing Gnome... it tended to be a bit slow). I can't wait for the .debs now! = ---

Re: XFree86 4.0 and Xterm colors...

On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > I've installed, and managed to get working, XFree86 4.0. The only big > problem remaining is that all of the terminal colors are really weird. > I now get pink on magenta and other generally unreadable color > co

XFree86 4.0 and Xterm colors...

I've installed, and managed to get working, XFree86 4.0. The only big problem remaining is that all of the terminal colors are really weird. I now get pink on magenta and other generally unreadable color combinations when I run mutt, slrn, etc. I've been trying to figure out where th

Re: XFree86-4.0 and xauth

On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 07:10:59PM -0400, Brian Stults wrote: > I upgraded to XFree86-4.0 recently, and now xauth doesn't seem to work. i don't use XFree86-4.0 yet, but here's guess or two. > I usually use ssh to work on my unix account at work and to do so, I > have

XFree86-4.0 and xauth

I upgraded to XFree86-4.0 recently, and now xauth doesn't seem to work. I usually use ssh to work on my unix account at work and to do so, I have a script that looks like this: ssh REMOTEHOST "/usr/openwin/bin/xauth add `grep -e IPADDR /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd-eth0.info | gawk -F = '

xfree86 4.0 on neomagic

debs, i run slink on my lapbox, having a neomagic 2097 (magicgraph 128zv+) video "card." xfree86 4.0 gives me these results: 1. twm default. a. how do i get to icewm?--my fav. 2. default vga. a. how do specify svga? 3. default screen size of 320x200. a. how do

Re: Install XFree86 4.0 on Potato

"Alex Kwan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Now I have another lesson to learn, it's install the XFree86 4.0 >(non .deb packages) on Potato. > >I have already download the necessary binary files of Free86 4.0 >(following to the XFree86's document), but I am af

Install XFree86 4.0 on Potato

Hi! Debian Friends, Thank you all the help of yours, the ppp dial-out now work! Now I have another lesson to learn, it's install the XFree86 4.0 (non .deb packages) on Potato. I have already download the necessary binary files of Free86 4.0 (following to the XFree86's document), but I

RE: Status of RIVA TNT2 3D Support in XFree86 4.0...?

ve not been able to find a definate answer as to the > existence of 3D Support in XFree86 4.0 for an NVIDIA RIVA TNT2 Card. > Some stuff that I have read seems to indicate that there is not a 3D > driver yet...? Is this true? Is there 3d support in X4, and if so, > is it usable at all

Re: Status of RIVA TNT2 3D Support in XFree86 4.0...?

There's actually something about this on slashdot.org today: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/03/21/0955231&mode=thread * Steve ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000321 15:22] penned: > Hello All, > > I have not been able to find a definate answer as to the > existence of

Status of RIVA TNT2 3D Support in XFree86 4.0...?

Hello All, I have not been able to find a definate answer as to the existence of 3D Support in XFree86 4.0 for an NVIDIA RIVA TNT2 Card. Some stuff that I have read seems to indicate that there is not a 3D driver yet...? Is this true? Is there 3d support in X4, and if so, is it usable at

Re: So, what's up with the XFree86 4.0 .debs?

Hi Branden, On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 10:32:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Hmm. I am using the following patch, which I got from slashdot of all > places: > > --- xc/config/makedepend/cppsetup.c.origSun Mar 12 15:47:41 2000 > +++ xc/config/makedepend/cppsetup.c Sun Mar 12 15:

Re: So, what's up with the XFree86 4.0 .debs?

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:18:09AM +0100, Sven LUTHER generated a stream of 1s and 0s: > Hello, > > Nice to hear about the future 4.0 plan. i agree with most of what you propose. > > I have a question conerning the 3D stuff. > > Glx will be included in XF 4.0, but this is a point that will mos

Re: So, what's up with the XFree86 4.0 .debs?

Hello, Nice to hear about the future 4.0 plan. i agree with most of what you propose. I have a question conerning the 3D stuff. Glx will be included in XF 4.0, but this is a point that will most assuredly confuse lots of people. In fact, (if i understood this issue correctly, which i am still

Re: So, what's up with the XFree86 4.0 .debs?

lookup_variable (ip, var, strlen(var)); } while (s); It did seem to fix the problem. If someone who understands cppsetup.c could comment and it turns out that this patch doesn't in fact disable some feature of cppsetup, I will submit this patch to XFree86. Anyway, XFree86 4.0 built with

Re: So, what's up with the XFree86 4.0 .debs?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:16:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > [snip] > > [1] The makedepend program gets stuck in an infinite loop when attempting > > to generate dependencies in xc/programs/xterm. One of Tom Dickey's > > patches, #130 or #131, is probably the c

Re: So, what's up with the XFree86 4.0 .debs?

On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:16:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: [snip] > [1] The makedepend program gets stuck in an infinite loop when attempting > to generate dependencies in xc/programs/xterm. One of Tom Dickey's > patches, #130 or #131, is probably the culprit since I think these are the >

Re: So, what's up with the XFree86 4.0 .debs?

Today's news flash: omitted words can really change the meaning of a sentence. On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:16:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > They're not available yet, so I am sending this message to apprise Debian > users my fellow developers of the situation. ...users AND my fellow develo

So, what's up with the XFree86 4.0 .debs?

I have been getting a fair amount of mail about this so I thought I would mail two of the most widely-read lists Debian has. Hopefully folks will agree with me that XFree86 4.0 support has ramifications for both users and developers. I don't subscribe to -user, so I will not see replies p