Dan Ritter wrote:
The web browser technology called WebRTC does that quite well,
but for security reasons -- nobody wants a self-perpetuating
worm -- you need an intermediary device to introduce the two
participants but not to actually transfer the file.
And so there is snapdrop.net, which you c
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 2:24 AM gene heskett wrote:
> Well, since I'm alone, my wife passed 3.5 years back, and was not
> computer literate, its my show. And sshfs Just Works. I use this machine
> as the src for my output for some 3d printers, although the 4 linuxcnc
> machines are largely standalo
On 6/1/24 06:07, Michael Grant wrote:
I use sshfs, works great to let me drop files on my server from my
desktop. But I wouldn't call that "file sharing". I probably would call
that a "network disk" or "remote mount".
There's probably some formal definition out there, but when I think of
fil
On Sat, 01 Jun 2024 10:06:43 +
"Michael Grant" wrote:
>
> To this day, I have yet ever to see an easy way to share a file
> between 2 devices without full internet connectivity, except by say
> getting one to run an ftp or ssh server and ftp or ssh'ing over the
> file between local ip addrs
Michael Grant wrote:
...
> I have long been plagued by the problem if sitting in a room or on a
> boat with someone, 2 devices right next to one another, and no trivially
> easy way to send a file from one device to the other without say first
> uploading it to some mutual third party (e.g. what
Michael Grant wrote:
> I have long been plagued by the problem if sitting in a room or on a boat
> with someone, 2 devices right next to one another, and no trivially easy way
> to send a file from one device to the other without say first uploading it
> to some mutual third party (e.g. whatsapp).
I use sshfs, works great to let me drop files on my server from my
desktop. But I wouldn't call that "file sharing". I probably would call
that a "network disk" or "remote mount".
There's probably some formal definition out there, but when I think of
file sharing, I think of someone profferin
On 5/31/24 22:37, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 31 May 2024 at 17:30:19 (+0100), mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-31 13:58, gene heskett wrote:
On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN
On Fri 31 May 2024 at 17:30:19 (+0100), mick.crane wrote:
> On 2024-05-31 13:58, gene heskett wrote:
> > On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
> > > On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
> > > > Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
&
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 01:16:28PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:30:19PM +0100, mick.crane wrote:
> > I only drag stuff in and out of the directory in Thunar. Dragging from the
> > directory takes a copy. I wondered what would happen if somebody deleted a
> > file while y
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:30:19PM +0100, mick.crane wrote:
> I only drag stuff in and out of the directory in Thunar. Dragging from the
> directory takes a copy. I wondered what would happen if somebody deleted a
> file while you were half way through fetching it.
If you're copying a file, that m
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:30:19PM +0100, mick.crane wrote:
[...]
> I only drag stuff in and out of the directory in Thunar. Dragging from the
> directory takes a copy. I wondered what would happen if somebody deleted a
> file while you were half way through fetching it.
This will depend on the
On 2024-05-31 13:58, gene heskett wrote:
On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:58:34AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
> > On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
> > > Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
> > > LAN? There have already been Loc
On 5/30/24 20:09, mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
problems.
I
Dear Richard,
But I never use pre-complied packages since by doing this I won't know whether
I will install proprietary binaries.
Yours,
Carter
On May 31, 2024 2:38:26 PM GMT+08:00, Richard wrote:
>LocalSend and LanXchange are available as precompiled archives. Also,
>LocalSend is available as
On 5/30/24 22:46, Carter Zhang wrote:
Dear Dan,
Thanks a lot for your reply but I am not clear how to use SFTP, SCP or
NFS on Android. Could you please show me how? Any help will be
appreciated.
(lines wrapped)
SFTP / SCP:
https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/pushpitha/50334853/1538653/1538653_80
Dear Richard,
Thank you for your reply. LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik,
Warpinator, TrebleShot have their respective problems.
LocalSend is not available in Debian's and Trisquel's official repositories,
and it is not so convenient to complie it from source using a machine w
Dear Dan,
Sorry I forgot an CC.
Thanks a lot for your reply but I am not clear how to use SFTP, SCP or NFS on
Android. Could you please show me how? Any help will be appreciated.
On May 29, 2024 11:37:55 PM GMT+08:00, Dan Ritter wrote:
>Carter Zhang wrote:
>> Dear Dan,
>>
>> Thanks a lot fo
On 5/30/24 20:08, mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
problems.
I
On 2024-05-29 15:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
problems.
I don't know if sshfs would have i
A client that by your own words barely works, while fully functional
alternatives have been available for many years already. So what's your
point?
Am Do., 30. Mai 2024 um 14:23 Uhr schrieb Anssi Saari <
anssi.sa...@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi>:
>
> Wow. I already mentioned an open source client? W
Richard writes:
> There have already been many answers. And since it's highly unlikely any
> third party will include support for such a
> closed down system, you might want to look at them. At least I don't think
> Google will suddenly open source Nearby Share
> for everyone to write clients f
There have already been many answers. And since it's highly unlikely any
third party will include support for such a closed down system, you might
want to look at them. At least I don't think Google will suddenly open
source Nearby Share for everyone to write clients for it.
Am Do., 30. Mai 2024 u
Carter Zhang writes:
> Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over LAN?
> There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange,
> LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
> problems.
I'd like to know too, assuming
On 5/29/24 13:34, Monte Milanuk wrote:
SyncThing
On 5/29/24 07:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
Hi,
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:07:17PM +0800, Carter Zhang wrote:
> Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files
> over LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
> NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have
> respective problems.
On 5/29/24 07:58, Curt wrote:
I travel to https://pairdrop.net/ on both devices on the LAN for
the occasional file transfer. There is an Android app, although you
don't need one (merely a browser).
Thanks for that... I may have to set that up with my wife's iPhone.
Getting her to use SyncT
SyncThing
On 5/29/24 07:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over
LAN? There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop,
NitroShare, Sharik, Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective
problems.
On Wed, 29 May 2024 22:07:17 +0800
Carter Zhang wrote:
> but they have respective problems.
We can't advise you very well if we don't know what you think their
respective problems are.
A more important question: What problem would you like to solve?
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
On 2024-05-29, Carter Zhang wrote:
>
> Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over LAN?
> There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik
> Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective problems=2E
I just go to https://pair
KDE connect? That has clients for many systems.
But the question is, what's the issue with the existing solutions? It's
quite a useless task to recommend file transfer apps when they all have the
same issue you try to avoid.
Richard
rsync - which is biderectional and uses checksums for correct transfer.
Best
Hans
On 5/29/24 10:07, Carter Zhang wrote:
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over LAN?
There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik,
Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective problems.
scp / sshd
nc, but you don'
Carter Zhang wrote:
> Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over LAN?
> There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik,
> Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective problems.
On the Debian side, options include:
- SFTP an
Are there any free apps for GNU/Linux and Android to share files over LAN?
There have already been LocalSend, LanXchange, LANDrop, NitroShare, Sharik,
Warpinator, TrebleShot, but they have respective problems.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 6:26 AM Curt wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-22, Reid wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry I irked you so much Curt, but you don't have to be rude.
>
> I'm Curt.
Let's be serious. You be Frank and I'll be Earnest.
On 2024-04-22, Reid wrote:
>
> I'm sorry I irked you so much Curt, but you don't have to be rude.
I'm Curt.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:02:09PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
> >> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
> >> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
> > but perhaps without all the decepti
>> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
>> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
>> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
> but perhaps without all the deception crap, unless you really mean
> to impugn the developers' motives.
Yu
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> That's probably a bug in Calamares. I checked with one of the live cd
> maintainers on this. As has been pointed out, the live cd is really
> intended more for checking than for major use but it does need some work.
> If you found the non-free compon
- Original message -
From: Curt
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote:
>
>> How can you be taken seriously when you can't even wrap your lines
>> according to our venerable guidelines?
>> Get a popular setting going, buddy.
>>
>> And, though it's true I extolled Proust recently, being succinct
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:31:03AM -0700, Reid wrote:
> Debian's policy change on non-free-firmware has made much of the Debian.org
> website very misleading, and some Debian OS installers have become very
> Free Software UNfriendly and deceptive. The following is my experience,
>
On 2024-04-22, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> I endure this on many other mailing lists unrelated to Debian,
> particularly from groups.io that have a Web interface.
It's a violation of Debian mailing list posting rules, guidelines, and
tips.
It irks me that in certain cases these guidelines are evoke
* On 2024 22 Apr 09:39 -0500, Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
> > You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
> > release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
> > not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy",
On 2024-04-22, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote:
>
>> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
>>> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
>>> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
>>> not what the Debian.or
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
>> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
>> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
>> not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We
On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
> not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We
> Are / What We Do" pages are current
On Sun Apr 21, 2024 at 9:58 PM BST, Reid wrote:
> If the Installers are not ALL going to give users the choice to opt-in
> or opt-out of non-free components, then those above-mentioned
> promotional pages really need to be updated so as to not be misleading
> users.
I'm sure th
Our Philosophy", and "Who We Are / What We Do" pages are currently
> promoting Debian as.
>
> That's not right. Period. If the Installers are not ALL going to
> give users the choice to opt-in or opt-out of non-free components,
> then those above-mentioned promo
On Sun 21 Apr 2024 at 21:59:21 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
>
> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
but perhaps without all the deception crap, un
> Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
> Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
Stefan
s
>> of the new policy on the download pages.
>
> Agreed. It should be easy to adjust the installation process with an
> extra step whether to include/install non-free-firmware or not.
> It's also an opportunity to raise awareness of the problem.
inent warnings
>> of the new policy on the download pages.
>
> Agreed. It should be easy to adjust the installation process with an
> extra step whether to include/install non-free-firmware or not.
> It's also an opportunity to raise awareness of the problem.
do you think the debian gods are listening
ges.
Agreed. It should be easy to adjust the installation process with an
extra step whether to include/install non-free-firmware or not.
It's also an opportunity to raise awareness of the problem.
Stefan
ly promoting Debian as.
That's not right. Period. If the Installers are not ALL going to give users the
choice to opt-in or opt-out of non-free components, then those above-mentioned
promotional pages really need to be updated so as to not be misleading users.
But BETTER yet, why not just
On 21 Apr 2024 11:31 -0700, from reid...@proinbox.com (Reid):
> I'm a 10+ year Debian user, and a longtime Free Software supporter.
> Two weeks ago I was shocked to discover 29 non-free components in
> the Debian desktop I'd been using for the last couple months. There
> had
Debian's policy change on non-free-firmware has made much of the Debian.org
website very misleading, and some Debian OS installers have become very Free
Software UNfriendly and deceptive. The following is my experience, and the
reasons why I believe Debian must re-word their promotiona
ly?
(Also I forgot to include that I have this driver installed on my current
machine
in the first email I included list of firmares - only this one was missed -
perhaps because it is in misc/main group in aptitude and not in
kernel/non-free-firmware)
Martin
On Wed 01 Nov 2023 at 14:42:17 (+0100), Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Marco M. wrote:
> > Am 01.11.2023 um 13:59:51 Uhr schrieb Martin:
> >
> > Do you have USB NICs?
> > Does your computer has an Ethernet NIC (wired)?
> >
> > Then use them for installing the packages.
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Marco M. wrote:
> Am 01.11.2023 um 13:59:51 Uhr schrieb Martin:
>
> Do you have USB NICs?
> Does your computer has an Ethernet NIC (wired)?
>
> Then use them for installing the packages.
I have one computer with wifi connection to internet.
The problem i
Am 01.11.2023 um 13:59:51 Uhr schrieb Martin:
> The problem is that my wifi receiver is not recognized by installer.
Do you have USB NICs?
Does your computer has an Ethernet NIC (wired)?
Then use them for installing the packages.
> My wifi adapter is TP-LINK TL-WN722N
Relevant is the USB-ID/PC
Hello,
I am currently using Sid version of Debian - in /etc/apt/sources.list i have:
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
non-free-firmware
non-free and non-free-firmware I have because of drivers I need for my machine
(most acute is wifi receiver, but i guess for
> :https://web.archive.org/web/20021211104811/http://www.deadearth.com/index.pl/legal
> * License : License GNU Free Documentation License v1.1 or any later
> version, no invariant sections or front and back text
> Programming Lang: unknown
> Description : tabletop rpg g
Joshua Allen wrote:
> deadEarth is a free and open TTRPG game for use in real
> life or online
Never heard of but sounds interesting, as technology, and
maybe even as a game.
Is it TT as in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabletop_Simulator
?
--
underground experts united
ps://web.archive.org/web/20021211104811/http://www.deadearth.com/index.pl/legal
> * License : License GNU Free Documentation License v1.1 or any later
> version, no invariant sections or front and back text
> Programming Lang: unknown
> Description : tabletop rpg game
&
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: deadearth
Version : second edition
Upstream Contact:i...@thegamecrafter.com
* URL
:https://web.archive.org/web/20021211104811/http://www.deadearth.com/index.pl/legal
* License : License GNU Free Documentation
> GlusterFS is vary simplistic to setup.
"simplistic" means something like *too* simple, which implies that it
is misleading.
You presumably meant "simple" or "very simple" :-)
Stefan
have same problem. And DRBD where
facing the problem also because of MTU.
DRBD is fastest of all.
Linstor on top of DRBD is a good one with extensive command line options. Linstor knows how to use ZFS and LVM to create volumes. A good status
overview. But Linstor is toward commercial and the
Mimiko writes:
Hello.
I would want to use a shared storage with docker to store volume so swarm
containers can use the volumes from different docker nodes.
As for now I tried glusterFS and linstor+drbd.
GlusterFS has a bug with slow replication and slow volume status
presentation or timing
Hello.
I would want to use a shared storage with docker to store volume so swarm
containers can use the volumes from different docker nodes.
As for now I tried glusterFS and linstor+drbd.
GlusterFS has a bug with slow replication and slow volume status presentation or timing out. Also directory
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 19:18:30 +0100
Computer Enthusiastic wrote:
> The web page used to search packages in Debian repositories at:
>
> https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
>
> seems not to search for packages in the recently created
> "non-free-firmware"
Hello,
The web page used to search packages in Debian repositories at:
https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
seems not to search for packages in the recently created
"non-free-firmware" section for bookwork and sid.
To whom this should be reported ?
Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 07:11:45AM -0500, Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
> I’d recommend contacting FSF for FSF questions, not Debian.
And I'd recommend against feeding trolls.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I’d recommend contacting FSF for FSF questions, not Debian.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 7:08 AM philip pocock
wrote:
> "While many groups and individuals have contributed to Linux, the largest
> single contributor is still the Free Software Foundation, which created not
> only most of
"While many groups and individuals have contributed to Linux, the largest
single contributor is still the Free Software Foundation, which created not
only most of the tools used in Linux, but also the philosophy and the
community that made Linux possible."
-- https://www.debian.org/relea
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 04:03:51 -0800
"Rick Thomas" wrote:
Hello Rick,
>So what do I need to add to my sources.list file to get them back now?
There was an announcement a few days ago, saying what to do. Typically,
I cannot find it ATM.
However, you simply need to add;
non-fre
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 23:21, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I've got a couple of Debian systems that (for various reasons) are running
> "testing" or "sid".
> I recently did
> apt update && apt upgrade && aptitude search '~o'
> on these machines and found that a number of firmware packages a
I've got a couple of Debian systems that (for various reasons) are running
"testing" or "sid". I recently did
apt update && apt upgrade && aptitude search '~o'
on these machines and found that a number of firmware packages are considered
"obsolete", presumably because they are no lo
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 21:19:55 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Sorry, that was my fault. I should have given the link to outcome of
> the vote as well, it was Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in
> installer, one installer"[1].
Thank you. My question is answered.
--
ven the link to outcome of
the vote as well, it was Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in
installer, one installer"[1].
Cheers,
Sven
1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2022/10/msg1.html
ller to do so. However, I am not
familiar enough with Debian processes to determine which language was
approved, so I could not determine the answer to my question.
> If you are making a wholly new install, I suspect that the change
> will be made for you if the need for non-free firmware is detected
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:09:27 +0100
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > To use the new section, edit sources.list like this:
> >
> > before:
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:09:27 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> To use the new section, edit sources.list like this:
>
> before:
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
>
> after:
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
>
Some news for you who are running unstable or testing/bookworm and have
firmware packages installed from non-free (most users who do not run
Debian in a VM probably have): these firmware packages are being moved
to a new section non-free-firmware, and you should update your
sources.list(5) entries
-
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/11.6.0+nonfree/amd64/iso-cd/firmware-11.6.0-amd64-netinst.iso
(CD size installer that requires network to continue to download)
-
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/11.6.0+nonfree/amd6
but i use hard disk installation method, i put firmware in same place as
iso image, installer can locate firmware without prompting me
that sport the latest Intel 12th generation
CPUs with Intel Iris Xe graphics and Intel AX211 wireless chipsets that are
capable of WiFi 6e. The current backported versions for Bullseye are more than
18 months' old.
Now is the time for maintainers to backport the latest non-free drivers in
p
Hi Leroy,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 07:43:45AM +, Leroy McFarland wrote:
> The non-free drivers in Bullseye's repos are dated 20210315, more than a year
> ago.
What is the package name that you are looking at within non-free?
Once you've worked that out, the next step is pr
Hi
The non-free drivers in Bullseye's repos are dated 20210315, more than a year
ago.
Could the maintainers build a backport that contains 20220815 or 20220913
drivers please?
Thanks.
Leroy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RWdELdiws4&t=5756s
On 9/13/22, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Ansgar writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 21:03 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>> My experience is the same as you describe, with the free installer:
>&
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 07:38:55AM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
[...]
> Thanks Tomas
You're welcome :)
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:29 AM wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 07:19:10AM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Is there a non-free installer for bookworm?
>
> Somewhere below here:
>
>
> https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-fre
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 07:19:10AM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> All,
>
> Is there a non-free installer for bookworm?
Somewhere below here:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/daily-builds/sid_d-i/current/
...depending on what
All,
Is there a non-free installer for bookworm?
Thanks
Tim
very much interested to get a live CD from you, please
> > > > what are the prerequisites that are needed to be archived this request
> > > > free
> > > > cd for free from you.
> > >
> > > See here:
> > >
> > > https:
On 2022-02-14, Celejar wrote:
>>
>> Because your premise is false, and there is no equivalence between time
>> and money.
>
> I have no premise of an "equivalence" between time and money; the
> question of why people distinguish between them is nevertheless a
People distinguish between them exac
erequisites that are needed to be archived this request free
>> > cd for free from you.
>>
>> See here:
>>
>> https://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd
>>
>> Since burning a CD and putting into the mail costs money, you can't
>> expect someone
Celejar wrote:
>
> I have no premise of an "equivalence" between time and money; the
> question of why people distinguish between them is nevertheless a
> legitimate one, since they are both scarce resources which people have
> to prioritize and allocate between their own personal needs and those
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 12:36:04 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2022-02-11, Celejar wrote:
> >>
> >> https://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd
> >>
> >> Since burning a CD and putting into the mail costs money, you can't
> >> expect someon
1 - 100 of 3199 matches
Mail list logo
