Hi.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 07:48:38PM +0200, n...@dismail.de wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 07:04:36PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > afirefox: After using an affected Firefox profile
> >
> > Ok, let's breakdown it (left is aboot, right is afirefox).
> > Here we see about 2Gb of memory
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 07:04:36PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > afirefox: After using an affected Firefox profile
>
> Ok, let's breakdown it (left is aboot, right is afirefox).
> Here we see about 2Gb of memory consumed:
>
> MemFree:32124660 kB / MemFree:30144704 kB
>
> Such
Hi.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 05:06:01PM +0200, n...@dismail.de wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 05:10:07PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > /proc/meminfo (please *do not soft* it), and the output of slabtop.
> > If you're need to understand where all that memory gone - you're in need
> > of proper
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 05:10:07PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> /proc/meminfo (please *do not soft* it), and the output of slabtop.
> If you're need to understand where all that memory gone - you're in need
> of proper tools.
I have saved the output of slabtop and /proc/meminfo for:
aboot: Directly
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 10:12:52AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Did this cause a problem, or are you chasing a number you don't
> like?
I avoided possible problems until now, as every time I expected to need a lot
of memory and the "used memory" was larger than expected I rebooted beforehand.
Also
Dan Ritter (12020-03-28):
> Is this causing a problem for you?
Not understanding something is a problem by itself.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n...@dismail.de wrote:
> after upgrading my hardware I started to notice what seemed like memory
> leaks.
Did this cause a problem, or are you chasing a number you don't
like?
> 650MiB(with MATE) of RAM are being used and after extended use, when closing
> all
> gui-
Hi.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 02:56:37PM +0100, n...@dismail.de wrote:
> But now I would often end up with something between +600MiB and +2.5GiB.
> When looking at top or htop no process using nearly that much memory is
> listed.
/proc/meminfo (please *do not soft* it), and the output of
Hi everyone,
after upgrading my hardware I started to notice what seemed like memory leaks.
After booting my desktop machine usually around 450MiB(with i3) or
650MiB(with MATE) of RAM are being used and after extended use, when closing all
gui-programs except a terminal, based on prior
On 10/22/2015 08:23 AM, David Wright wrote:
Quoting Marc Shapiro (marcns...@gmail.com):
On 10/20/2015 11:33 PM, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote on 10/21/2015 06:52:
Something is not freeing up memory. It may, or may not be Firefox, but... I
can exit all programs and all
On 2015-10-23 at 14:06, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 23 October 2015 18:20:10 Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
>
>> For people in my cognitive (disability type)
>
> [earlier]
>
>> 4 open windows with ~350 tabs open between them on 1GB memory.
>> Again. lol =)
>
> You claim to have cognitive
On Friday 23 October 2015 18:20:10 Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> For people in my cognitive
> (disability type)
[earlier]
> 4 open windows with ~350 tabs open between them on 1GB memory. Again. lol
> =)
You claim to have cognitive disability, yet you can keep track of ~350 tabs???
I can't _see_
Hi.
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:20:10 -0400
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> 4 open windows with ~350 tabs open between them on 1GB memory. Again. lol =)
It's possible with iceweasel/firefox. The trick is that firefox
'cheats' and does not load inactive tabs.
So, open
On 10/22/15, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 1er brumaire, an CCXXIV, Marc Shapiro a écrit :
>> Google was my friend and showed me how to free up that memory ('free &&
>> sync
>> && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches && free' as root) and all is now
>> good
>> with the world.
>
Le duodi 2 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Cindy-Sue Causey a écrit :
> Your statement left me confused so I just bypassed it (but kept it
> and Tomas' in mind). Five seconds later I entered that full command
> into a search engine. For others likewise confused but less bold about
> speaking up, this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:26:14AM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
[...]
> Don Armstrong had also suggested checking the cache and buffers,
> which I had forgotten to do when I restarted [...]
To quote an old Linux saw (which just paraphrases many
Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:20:10 -0400
> Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
>
> > 4 open windows with ~350 tabs open between them on 1GB memory. Again. lol =)
>
> It's possible with iceweasel/firefox. The trick is that firefox
>
On 10/20/2015 11:33 PM, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote on 10/21/2015 06:52:
Something is not freeing up memory. It may, or may not be Firefox, but... I
can exit all programs and all instances of X, leaving only a single console
running. Top will show itself and bash, nothing
Le primidi 1er brumaire, an CCXXIV, Marc Shapiro a écrit :
> Google was my friend and showed me how to free up that memory ('free && sync
> && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches && free' as root) and all is now good
> with the world.
I hope you realize this is only useful for debugging purposes.
Quoting Marc Shapiro (marcns...@gmail.com):
> On 10/20/2015 11:33 PM, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> >Marc Shapiro wrote on 10/21/2015 06:52:
> >
> >>Something is not freeing up memory. It may, or may not be Firefox, but...
> >>I
> >>can exit all programs and all instances of X, leaving only a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18/10/15 20:53, Don Armstrong wrote:
> a plugin or add-on which is buggy
I second that.
I have this issue with a bug in a thunderbird plugin, goes crazy and
eats the memory.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/10/15 15:26, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> So how do I tell what is using up the memory and not freeing it up?
> Is there a way to free that memory without having to reboot?
ps -eo pid --sort rss | tail -1 | xargs sudo strace -fp
would show what the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/10/15 15:26, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Is there a way to free that memory without having to reboot?
yep, typically when your machine goes super slow due to memory you can
always drop to a tty ps and kill the process which will bring your
machine
Marc Shapiro wrote on 10/21/2015 06:52:
> Something is not freeing up memory. It may, or may not be Firefox, but... I
> can exit all programs and all instances of X, leaving only a single console
> running. Top will show itself and bash, nothing else, but free can show over
> 2GB used. If I
On 10/18/2015 12:53 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Marc Shapiro wrote:
When I do have to do a reboot I close down everything to a single
console running. I then run top and it only shows bash and top. Next
time I will run top and include root and daemon processes and see if
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> When I do have to do a reboot I close down everything to a single
> console running. I then run top and it only shows bash and top. Next
> time I will run top and include root and daemon processes and see if
> anything shows up. I am guessing that this is
On 10/13/2015 07:32 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2015-10-13 at 10:26, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Is there a way to determine what is using up my memory? I have an
8GB system and every few days the memory usage rises to over 7 GB and
up to a GB, or more of swap is used. Granted, I have 3 X sessions
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Is there a way to determine what is using up my memory? I have an 8GB
> system and every few days the memory usage rises to over 7 GB and up
> to a GB, or more of swap is used. Granted, I have 3 X sessions
> running, along with 2 instances of Firefox and
Is there a way to determine what is using up my memory? I have an 8GB
system and every few days the memory usage rises to over 7 GB and up to
a GB, or more of swap is used. Granted, I have 3 X sessions running,
along with 2 instances of Firefox and one of Chrome, not to mention up
to 3
On 2015-10-13 at 10:26, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Is there a way to determine what is using up my memory? I have an
> 8GB system and every few days the memory usage rises to over 7 GB and
> up to a GB, or more of swap is used. Granted, I have 3 X sessions
> running, along with 2 instances of
Hello,
I tried to update my Lenny box, and I got an error: no space left on device.
Tried aptitude autoclean, clean, but no luck. I known, it is my own fault, I
was too lazy to change the partition scheme give by the D-I at installation.
Anyway, there is a line command to use to change the
Thierry Chatelet:
Anyway, there is a line command to use to change the amount of reserved space
on the partition. I have used it some time ago, but forgot what it is. If
some one could refresh my memory
You are looking for tune2fs (if you are using ext2/ext3).
J.
--
People talking a
On Thu August 28 2008 03:27:37 Thierry Chatelet wrote:
I tried to update my Lenny box, and I got an error: no space left on
device. Tried aptitude autoclean, clean, but no luck. I known, it is my own
fault, I was too lazy to change the partition scheme give by the D-I at
installation. Anyway,
by the D-I at installation.
Anyway, there is a line command to use to change the amount of reserved space
on the partition. I have used it some time ago, but forgot what it is. If
some one could refresh my memory
Thanks.
Thierry
This is not very clear; your subject says 'memory leaks
subject says 'memory leaks', but 'no space
left on device' sounds like a disk partition is full. Which one? Say
my own, of course plus but forgot what it is seem to indicate
that his brains are leaking out his ears.
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Do not bite at the bait of pleasure till
refresh my memory
Thanks.
Thierry
This is not very clear; your subject says 'memory leaks', but 'no space
left on device' sounds like a disk partition is full. Which one? Say
my own, of course plus but forgot what it is seem to indicate
that his brains are leaking out his ears
Hi!
Sometimes I experience system hangs because of memory leaks. A process
with a memory leak eats all memory till the system starts swapping.
Only a few seconds after the process was started the system slows down
till it is practically useless. I believe this could be prevented by
deactivating
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 09:50:39PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
Hi!
Sometimes I experience system hangs because of memory leaks. A process
with a memory leak eats all memory till the system starts swapping.
Only a few seconds after the process was started the system slows down
till
Hey,
I am running a quite standard Debian woody setup with the kernel 2.4.18
that comes from the packages. The 2 HDs are in a RAID0, formatted as
ext3, with quota installed. Problem is that for some reason after about
1 week the 1 Gb of RAM is completely filled and when looking in top or
ps I
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:03:22PM +0200, Thomas De Groote said
Hey,
I am running a quite standard Debian woody setup with the kernel 2.4.18
that comes from the packages. The 2 HDs are in a RAID0, formatted as
ext3, with quota installed. Problem is that for some reason after about
1 week
On the box I was talking about:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free
total used free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem:901440 441232 460208 0 90296
247512
-/+ buffers/cache: 103424 798016
Swap: 481928 0 481928
[EMAIL
[Please don't top post! It makes your message harder to read,
especially in long threads.]
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:23:51PM +0200, Thomas De Groote said
On the box I was talking about:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free
total used free sharedbuffers
cached
Quoting Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also remember that when trying to diagnose the problem no memory is
normal. Linux (the kernel) will use as much memory as it can get away with
for buffers and caching. I'm hopping in at the middle here so you might
have mentioned that you're aware
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Steve Lamb wrote:
I know there was a program that was much like top except it recorded all
processes that had run along with their peak memory usage, CPU usage over its
run, etc. I forget the name of it. Hopefully someone knows of the utility I
am referring to and
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:10:40 -0400 (EDT)
Arthur H. Johnson II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its called atop. It records top info in a binary database every 5 minutes
or so and lets you page through it at your liesure.
Nope. Took a look at atop and it is completely different than the one I
am
hi,
after boot my system runs out of memory in ~36-48 hours.
i have rebooted my machine and let it sit there, only logging into a
virtual console to run top. it still runs out of memory with no other
user applications running than top.
so i believe that a daemon process has a memory leak.
Thus spake matt zagrabelny:
hi,
after boot my system runs out of memory in ~36-48 hours.
i have rebooted my machine and let it sit there, only logging into a
virtual console to run top. it still runs out of memory with no other
user applications running than top.
What do you mean by
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 15:44, Nathan Poznick wrote:
Thus spake matt zagrabelny:
hi,
after boot my system runs out of memory in ~36-48 hours.
i have rebooted my machine and let it sit there, only logging into a
virtual console to run top. it still runs out of memory with no other
matt == matt zagrabelny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
matt hi, after boot my system runs out of memory in ~36-48 hours.
What precisely happens when you run out of memory? Also, what
version of Debian are you running.
Cheers!
Shyamal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 17:45, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
matt == matt zagrabelny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
matt hi, after boot my system runs out of memory in ~36-48 hours.
What precisely happens when you run out of memory? Also, what
version of Debian are you running.
the normal
matt zagrabelny wrote:
i am running unstable. yikes! no not yikes, this is the first
_serious_ problem i have run into, and my guess is other people
running unstable dont have this problem, so i dont blame unstable.
but i am not experienced enough to debug this one on my own except
every
matt zagrabelny wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 17:45, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
matt == matt zagrabelny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
matt hi, after boot my system runs out of memory in ~36-48 hours.
What precisely happens when you run out of memory? Also, what
version of Debian are you running.
Also sprach matt zagrabelny (Mon 23 Jun 02003 at 03:17:47PM -0500):
hi,
after boot my system runs out of memory in ~36-48 hours.
i have rebooted my machine and let it sit there, only logging into a
virtual console to run top. it still runs out of memory with no other
user applications
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, matt zagrabelny wrote:
hi,
after boot my system runs out of memory in ~36-48 hours.
i have rebooted my machine and let it sit there, only logging into a
virtual console to run top. it still runs out of memory with no other
user applications running than top.
so i
Hi there,
On Die, 2003-06-24 at 04:13, Erik Steffl wrote:
What precisely happens when you run out of memory? Also, what
version of Debian are you running.
the normal scenario is i leave my computer running at night and then i
come down in the morning and find applications (usually the
matt == matt zagrabelny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
matt note: i dont think the leak is in the normal applications as
matt mentioned in previous email, something seems to be gobling
matt up memory even before i log in to an x environment.
What do you have matching /etc/rc2.d/S* on
On 23 Jun 2003 20:33:14 -0500
matt zagrabelny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am running unstable. yikes! no not yikes, this is the first _serious_
problem i have run into, and my guess is other people running unstable
dont have this problem, so i dont blame unstable.
Just wanted to confirm
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Antony Gelberg wrote:
matt zagrabelny wrote:
i am running unstable. yikes! no not yikes, this is the first
_serious_ problem i have run into, and my guess is other people
running unstable dont have this problem, so i dont blame unstable.
but i am not experienced
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 03:17:47PM -0500, matt zagrabelny wrote:
hi,
after boot my system runs out of memory in ~36-48 hours.
i have rebooted my machine and let it sit there, only logging into a
virtual console to run top. it still runs out of memory with no other
user applications
Hi,
I am tired of memory leaks, and the first step in solving them is figuring out
what is causing them.
today is a typical example. My box has been up for 5 days, running a single
gdm gnome/nautilus session the entire time. mozilla has been running pretty
much the entire time, with lots
Hi ppl,
I'm using Debian 3.0, kernel 2.4.18,KDE 3.1 on a P4 2.2 with 512MB RAM and 256
MB Swap.
I've noticed that in a few days time or weeks the system slows down i.e screen
refresh takes longer, apps may take longer to launch,etc.
The apps I typically use are
that's causing the error.
I would however like if there was a better way to detect if an apps leaking
memory. I don't have source codes of many of the apps so I can't run it in a
typical debugger.
'valgrind' should detect memory leaks even if you don't have the source
and don't have debugging
by
free was 50 MB higher than just after reboot. Is 2.0.31 known to
suffer from memory leaks and bad behaviour when exhausting virtual
memory? That would be very bad for a Unix kernel. What is the latest
really stable kernel? 2.0.27?
Another thing is that swapon does not let me add more than 8
63 matches
Mail list logo