On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 14:39 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
Thanks, Thomas.
I did get the signers key fingeprints from their personal github pages. I
would go the full security route if it were only my use I'm concerned with,
but I'm working on a Raku module for others and I don't want them to be
"Thomas Schmitt" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tom Browder wrote:
> > I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> > Rakudo downloadable files.
>
> Do i get it right that you talk about https://rakudo.org/downloads ?
>
> >
Hi,
Tom Browder wrote:
> I found a usable answer. Run "gpg file.asc" and the output shows the two
> fingerprints: the primary key fingerprint and the subkey fingerprint.
Wow, that's surprising.
But indeed the man page says:
COMMANDS
...
gpg may be run with no commands, in which case i
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 05:13 Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 3:29 AM DdB
> wrote:
> > Am 08.10.2023 um 01:16 schrieb Tom Browder:
> > > I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> > > Rakudo downloadable files.
> > &
Hi,
maybe
gpg --keyid-format long --verify signature_file.asc /some/dummy/file
this gives me the last 16 characters of the fingerprint. Like:
gpg:using key E9CBDFC0ABC0A854
with a matching payload file i get something like:
Primary key fingerprint: 44BC 9FD0 D688 EB
On Oct 08, 2023, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 3:29 AM DdB
> wrote:
> > Am 08.10.2023 um 01:16 schrieb Tom Browder:
> > > I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> > > Rakudo downloadable files.
> > > Quest
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 3:29 AM DdB
wrote:
> Am 08.10.2023 um 01:16 schrieb Tom Browder:
> > I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> > Rakudo downloadable files.
> > Question: How can I get the fingerprint from the downloads?
> There
Hi,
Tom Browder wrote:
> I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of Rakudo
> downloadable files.
Do i get it right that you talk about https://rakudo.org/downloads ?
> Question: How can I get the fingerprint from the downloads?
> The products I dow
Am 08.10.2023 um 01:16 schrieb Tom Browder:
> I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> Rakudo downloadable files.
>
> Question: How can I get the fingerprint from the downloads?
>
> The products I download are (1) the file of interest, (2) a
I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of Rakudo
downloadable files.
Question: How can I get the fingerprint from the downloads?
The products I download are (1) the file of interest, (2) a PGP signed
checksums file with various shaX hashes for the file, and
Hi,
sorry for this german mail which i sent to debian-user by mistake.
(I was asked by the xorriso maintainer of another distro to upload my
public PGP key to the keyserver which the distro uses. Hopefully i was
able to fulfill that wish and did not publish any secrets of mine.)
Have a nice
Hi,
> siehst Du eine Möglichkeit Deinen PGP-Schlüssel auf keys.openpgp.org zu
> verwalten und die E-Mail-Adresse freizugeben?
Ich habe die Ausgabe von
gpg --export scdbac...@gmx.net
hochgeladen. (Ich haette ja gerne inspiziert, was in dem Ausgabefile
steht, aber soweit bringt mich &q
Marco Möller wrote:
> So, unfortunately I am still in need to find more information about the
> two different (or in the end not different?) GUI tools concerning their
> PGP functionality.
>
Focus on kgpg for now and start with PGP and OpenGPG (gnupg)
https://www.openpgp.org/
Th
Kleopatra appears to be kind of a GUI database manager for managing PGP
keys and also X.509 certificates.
But installing them both and comparing there PGP related offers without
understanding too much about the topic, Kleopatra seems, like Kgpg, the
same being a GUI frontend to GnuPG, also
On Lu, 31 mai 21, 22:57:26, deloptes wrote:
>
> gnupg is the mother of all open source pgp stuff. In fact you must know that
> PGP is the commercial implementation of a standard for symetric encryption
> (I hope I am not wrong in my wording while citing from memory)
PGP support
Marco Möller wrote:
> Could someone explain for a raw beginner concerning the usage of PGP the
> difference between Kleopatra and Kgpg, what the typical work case is for
> the one and the other, what important feature the one and the other is
> missing?
>
apt-cache show kleopat
Hello,
Could someone explain for a raw beginner concerning the usage of PGP the
difference between Kleopatra and Kgpg, what the typical work case is for
the one and the other, what important feature the one and the other is
missing?
Sorry for the related but low specific questions in the
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, pjw wrote:
Since July ProtonMail is now fully interoperable with
other PGP mail clients.
Now that is a nice piece of news.
--
Fraught with portent
On 2018-07-08 18:18, HP Garcia wrote:
Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
Thanks in advance
roundcube with enigma plugin
dunno if it is working
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
0x4BFEBB31.asc
Description: application/pgp
On 18-07-08 14:42:54, Jude DaShiell wrote:
If you can live with the configuration mutt or neomutt can fill the
bill.
I can never truly recommend mutt to people who aren't used to terminal
apps.
That said, it's a great piece of software and the PGP handling in
particular is really
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, HP Garcia wrote:
> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 13:18:25
> From: HP Garcia
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: PGP Email Client
> Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 17:18:45 + (UTC)
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> Can anyone recomm
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 10:18:25 -0700,
HP Garcia wrote:
>Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
>using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
>
Why not Claws-Mail? With the correct plugins (claws-mail-pgpinline or
claws-mail-pgpmime) that should be packaged in Debian it ha
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 10:18:25 -0700
HP Garcia wrote:
Hello HP,
>Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
>using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
CM; Install the relevant plugin(s) and you're ready.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The
On 7/8/2018 7:18 PM, HP Garcia wrote:
Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
https://www.claws-mail.org/plugin.php?plugin=gpg
Thunderbird with enigmail.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/digitally-signing-and-encrypting-mes
Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
Thanks in advance
--
HP Garcia KM6JBI
www.HPGPhotography.com
Hi,
GC wrote:
> I would like to get a PGP SIGNED MESSAGE. How do I do that?
For production, see chapter 1 of GPG documentatio,
"Getting Started":
https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/c14.html
(note the swapping of "g" and "p" in comparison to PGP.)
The manu
On 18/11/15 18:19, GC wrote:
> I would like to get a PGP SIGNED MESSAGE. How do I do that?
Could you be more specific?
If it was just your goal in life to have someone send an OpenPGP signed
email, you can cross that off your "bucket list".
I suspect that was not your aim tho
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:19:24 -0800
GC wrote:
Hello GC,
>I would like to get a PGP SIGNED MESSAGE. How do I do that?
Wait for somebody to send you one.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Well you
I would like to get a PGP SIGNED MESSAGE. How do I do that?
second.
Wow. How did it happen? Where did he take previous signature?
pgpDyPp3ooIlV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
image.debian.org
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.2.0/amd64/iso-dvd/SHA512SUMS.sign:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABCAAGBQJSWw5jAAoJENqH6A1ilL6bQ80QAOBDh5Sot0bcIPLXE0L7T8kU
KJUSdQRcjTvwpW76BB7ekC6/gAfyHO7hd857vO6SI+78seLlbh3MBJ6swmn3WAcS
YmxhD
ng RSA key ID 6294BE9B
gpg: Good signature from "Debian CD signing key "
--------
pgpmUa8nf05o5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
What is this? The file on official cd mirror is different.
SHA512SUMS
Description: Attachment: SHA512SUMS
SHA512SUMS.sign
Description: Attachment: SHA512SUMS.sign
h messages (especially
> encodings).
When I have time. I have been busy lately.
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
--
[Mika Suomalainen](https://mkaysi.github.com/) ||
[gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
4DB53CFE82A46728](http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/key.txt) ||
[Why do I
Hopefully not reigniting this...
On Ma, 08 mai 12, 05:43:17, Indulekha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting this with most gog/pgp-signed mails received
> from this list (using mutt):
This part has been solved, but since it is highly unlikely for you to
have a trust path to my key y
This is an interesting thread for me. I can see (I think!) the various
points that have been made, but as it is, I feel, it's mostly trivial.
If I write to this list, or others, or friends, or colleagues, why do
I need to identify myself? Or require someone to find my public key to
read or confirm
en if I would see cryptic lines at the bottom of
> my mails, but IMO we should avoid photos as thumbnails, PGP, HTML.
You are entitled to that opinion ☺
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
The Signature from someone else:
"Confidence is what you have before you understand a problem"
- Woody Allen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/133667150
le ID cards, anyway, this in addition won't make mailing list
mails more true or less true. There's more untruth for notarized papers
than for non-notarized papers. Why should things become better with
openPGP signing?
Again, I don't care, even if I would see cryptic lines at the
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:17:17PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Regarding to security. Assumed somebody always sign the mails to a
> mailing list. Isn't it possible that somebody hacks the view of a
> mailing list archive? Make it look like if a nice guy said odd things
> for signed mails. He never
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 14:56 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2012 23:22:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 20:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> What is what you understand by "dirty"?
> >>
> >> I can send the same spam, virus-inside or crap message with a signature
>
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 20:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:33:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
> >> Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will
> >> improve securit
On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:33:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will
>> improve security when reading/posting e-mails >;-)
>
> AFAIK a signed message can't
Regarding to security. Assumed somebody always sign the mails to a
mailing list. Isn't it possible that somebody hacks the view of a
mailing list archive? Make it look like if a nice guy said odd things
for signed mails. He never did, the mails were not hacked, just the view
of the web page is hack
ok here.
This is only visible if I explicitly view the source:
--enigD875626BE35FED68C9AA150D
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filenam
won't probably find any relation to my key, because
of
https://github.com/Mkaysi/mkaysi.github.com/blob/master/PGP/WhyDoISignEmails.html.md#your-signature-doesnt-mean-anything-anyway-because-you-arent-part-of-any-trust-web
.
I will now continue this policy,
https://github.com/Mkaysi/mkaysi.git
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> When the subject was "gpg/pgp noise" Jon Dowland wrote: "I clearly
> explained that his key was signed by another he owned, which in turn was
> signed by *someone else entirely*."
>
> A chain of
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
> Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will
> improve security when reading/posting e-mails >;-)
AFAIK a signed message can't become dirty. So it's secure that nobody
add a word, removed a word or co
.)
> If you really need security, than you need to take care about many
> things using PGP. I only use openPGP from time to time, to ensure that
> just a special person can read this mail, but not to be completely
> secure. I don't need knowledge about how to handle PGP correct and I
&
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:20:08PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> 09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >> Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
> >> You waste our time and bandwi
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:28:35AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> > You must be from up north, LOL!
>
> Now *that's* rude.
Only if you're from up north, and from where I'm sitting that includes
just about everyone. :(=)
--
"Religion is e
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Mika Suomalainen
wrote:
> 09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti:
>> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
>>> You waste our time and bandwidth.
>&g
If this discussion can't be stopped, than perhaps we can make it a
useful thread, by not talking about how to behave or not to behave on a
mailing list, by not talking about if we won't signed emails or not.
When the subject was "gpg/pgp noise" Jon Dowland wrote: "I clear
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:37:23AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The signature of Tiberius was trusted by Pilatus and Herodes. The
> signature of Philippus wasn't trusted by Lysanias or anybody els.
>
> I couldn't find a key on public servers for Hannas and Kaiphas, but
> fortunately the key of Joh
e key holder (or
> another person called Mika?), using a key that was signed... by (Mika).
>
> That's *not* a chain of trust.
I clearly explained that his key was signed by another he owned, which in turn
was signed by *someone else entirely*. You are committing a more serious
mailing li
On 09/05/12 19:39, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:20:15PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 09/05/12 18:56, Jon Dowland wrote:
>>> In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
>>> are valid.
>>
>> All his posts?
>> Is cutting and pasting a hobby?
>> Do yo
On Wed, 09 May 2012 11:37:23 +0200, Ralf wrote in message
<1336556243.2171.373.camel@precise>:
> Or would it be a good idea t close this thread?
>
> Regards,
> Ralf
..+5. ;o)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry.
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:39 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> we can then verify his signed messages in the past
Why should anybody be interested in verifying any mailing list mail?
Somebody might change the content of mails without signature?
So we should ensure that somebody really finished the mail w
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 09:56 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
> > You waste our time and bandwidth.
>
> In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fi
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:20:15PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 09/05/12 18:56, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
> > are valid.
>
> All his posts?
> Is cutting and pasting a hobby?
> Do you between "some" and "all"?
The ones I've b
09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
>> You waste our time and bandwidth.
>
> In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatur
On 09/05/12 18:56, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
>> You waste our time and bandwidth.
>
> In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:23:06AM +0200, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Am 08.05.2012 13:11, schrieb Indulekha:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> >>
> >
t;Delivered-To"
> are added, as are all kinds of "X-stuff" ones). Does PGP/MIME really
> protect all headers (beyond the MIME ones)? It really breaks if *any*
> headers are modified? Please provide documentation.
Writing off the top of my head, you may wish to verify everyth
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
> You waste our time and bandwidth.
In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
are valid.
> Bob's key validates his identity - yours
Am 08.05.2012 13:11, schrieb Indulekha:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqPsiAAoJECPmYW6gk8JjitcH/RGtSdn39OPewwyXYgebGiUy
>> Ws29uZkfae4Ll
lack Ops?
>
> If I recall correctly, Bob has told that his email address has been
> spoofed to this list and he signs everything what he sends (as far as
> I can see).
Seven reasons you shouldn't compare your posts, or your use of PGP with
Bob (Proulx):-
Bob's PGP signature is valid
Indulekha wrote:
> Anyone know a way to simply filter out all that annoying gpg/pgp noise?
> I don't actually care if it really works, just don't want to see the garbage
> huge
> blocks of text and error messages.
If you don't care about signatures, tell m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Celejar wrote:
>On Tue, 08 May 2012 14:53:30 +0300
>Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> 08.05.2012 14:45, Jochen Spieker kirjoitti:
>> > Indulekha:
>>
On Tue, 08 May 2012 14:53:30 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> 08.05.2012 14:45, Jochen Spieker kirjoitti:
> > Indulekha:
> >>
> >> No, I think you may have an incorrect or incomplete
> >> confi
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 21:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> *chuckle*
>
> Perhaps I'm now unsubscribed to debian-users too?! This mail didn't came
> through the list or simply wasn't forwarded to myself by the list.
Everything is ok. So at least at the moment subscribing and
unsubscribing is easy to
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 21:07 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 20:37 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 20:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 18:32 +0200, an unknown sender wrote:
> > > > Doesn't digest send only one email in 24 hours?
> > >
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 20:37 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 20:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 18:32 +0200, an unknown sender wrote:
> > > Doesn't digest send only one email in 24 hours?
> >
> > No, it belongs to the volume, how many digest a day will be
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 20:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 18:32 +0200, an unknown sender wrote:
> > Doesn't digest send only one email in 24 hours?
>
> No, it belongs to the volume, how many digest a day will be send.
>
> FWIW I again reversed my subscription by
>
> http://w
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 18:32 +0200, an (not really) unknown sender
(Camaleón) wrote:
> On Tue, 08 May 2012 16:57:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> > Btw. if people wish to sign mails to Linux mailing lists, they should
> > do. IMO it's nonsense to sign mails to Linux mailing lists. For w
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 18:32 +0200, an unknown sender wrote:
> Doesn't digest send only one email in 24 hours?
No, it belongs to the volume, how many digest a day will be send.
FWIW I again reversed my subscription by
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/unsubscribe
[x] debian-user-digest
Your E-Ma
On Tue, 08 May 2012 16:57:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
(...)
> Btw. if people wish to sign mails to Linux mailing lists, they should
> do. IMO it's nonsense to sign mails to Linux mailing lists. For what do
> you need signing?
+5
I also find it senseless and not just for mailing lists.
Greeti
On Tue, 08 May 2012 09:35:08 -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:11:32PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> > Anyone know a way to simply filter out all that annoying gpg/pgp
>> > noise?
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> IIRC, Mutt does not aut
Could you all please discuss this off-list? Thank you! I receive digest,
because I wish to have less traffic. But now I receive tons of digest
just about this discussion. Since digest isn't correct formated anymore,
it already isn't a pleasure to read it, resp. to sort out what I won't
read isn't e
08.05.2012 17:57, Ralf Mardorf kirjoitti:
> Could you all please discuss this off-list? Thank you! I receive digest,
> because I wish to have less traffic. But now I receive tons of digest
> just about this discussion. Since digest isn't correct formated anymore,
> it already isn't a pleasure to re
08.05.2012 17:19, Lars Noodén kirjoitti:
> My guess would be somewhere here:
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/
> The response from IRC might be more precise. But once it is entered, it
> is easier to find out if it is really an upstream problem.
>
> Regards
> /Lars
This bug is now reported.
On Tue, 08 May 2012 13:00:26 +0100, Phil wrote in message
<4fa90ada.80...@gmail.com>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/05/12 12:57, Indulekha wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:53:30PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> > 08.05.2012 1
easier to find out if it is really an upstream problem.
>
> Regards
> /Lars
>
>
That page links to wiki page, which asks running reportbug .
PS. My emails to this list should be signed with PGP/MIME with
instructions form someone who is reading this list with newsgroup and
canno
On 5/8/12 4:35 PM, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> 08.05.2012 16:09, Lars Noodén kirjoitti:
[snip]
>> For Canonical's products, the bug should be in in Launchpad. If
>> you point to it, we can add to it.
[snip]
> What would be the correct project at Launchpad to report this bug? I
> have just pinged peo
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:11:32PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 08 May 2012 05:43:17 -0500, Indulekha wrote:
>
> > I'm getting this with most gog/pgp-signed mails received from this list
> > (using mutt):
> >
> > [-- PGP output follows (current ti
uto-key-retrieve
> to ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf .
>
> PS. If anyone is interested, my gpg.conf can be found at
> https://github.com/Mkaysi/shell-things/blob/master/gnupg/gpg.conf .
>
This is my configuration and it's never had a problem with a single
mailing list. I'm
On Tue, 08 May 2012 05:43:17 -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> I'm getting this with most gog/pgp-signed mails received from this list
> (using mutt):
>
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue 08 May 2012 05:35:27 AM CDT) --]
> gpgkeys: key 7356B378DEA22DE9 not found on keyserv
Okay, yes I'm top-posting get over it...
Are you fraking kidding me? All this fscking drivel filling up the
Debian mailing list because Ubuntu and other mailing lists don't
properly handle PGP/MIME open standard signed email messages? Is that
why my mailbox is gettin
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:41:29PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/05/12 14:35, Indulekha wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:26:47AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Mika Suomalaine
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:28:35AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> > And on top of it, everyone else on the list gets held hostage
> > and is forced to jump through so many hoopes just to avoid being
> > inconvenienced.
> >
> > So rude...
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:46:40PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:38:49AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> > They don't support the considerate version of gpg/pgp.
> > Now that I know that people using this actually have a choice and
> > choose to be ru
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:50:22PM +0200, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>
> Are you receiving the missing keys from keyserver automatically? You
> can do this by adding
> > keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve
> to ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf .
>
> PS. If anyone is interested, my gpg.conf can be found at
> https:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:38:49AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> They don't support the considerate version of gpg/pgp.
> Now that I know that people using this actually have a choice and
> choose to be rude, it does make it rather tempting to set up an
> autoresponder and filter to
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:28:35AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> And on top of it, everyone else on the list gets held hostage
> and is forced to jump through so many hoopes just to avoid being
> inconvenienced.
>
> So rude...
With respect, I don't think you have the right to speak for 'everyone el
'
> >>
> >> ~/.mutt/display-filter:
> >>
> >> /^gpg:/d
> >
> > Thanks. I have learnt something new in this thread.
>
> JFTR, my actual display-filter contains this for PGP signatures:
>
> # wipe secondary gpg user ids
> /^gpg:[ ]\+a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 14:35, Indulekha wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:26:47AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Mika Suomalainen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> And if someone spoofs email from my address to this
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:07:25AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:51:48PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> >
> > That keyserver which you are using seems to be offline and I don't
> > know how used it is. The recommended keyserver is
> > pool.sks-keyservers.net according to g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
08.05.2012 16:09, Lars Noodén kirjoitti:
> On 5/8/12 4:02 PM, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>> 08.05.2012 15:43, Lars Noodén kirjoitti:
>>> On 5/8/12 3:41 PM, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>>>> Note that gnupg mailing lists are also
e learnt something new in this thread.
JFTR, my actual display-filter contains this for PGP signatures:
# wipe secondary gpg user ids
/^gpg:[ ]\+aka/d
/^gpg:[ ]\+There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner\.$/d
/^gpg: please do a --check-trustdb/d
/^Primary key fingerprint:/d
That
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:26:47AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Mika Suomalainen
> wrote:
> >
> > And if someone spoofs email from my address to this list and it's
> > unsigned and my messages to this list are always unsigned, I cannot
> > say that I always sign my emails
1 - 100 of 881 matches
Mail list logo
