> Previously these were automatically deleted by SmarterMail and we
> never saw them. Now they're building up in the error directory.
But that's completely at odds with the claim that _not_ quarantining
them was resulting in spam leakage. So what's the real lowdown here?
This should become
Mark et al.,
SmarterMail shouldn't be leaving this trash around, and it shouldn't be
passing this trash to Declude. While having a work-around in Declude
is nice in lieu of a fix from SmarterMail, this really should be fixed
in SmarterMail if I am understanding the issues properly.
Matt
M
Okay. I can confirm that all 20,000 messages have failed in the header
file. My problem now seems to be that this directory is pretty large in
size. A lot of these messages are larger than our maximum allowed size.
I'm guessing that when SmarterMail receives an email larger than the
maximum allowed
Mark, try this.
Go to Windows Search function.
Search files *.hdr
Search text in files failed
Search only the error directory.
Once you run the search, select all, cut, past into a temp directory.
You can now view the error directory to see if there is any file there that
does not have fail
> As long as someone is working on this. I have 20,000 messages in the
> error directory from the past 48 hours.
That's totally inappropriate.
Degrade gracefully, people. At least make this a configurable option.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
As long as someone is working on this. I have 20,000 messages in the
error directory from the past 48 hours. Obviously there is no way we can
sort through this volume of mail. Randomly looking at samples it appears
as though every messages has the Failed text in the .hdr file. I can
only hope that
Will there every be improvements to the decoding of
the message body?
I'd really like to see quoted printable
improvements.
Example:
email contains quoted-printable encode
declude=2e.com
filter contains body 50 contains
declude.com
filter does not fire.
I have to manually add body
Gary,
>From time to time I feel like the Declude pinyada but in this instance we
have provided a solution for what is happening in SM. And as I have said we
are working with them to resolve this between us.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I don't have an answer to this question. I just know that it is a problem.
But what I find amusing is, here is another instance of two vendors of
interacting software products who point the finger at each other, both saying
"it's the other guy's fault."
Original Message
>
Hi Mike,
Here is my understanding of the 2 tests:
If an email originates from a country it will fail the COUNTRY test
If an email passes through a country it will fail the COUNTRIES test
-Nick
Mike N wrote:
I looked in the 4.x Junkmail manual, and couldn't find an
authoritative definition o
Although I do not use SmarterMail, my take is these are like T files in
Imail where it is not a complete message, but for some reason SmarterMail is
allowing Declude to have them even though they are not complete.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
>
Also, doesn't 3.1 have a problem with writing headers under
specific conditions (possibly identified in 4.2 as headers sometimes not written
with copyfile)? See Declude ticket [30A-0C30A9AC-1BB6].
Michael ThomasMathbox978-683-67181-877-MATHBOX (Toll
Free)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes there will be further 3.x fixes for a period of time.
However we have encouraged customers to move to 4.x as that is where future
development will be focused.
David
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott FisherSent:
Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:36 PMTo:
dec
Will there be any more 3.x releases?
- Original Message -
From:
David
Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:07
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Has a 3.
version been released with the same fixes as 4.2 build 20
No version
So 3.10 does not have a buffer overflow in
BANEXT for EVA?
Mark Reimer
IT Project Manager
American CareSource
214-596-2464
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:07
PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
GotCha. I then like the move to the error folder.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Barker
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:54 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Re
No version 3 is still 3.10 are you experiencing any of the
same problems exhibited by 4 ?
David
B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark ReimerSent:
Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:01 PMTo:
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Has a
David is quick
- Original Message -
From: "chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country tests
See if this helps:
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=6
and this may be of some use:
http://support.d
See if this helps:
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=6
and this may be of some use:
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=42
-chris
- Original Message -
From: "Mike N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:57 PM
Subj
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBSearch.aspx?search=COUNTRY&categoryid=
0
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:57 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMai
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:57 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Country tests
I looked in the 4.x Junkmail manual, and couldn't find an authoritative
definition of
David,
Has a 3. version been released with the same fixes as in 4.2
build 20?
Mark Reimer
IT Project Manager
American CareSource
214-596-2464
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "u
I looked in the 4.x Junkmail manual, and couldn't find an authoritative
definition of the Country tests. I have found a number of archived
messages, but it is tricky to know if the reason that things are documented
is that they are being deprecated or whatever.
Is there a Kbase article or
That is exactly what was happening prior to the fix and it created a deluge
of spam ending up in SmarterMail inboxes.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:49 PM
To: declude.ju
How about if the message has failed in the .hdr file declude just ignores the
file to let SmarterMail process it as it see fit???
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Barker
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:26 PM
>
Not sure who you spoke to at SmarterTools but I do NOT believe this is true.
Declude will not pick up a message until it is completed writing both the
.hdr and .eml files, that is the reason why SmarterMail while writing the
header will have the .eml file as .em_ (while writing) so that when the
Here is SmarterTools take on the problem:
> Failed is written to the .hdr if the message was not succesfully recieved via
> SMTP. For
> instance, if the connection is closed mid transmission. These(and
> corresponding .emls) are
> normally just deleted by SmarterMail. The only reason you are n
I am noticing the COPYFILE does not add everything to the headers. One of
the things its missing is my custom XINHEADERS.
Is this by design? As my expectation is that all of the XINHEADERS would be
added as they really help reviewing messages.
Lastest version of Declude 4.2.20/IMAIL and I
Thanks Nick/Chris(Declude). I got the new file.
Darrell
Nick Hayer writes:
There is a much more recent avail you can download from 'my account' on
the declude site. If you cannot find it let me know and I will send it to
you.
-Nick
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What is the lat
There is a much more recent avail you can download from 'my account' on
the declude site. If you cannot find it let me know and I will send it
to you.
-Nick
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What is the latest all_list.dat file. Mine is dated 9/28/2005.
I am seeing an issue with 67.111.13
Darrell, The latest version of that file is available on Declude's site.
Once you log into your account, you will see it on the right hand side of
the page, about half way down.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROT
What is the latest all_list.dat file. Mine is dated 9/28/2005.
I am seeing an issue with 67.111.134.133 which is in Reston, VA. Howeverm
Declude thinks its in Korea.
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imai
Comment's inline.
Darrell
John T (Lists) writes:
Couple of questions:
Does it run in an active session, such as the console, or does it run even
if logged off?
It runs in an active session. If you log off the program will be closed by
windows. However, once started its interactive so
33 matches
Mail list logo
