RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing

2006-10-24 Thread John T \(Lists\)
find!"   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Edmonds Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:45 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing Importance: High   Hi Darre

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing

2006-10-24 Thread Craig Edmonds
end script     Kindest RegardsCraig Edmonds123 Marbella InternetW: www.123marbella.com   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 8:19 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files mag

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing

2006-10-23 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Message - From: Craig Edmonds To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 6:12 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing On one of my imail servers, my spool folder is slowly filling up with D files.   I am

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing

2006-10-23 Thread Craig Edmonds
24000400828f94.smd status=1   Kindest RegardsCraig Edmonds123 Marbella InternetW: www.123marbella.com   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig EdmondsSent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:13 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing

2006-10-23 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
notes.   Andrew 8)       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig EdmondsSent: Monday, October 23, 2006 3:13 PMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearingImportance: HighSensitivity: Confide

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing

2006-10-23 Thread Craig Edmonds
On one of my imail servers, my spool folder is slowly filling up with D files.   I am using fpreview to view the files in the spool and there are currently 180 or so emails.   when i try to "return to queue" I get an error saying that the q file could not be found, whch isa bit strange beca

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail

2006-07-21 Thread Dean Lawrence
Hi Mark, You could always modify the web templates so that they never see the link to the auto-responder page. I do this for other features that I don't want users to access. Hope this helps, Dean On 7/20/06, Mark Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know this belongs on the IMAIL forum but I'm

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail

2006-07-20 Thread Mark Smith
I know this belongs on the IMAIL forum but I'm not subscribed there -- apologies in advance. Does anyone know of a way to globally disable the information manager so I can prevent users from setting up auto-responders? Thx --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsub

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing

2006-03-29 Thread William Baumbach
- - Original Message - From: "Bonno Bloksma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 10:32 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing Hi John, To jump in on a tangent... > I'm maki

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing

2006-03-26 Thread John Shacklett
7;m flying completely blind. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Nice Sent: Sunday, 26 March 2006 1:53 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing A great solution to the @home.com thing: if yo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing

2006-03-26 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi John, To jump in on a tangent... I'm making the jump from Imail 6 on NT4 clear up to Imail 2006.03 on 2kServer. If you are starting with a new server might I suggest Win2k3 in stead of Win2k. As we all know Win2k support will end soon. For a server connected to the internet one would wan

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing

2006-03-25 Thread Mike Nice
A great solution to the @home.com thing: if you make the assumption that the new owner of @home.com won't do anything useful with it, you can create a local DNS entry for it with no MX record. This causes IMail to immediately bounce the message instead of sitting in the queue. - Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing

2006-03-25 Thread John Shacklett
@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing John, Exactly what are you looking to do in terms of insight into the spool? Monitor files? See who the messages are too? Darrell Check out http://www.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing

2006-03-25 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "John Shacklett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 4:12 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing Here'

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail queue viewing

2006-03-25 Thread John Shacklett
Here's my second off-topic question. Thank you again for all the great suggestions on handling the port forwarding question on Wednesday and for all the great discussion that spun off of that original thread. Question two: I'm making the jump from Imail 6 on NT4 clear up to Imail 2006.03 on 2kSer

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Aliases

2006-01-20 Thread Rick Davidson
Smith To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 9:31 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Aliases Sorry about the Off-Topic question...I use Imail/Declude as a gateway system only for a large Exchange org.To avoid the dictionary attacks, we do some

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Aliases

2006-01-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> Any ideas on how to get around this? Of course. Create a second virtual host for the second Exchange address space. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Aliases

2006-01-18 Thread Mark Smith
Sorry about the Off-Topic question... I use Imail/Declude as a gateway system only for a large Exchange org. To avoid the dictionary attacks, we do some scripting magic to put the Exchange SMTP addresses in the Imail Alias setup. Here's the problem. Our Exchange org has two domains associated wit

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail vs. Merak

2005-12-28 Thread Jeff Kratka
ECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Don Brown Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:04 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail vs. Merak Does it support port 587 for authentication? Wedn

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail vs. Merak

2005-12-28 Thread Don Brown
> -Original Message- JK> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JK> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser JK> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 7:35 AM JK> To: DECLUDE.JUNKMAIL@DECLUDE.COM JK> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail vs. Merak JK> Hello, All, JK> We are re-ar

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail vs. Merak

2005-12-28 Thread Jeff Kratka
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 7:35 AM To: DECLUDE.JUNKMAIL@DECLUDE.COM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail vs. Merak Hell

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail vs. Merak

2005-12-28 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, All, We are re-architecting our e-mail hosting and are going to be upgrading from IMail 6.06 to a new e-mail platform. We are familiar with IMail can do so we are currently evaluating Merak e-mail server to see what else is out there. Has anyone on this list done a similiar evaluation

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility

2005-10-17 Thread Evans Martin
4:10 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility > > I didn't even think this was possible. Does anyone know of a command line > utility that does this? > > Robert > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL P

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility

2005-10-17 Thread Darin Cox
9 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility I didn't even think this was possible. Does anyone know of a command line utility that does this? Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Rapaport Sent: Monday, October

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility

2005-10-17 Thread Robert Shubert
t: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility At 08:53 AM 10/17/2005, you wrote: >IPlus Info Browser by Martekware? http://www.martekware.com I think that was it, but so far I can't find it (had it on an server that I subsequently upgraded) >I use > >http://crofts

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility

2005-10-17 Thread Dan Rapaport
At 08:53 AM 10/17/2005, you wrote: IPlus Info Browser by Martekware? http://www.martekware.com I think that was it, but so far I can't find it (had it on an server that I subsequently upgraded) I use http://croftssoftware.com/downloads/Decode_IMail_Users_Password_Setup.exe Well that will

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility

2005-10-17 Thread Dave Doherty
I use http://croftssoftware.com/downloads/Decode_IMail_Users_Password_Setup.exe -d - Original Message - From: "Dan Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 2:05 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility I used to use a ut

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility

2005-10-17 Thread Evans Martin
[Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility > > I used to use a utility that would extract imail user names and decrypt > passwords from the registry, but I seem to have misplaced it somewhere on > some machine, and I don't even remember the name of it. > > If someo

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility

2005-10-17 Thread Dan Rapaport
I used to use a utility that would extract imail user names and decrypt passwords from the registry, but I seem to have misplaced it somewhere on some machine, and I don't even remember the name of it. If someone could jog my memory, I'd appreciate it. Feel free to contact me off list --- [Th

[Declude.JunkMail] OT Imail Logs filter

2005-09-28 Thread Frederick Samarelli
I need a log filter program that will tell me what address sent and received emails and to whom. Anyone have one. Very Imported. Thanks. Fred --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-08 Thread Don Brown
I don't see that as a big issue. They can't Auth when 'Account Access Disabled' is checked in the user gui. If the user has a POP box, uncheck 'Account Access Disabled' and use their unique password. If the user is for forwarding, then make sure that 'Account Access Disabled' is checked. They c

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-08 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
: "Russ Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003 Orin Wells wrote: OK, I see it. The question is how do you KILL the stuff that has gotten into the server? We shut down th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-08 Thread Russ Lists
Orin Wells wrote: OK, I see it. The question is how do you KILL the stuff that has gotten into the server? We shut down the IMAP yesterday primarily because we really don't have anyone we are aware of who does not use POP3. But the problem persists and seems to avoid every attempt to find

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-08 Thread Matt
One other thing to add to this.  Ipswitch in their brilliance, decided to make a default password of "password" for any newly created account including root.  One must take great care to change these otherwise they can become susceptible to AUTH hacking with a great deal of ease, and you then b

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-08 Thread Dan Horne
Orin Wells <> wrote on Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:15 AM: > Regarding telnet - apparently there is a problem with windows 2003 > and iMail. If my source is correct one can telnet into a Windows > 2003 system running iMail (pick a version) on port 25 and get by the > authentication. Again, m

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-08 Thread Orin Wells
Actually, we have tried both but have not found the culprit(s) yet. Although my partner believes he saw a spike in traffic coming in as a Telenet session from an unexpected origin - rrcs-74-39-200-122.nys.biz.rr.com which on searching with google appears not too uncommon - that is hacks, spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-07 Thread Kevin Bilbee
and remove it. Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Orin Wells > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 3:32 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-07 Thread Orin Wells
At 01:43 PM 9/7/2005, Ncl Admin wrote: I think that the exploit is in imail 7.07 and not in your server do a google on imail 7.07 exploit. OK, I see it. The question is how do you KILL the stuff that has gotten into the server? We shut down the IMAP yesterday primarily because we really don

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-07 Thread Ncl Admin
I think that the exploit is in imail 7.07 and not in your server do a google on imail 7.07 exploit. So you most likely would need to upgrade to 8.2 series. Tho the exploit isn't in 8.15 I don't believe. BTW they do seem to have some interesting pricing going on if you google imail deals depending

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-07 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> We have been running iMail 7.07 under windows 2000. We had some input that > there may be some problems in this environment. We are not keen on > upgrading to 8.x since IPSwitch is walking away from iMail the product. Ipswitch is not walking away from Imail. It is still alive and well, and in

[Declude.JunkMail] OT - iMail 7.x and Windows 2003

2005-09-07 Thread Orin Wells
We are about to build a new server using Windows 2003. The reason is that we were apparently attacked through the iMail IMAPI exploit. The last of whatever got in seems to be running in a very effective stealth mode because nothing seems to be able to find it and kill it. As a consequence, o

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / Declude as a front end for Exchange

2005-07-20 Thread Dan Shadix
EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:22 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / Declude as a front end for Exchange Dan, Did you make sure the "This exchange organization is responsible for all mail delivery to this address" o

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / Declude as a front end for Exchange

2005-07-20 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dan, Did you make sure the "This exchange organization is responsible for all mail delivery to this address" on the recipient policy email address. Darrell Dan Shadix writes: I have an Exchange 2003 server setup using my domain name trhs.org. I added an SMTP recipient policy for email.tr

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / Declude as a front end for Exchange

2005-07-20 Thread Schmeits, Roger
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / Declude as a front end for Exchange I have an Exchange 2003 server setup using my domain name trhs.org. I added an SMTP recipient policy for email.trhs.org and created an alias on the Imail server to forward mail to email.trhs.org. I also

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / Declude as a front end for Exchange

2005-07-20 Thread Dan Shadix
I have an Exchange 2003 server setup using my domain name trhs.org.  I added an SMTP recipient policy for email.trhs.org and created an alias on the Imail server to forward mail to email.trhs.org.  I also added email.trhs.org to the hosts file.  The Imail server sends the message to the Exch

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
er > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 9:38 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working > > We found the issue; a mis-typed IP range in the relay file (one numeral off > in 3rd octave). We must have looked at this 100 times ov

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
We found the issue; a mis-typed IP range in the relay file (one numeral off in 3rd octave). We must have looked at this 100 times over the weekend and didn't catch it. Thank you for all that responded to help - I am sorry to waste everyone's time Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Support Departm

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
>In the HOSTS file, you do have IP address then space or tab and then the domain, correct? YesThis is my hosts files #start 127.0.0.1 localhost #plantorders.com 207.170.50.162 plantorders.com 207.170.50.162 mail.plantorders.com #VACVA 63.243.73.177 acva.com 63.243.73.177 mail.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I can't see anything else wrong unless you (like John suggested) have an issue with the hosts file like missing a line, misspelling, etc. One thing I would suggest - just to rule out a hosts issue is change the ip address in the hosts file to something else than what it is - i.e. 1.2.3.4 and do

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
>It seems as if you have everything in order. Just to make sure - the host does >NOT exist under the Imail Admin Utility where the domains are listed right? > >Darrell Correct - The host DOES NOT exist as an IP host or virtual host under the Imail admin. As a double check - I have searche

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Web.net > Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 5:25 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working > > >notepad %windir%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts. > > everything checks out with thisno problems opening it. > > I&#x

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
It seems as if you have everything in order. Just to make sure - the host does NOT exist under the Imail Admin Utility where the domains are listed right? Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities f

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
>Also, after you added the IP Address to the Relay For Addresses table did you stop and >start SMTP for it to take affect? > >Darrell Darrell, Yes - I did stop/start SMTP & also rebooted several times Initially I copied over the host fiole from the other server. The permissions on it are the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Also, after you added the IP Address to the Relay For Addresses table did you stop and start SMTP for it to take affect? Darrell Intelligent URI Filtering with invURIBL. Stops 85%+ SPAM with the default configuration. T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-20 Thread Dan Horne
ED] On Behalf Of Webmaster - GlobalWeb.net Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 5:35 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working I've posted this to the IMailo forum; no replies so far. So I wanted to shoot this out here. We just fired up a ne

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-19 Thread Webmaster - GlobalWeb.net
>notepad %windir%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts. everything checks out with thisno problems opening it. I've doubled checked again to be sure that there is a blank line after the last entry... I'm stumped... 8.2 has the relay for addresses as 8.15 did. Any one else have any problems with thi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working Those two steps do sound right.  I'm not sure about the interface for v8.20 though; is there a checkbox actually checked for "relay for addressses:" in the GUI?   Also, check that your hosts file is really called

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-18 Thread Webmaster - GlobalWeb.net
John, Thanks for the reply... >Is there a carriage return after the domain name in the HOSTS file? Yes I have carriage returns after each line... >Why aren't you using aliases instead of accepting all? I do not understand what you are asking in regards to the alias vs. all - my understanding is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-18 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
L PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webmaster - GlobalWeb.net > Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 2:35 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working > > I've posted this to the IMailo forum;

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working

2005-06-18 Thread Webmaster - GlobalWeb.net
I've posted this to the IMailo forum; no replies so far. So I wanted to shoot this out here. We just fired up a new server on Friday with Imail 8.20hf2, JM Pro, Declude Virus Std w/ FProt, Hijack and Sniffer. (old server was 8.15hf2 and starting thursday, the QueueMgr just quit working) We ha

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and 2nd MX records

2005-02-20 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
ll them to "turn on" mail handling and webmail for your domain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 10:17 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and 2nd MX records

2005-02-19 Thread Erik
ed to sender. Erik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 7:04 PM To: Erik Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and 2nd MX records > Sometimes, our DNS server wants to use their 2 M

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and 2nd MX records

2005-02-19 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> Sometimes, our DNS server wants to use their 2 MX record even though > that domain has properly configured priority numbers and their > primary server is active. "Use" the secondary, if it's the only MX record IMail ever sees = perfectly valid for IMail, broken in DNS. "Use" the se

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and 2nd MX records

2005-02-19 Thread Erik
lot.org to our Windows HOSTS file until I can find out what is going on. Erik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 6:32 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and 2nd MX records

2005-02-19 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Erik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 9:28 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and 2nd MX records This is OT for this list but a

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and 2nd MX records

2005-02-19 Thread Erik
This is OT for this list but am hoping someone could provide me some input. We have been having problems sending to one domain that we do not host. After investigating it, here is what I have found. The domain "ipapilot.org" has 2 MX records. Sometimes, our DNS server wants to use their 2 MX rec

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jose Gosende
Thank God I'm not, and like I said, after turning off syslog things are back to normal. Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of marc catuogno Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 3:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread marc catuogno
bject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities Does anyone know of any vulnerabilities in iMail 6.06? Within a minute after turning on iMail's SMTP service my server becomes completely unresponsive and eventually goes down. I've also installed all of the 6.06 related patches from Ipswitc

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Darin Cox
A quick google for "kiwi syslog" reveals...www.kiwisyslog.com... Darin. - Original Message - From: "Jeff Maze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 2:26 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabiliti

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jeff Kratka
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Maze Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities Hmmm.. Have a link for Kiwi? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jeff Maze
Hmmm.. Have a link for Kiwi? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Kratka Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities I'm still running v6.06 (mostly d

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jeff Kratka
ville, OR 97417 tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jose Gosende Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 6:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMai

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities > > FWIW - After turning off the IMail Sys Logger Service > the server is much more stable. Time to find if there's > an exploit for this service... > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jose Gosende
ECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities We're running 6.06 and haven't had that problem yet (knocks on wood). But I do know there are certain MS patches that will mess up the display of the admin page (2000 SP4 for example). Is it possible you just ran an MS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jeff Maze
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities Does anyone know of any vulnerabilities in iMail 6.06? Within a minute after turning on iMail's SMTP service my server becomes completely unresponsive and eventually goes down. I've also installed all of the 6.06

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jose Gosende
Does anyone know of any vulnerabilities in iMail 6.06? Within a minute after turning on iMail's SMTP service my server becomes completely unresponsive and eventually goes down. I've also installed all of the 6.06 related patches from Ipswitch's site. Jose --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore

2004-06-11 Thread Darin Cox
Nope. That covers it. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Goran Jovanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:21 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore Tom, Is there more in the registry than under

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore

2004-06-11 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
That's all that you need -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 4:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore Tom, Is there more in the registry than

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore

2004-06-11 Thread Goran Jovanovic
11, 2004 12:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore > > When you export the imail registry hive > Look at the resulting file... > If there are hard references to C: > Then run a search/replace all to update to D > > If you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore

2004-06-11 Thread Mike Hyslip
iday, June 11, 2004 12:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore Hi, I think this is going to work I need to backup IMail from the C Drive, reformat the server, create D drive and then put IMail back on D Drive. I figure the way to do this is Old Server

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore

2004-06-11 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
al path is stored in each row. Other than that, its exactly what I've done many times. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail

[Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore

2004-06-11 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Hi, I think this is going to work I need to backup IMail from the C Drive, reformat the server, create D drive and then put IMail back on D Drive. I figure the way to do this is Old Server Stop all IMail services Backup IMail and all directories Make new server Install IMail on new server D D

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL domains expanding slowly.

2004-05-03 Thread Chris Patterson
] "Managed Spam Filtering and Anti-Virus Protection for Your Internet Service - Available Today from Rapid Systems" -Original Message- From: Don L. Might [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL domains expanding slowly.

2004-05-03 Thread Don L. Might
On-access virus scanner on the mail directory? I seem to remember av causing this symptom. Don -Original Message- From: Chris Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL domains expanding slowly

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL domains expanding slowly.

2004-05-03 Thread Chris Patterson
I have been dealing with an issue for a few weeks now moving IMAIL to a BIG server. The old server is running good on dual 1.0 GIG procs. This is the basic Specs on the new server: DL380 G3 Compaq Dual 3.06 Zeon 2 Gigs factory Ram 6 Scsi drives Windows 2000 server I have done this migration by

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Queue manager and gateway

2004-03-11 Thread Mark Smith
So should I just disable the DNS Cache and skip list then? Mark > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John > Tolmachoff (Lists) > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 5:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declud

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Queue manager and gateway

2004-03-10 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> Just a personal pet peeve: Aren't all pet peeves personal? :)) --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailma

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Queue manager and gateway

2004-03-10 Thread Jerod Bennett
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Queue manager and gateway You can not disable the Queue Manager. That is the delivery process, to where ever the message is to be delivered. DNS cache can be disabled if desired, irregardless of Imail configuration or use. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Queue manager and gateway

2004-03-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Queue manager and gateway > > If I'm only using imail as a gateway for Ex

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Queue manager and gateway

2004-03-10 Thread Mark Smith
If I'm only using imail as a gateway for Exchange and only one domain is being forwarded to, wouldn't it make sense to disable the DNS cache and Queue manager. In the remote case the receiving Exchange server is put on the skip list that would mean that all email would stop. Right? --- [This E-m

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Versions

2004-03-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 9:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Versions > > I'm working on an Exchange 2003 roll out where I'll use Imail and Junkmail > as a spam filter/relay/&

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail Versions

2004-03-06 Thread Mark Smith
I'm working on an Exchange 2003 roll out where I'll use Imail and Junkmail as a spam filter/relay/"edge antivirus scanner". Imail will not host any domains and only act as a gateway relayer for the domains that are hosted in the Exchange namespace. I don't think that I'll need Imail Professional s

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL -> AD

2004-02-10 Thread Matt
Pete, I try not to get too passionate about things around here, so I welcome your contribution. You are correct though, after a couple of days of discussion, the solution to this need does appear to exist. I have a great appreciation for your skill, and your willingness to share both insight

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL -> AD

2004-02-10 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> 1) Envelope rejection (and all that comes with it). Already extant, as previously discussed. > 2) SMTP AUTH (so it can co-exist on the same server as IMail, and handle > hosted accounts with redundancy). This is going to be very difficult relative to the other ideas, if you continue to resi

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL -> AD

2004-02-10 Thread Pete McNeil
Sorry about that - I seem to have stepped into a bit of a tiff. I was skimming and saw a Sniffer reference and jumped in - I shouldn't do that (I should get more sleep). At any rate, the pattern matching engine can run at any point... Sniffer as it is packaged now runs after submission, but the

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL -> AD

2004-02-10 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Pete, Everything that Sniffer does is after submission, so it really wouldn't apply. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Dec

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL -> AD

2004-02-10 Thread Pete McNeil
In terms of scale, I would expect to see a server handle not much more than 500,000 messages in a full Declude/IMail environment, and with an average of more than 10 pieces of spam per address per day, a solution of this sort would need to effectively resolve against 50,000 or so E-mail addresses

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL -> AD

2004-02-10 Thread Matt
Sanford Whiteman wrote: It's simple and built-in functionality, not a tweak or anything like that all. You simply enable the recipient blacklist button in the "everybody but these people" mode (one of two modes). There's no need to worry about processing order. All addresses are in plain

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL -> AD

2004-02-10 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> To be honest, yes, I don't think I saw that in your messages. Take > it from a fellow rambler...you could condense things from time to > time...and maybe spend less time describing how I'm wrong or how > impossible a task might be :) Maybe... > I saw a reference to an "everybody but"

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMAIL -> AD

2004-02-10 Thread Matt
Sanford Whiteman wrote: Did you fail to read (twice) the part of my posts about the "accept only for these users" option in ORF, which is loaded from a text file? This has nothing to do with LDAP. To be honest, yes, I don't think I saw that in your messages. Take it from a fellow rambler..

  1   2   >