[Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail API

2002-10-31 Thread Jeff Cheung
I realize that this mailing list is devoted to JunkMail discussions; however, I was referred here when I had a question regarding the release of ipswitch's API for IMail. I am currently trying to develop a control panel automation software, and would like to incorporate IMail into it. I understan

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail API

2002-10-31 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> I realize that this mailing list is devoted to JunkMail discussions; > however, I was referred here ...from where? > Any help or a link to another group that would be able to help me would be > greatly appreciated. Try signing up for the IMail Forum at: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mai

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-30 Thread Omar K.
I agree, but spamcop doesn't think so. Look at headers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 3:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam Since

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-30 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Since when is a company not allowed to send out production information and such to its customers, and on an infrequent basis at that? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Jun

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-30 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam > > Since when is a company not allowed to send out production information and > such to its customers, and on an infrequent basis at that? > > John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA > Eng

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-30 Thread Jools Chesters
CSE CSSA >Engineer/Consultant >eServices For You >www.eservicesforyou.com > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) >> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:49 PM >&g

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-30 Thread Smart Business Lists
Jools, Friday, May 30, 2003 you wrote: JC> But, to block a server at Spamcop it must be reported several times, JC> this is obviously to stop people from being nasty and getting servers JC> blocked that they don't like. That's not true. Spamcop blocks on ONE incident. Sometimes it is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-31 Thread Jools Chesters
This is waht Spamcop have to say about how their system works: http://mailsc.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/297.html look at number 7 especially: 7. If a host has only 1 SUBE report against it, it will not be listed. (SUBE is Supposed Unsolicited Bulk Mail) We are quite aggressive in blocking spam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-31 Thread Smart Business Lists
Jools, Friday, May 30, 2003 you wrote: JC> This is waht Spamcop have to say about how their system works: JC> http://mailsc.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/297.html JC> look at number 7 especially: JC> 7. If a host has only 1 SUBE report against it, it will not be listed. JC> (SUBE is Supposed Unsolic

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-31 Thread R. Scott Perry
Now in their defense I will say they are pretty good about responding to my messages and they have always done the right thing. But it is still time consuming and disruptive to have to investigate each incident. Their system is much too easily used for malicious purposes. What

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-31 Thread Jools Chesters
That would be nice, I'm surprised by their undocumented methods though. My dealings with them have been quite good as they delisted our old server very quickly after several people submitted a mailing of ours. It's a wonder that more people don't submit mail maliciously if the system works as it a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-31 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> We are quite aggressive in blocking spam and use ROUTETO a specific > account for SpamCop blocked email, I find that 99% of the time it is > accurate with very few false positives. If you would kindly search the archives (when they are back up) you will find past discussions that have proven dif

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-31 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> It's a wonder that more people don't submit mail maliciously if the > system works as it appears. Some do. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-ma

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-31 Thread Jools Chesters
The difference with us is that we are mainly handling our own companys mail with a few small clients, our traffic is quite low so we can afford to look at our routeto mailbox fairly often. False positives (if there are any) are forwarded to the original recipient, otherwise they are binned. We al

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail (NOT) spam....

2003-05-31 Thread Smart Business Lists
Jools, Friday, May 30, 2003 you wrote: JC> At some point I intend to write a pop mailbox viewer that I can press JC> a button to forward to original recipient (with addition of a JC> whitelisted header), reply, delete, bounce or report to spamcop. Just be careful though because I think that'