> Well, I have that too now but. that did not solve the
> problem because the subject column in the top windows is
> empty. Strange, as the subject line in the window below that
> *does* show the subject. Anybody else have this problem too?
It's not a problem.
There is a switch in the conf
4 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Hi,
[... sorting on spam weight in spamreview...]
> > I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold
> > messages with "[spam %weight%]"
Well, I have that too now but. that did not solve the problem because
the subjec
Hi,
[... sorting on spam weight in spamreview...]
> > I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold
> > messages with "[spam %weight%]"
Well, I have that too now but. that did not solve the problem because
the subject column in the top windows is empty. Strange, as the subject line
eight and
sending mail server HELO/IP.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "John Shacklett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
>Scott, do you know anything about this as a possible addition to your
>product/tools line?
It is som
Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!
(And watch for line wraps)
I think this is what the setup.lst file needs to be for Windows Server 2003:
_
[Bootstrap]
SetupTit
; Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
>
> That would be great John.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dean
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
> (Lists)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:0
nkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
>
> Did anyone have any problem installing Spam Review?
> I'm trying to install it on a Windows 2000 Server an
That would be great John.
Thanks,
Dean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Some what known issue. What you
TECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 6:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
>
> Did anyone have any problem installing Spam Review?
> I'm trying to install it on a
Scott, do you know anything about this as a possible addition to your
product/tools line?
It is something that we were looking into, but I do not believe that we
ended up with the source code.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam
product/tools line?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:30 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
1.) It's much easier to reply if the original message is in PLA
> What would be the best way to do the below :
>
> I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold
> messages with "[spam %weight%]"
For example we hold on 100 points and mark any message above 75 points in
the subject line.
So we have in the $default$.junkmail file
WEIGHT75S
L PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
What would be the best way to do the below :
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold messages with
"[spam %weight%]"
Now you can sort in spamreview by sibject line and it will show all hold
messages in weighted
What would be the best way to do the below :
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold messages with
"[spam %weight%]"
Now you can sort in spamreview by sibject line and it will show all hold
messages in weighted order.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[
1.) It's much easier to reply if the original message is in PLAIN -TEXT
> Is Spam Review still being maintained?
As I know it's not more maintained by the initial developer, but he has
offered to give the source to someone who is interrested to maintain it in
the future.
> 1) When
In the Global.cfg file, add the
following line:
XINHEADER X-RBL-Warning: Total
weight: %WEIGHT%
XOUTHEADER X-RBL-Warning: Total weight:
%WEIGHT%
Put that above all other header lines.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyo
eptember 26, 2003 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
> > Can you give me the syntax for that?
>
>
> Assuming you have configured 2 weight tests like
>
> WEIGHT10
> WEIGHT20
>
> in your global.cfg file and you want to hold on 20 points:
>
> Can you give me the syntax for that?
Assuming you have configured 2 weight tests like
WEIGHT10
WEIGHT20
in your global.cfg file and you want to hold on 20 points:
Set the two actions
WEIGHT10 SUBJECT [spam%WEIGHT%]
WEIGHT20 HOLD
in your $default$.junkmail file. (Note the space after the "
Can you give me the syntax for that?
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
>
> > How do I get the Weight: to show?
>
&
> How do I get the Weight: to show?
Andy,
It's not the answer but maybe this will also work for you.
I've configured Declude to add the weight to the subject-line from a
certain weight on.
WEIGHT75SUBJECT [spam%WEIGHT%]
We hold on 100 and can now see immediatly the weight and also so
John,
You can find information on this at http://www.slsoft.com/spamreviewhelp.htm
You may need to run File/Check for Updates to get the latest version.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Olden
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:5
Adding the XSENDER option took care of my problem. Thanks to Tom and Scott
for your help on this problem and especially to Tom for all the effort on
SpamReview! Paypal donation on the way!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwar
EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
>>Ah, okay. Thanks for the clarification. Then Tom's suggestion of:
>&g
>Ah, okay. Thanks for the clarification. Then Tom's suggestion of:
>
>XINHEADER X-FromEMailAddress: %MAILFROM% [%REMOTEIP%]
>
>make sense. Except, we currently cannot do anything with the [%REMOTEIP%]
>variable at this time, so we can probably leave that off?
Yes. That was likely included b
Sorry for the string of questions, just want to make sure I understand.
Thanks,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
>Tom, how about using:
>
>XINHEADER X-SenderIP: [%REMOTEIP%]
>
>since isn't is really the remote IP address that we are looking for, and not
>necessarily the e-mail address? Or am I confused. What are we looking for
>here, the original sending mail servers IP address or something else?
There
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Tom Schwarz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
So do I/We need to decide on what needs to be used so I can program
spamreview to support bot
How about:
Here is the headers that I am inserting - in case that helps:
XINHEADER X-Declude: Version %VERSION%; %QUEUENAME% from %REVDNS%
[%REMOTEIP%]
XINHEADER X-Declude: Failed %TESTSFAILED% [%WEIGHT%]
XINHEADER Return-Path: <%MAILFROM%>
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +
.
XINHEADER X-FromEMailAddress: %MAILFROM% [%REMOTEIP%]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
>Scott, would it be possible to use instead of X-Sender, something like:
>
>XINHEADER X-Addr: %MAILFROM% [%REMOTEIP%]
>
>or something other than X-Sender so that we do not end up with multiple
>X-Sender entries?
Yes, that would work fine.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was
: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
>We would rather you use
>the mailfrom actually, but I do not know how you would integrate
>this.
It's the same thing.
The return address ("MAIL
>We would rather you use
>the mailfrom actually, but I do not know how you would integrate
>this.
It's the same thing.
The return address ("MAIL FROM" from the SMTP envelope), which is the only
address that IMail's kill.let can use, does not show up by default in the
headers. Declude does h
Oops. My bad. I had the XSENDER commented out. I just uncommented it and
set it to ON. I'll let you know in a little while when I get some junkmail.
Thanks,
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz (by
way of "R. Scott Perry" <[
I'm getting the weight just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Noticed after updating to v1
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Importance: Low
Noticed after updating to v1.0.12 this morning that the weight is no longer
appearing. The warnings are showing, but the warning is always blank.
Sincerely,
Grant Griffith, Vice President
EI8HT LEGS Web Mana
-
||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Schreiner
||Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:39 AM
||To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
||
||
||I agree the sort feature would be a big help. BTW, love the add to
||kill.lst
]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
I second this!!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
I second this!!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Hey Tom,
I have a suggestion... :)
On your spam
Hey Tom,
I have a suggestion... :)
On your spam review software.. can you have a button so we can sort by sent
address... then we can select all of those and delete a block at a time...
I have noticed when I am cleaning it out.. i have a number of spams which
have the same return email address.
Junkmail for in the
first place.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
But with the black list the sender of
All
I am wanting to do is a quick way to remove blocks from the review of spams
that have been caught...
Bennie
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 9:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMa
has
an option to add to the imail kill list, but that requires a restart of
SMTP.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 7:22 PM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7 on Saturday 10:18:30 AM
Seems to me the best way to handle same sender messages is to
detect within the program matching senders than ask with a popup
'Delete all instances of this sender?' Yes No. or e
Hey Tom,
I have a suggestion... :)
On your spam review software.. can you have a button so we can sort by sent
address... then we can select all of those and delete a block at a time...
I have noticed when I am cleaning it out.. i have a number of spams which
have the same return email address.
Tom,
I would want 2 separate button options.
1. Button to the delete & Kill list.
2. Button to the Delete folder only.
Not 100% for sure but a warning in the documentation about having the
%MAILFROM% variable in your header as Scott was stating in a previous
post. Does this address the issu
>I use the "D" file for the list so I think I have the right email address.
>Is this correct Scott?
The correct address to use in the IMail Kill List is the "return address"
or "MAIL FROM:" address, which may or may not be the same as the "From:"
address in the E-mail headers (in the "D" file)
change it just in case.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File
I would prefer a separate button. Because whe
I would prefer a separate button. Because when I delete something I don't
necessarily want to kill the address. But when I kill the address I would
probably want to delete the message.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Se
Tom:
I think a button option would be fine. Here is my reasoning - many of the
from addresses are bogus anyway so I do not bother with putting many of them
on the kill.lst very often. I have put from addresses on the kill list only
to see the spammer change his from address within the hour. I
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File on Wednesday 6:15:27 PM
A button would be great. The problem as I see it is
making sure it was the real SMTP %MailFrom% variable.
I use:
XINHEADER X-Note: SMTP Real-From: %MAILFROM%
But maybe the best way for
Sorry...
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
nope
nope! that doesn't work, tells me "your not authorized to view that page".
Nice try anyway.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
Did i miss
Did i miss something here, where do i get this program spam review, sounds
interesting.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Madson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is
Kudos to Tom! Wonderful tool.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Watchman
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
Thanks Tom, Spam Review is terrif
. Love the app so far.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Question
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
Roger.
Where do you ad this line?
Bennie
>
> This line gives me the 'real' sender and I'd love to kill.lst
> some of these if they are clearly doing only spamming...:
>
> XINHEADER X-Note: SMTP Real-From: %MAILFROM%
>
> I do not see an immediate need to notify senders of bad mail.
>
>
Hi,
absolutely
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 10:38:23 AM, you wrote:
TS> On some of the email I review I would like to click a button and send an
TS> email back to the sender, based on a template, letting them know
Yes, actually, I would love to be able to just forward/redirect the message
to my SPAMCOP mailbox. I currently do that automatically with Declude for
Weight 20 and above.
Then SPAMCOPY will figure out who REALLY is to notify - because sending it
back to the originator in 99 out of 100 times will
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Question on Wednesday 9:38:23 AM
Actually, the next most useful feature for me would
be to take the real sender and add-to-kill.lst function.
Then if you consistently see an abuser, you just add his
address to Imails kill file
Yes. Can you also build a "your a &@#$(&&&$#&# for sending me this stupid
SPAM" feature?!!! :-))
Love the app!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [D
Management Co., Inc.
http://www.getafreewebsite.com
877-483-3393
||-Original Message-
||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
||Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 5:03 PM
||To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Spangenberg
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
Great program?
Are you ready for some feedback and a few ideas/suggestions?
I would like a way to shut off the delete confirmation.
It would be nice to
hanks
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 3:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
>
>
>
> Yes http://www.
>By default don't your new configuation files put out a warning at 10?
Yes, that is correct.
The "XINHEADER X-Note: Total weight of %WEIGHT%." could be used instead, so
that the weight appears in all E-mails (whether or not the weight is
greater than or equal to 10).
-
Scott,
By default don't your new configuation files put out a warning at 10?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 7:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam R
>You web page mentions that you place a weight message
>in your headers using Declude but does not show how this
>is done. Can you show this here? I'd like to get this working...
It can be done using the new %WEIGHT% variable, in combination with a
header. For example:
XINHEADER
Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 6:17 PM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program on Saturday 10:28:46 AM
Tom, I am really enjoying the speed of your app.
You web page
Very nice. I just saved a ton of time going through the files.
FYI used it on XP Pro and 2000 server / remote and local. Very quick !
Great Job !!!
David Barrett
Maine Connect, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday,
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program on Saturday 10:28:46 AM
Tom, I am really enjoying the speed of your app.
You web page mentions that you place a weight message
in your headers using Declude but does not show how this
is done. Can you show this here? I&#
Yes http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andyb@thumpernet
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
Hi,
Has it been posted
Hi,
Has it been posted anywhere yet?
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Saturday, January 26, 2002, 11:28:46 AM, you wrote:
TS> I have received several replies. If it's ok with Declude, I will post the
TS> download address on this list. If someone
]
**
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 11:28 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
> Either will w
nuary 26, 2002 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
> I must be missing something, because I have tried it both ways and it just
> doesn't seem to list any emails... there are over 100 in the spool\spam
> dir...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim
> - O
aturday, January 26, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
> Either will work.
>
> \\myserver\imail\spool
>
> or
>
> c:\imail\spool
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Beh
Either will work.
\\myserver\imail\spool
or
c:\imail\spool
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Jones, Jr.
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
can i
can i use a unc to get to the spooled files or does it have to be mapped?
thanks!!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
> Exactly 15 hours afte
>I have received several replies. If it's ok with Declude, I will post the
>download address on this list. If someone from Declude would reply to me I
>would appreciate it.
Feel free to post it. I can also include a link at
http://www.declude.com/tools .
-Scott
---
[This
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program on Saturday 10:28:46 AM
I appreciate this. It would prove useful if it works well.
I manage my files over a network, all but the drive is ok
in that path. I'd like a copy, but I am already wondering
if I can change the
81 matches
Mail list logo
