Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-13 Thread Knut Anders Hatlen
Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They all seem like bug fixes that would need to be merged to the new branch so unless I hear otherwise, I plan to cut the branch(es) from revision 635183. Can you confirm that 635183 was the revision base for the

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-13 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They all seem like bug fixes that would need to be merged to the new branch so unless I hear otherwise, I plan to cut the branch(es) from revision 635183. Can you confirm that 635183 was the revision base for the

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-13 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They all seem like bug fixes that would need to be merged to the new branch so unless I hear otherwise, I plan to cut the branch(es) from revision 635183. Can you confirm that 635183 was

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-12 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They all seem like bug fixes that would need to be merged to the new branch so unless I hear otherwise, I plan to cut the branch(es) from revision 635183. Can you confirm that 635183 was the revision base for the branch? Thanks, Dan.

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rick Hillegas wrote: When I run sysinfo against the branch, it reports that the version id is 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635685). It think that you need to modify the 3rd digit in the release id. I believe that is the secret handshake which turns an

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rick Hillegas wrote: When I run sysinfo against the branch, it reports that the version id is 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635685). It think that you need to modify the 3rd digit in the release id. I believe that is the secret

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Knut Anders Hatlen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did some experimenting, and here are the results: Alt A: With maint=001 and beta=true 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861) Alt B: With maint=001 and beta=false 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861M) Alt C: With maint=101 and beta=true 10.4.1.1 beta - (635861M) Alt

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
Knut Anders Hatlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did some experimenting, and here are the results: Alt A: With maint=001 and beta=true 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861) Alt B: With maint=001 and beta=false 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861M) Alt C: With maint=101

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Knut Anders Hatlen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Knut Anders Hatlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did some experimenting, and here are the results: Alt A: With maint=001 and beta=true 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861) Alt B: With maint=001 and beta=false 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861M)

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Rick Hillegas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Knut Anders Hatlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did some experimenting, and here are the results: Alt A: With maint=001 and beta=true 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861) Alt B: With maint=001 and beta=false 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861M)

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Knut Anders Hatlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did some experimenting, and here are the results: Alt A: With maint=001 and beta=true 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861) Alt B: With

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rick Hillegas wrote: When I run sysinfo against the branch, it reports that the version id is 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635685). It think that you need to modify the 3rd digit in the release id. I believe that is the secret

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Rick Hillegas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Knut Anders Hatlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did some experimenting, and here are the results: Alt A: With maint=001 and beta=true

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
Knut Anders Hatlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Knut Anders Hatlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did some experimenting, and here are the results: Alt A: With maint=001 and beta=true 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861) Alt B: With

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to change the Wiki so that each step of the release process becomes a cookbook, that the RM can follow. or that could be implemented in an ant script ... Dan.

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Knut Anders Hatlen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2. Before creating the first release candidate, update both the third and the fourth digit of the version number by updating the maint property in tools/ant/properties/release.properties, and set the beta property in the same file to false. After

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2. Before creating the first release candidate, update both the third and the fourth digit of the version number by updating the maint property in tools/ant/properties/release.properties, and set the beta property in the same file to false. After

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to change the Wiki so that each step of the release process becomes a cookbook, that the RM can follow. or that could be implemented in an ant script ... A laudable goal to be sure... but I think I'll

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread fp
When I run sysinfo against the trunk i get, Why ? 10.5.0.0 alpha - (635600) Daniel John Debrunner-2 wrote: Rick Hillegas wrote: When I run sysinfo against the branch, it reports that the version id is 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635685). It think that you need to modify the 3rd digit in the

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-11 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
fp wrote: When I run sysinfo against the trunk i get, Why ? 10.5.0.0 alpha - (635600) 10.5 because with the creation of the 10.4 branch, trunk becomes the development line for the next release (10.5). alpha because the third digit is zero and the trunk is leading edge development, see:

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-10 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: They all seem like bug fixes that would need to be merged to the new branch so unless I hear otherwise, I plan to cut the branch(es) from revision 635183. I plan to do this early on Monday (CET). Done:

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-10 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: They all seem like bug fixes that would need to be merged to the new branch so unless I hear otherwise, I plan to cut the branch(es) from revision 635183. I plan to do this early on Monday (CET). The wiki page for how to bump the

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-10 Thread Dyre Tjeldvoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The update of the maint property on the 10.4 branch will hopefully happen soon... There... r635654 | dyre | 2008-03-10 20:03:13 +0100 (Mon, 10 Mar 2008) | 2 lines Updating the maint property

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-10 Thread Myrna van Lunteren
On 3/10/08, Dyre Tjeldvoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The update of the maint property on the 10.4 branch will hopefully happen soon... There... r635654 | dyre | 2008-03-10 20:03:13 +0100

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-10 Thread Rick Hillegas
Dyre Tjeldvoll wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The update of the maint property on the 10.4 branch will hopefully happen soon... There... r635654 | dyre | 2008-03-10 20:03:13 +0100 (Mon, 10 Mar 2008) | 2 lines

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-10 Thread Dyre Tjeldvoll
Myrna van Lunteren wrote: On 3/10/08, Dyre Tjeldvoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The update of the maint property on the 10.4 branch will hopefully happen soon... There... r635654 | dyre |

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-10 Thread Dyre Tjeldvoll
Rick Hillegas wrote: Dyre Tjeldvoll wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The update of the maint property on the 10.4 branch will hopefully happen soon... There... r635654 | dyre | 2008-03-10 20:03:13 +0100 (Mon, 10 Mar

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-10 Thread Rick Hillegas
Dyre Tjeldvoll wrote: Rick Hillegas wrote: Dyre Tjeldvoll wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The update of the maint property on the 10.4 branch will hopefully happen soon... There... r635654 | dyre | 2008-03-10

Re: Preparing to cut the 10.4 branch

2008-03-10 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Rick Hillegas wrote: When I run sysinfo against the branch, it reports that the version id is 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635685). It think that you need to modify the 3rd digit in the release id. I believe that is the secret handshake which turns an alpha into a beta. The secret handshake is