Thommy M. wrote:
> Ken Mays wrote:
>
>> Ref:
>> http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/06/13/songbird-06-final-released-harder-better-faster-stronger/
>>
>> SongBird 0.6 (official release) for OpenSolaris hits the streets:
>>
>> http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Solaris/releases/0.6/pkgadd/
>
Ken Mays wrote:
> Ref:
> http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/06/13/songbird-06-final-released-harder-better-faster-stronger/
>
> SongBird 0.6 (official release) for OpenSolaris hits the streets:
>
> http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Solaris/releases/0.6/pkgadd/
>
> Cool things to try:
>
>
OK, tried again when I got home and now it works. Weird.
Anyway, performance improvements are very much appreciated here. My
library is 5k+ tracks. I can now zip up and down with no lag.
-Christian
Christian Kelly wrote:
> hmmm, it's seg faulting for me
>
> chris at sulaco:~$ pstack core
>
That's pretty weird corruption, the pointer that dgettext is calling
strcmp on stored in a structure on the heap. If you have some free time,
try reproducing the crash when Songbird is running with libumem.
-Albert
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 22:42 +0100, Christian Kelly wrote:
> OK, tried again when I
hmmm, it's seg faulting for me
chris at sulaco:~$ pstack core
core 'core' of 7210:/opt/sfw/bin/songbird
fefe374e strcmp (10, fefe6755) + de
fefd992f _dgettext (fefe6755, fefe5349) + 113
fefd99b6 _rtld_msg (41) + 2a
fefd5b62 eprintf (feffb178, 2, fefe5994, feca0f80, fefe90a2) + 2be
> Yeah - we haven't published the Songbird 0.6 tarball yet; our
> build/release guy has been pretty busy :) We're hoping to get it up
> this week, but in the meantime - you can pull the "Songbird0.6" tag from
> our SVN (publicsvn.songbirdnest.com/songbird/client) and build from that.
This rele
Ken Mays wrote:
> Ref:
> http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/06/13/songbird-06-final-released-harder-better-faster-stronger/
>
> SongBird 0.6 (official release) for OpenSolaris hits the streets:
>
> http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Solaris/releases/0.6/pkgadd/
>
> Cool things to try:
>
>
Mario Goebbels wrote:
>> Yeah - we haven't published the Songbird 0.6 tarball yet; our
>> build/release guy has been pretty busy :) We're hoping to get it up
>> this week, but in the meantime - you can pull the "Songbird0.6" tag from
>> our SVN (publicsvn.songbirdnest.com/songbird/client) and b
Hi Mark,
The Songbird 0.6 source has just been uploaded. Please try that again.
Cheers,
-Alfred
Mark Wright wrote:
> Hi,,
>
> I was wondering if anyone knows where the source code is
> for songbird? Compiling it from SFE fails, I look around
> on the site and I can not find this file? The file
Hi,,
I was wondering if anyone knows where the source code is
for songbird? Compiling it from SFE fails, I look around
on the site and I can not find this file? The file name
does not include sun or or solaris or anything, yet it
was in a sun directory.
goanna% pkgtool --download build SFEsongb
Mark Wright wrote:
> Hi,,
>
> I was wondering if anyone knows where the source code is
> for songbird? Compiling it from SFE fails, I look around
> on the site and I can not find this file? The file name
> does not include sun or or solaris or anything, yet it
> was in a sun directory.
>
> goanna
Just repost the SPARC builds for Songbird to include Ginn's performance
patch without Xrender on SPARC to xulrunner. The performance is better
for web browsing now :-)
Cheers,
-Alfred
Ken Mays wrote:
> Ref:
> http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/06/13/songbird-06-final-released-harder-better-fast
>> In Windows, Songbird uses VLC for all playback business, under *nix,
>> it's GStreamer. Since the situation in Solaris regarding GStreamer is
>> in a rather sorry state right now, would it be possible to make it
>> use VLC, too?
>
> I run Preferences->Sound, and on the Devices page
> Audio Conf
Ken Mays wrote:
> Ref:
> http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/06/13/songbird-06-final-released-harder-better-faster-stronger/
>
> SongBird 0.6 (official release) for OpenSolaris hits the streets:
>
> http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Solaris/releases/0.6/pkgadd/
>
> Cool things to try:
>
>
> SHOUTcast works perfectly (I think) well on my 2008.05. Are there any
> incentives why I should try SongBird? Apologize for being a turkey.
I think it is a great media program, and a nice alternative to using
rhythmbox.
One neat thing about Songbird is that it has really good licensing.
It
Yeah - we haven't published the Songbird 0.6 tarball yet; our
build/release guy has been pretty busy :) We're hoping to get it up
this week, but in the meantime - you can pull the "Songbird0.6" tag from
our SVN (publicsvn.songbirdnest.com/songbird/client) and build from that.
cheers,
steve
Ev
Mario Goebbels wrote:
> Here's something else I've thought about:
>
> In Windows, Songbird uses VLC for all playback business, under *nix, it's
> GStreamer. Since the situation in Solaris regarding GStreamer is in a rather
> sorry state right now, would it be possible to make it use VLC, too?
>
>
Here's something else I've thought about:
In Windows, Songbird uses VLC for all playback business, under *nix, it's
GStreamer. Since the situation in Solaris regarding GStreamer is in a rather
sorry state right now, would it be possible to make it use VLC, too?
Regards,
-mg
This message pos
> What do
> you mean "think" Mr.
> Turkey?James
Call me a Mr turkey or an idiot. Don't really care.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
New to OpenSolaris at least...
(I'll regress back into my cave and chomp on bits)
James
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:56 PM, Stephen Lau wrote:
> James Cornell wrote:
>> Shoutcast Radio (As a client) not as a server. Of course you can
>> use VLC or MPlayer for listening to an mp3 stream granted you
Thanks Ken, I'll take a look.
James
On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:56 PM, Ken Mays wrote:
> Ref:
> http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/06/13/songbird-06-final-released-harder-better-faster-stronger/
>
> SongBird 0.6 (official release) for OpenSolaris hits the streets:
>
> http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Son
Shoutcast Radio (As a client) not as a server. Of course you can use
VLC or MPlayer for listening to an mp3 stream granted you built your
client of choice with mp3 support, or are using fluendo if you happen
to be using something that depends on the gstreamer backend.
Songbird is particular
James Cornell wrote:
> Shoutcast Radio (As a client) not as a server. Of course you can use
> VLC or MPlayer for listening to an mp3 stream granted you built your
> client of choice with mp3 support, or are using fluendo if you happen
> to be using something that depends on the gstreamer backen
> Ref:
> http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/06/13/songbird-06-fi
> nal-released-harder-better-faster-stronger/
>
> SongBird 0.6 (official release) for OpenSolaris hits
> the streets:
>
> http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Solaris/relea
> ses/0.6/pkgadd/
>
> Cool things to try:
>
> - SHOUT
Ref:
http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/06/13/songbird-06-final-released-harder-better-faster-stronger/
SongBird 0.6 (official release) for OpenSolaris hits the streets:
http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Solaris/releases/0.6/pkgadd/
Cool things to try:
- SHOUTcast Radio
Easily discover a
Turning a few knobs and flipping a switch or two...
SongBird 0.6 review is underway... (now SongBird 0.6rc4)
Keep watching:
http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Solaris/
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Well, SongBird 0.5 is officially out of the nest which means there should be
an updated port soon!!
http://www.songbirdnest.com/release-notes/0.5/
Also check out Rhythmbox 0.11.5 with these features:
Overview of changes in Rhythmbox 0.11.5
===
* Improvements
Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> James:
>
>> Kinda funny that essentially every common codec is "legacy"... makes
>> me laugh a bit since they are still in use and are essential to
>> end-user transparency. I really am a tad ticked off about the GPL
>> even more now, a step backwards for all media proj
James:
> Kinda funny that essentially every common codec is "legacy"... makes me
> laugh a bit since they are still in use and are essential to end-user
> transparency. I really am a tad ticked off about the GPL even more now,
> a step backwards for all media projects on all non-commercial sy
Ken Mays wrote:
> Dick asks:
>
>> And why is songbird so much better than rhythmbox that is provided by
>>
> gnome already on opensolaris?
>
> Steve and Brian gave good answers. My answer deals with Rhythmbox being great
> for what it does and it came before SongBird publically existed (I'
Dick asks:
> And why is songbird so much better than rhythmbox that is provided by
gnome already on opensolaris?
Steve and Brian gave good answers. My answer deals with Rhythmbox being great
for what it does and it came before SongBird publically existed (I've package
maintained Rhythmbox on Sun
Stephen Lau wrote:
> James Cornell wrote:
>
>> Thanks Steve, this is good news. Sun's MP3 codec is bundled with
>> OpenSolaris/Solaris, right? Sorry if it's a kinda dumb question, I
>> don't do like any media at all with OpenSolaris when I use it. Main
>> reason is that I want a player for
James Cornell wrote:
> Ken Mays wrote:
>
>>> We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or Tuesday of next
>>> week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and then make a build
>>> based off of that.
>>> cheers,
>>> steve
>>>
>>>
>> Plan on porting SongBird's 0.5 final rel
Dick/James:
James Cornell asks:
> Supported codecs out of the box? (Add in comments about legal rights
> too if Sun's really concerned about it)
> Sun's MP3 codec is bundled with OpenSolaris/Solaris, right?
Wrong, unfortunately. In previous Nevada builds, we did include the MP3
decoder plug
Mario Goebbels wrote:
>> Now I'm going to use it in place of MPD for a while,
>> to see what happens. Looks quite nice.
>>
>
> Also, here's a decent looking whitish theme, that doesn't create a jarring
> contrast.
>
> http://addons.songbirdnest.com/extensions/detail/186
>
> That Addons site
Stephen Lau wrote:
> Mario Goebbels wrote:
>
>>> Yeah - a couple of people have reported that same problem - I'm not sure
>>> if this is a Songbird fault, a GStreamer fault, or some interaction
>>> issue between the two of them.
>>>
>>>
>> Something else I'm wondering about, is the l
Alfred Peng wrote:
> James Cornell wrote:
>
>> Ken Mays wrote:
>>
>>
We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or Tuesday of next
week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and then make a build
based off of that.
cheers,
steve
Hi Stephen/Alfred,
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Stephen Lau wrote:
> Hey Mike,
> If you have the JDS CBE installed, you could take Alfred's .spec
> file and rebuild it with that (which is probably the easiest/best way to
> do it.)
>
Can one of you provide the URL to the spec file. I
> Yeah - a couple of people have reported that same problem - I'm not sure
> if this is a Songbird fault, a GStreamer fault, or some interaction
> issue between the two of them.
Something else I'm wondering about, is the library supposed to be that
sluggish or is it a known issue? I have maybe 160
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
ken mays wrote:
> > Steve Lau said:
> >We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or
> >Tuesday of next
> >week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and
> >then make a build based off of that.
>
> Great! SongBird 0.5RC2 is simply awesome. Let'
Mario Goebbels wrote:
>> Yeah - a couple of people have reported that same problem - I'm not sure
>> if this is a Songbird fault, a GStreamer fault, or some interaction
>> issue between the two of them.
>>
>
> Something else I'm wondering about, is the library supposed to be that
> sluggish or
Stephen Lau wrote:
> James Cornell wrote:
>> Ken Mays wrote:
>>
We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or Tuesday of
next week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and then make a
build based off of that.
cheers,
steve
>>> Plan on porting
Stephen Lau wrote:
> Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
>> ken mays wrote:
>>
>>
>>
Steve Lau said:
We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or
Tuesday of next
week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and
then mak
Hi Mike,
The Songbird binary is built from XULRunner trunk(2008-02-21 code). I
think it can't be built on Solaris 10 without a newer version of glib
and pango(maybe more) since the landing of the patch for
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177805. Well, the XULRunner
1.8.1 branch code s
James Cornell wrote:
> Thanks Steve, this is good news. Sun's MP3 codec is bundled with
> OpenSolaris/Solaris, right? Sorry if it's a kinda dumb question, I
> don't do like any media at all with OpenSolaris when I use it. Main
> reason is that I want a player for video podcast and music, with
James Cornell wrote:
> Stephen Lau wrote:
>> Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
>>> ken mays wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Steve Lau said:
> We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or
> Tuesday of next week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 fin
Ken Mays wrote:
>> We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or Tuesday of next
>> week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and then make a build
>> based off of that.
>> cheers,
>> steve
>>
>
> Plan on porting SongBird's 0.5 final release. I've tested SongBird 0.5RC2
> today a
James Cornell wrote:
> Ken Mays wrote:
>
>>> We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or Tuesday of next
>>> week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and then make a build
>>> based off of that.
>>> cheers,
>>> steve
>>>
>>>
>> Plan on porting SongBird's 0.5 final rel
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
> ken mays wrote:
>
>
>>> Steve Lau said:
>>> We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or
>>> Tuesday of next
>>> week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and
>>> then make a build based off of that.
>>>
>>
Mario Goebbels wrote:
>> Now I'm going to use it in place of MPD for a while,
>> to see what happens. Looks quite nice.
>>
>
> Also, here's a decent looking whitish theme, that doesn't create a jarring
> contrast.
>
> http://addons.songbirdnest.com/extensions/detail/186
>
> That Addons site
Mario Goebbels wrote:
>> We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or
>> Tuesday of next
>> week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and
>> then make a build
>> based off of that.
>>
>
> Running 0.5pre from there on snv_76:
>
>
>> http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Sola
>We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or Tuesday of next
>week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and then make a build
>based off of that.
>cheers,
>steve
Plan on porting SongBird's 0.5 final release. I've tested SongBird 0.5RC2 today
and it is very cool for what we need for
> Now I'm going to use it in place of MPD for a while,
> to see what happens. Looks quite nice.
Also, here's a decent looking whitish theme, that doesn't create a jarring
contrast.
http://addons.songbirdnest.com/extensions/detail/186
That Addons site looks at the user agent and doesn't let Sol
> Steve Lau said:
>We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or
>Tuesday of next
>week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and
>then make a build based off of that.
Great! SongBird 0.5RC2 is simply awesome. Let's make
this rock on OpenSolaris distros.
~ Ken
_
> We're planning to push Songbird 0.5 out on Monday or
> Tuesday of next
> week - probably easiest to wait for 0.5 final and
> then make a build
> based off of that.
Running 0.5pre from there on snv_76:
> http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Solaris/
First clicking around, the only issue I
Ken Mays wrote:
> Alfred said:
> "The Songbird binary is built from XULRunner trunk(2008-02-21 code). I
> think it can't be built on Solaris 10 without a newer version of glib
> and pango(maybe more) since the landing of the patch for
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177805. Well, the
Alfred Peng wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> The Songbird binary is built from XULRunner trunk(2008-02-21 code). I
> think it can't be built on Solaris 10 without a newer version of glib
> and pango(maybe more) since the landing of the patch for
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177805. Well, the
Alfred said:
"The Songbird binary is built from XULRunner trunk(2008-02-21 code). I
think it can't be built on Solaris 10 without a newer version of glib
and pango(maybe more) since the landing of the patch for
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177805. Well, the XULRunner
1.8.1 branch co
Michael J. Ellis wrote:
> looks pretty exciting...
>
> sadly I'm stuck with poor-ole' Solaris10 on my x86 system, and this release
> of SongBird requires a newer version of GTK.
>
> sunfreeware.com has gtk libraries that nicely pkgadd into /usr/local, but
> there isn't a run-time flag to songbird
looks pretty exciting...
sadly I'm stuck with poor-ole' Solaris10 on my x86 system, and this release of
SongBird requires a newer version of GTK.
sunfreeware.com has gtk libraries that nicely pkgadd into /usr/local, but there
isn't a run-time flag to songbird to provide an alternate GTK library
Guys,
Just want to give some updates about Songbird on Solaris.
It's based on the snapshot of XULRunner 2008-02-21/Songbird 2008-03-05
and could be buggy. Just extract it and run "./songbird" should be fine.
Cheers,
-Alfred
--->
This is very cool. Congrats!
~Ken
This message posted from open
Guys,
Just want to give some updates about Songbird on Solaris.
With some tweaking, the code can now be built on Solaris and it can be
startup successfully on my box here. Anyone who would like to have a try
can download the binary from here:
http://releases.mozilla.com/sun/Songbird-Solaris/songb
Stephen Lau wrote:
>> 11. Get an dialog for "internal playback core error":
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/39375616 at N00/2293710392/. Click "more
>> info" won't help... Proceed by "more info" and "continue".
>>
>> 12. Accept the license
>> agreement(http://www.flickr.com/photos/39375616 at N0
Brian Cameron wrote:
> Stephen:
>> If Songbird is distributed as GPL, and it uses GStreamer under LGPL (and
>> thus converts GStreamer to GPL via section 3 of the LGPL), why would
>> that stop you from using the Fluendo one (which is distributed via MIT)?
>
> The LGPL is a more lenient license,
Ken Mays wrote:
>> JavaScript error: , line 0: uncaught exception: [Exception...
>> "'Component not initialized' when calling method:
>> [sbIPlaylistPlayback::getSupportedFileExtensions]" nsresult:
>> "0xc1f30001 (NS_ERROR_NOT_INITIALIZED)" location: "JS frame ::
>> chrome://songbird/content/sc
Alfred Peng wrote:
> Following are the current status on my porting of SongBird to Solaris.
> SongBird GUI can be launched on my Solaris x86 box(svn_80):
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/39375616 at N00/2293711728/. But nothing
> happen when I choose "Open a File". The debugging output for the
>
Hi Stephen,
Following are the current status on my porting of SongBird to Solaris.
SongBird GUI can be launched on my Solaris x86 box(svn_80):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/39375616 at N00/2293711728/. But nothing
happen when I choose "Open a File". The debugging output for the binary
is here:
Stephen:
> minor minor nit: it's Songbird, not SongBird. (sorry, gotta make
> sure we correct those trademarks, ya know? ;-))
Sorry, thanks for the correction.
> I just want to clarify here. Are you talking about the Fluendo
> GStreamer MP3 plugin:
> http://www.fluendo.com/resources/flu
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> Many programs which use GStreamer are under the GPL license, and the GPL
> license does not allow you to link with any code that contains license
> restrictions (such as patents that require you to pay fees to use them).
It is good that Sun pays attent
Stephen:
I have a question for you about SongBird. Note that we cannot ship
the GStreamer MP3 decoder plugin with Solaris (even though Sun has
license with MPEG to distribute this decoder). The problem isn't with
MPEG, it is with the GPL license.
Many programs which use GStreamer are under the
Hey Brian,
minor minor nit: it's Songbird, not SongBird. (sorry, gotta make
sure we correct those trademarks, ya know? ;-))
I just want to clarify here. Are you talking about the Fluendo
GStreamer MP3 plugin:
http://www.fluendo.com/resources/fluendo_mp3.php
?
If Songbird is distributed as
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> If Solaris came with a standard C/C++ compiler (as old SunOS used to),
As Solaris 10 and later do with /usr/sfw/bin/gcc.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
>JavaScript error: , line 0: uncaught exception: [Exception...
>"'Component not initialized' when calling method:
>[sbIPlaylistPlayback::getSupportedFileExtensions]" nsresult:
>"0xc1f30001 (NS_ERROR_NOT_INITIALIZED)" location: "JS frame ::
>chrome://songbird/content/scripts/playerOpen.js :: SBF
Just to follow up, I managed to rebuild myself a debug XULRunner, and
get some more useful debugging output out of the `songbird` binary.
I've put the debug log up here:
http://whacked.net/songbird-debug.log
while I figure out what to make of it. :-P
notable errors include many assertion failure
Ken Mays wrote:
> Steve,
>
> What version of XulRunner are you using? I glanced at your truss ouput and
> see it is for a AMD64 platform (w/SSE2 and mlib) and the app is hitting the
> gnome libs but having issues??
>
I'm pulling from XulRunner's trunk.
> So next question: What OS build and JDS
Steve,
What version of XulRunner are you using? I glanced at your truss ouput and see
it is for a AMD64 platform (w/SSE2 and mlib) and the app is hitting the gnome
libs but having issues??
So next question: What OS build and JDS build are you now building against??
- Ken
This message poste
I made some progress here tonight. I was able to build XULRunner
successfully, and after a few false starts, I was able to get Songbird
built successfully. It appears to startup, but then exits pretty
quickly without ever drawing anything on the screen.
It creates and populates a ~/.songbird1
77 matches
Mail list logo
